Wed30Sep FlyDubai FZ1073 Empire Hacks Another Boeing 737 Max 8? Crash Dives, Dubbed 'Antisemitic Hijack'

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

FZ1073 departed 07:05
FlyDubai 737 MAX Makes Emergency Landing After Inflight Incident
https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/ ... r-inflight

Alan Dron September 30, 2026

Aviation officials in the United Arab Emirates, Israel and Saudi Arabia are investigating the circumstances that led a FlyDubai Boeing 737-8 to make an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia early on Sept. 30 after suddenly plummeting during flight. The airline said there had been “an altercation” on the...

Alan Dron

Based in London, Alan is Europe & Middle East correspondent at Air Transport World.

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

Sunday's Fairford False Flag Fiasco Failed...

So They Hacked Another Boeing 737, Calling It A Hijack? https://airguide.info/historical-contex ... n-history/

Boeing 737 MAX & Beyond: The Safety Scandals That Forced Aviation To Change

May 12, 2026, 9:00 PM EDT

In recent history, one of the largest scandals within the aviation industry was that of the cover-up of the MCAS software by American manufacturer, Boeing, on its 737 MAX aircraft. While it initially went unnoticed, the spotlight quickly shone on the aircraft and its systems after two crashes of a similar nature occurred within a few months. This then led to a worldwide grounding of the aircraft type for nearly two years, during which extensive investigations were conducted.

While the aircraft type is now considered safe and has been flying for several years, the above-mentioned accidents and several subsequent incidents, along with investigation findings, served as an eye-opening reminder to manufacturers and aviation regulators worldwide that safety should always be a priority.

The 737 MAX entered commercial service in 2017 as the next evolution of the manufacturer's extremely successful aircraft series. While the MAX family was popular and generated significant orders for its various variants, things took a downturn when the entire MAX family was grounded globally for 20 months following two fatal accidents of a similar naturewithin a span of six months.

Lion Air Flight 610 (October 2018)

This first accident occurred just 12 minutes after a 737 MAX 8 departed from Jakarta, Indonesia, when the aircraft performed an unprompted nose-dive, from which the crew could not recover aircraft control, leading to the unfortunate death of 189 people onboard the aircraft.

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 (March 2019)

This second accident occurred a mere six minutes after departure from Addis Ababa, when the aircraft, also a MAX 8, experienced unstable vertical speed readings, resulting in a similar aircraft reaction to that of the aircraft involved in the Lion Air accident. This led to the unfortunate death of 157 people onboard the aircraft. After the second crash of a similar nature, the industry was quick to react, with regulators worldwide grounding the aircraft type, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issuing an Airworthiness Directive (AD) regarding the aircraft family.

MCAS Software And Its Cover-Up

The findings from these two crashes indicated that the MCAS system onboard the aircraft did not operate as intended. It is essentially software incorporated into the aircraft to offset the nose-up moment inherent in the aircraft design, due to newer, larger engines being placed farther forwardon the wing, which affects the aircraft's moments about its center of gravity.

The software was designed to initiate a "controlled" pitch-down moment and prevent a stall from a significant pitch-up moment caused by engine thrust. Findings from the investigation revealed that the system acted erroneously, forcing the aircraft to pitch down during its take-off climb in both cases. The key issue, however, was that Boeing had concealed the system's existence from the FAA and other regulators, as well as airlines.

This meant the MCAS was not referenced in any of the aircraft documents or even training manuals, because it was reportedly a concern for Boeing that disclosing a new system could lead to certification delays and might reduce the flight deck commonality of the MAX aircraft compared to previous 737 jets, thus becoming less attractive to airlines due to additional crew-training expenses.


Is MCAS Only Used On The Boeing 737 MAX?

Subsequent Incidents & Other Findings

Although Boeing is back on track, producing aircraft and working towards the certification of the 737 MAX 7, MAX 10, and larger 777X , the following years since the grounding of the MAX aircraft, have proven to be challenging for the manufacturer. According to a comprehensive report published in October 2024 by the US Department of Transportation (DOT), several issues were identified.

This included production quality issues on the Dreamliner jets, which led Boeing to pause deliveries in 2020 and, later in December 2021, to undertake FAA-mandated inspections of specific 787 Dreamliners that had been delivered due to certain requirements not being met during assembly. Furthermore, in early 2024, certain 737 MAX jets were grounded for inspection after a major incident involving door plugs on some aircraft of the type.

This incident involved an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 that suffered a mid-flight door plug blowout in January 2024. While no passengers were injured, the aircraft landed safely. The investigation findings showed that four retaining bolts, which should hold the door plug in place, were not reinstalled by Boeing after a factory repair. This finding then led to certain jets configured with door plugs being grounded for inspection.

Boeing also acknowledged the problems it faced in the aftermath of the crash, according to the DOT's report.

"For years, we prioritized the movement of the airplane through the factor over getting it done right, and that's got to change."
....


the MCAS was not referenced in any of the aircraft documents or even training manuals, because it was reportedly a concern for Boeing that disclosing a new system could lead to certification delays and might reduce the flight deck commonality of the MAX aircraft compared to previous 737 jets, thus becoming less attractive to airlines due to additional crew-training expenses.



Perhaps A Lack Of Regulatory Oversight

Since the MAX grounding, Boeing, along with its aircraft production process and facilities, has been under more intense scrutiny. Especially considering the findings and incidents that followed. While Boeing has since improved its quality control and thus 

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

https://911forum.org.uk/viewtopic.php?t=24444

Lion Air (2018)
Ethiopian Airlines (2019)
China Eastern (2022)

Pissed off because my post referring to Wikileaks Vault7 was almost immediately DELETED there
https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/645 ... ent-2.html
loads of disinfo there about pilot suicide and tail fell off drivel etc etc

I explained Wikileaks Vault 7 PROVED
INTEL sold programs to commericl business to do JUST THIS
For Cars Locomotives, Ships, Nuclear Power Stations (Stuxnet) and aircraft
ASSASSINATION TOOLS

7 year old plane
China has ONLY JUST approved the 737 MAX to fly there again
May be in final stages of approval???

This crash identical to the 737 MAX 8 crashes
Just look at the pilots apparent struggle to keep it in the air then it goes into a power dive

OBVIOUSLY HACKED


from PPRUNE

Originally Posted by Flocks View Post
​​​​​
If it is not in China it doesn't count ? ...

Flash airline flight 604, malfunction lead to autopilot disconnected and pilot not controling their aircraft, that it is low altitude doesn't change anything, high altitude make it even more easier to loose control.

Adam air flight 574 ... High altitude lost of control after autopilot disconnectedhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_Airlines_Flight_604

The descent rate varied during the fatal dive, with a maximum recorded value of 53,760 feet per minute,
From memory, I believe that the descent profile of the Adam air is quit similar of the one seems to be seen here.