King Charles Megalomaniac Chief of GCHQ MI5 MI6 & Great Reset Cult Guru

WHAT: A pre-planned collapse of the US (and global) financial and economic systems. WHO: The same characters who perpetrated the original 911. WHERE: New York City & DC, of course. Plus a sideshow in Washington state. WHEN: The days surrounding September 11, naturally.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

King Charles Megalomaniac Chief of GCHQ MI5 MI6 & Great Reset Cult Guru

Post by TonyGosling »

The Prince of Wales maintains a close interest in the work of the Intelligence Agencies. ... ns-3001461
In 2011 he became the first Royal Patron of the MI5, SIS and GCHQ, and has regular meetings with senior representatives from each agency.
His Royal Highness also presents the ‘The Prince of Wales’s Intelligence Community Awards’, to honour those whose vital work could never be celebrated publicly.

Paradise Papers: Prince Charles lobbied on climate policy after shares purchase
By Paradise Papers reporting team
BBC Panorama - 7 November 2017

Paradise Papers: Prince Charles’ offshore investments revealed
Prince Charles campaigned to alter climate-change agreements without disclosing his private estate had an offshore financial interest in what he was promoting, BBC Panorama has found.

The Paradise Papers show the Duchy of Cornwall in 2007 secretly bought shares worth $113,500 in a Bermuda company that would benefit from a rule change.

The prince was a friend of a director of Sustainable Forestry Management Ltd.

The Duchy of Cornwall says he has no direct involvement in its investments.

A Clarence House spokesman said the Prince of Wales had "certainly never chosen to speak out on a topic simply because of a company that it [the Duchy of Cornwall] may have invested in".

He added: "In the case of climate change his views are well-known, indeed he has been warning of the threat of global warming to our environment for over 30 years.

"Carbon markets are just one example that the prince has championed since the 1990s and which he continues to promote today."

'Conflict of interest'
He added Prince Charles was "free to offer thoughts and suggestions on a wide range of topics" and "cares deeply" about the issue of climate change but "it is for others to decide whether to take the advice".

Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said Prince Charles's actions amounted to a serious conflict of interest.

He said: "There's a conflict of interest between his own investments of the Duchy of Cornwall and what he's trying to achieve publicly.

"And I think it's unfortunate that somebody of his importance, of his influence, becomes involved in such a serious conflict."

Tycoon made $41m from ‘people’s fund’
Paradise Papers: All you need to know
Owner avoided taxes on shopping centre
The leaked documents held by law firm Appleby show the Duchy of Cornwall also made offshore investments totalling $3.9m in four funds in the Cayman Islands in 2007. This is legal and there is no suggestion of tax avoidance.

A Duchy of Cornwall spokesman said Prince Charles voluntarily pays income tax on any revenue from his estate.

He added the estate's investments "do not derive any tax advantage whatsoever based on their location or any other aspect of their structure and there is no loss of revenue to HMRC as a result".

Kept confidential
The prince began campaigning for changes to two important environmental agreements weeks after Sustainable Forestry Management (SFM) sent his office lobbying documents.

Prince Charles's estate almost tripled its money in just over a year although it is not clear what caused the rise in the share value. Despite his high profile campaign, the environmental agreements were not changed.

The documents reveal the Duchy of Cornwall, an £896m private estate that provides Prince Charles with an income and which he is said to be "actively involved" in running, bought the shares in February 2007. At the time $113,500 was worth about £58,000.

One of SFM's directors was the late Hugh van Cutsem, a millionaire banker and conservationist who has been described as the one of the Prince's closest friends.

The minutes of a company board meeting that approved the Duchy's shareholding say: "The Chairman thanked Mr van Cutsem for his introduction of the Duchy of Cornwall and the Board unanimously agreed that the subscription by the Duchy of Cornwall be kept confidential except in respect of any disclosure required by law."

Source document
The island that swapped donkey rides for offshore cash
Paradise Papers revelations around the world
Apple's secret tax bolthole revealed
Change in policy
SFM traded in carbon credits, a market created by international treaties to tackle global warming.

It wanted to trade in credits from "tropical and subtropical forests" but was hampered by two important climate change agreements, the EU's Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and the Kyoto Protocol, which largely excluded carbon credits from rainforests.

When the Duchy bought its shares, SFM was lobbying for a "change in policy" on carbon credits, the documents show.

It had hired the US former lead negotiator on the Kyoto Protocol, Stuart Eizenstat "to lobby for inclusion of forest carbon credits" in new US and EU laws and regulations.

Board minutes from February 2007 show SFM was also taking "steps to influence events to support forest credits" ahead of Kyoto Protocol meetings at the end of the year.

On 6 June 2007, four months after the Duchy bought its shares, Mr van Cutsem asked SFM's chairman to send lobbying documents to the office of the prince.

Under the heading "public policy and advocacy", minutes of a board meeting held in Paris say "the chairman referred the committee to the bundle of materials which had been prepared by the company for various policymakers... Mr van Cutsem... asked that a set of documents be prepared for the Prince of Wales office. The chairman undertook to do so".

Rainforests project
Four weeks later, on 2 July, Prince Charles, made a speech that criticised the EU ETS and Kyoto Protocol for excluding carbon credits from rainforests, and called for change.

Speaking at the Business in the Community Awards Dinner, the prince said: "As the Kyoto protocol now stands tropical rainforest nations have no way of earning credits from their standing forests other than by cutting them down and planting new ones," he said.

"The European Carbon Trading Scheme excludes carbon credits for forests from developing nations. This has got be wrong and we must urge the international community to work together to redress these failings urgently."

Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image caption
The campaigning was taking place ahead of meetings about the Kyoto Protocol
In October 2007, he launched the Prince's Rainforests Project, which aimed to "increase global recognition of the contribution of tropical deforestation to climate change and to find ways to make the rainforests worth more alive than dead."

In a speech to mark the launch, he said: "The Kyoto Protocol does not have a mechanism to protect standing rainforests.

"Credits are available for afforestation and reforestation projects, but not for maintaining an old growth forest. And the European Trading Scheme excludes carbon credits for forestry in developing nations altogether… surely we have to accept that the pressing urgency of climate change requires a response that embraces rather than excludes primary tropical forests?"

Panorama has been unable to find evidence of any speeches the prince made before 2008 about changing Kyoto and EU ETS to include carbon credits for rainforests. The programme asked the prince's office for any such speeches but they did not respond.

'Helping hand'
Over the next six months, the future king made further speeches and videos about rainforests.

In a video released in January 2008, the prince said: "The immediate priority, I believe, is the need to develop a new credit market which will give a true value to carbon and the ecosystem services the rainforests provide the rest of the world."

Lewis Hamilton 'dodged' VAT on private jet
Mrs Brown's Boys stars 'put £2m offshore'
Bono linked to tax probe in Lithuania
In February 2008, he reportedly discussed rainforests at a private meeting with the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

Days later, he met with the then President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, and the EU's environment, energy, trade and agriculture commissioners.

In a speech to 150 MEPs, he said: "I have great hopes that the next version of the European Emissions Trading scheme might extend the helping and very visible hand of a market approach to assist in keeping the rainforests standing… the lives of billions of people depend on your response and none of us will be forgiven by our children and grandchildren if we falter and fail."

On 18 June 2008, as the global financial crash was beginning, the Duchy sold its stake in SFM.

The documents show it was paid $325,000 for the 50 shares.

SFM is no longer in existence.

Media captionSir Alistair Graham says Prince Charles should be accountable to public scrutiny
The Duchy was established in 1337 and uses the income to fund the public, private and charitable activities of the Prince of Wales and his children. Its accounts are independently audited and put before Parliament.

A Duchy of Cornwall spokesman said the estate followed a "responsible investment policy which governs the sectors that it may invest in".

The Paradise Papers documents also showed about £10m of the Queen's private money was invested offshore in 2004-2005 in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.
Last edited by TonyGosling on Sun Oct 25, 2020 12:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »

Prince Charles's estate made big profit on stake in friend's offshore firm
This article is more than 2 years old
MPs urge transparency after Paradise Papers show prince’s estate held stake in forestry firm as he campaigned on climate ... ise-papers

Hilary Osborne Tue 7 Nov 2017 18.00 GMTLast modified on Tue 19 Dec 2017 13.59 GMT

Prince Charles with Hugh van Cutsem at an agricultural show in the 1980s. Photograph: PA/Guardian Design Team
The Prince of Wales’s private estate has invested millions of pounds in offshore funds and companies, including a Bermuda-registered business run by one of his best friends, according to documents in the Paradise Papers leak.

The Duchy of Cornwall’s decision to buy shares was regarded as highly sensitive and board members of the company, which invested in land to protect it from deforestation, were sworn to secrecy.

Documents show the duchy was introduced to the company by its director, Hugh van Cutsem, a millionaire horse breeder who owned a 1,600-hectare (3,400 acre) estate in Norfolk. He met Prince Charles when they were at Cambridge University in the 1960s.

While there was no tax advantage to the estate, the decision to give financial backing to a company run by such a close friend of the prince, and the insistence that the estimated $100,000 stake be kept secret, may raise awkward questions for the duchy.

Its financial advisers may also be asked if the duchy should have publicly declared the investment in a company that might have indirectly benefited from the impact of the prince’s longstanding support for conservation projects.

He has been making speeches and writing books on the environment since the 1980s. In January 2008, months after the duchy bought the shares, the prince released a video in which he called for new ways of supporting rainforests.

The duchy pointed to the prince’s track record on green issues and insisted he had “never chosen to speak out on a topic simply because of a company that the duchy may have invested in”.

It said the prince did not have any “direct involvement in investment decisions”.

But the Labour MP and tax campaigner Margaret Hodge said the disclosures confirmed the need for more transparency.

“It seems clear to me that Prince Charles could not have known or understood the nature of the investment in his friend’s company,” she said.

Highgrove, Prince Charles’s home in Gloucestershire.
Highgrove, the prince’s home in Gloucestershire. Photograph: Matt Cardy/Getty Images

“What is clear is that there should be proper transparency of all investments made by the Duchy of Cornwall, that the Prince of Wales should not be involved in investment decisions and that the Treasury should monitor the investments to ensure that the reputation and integrity of our royal family is protected.”

Before the Paradise Papers leak, there had been no public disclosure that the prince’s estate had offshore interests. While the royal household publishes annual accounts, it does not go into details about investments and where they are made – omissions that have been repeatedly challenged by parliamentary committees and campaign groups.

The Duchy of Cornwall is a private estate that was established in 1337 by Edward III to provide independence to his son and heir, Prince Edward. A charter ruled that each future Duke of Cornwall would be the eldest surviving son of the monarch and the heir to the throne. The duchy’s main purpose is funding the “public, charitable and private activities of the Prince of Wales and his family”.

Prince Charles and his links to the Van Cutsems
The duchy owns 53,000 hectares of land in 23 counties, including Prince Charles’s Gloucestershire home of Highgrove. It is a major business with interests in commercial and residential property and farmland. The latest accounts show it had assets of £913m in April.

The duchy’s portfolio included shares in a company called Sustainable Forestry Management, which it bought in early 2007, according to the Paradise Papers.

The company, which was registered in Bermuda’s capital, Hamilton, was set up in 1999 to trade in carbon credits. Van Cutsem, who died in 2013, was a director of SFM, a company that aimed to generate “attractive returns … by investment in the world’s tropical and subtropical forests”.

Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more
Board minutes for SFM from February 2007 show the duchy had recently become an investor in the company with the purchase of 50 shares.

“The chairman thanked Mr Van Cutsem for his introduction of the Duchy of Cornwall and asked and the board unanimously agreed that the subscription by the Duchy of Cornwall be kept confidential, except in respect of any disclosure required by law,” the minutes say.

Other investors in the company included wealthy business people and society figures, including an Israeli billionaire.

The shares appear to have been held for about a year, after which they were transferred to another investor for $325,000.

Prince Charles and Camilla, Duchess Of Cornwall, at the Highgrove shop in Tetbury
The prince and Camilla, Duchess Of Cornwall, at the Highgrove shop in Tetbury. Photograph: Mark Cuthbert/UK Press/Getty Images

In the years after the duchy sold its stake, the company got into trouble after failing to raise enough funds to pursue projects, and was wound up in 2011.

Minutes for a later meeting show the company attempting to raise support for the 2007 “forest now declaration”, which called for policies and reforms to incentivise the protection of tropical forests and advocated the use of carbon credits.

The papers show Van Cutsem wanted to brief his friend on the issue and he “asked that a set of documents be prepared for the Prince of Wales’s office”.

The prince launched the Rainforests Project in October 2007, and in January 2008 it released a video in which he returned to the theme, saying: “We have to find a way of putting a price on them, on the forests, which makes them more valuable alive than dead. So how to do we do it?

Quick guide
Key revelations from the Paradise Papers
“The immediate priority, I believe, is the need to develop a new credit market which will give a true value to carbon and the ecosystem services the rainforests provide the rest of the world … In other words, pay for the perpetual retention of forests.”

The papers show the duchy also committed to invest £1m in a private equity fund based in the Cayman Islands. It became a partner in Coller International Partners IV-D, which acts as a feeder fund for a $2.6bn fund run from London.

The duchy has never had to pay any UK tax on its income or gains from investments, although since 1993, the prince has voluntarily paid tax on the income he gets from the fund each year, after some expenses.

A Clarence House spokesman said: “The prince has never chosen to speak out on a topic simply because of a company that the duchy may have invested in. In the case of climate change, his views are well known. Indeed, he has been warning of the threat of global warming to our environment for more than 30 years.

“Throughout this period, he has highlighted many different ways in which it might be possible to slow or halt the damage that is being done. Carbon markets are just one example that the prince has championed since the 1990s and which he continues to promote today, including in his most recent book published earlier this year.”

Asked about its investments, a duchy spokesman said: “The Duchy of Cornwall’s accounts are independently audited and presented to parliament every year. The Prince of Wales does not have any direct involvement in the investment decisions taken by the duchy. These are the responsibility of the duchy’s finance and audit committee.”

Prince Charles greets William Van Cutsem at the funeral of his father, Hugh, in 2013
The prince greets William van Cutsem, godfather to Prince George, at the funeral of his father, Hugh, in 2013. Photograph: Rex/Shutterstock
The duchy said it would not comment on any of its investments.

“Because it is a private estate we do not comment on the details of the investments beyond stating that they must adhere to its responsible investment policy, which governs the sectors that the duchy may invest in. In all cases, these investments do not derive any tax advantage whatsoever based on their location or any other aspect of their structure, and there is no loss of revenue to HMRC as a result,” it added.

In 2013, the public accounts select committee questioned the fairness of the estate’s tax-exempt position. There have also been calls to extend scrutiny of the duchy’s business dealings; currently, the Treasury must approve all the duchy’s land deals, but only those with a value of more than £500,000.
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »

Davos 2020: Prince Charles meets Greta Thunberg

Davos Special Edition: Royal assent for carbon tax ... e547046735

Gillian Tett, Billy Nauman and Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson JANUARY 23 2020Print this page27

Carbon taxes get Royal seal of approval
It is not often that His Royal Highness Prince Charles is mentioned in the same breath as Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission president, or Axel Weber, UBS chairman, and Janet Yellen, the former Federal Reserve chair. However, this happened on Wednesday when the prince sternly told the business and political elites at Davos that it was high time that global leaders got serious about imposing a proper tax on carbon usage.

In some senses, he is a little late to this rhetorical game. After all, a host of economists, ranging from Yellen to Raghuran Rajam to Joseph Stiglitz, to name but a few, have called for a global carbon tax, and last month the IMF issued an admirably clear paper outlining what price would be needed to incentivise the reduction in carbon usage that could hit the Paris accord (around $75 a tonne, as a global average, rather than $2 today.)

Mr Weber, UBS chairman, suggested on Monday that the finance industry was ready to embrace this idea as a reference point for ESG finance. And, on Wednesday, Van de Leyen added her own influential voice to the debate by declaring that Europe will soon introduce “border adjustment mechanisms” (ie., tariffs) on imports from regions of the world which do not penalise carbon usage as much as Europe.

© Bloomberg
She apparently believes that this can be done in a manner compliant with World Trade Organization rules and indicated that the laws could be drafted later this year; stressing that the aim was to prompt other countries such as China, Russia and India to introduce such taxes.

This is striking stuff — and is already prompting a host of policy wonks to redouble their efforts to suggest how carbon taxes should, or should not, work. However, Wednesday’s princely intervention is notable because it takes the debate out of geek circles into the Western tabloid newspapers, and popular consciousness. The dwindling group of fossil fuel companies which have been lobbying against the idea might take note. (Gillian Tett)

One standard to rule them all


Slowly but surely, the business world is inching toward a consensus on environmental, social and governance accounting standards. Brian Moynihan, chief executive of Bank of America and chair of the World Economic Forum’s International Business Council (IBC), announced on Wednesday at Davos that a large group of companies and the big four accounting firms had agreed on a new framework to disclose ESG data similar to how they disclose regular financial data.

The end goal is to create something akin to GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) for ESG.

If they can pull it off, it would be huge. But Bob Eccles, visiting professor of management practice at the University of Oxford’s Saïd Business School, has been working in this sector a long time and he’s not ready to start the parade.

“I like the commitment but I’m dubious that a bunch of CEOs can just come out and declare a standard,” he said.

As loyal readers will be aware, we spend a lot of time talking about this issue at Moral Money — that’s because, as boring as it may seem, it is really important. The world needs to mobilise trillions of dollars to achieve the SDGs, and investors can only allocate their cash to these projects effectively if there is good data available.

Refinitiv’s new deep dive into the topic explains the problem. “The lack of actionable data results in capital markets that are unable to integrate sustainability considerations and, as a result, allocate capital to inefficient and often environmentally damaging effect,” chief executive David Craig wrote.

To bridge the gap Refinitiv said on Wednesday that it was joining the UN, the International Institute of Finance and a host of other groups to set new standards to improve the data that is available. This is a worthy cause, of course, as is Mr Moynihan’s with the IBC, but the irony is inescapable that the two groups launched their initiatives on the same day.

“The good news is that there is now general recognition of the need for standards for ESG . . . The challenge now is to reconcile the views of everyone trying to contribute to this,” said Mr Eccles. “Not surprisingly, they all think they have the right answer.”

Perhaps someday regulators will settle the issue, or all the groups working on it will lock themselves in a room and not come out until the problem is solved. Until then, we may be trapped in an endless cycle of proliferation. (Billy Nauman and Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson)

$4.3tn investor group adds more allies in fight for carbon neutrality
Two more of the world’s largest investors have joined the Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance agreeing to push the companies in their portfolios to reach carbon neutrality by 2050.

Generali, the third-largest insurer in the world, and the Church of England pension fund signed up with the group yesterday, bringing its member count to 18 and its collective assets under management to $4.3tn.

The initiative, which also includes Allianz and Calpers, the largest state pension in the US, was launched last September during Climate Week. At that time Anne Simpson, Calpers director of board governance, told Moral Money that the pension had identified 100 companies out of the 11,000 in its portfolio that account for three-quarters of its overall emissions.

The group’s plan is not to divest from these companies but rather to use their influence as a shareholder to lobby these companies to change.

And that work is beginning at Davos. Allianz, one of the founders of the Alliance, set up an invitation-only session for executives from 50 of their portfolio companies, featuring a presentation from former Bank of England Governor Mark Carney, climate scientist Johan Rockström, Shell chief executive Ben van Beurden, and Allianz chief executive Oliver Bä̈te.

The Alliance has promised to put out periodic progress reports, so it will be interesting to see how quickly these engagements have an effect. (Billy Nauman)

Big Tobacco’s ESG smoke signal for Big Oil
One of the slickest corporate outposts on the Davos Promenade this year is Philip Morris International’s storefront. As you walk from the Congress Centre to the Hotel Europe you can stop for a coffee or a science museum-worthy demonstration of how much less tarry your lungs will look if you smoke its IQOS heated tobacco product. The motto on its walls asks passing investors and government officials to “unsmoke your mind”.

Moral Money has written before about PMI’s CEO, André Calantzopoulos, and his unlikely effort to turn a company whose products have what he calls a “mortality” problem into a sustainability leader by persuading the world’s 1bn smokers to switch to products it says are less harmful.

That sounds in tune with the WEF, but the hosts of Davos have yet to unsmoke their minds to the extent of making tobacco executives like Mr Calantzopoulos full participants. “It’s very interesting that the WEF is saying it’s only by inclusion and collaboration that you can resolve a problem,” he observed pointedly.

That did not stop him from wading into the debate launched by Greta Thunberg and other activists who have called on investors at Davos to divest immediately from all fossil fuel companies.

“I don’t believe philosophically that exclusion has ever resolved any problem,” he told Moral Money. Investors excluding tobacco companies from their portfolios “is not going to persuade one [smoker] to switch,” he said, arguing that the same held true for fossil fuel companies.

No alternative to cigarettes or oil would have zero impact on people or the planet, he said, but governments and investors should still encourage the people who produce tobacco and fossil fuels to innovate and invest in alternatives.

That, he said, requires “sticks and carrots”, from taxes on the old product to subsidies for the new one. It also requires engagement, he argued: “Engagement is the only way to change human behaviour.”

A tip to the world’s oil majors: book your spot on the Promenade for next year without delay. (Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson)

Chart of the day

Global plastic consumption continues to grow
Despite all the announcements from companies about their efforts to reduce plastic packaging, plastic consumption volumes continue to grow, according to a Morgan Stanley report published on Wednesday. Global PET plastic used for water bottles is still growing at about 4 per cent a year.

“Structural demand is likely to continue, particularly across emerging markets.” Plastics growth is expected to slow in Europe, but Morgan Stanley’s analysts said they do not expect declines in any geographic market.

The analysis follows an October report from the Ellen MacArthur Foundation that said the world’s biggest consumer groups are still using very little recycled plastic in their packaging.

Grit in the oyster

© AFP via Getty Images
Democratic presidential contender Senator Elizabeth Warren, one of the Davos crowd’s favourite foils, has written to eight globally systemically important banks to inquire about their plans to mitigate climate change.

Warren asked the banks if financial regulators should be required to consider climate-related risks. She also asked how potential stress testing for climate change would affect each bank’s investments in fossil fuel and other carbon-intensive industries.

Warren has sponsored legislation to add new climate risk scenarios for bank stress tests. You can read the full text of the letters here.

Smart reads
Davos bigwigs are all talking about “stakeholders” this year, but as Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson explains in his latest column, workers want more than promises and have little faith their bosses will follow through on their inclusive rhetoric.

Too few executives have yet done the work needed to understand what life is like for the people they employ, or how giving them a living wage can benefit the company — and even its shareholders — in the long run. (FT)
User avatar
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Lancashire

Post by Life »

Brexit it is to be but into who's hands is this government running : ... pe-israel/
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Prince Charles Colonel-in-Chief of the Intelligence Services

Post by TonyGosling »

The Prince of Wales maintains a close interest in the work of the Intelligence Agencies.
In 2011 he became the first Royal Patron of the MI5, SIS and GCHQ, and has regular meetings with senior representatives from each agency.
RAF Menwith Hill is a joint UK and U.S. defence communications establishment, providing intelligence support for UK, U.S. and allied interests.

Prince of Wales visits Harrogate's RAF Menwith Hill to celebrate 60 years of operations
The Prince of Wales has toured the newly dedicated Serenity Park at RAF Menwith Hill in Darley.
By Damian Shepherd
Tuesday, 13th October 2020, 10:38 am
Harrogate district placed under Tier 1 of new local lockdown system - here's what it means ... ns-3001461

During a visit which lasted an hour and a half yesterday, Monday, His Royal Highness viewed the park built to commemorate the 60th Anniversary of operations at the site.

The park also celebrates the base’s close relationship with the local community, providing a space for people to find quiet and calm.

His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales visited RAF Menwith Hill on Monday.

The area is set to form a focal point of community events and celebrations in the years to come, as well as a spot for families to gather.

His Royal Highness, who was hosted by the RAF Cdr, Sqn Ldr Geoff Dickson, and the U.S Site Director, also visited the operations centre where he learned about the station’s history, mission and organisational partnerships, before addressing the workforce.

He met members of the Ministry of Defence and staff who work at the base to thank them and acknowledge the important work that they undertake.

Following the visits, Sqn Ldr Geoff Dickson said: “The delight on the faces of our employees reflects the honour we all feel in seeing His Royal Highness come to RAF Menwith Hill to see firsthand the work that we do, particularly in the year in which we are commemorating 60 years of operations.”

His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales outside the Operations Building with Sqn Ldr Geoff Dickson, RAF Cdr, RAF Menwith Hill.
RAF Menwith Hill is a joint UK and U.S. defence communications establishment, providing intelligence support for UK, U.S. and allied interests.

The Prince of Wales maintains a close interest in the work of the Intelligence Agencies.

In 2011 he became the first Royal Patron of the MI5, SIS and GCHQ, and has regular meetings with senior representatives from each agency.

Risk levels for Yorkshire revealed after Prime Minister sets out new system for coronavirus restrictions

His Royal Highness also presents the ‘The Prince of Wales’s Intelligence Community Awards’, to honour those whose vital work could never be celebrated publicly.
prince charles signs guards orders
prince charles signs guards orders
map of menwith hill
map of menwith hill
Prince Charles in North Yorkshire
Prince Charles in North Yorkshire
Menwith Hill US NSA spy base
Menwith Hill US NSA spy base
Prince Charles chit chats at Catterick or Menwith
Prince Charles chit chats at Catterick or Menwith
Prince Charles outside the Menwith Hill HQ
Prince Charles outside the Menwith Hill HQ
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »

Psst ... Charles hands gongs to spies ... 77nbdq9wh9

David Leppard
Sunday December 16 2012, 12.01am, The Sunday Times

BRITAIN’S spy chiefs have recruited the Prince of Wales for a special mission ­ as a patron who will preside over top secret ceremonies to award gongs to the country’s best agents.

Prince Charles was personally invited by the chiefs from all three main intelligence agencies to become their first royal patron.

In his first engagement in the role last week, he presented what will become annual awards for espionage excellence ­ officially known as the Prince of Wales’s Intelligence Community Awards.

In the secret ceremony at St James’s Palace, Charles met several dozen officers from MI6, MI5 and the eavesdropping centre GCHQ and formally commended them for their outstanding work in keeping the country safe from terrorists and other “enemies of the state”.
User avatar
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Lancashire

Post by Life »

Where is the Queen?

31 January 2020 and the EU Withdrawal Agreement Act came into force.
Section 38 of this Act purports to acknowledge Parliament as a sovereign entity and that no statutes within this Act can ever challenge the sovereignty of Parliament.

Only the Office of Monarch is Sovereign, not the Monarch itself and the authority of the Office of Monarch is borrowed from the people. Parliament can never be sovereign and only holds legitimacy to act on behalf of the people to curb the powers of the Office of Monarch so long as the House of Lords and Office of Monarch are intact.

In this Unlawful claim of sovereignty Parliament has subverted the Constitution and the common law and given itself the powers of a dictator and has chosen to enact the MIT/Jeffery Epstein pseudo science coming out of the United Nations, as the only body of policy they serve upon the people.

This entire charade has nothing to do with pandemic it is the move to install the green policy which will shut down all nations and begin the population cull through starvation should you refuse to dance to the financial reset doctrine.
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »

Charles is immensely powerful and wealthy
Nobody in the country spends half as much on PR as he does.
And when anything leaks from his private circle hes straight to the courts ... ILSON.html

The Mail and everyone else know this after bitter experience
He's also now exempt from all FOI requests which is unbelievable ... mation-act

He has taken you in too with his 'duffer' image too it seems.
Don't be fooled by this wolf in sheeps clothing
He has ways of getting under ones skin
Even the best of us
I;ve seen it many times
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »

[html]<h1><a class="keychainify-checked" title="At five - discussing the big stories in Bristol, Britain and around the world After six - straight talking and investigative reports with Martin Summers" href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Friday 15th January 2021</a></h1>
<h3>Listen live online each week 17:00 to c. 20:00 GMT, 12:00-15:00 EST, 09:00-12:00 PST. <br />Repeats 23:00, 05:00, 11:00 & 17:00 GMT daily on the stream <a class="keychainify-checked" href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener"></a></h3>
[caption id="attachment_42998" align="aligncenter" width="640"]<a class="keychainify-checked" href=""><img class="wp-image-42998" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... lthree.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="275" /></a> Tony's three eBooks available for a donation and to buy[/caption]
<h4>BCfm's weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish Republican Labour activist Martin Summers has been forced off FM, now online only, being 'rested due to the pandemic' on 24 March 2020 by BCfm charity boss Pat Hart. <a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... ty+reports" target="_blank" rel="noopener">This Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show</a> is now available 17:00-19:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart has replaced us with a dumbed-down show called <a class="keychainify-checked" href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Bristol Agenda</a>. If you'd like to request our reinstatement you can <a class="keychainify-checked" href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener">contact the BCfm board and manager here</a>. </h4>
<h4>We have been ready to go live on BCfm's FM server remotely, awaiting the go-ahead from Pat Hart since 16th March. Initially we were told <a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... s.pdf">'In the light of government and Ofcom guidance' Pat Hart's team decided 'not to broadcast discussion or political shows' that 'might put the FM licence at risk'</a>, because they 'don't want the burden of dealing with potential Ofcom complaints'. As it turns out <a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... html">'bad health and medical advice' came from official</a> government <a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... >decisions and announcements</a> which we were't able to criticise on FM and thousands are dead unnecessarily. Now we've been told a wider 'reorganisation' is underway and this show may be allowed to return to FM in November 2020.</h4>
<p><strong><a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... ">February 2019 Ofcom complaint result</a></strong><strong>:</strong> <a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... nt/">UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry</a> - <a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... 8">Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for anti-semitic conspiracy theories</a></p>
<h4>Radio4All audio files usually available 2-4hrs, after TX<br />Any probs mp3s should be on <a class="keychainify-checked" title="The A-Infos Radio Project was formed in 1996 by grassroots broadcasters, free radio journalists and cyber-activists to provide ourselves with the means to share our radio programs via the Internet. To our knowledge, the A-Infos Radio Project was the first grassroots media project of it's kind on the internet. Our goal is to support and expand the movement for democratic communications worldwide. We exist to be an alternative to the corporate and government media which do not serve struggles for liberty, justice and peace, nor enable the free expression of creativity. The archived material is available to anyone who wants it free of charge. We welcome submissions from all stations and independent contributors in the service of these goals. All material is donated by its contributors who are solely responsible for its content." href="" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">alternative links</a> below by then<br /><strong>Feel free to forward this show through networks and to media contacts</strong></h4>
<p><strong>Part One - </strong>Covid-19 Scamdemic Casedemic latest and investigations</p>
<p><strong><a href=" ... case"><img class="alignright wp-image-43227" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... rry-qc.jpg" alt="" width="388" height="284" /></a>Robert Hanson, a lawyer and commentator from Hong Kong, discusses what is happening in China at the moment – the arrest of pro-democracy protesters, how the political system works in Hong Kong, Covid 19 in Hong Kong – how they have kept the numbers so low, and foreign intervention in Hong Kong. Trump says he may pardon Assange and Snowden</strong>  <a href=" ... ng>British QC prosecuting activists in Hong Kong fought to be allowed to take case David Perry faces accusations of ‘making the wrong choice’ after applying despite local objections</strong> Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor Fri 15 Jan 2021 David Perry, the British QC under fire for agreeing to prosecute pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong, had to go to court himself to win permission to take the controversial case. The nine activists facing a potential seven-year jail sentence for alleged unlawful assembly in 2019 include Jimmy Lai, the independently minded newspaper proprietor, and Martin Lee, the so-called father of Hong Kong democracy. Perry has so far refused to comment on why he took the case. If the defendants lose, the courts have already declared that the Hong Kong commissioner of police would have greater powers to restrict freedom of peaceful assembly.</a></p>
<p><strong><a href=" ... tion"><img class="alignright wp-image-43234" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... hedges.jpg" alt="" width="405" height="215" /></a>The conflict between West and East. Chris Hedges, on Democracy Now, talking about Big Tech Trump and censorship - the storming of Congress by Trump supporters – staged?</strong> <a href=" ... ion">CHRIS HEDGES: Well, Twitter, all of these digital platforms are not neutral arbiters. In fact, they’re, of course, for-profit corporations with close ties to the security state. And if you look back over the past few years, they have imposed heavy forms of censorship and interference, primarily on the left, and in particularly on WikiLeaks. So, they blocked the ability for WikiLeaks to accept donations on PayPal and every other platform. Every time WikiLeaks would hold a press conference, there would be interference, electronic interference. People couldn’t get in the room. They’ve used algorithms. And then we saw, again, their very partisan activity during the campaign when they locked the New York Post out of its own Twitter account because it had published stories about the revelations found on the discarded or abandoned laptop from Hunter Biden, which, in retrospect, have proven quite serious. Glenn Greenwald took a very heroic stance on this, and The Intercept wouldn’t publish his story. So, to allow these opaque ­ and remember, these companies know everything about us; we know nothing about them. To allow these companies to essentially function as de facto platforms for censorship and manipulation ­ I’m not in any way minimizing what happened last week ­ harkens back to the way civil liberties were eviscerated in the wake of 9/11 ­ the PATIOT Act, which the great civil rights attorney Michael Ratner called a coup d’état, the 2002 Authorization to Use Military Force Act. So, responding to a crisis ­ and I think we do live in a crisis. I have written about this right-wing, nativist fascist. My book, American Fascist, came out in 2006, so I’m very cognizant of the very real threat that we face. But to respond by, in essence, empowering these private corporations to function as censors over billions of people will come back to haunt us. And we see that, because it’s not just Trump they target. It’s always, in the end, the left that pays for this kind of censorship.</a></p>
<p><strong>Charlie Mullins, head of Pimlico Plumbers, says no vaccine no job to his employees.</strong> <a href="">A large London plumbing firm plans to rewrite all of its workers' contracts to require them to be vaccinated against coronavirus. Pimlico Plumbers chairman Charlie Mullins said it was "a no-brainer" that workers should get the jab. If they do not want to comply with the policy, it will be decided on a case-by-case basis whether they are kept on, he said. Employment lawyers said the plan carried risks for the business. The NHS is seeking to vaccinate 15 million people from priority groups by mid-February as part of efforts to try to control the spread of Covid-19. But Mr Mullins said he was prepared to pay for private immunisations for people at the firm, should they become available, which would be done on the company's time. Doctors have warned that key hospital services in England are in crisis, with reports of hospitals cancelling urgent operations after a surge in Covid patients in recent weeks.</a></p>
<p><strong>Negative interest rates explored by Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee. QE since 2008 unprecedented.</strong> <a href=" ... r">Cutting the UK’s official interest rate below zero would be good for growth and could be done without crippling commercial banks, a Bank of England policymaker has said. Silvana Tenreyro, one of the nine members of Threadneedle Street’s monetary policy committee, said negative rates had worked in other countries and would assist the UK’s recovery from its Covid-19 slump. In an online speech to the University of the West of England, Tenreyro rejected the argument that the profitability of banks would be adversely affected if the Bank cut the official cost of borrowing – bank rate – from a record low of 0.1% to below zero. The Bank is looking at the technical feasibility of negative rates for Britain’s financial system, and is expected to publish its views on this after next month’s policy meeting.</a></p>
<p><strong>Iraq court calls for arrest of Trump for assassination of Sulemeini </strong>- <a href=" ... html">Iraq issues warrant to arrest Trump for 'premeditated murder' over airstrike which saw its paramilitary chief killed alongside Iran's General Soleimani A Baghdad court has issued a warrant for arrest of US President Donald Trump Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis died in the same US drone strike that killed Soleimani Court for east Baghdad issued the warrant under Article 406 of the penal code PUBLISHED: 15:54, 7 January 2021 An arrest warrant has been issued for outgoing President Donald Trump in connection with the killing of an Iranian general and a powerful Iraqi militia leader last year, Iraq's judiciary said. The warrant was issued on Thursday by a judge in Baghdad's investigative court tasked with probing the Washington-directed drone strike that killed Gen. Qassim Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the court's media office said. They were killed outside the capital's airport last January. Al-Muhandis was the deputy leader of the state-sanctioned Popular Mobilization Forces, an umbrella group composed of an array of militias, including Iran-backed groups, formed to fight the Islamic State group.</a></p>
<p><strong><a href=" ... html"><img class="alignright wp-image-43239" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... ab-wef.jpg" alt="" width="436" height="245" /></a>Davos online at end of January – Extra Singapore Meeting in May. WEF, Prince Charles, and The Great Reset meeting – what is the Great Reset?</strong> <a href=" ... tml">Davos 2021 goes online: Ambani, Mahindra, Gadkari to attend. How to follow Updated: 10 Jan 2021 The online event by the name of DavosAgenda will be organised by the World Economic Forum between Jan 25-29. WEF will host its physical annual meeting in May in Singapore. Davos 2020 was the last major global event that took place before almost the entire world got locked down due to the pandemic. The World Economic Forum's yearly congregation of the rich and powerful of the world at Davos goes online this year with the name of Davos Agenda! The online event will be held between January 25 and 29, around the same time it is generally hosted at the regular venue of Swiss ski resort town. However, WEF will host its physical annual meeting in May in Singapore. The decision comes amidst the Covid 19 pandemic situation, as the World Economic Forum writes in its statement, the pandemic has accelerated systemic changes that were apparent before its inception. The fault lines that emerged in 2020 now appear as critical crossroads in 2021.</a></p>
<p><strong><a href=" ... deo/"><img class="alignright wp-image-43219" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... acking.jpg" alt="" width="344" height="215" /></a>Italian whistleblowers and high tech US election fixing. Dominion Corp, who arranges US voting system, is suing Trump.</strong> <a href=" ... o/">Lawyer For Leonardo Contractor Who Witnessed U.S. Election Interference Operation In Italy Recounts Affidavit Via Video January 9, 2021 Mike Dakkak Professor Alfio D’Urso, the lawyer for the man who claims to have witnessed the operation to interfere with the U.S. election in Italy on election night, has released a video detailing his sworn affidavit. That written affidavit was reportedly delivered to members of the U.S. Congress on Wednesday. Remarkably, the vote to certify the 2020 election results – even though evidence may exist that those results are fraudulent – went forward. D’Urso’s client, a man by the name of Arturo D’Elia, claims to have taken part in an operation in which operatives from various intelligence agencies remotely manipulated votes from several locations in Italy, including the U.S. Embassy in Rome, and used military satellites owned and operated by Italian defense contractor Leonardo SpA to do it. The revelations are being brought to light with the help of Maria Zack, Chairwoman of, a government accountability advocacy group based in Florida. Zack reportedly has received intercepts, photos and records of phone calls from the Italian intelligence service which is helping to bring the allegations to light. D’Elia says he is willing to testify to all individuals and entities who participated in the scheme, which allegedly involved the switching of votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden on election night. Significantly, D’Elia says he has made data backups of the original data and the data after the switches the operatives were instructed to make, and is willing to provide that evidence in court. Requests for comment from various members of Congress, including Speaker Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer have so far gone unanswered.</a></p>
<p><strong><a href=" ... 9626"><img class="alignright wp-image-43257" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... rees-2.jpg" alt="" width="503" height="314" /></a>Call for Bristol mayor to resign over Bristol Energy ‘disaster’ The council-owned energy firm lost a staggering £50million before it was broken up and sold An opposition councillor has called for the Bristol mayor to resign after it emerged the city council’s energy firm lost a staggering £50million before it was broken up and sold.</strong> <a href=" ... 79626">But Marvin Rees has defended the ruling Labour group’s handling of Bristol Energy, blaming the company’s failure on the previous administration and other factors such as the coronavirus pandemic.he political row erupted after new financial figures revealed Bristol Energy posted official losses totalling £49.4million in the six years before the council finally admitted defeat and sold it. The firm’s final annual report released on Sunday (January 10) showed it lost £14.8million in 2019/20. That followed escalating losses each year since it was set up, of £2.9million in 2015/16, £8.4million in 2016/17, £11.2million in 2017/18 and £12.1million in 2018/19, records on Companies House show. Bristol Energy was set up by Bristol City Council's then cross-party cabinet in 2015, under former Bristol mayor George Ferguson, to provide affordable gas and electricity for residents while returning a profit for the local authority. </a><strong>The Labour administration took office a year later and in 2019 agreed to increase the council's investment in the energy firm to a maximum of £37.7million and set aside an extra £7.3million in risk reserves.</strong> <a href=" ... 9626">This means the council, which has ploughed an estimated £37million of taxpayers' money into the failed venture so far, could potentially spend up to another £8million before it finally rids itself of the financial millstone and receives the £15.3million it has been promised by the company’s buyers. Bristol’s Liberal Democrat, Conservative and Green councillors have been sounding warnings about continued council investment in Bristol Energy for a number of years. Now they have roundly condemned the city mayor and his Labour cabinet for the “disaster”, with Tory group leader Mark Weston accusing them of “unparallelled” financial mismanagement and Lib Dem member Tim Kent calling for the mayor to apologise and resign. ...... Cllr Kent told the Local Democracy Reporting Service he expected the total loss to council taxpayers would run to more than £50million once all the costs came to light. “It is time Bristol mayor @MarvinJRees came clean on the disaster of Bristol Energy. It is time he revealed the true full cost. It is time he apologised,” Mr Kent tweeted yesterday (January 11). “It is truly unbelievable that mayor Rees, who has lost tens of millions of taxpayers’ money, is still to apologise," he said later. “We still do not know the truth of how this has occurred nor the total cost. “It is clear the mayor should resign.”</a></p>
<p><a href=" ... rong>Music by Sirplus, Mayor Marvin Rees’s half brother Martin Walker, who attempted suicide </strong><strong>in May 2020, six weeks </strong><strong>after the Covid lockdown was imposed, </strong><strong>and died in November. </strong></a></p>
<p><strong><a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... ty+reports" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Radio4All download pages</a></strong><br />BCfm audio file - [right click to download]<br /><a href=" ... g>Complete 240 minute show - [right click to download]</strong></a><br />Full interviews with frontline doctors below...</p>
<p><a href=""><img class="aligncenter wp-image-43259 size-full" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... ix-neo.jpg" alt="" width="605" height="668" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Part Two -</strong> News Review and Investigative Reports THE SILENCED COVID DOCTORS: </p>
[caption id="attachment_43242" align="alignright" width="397"]<a href=" ... -rat"><img class=" wp-image-43242" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... alpin_.jpg" alt="" width="397" height="264" /></a> Dr David Halpin, pictured at home near Hay Tor, Dartmoor, Devon, who is bringing judicial review proceedings over the case of Dr David Kelly.[/caption]
<p><strong>Dr David Halpin</strong>, commentator and <strong>former surgeon who played a major part in telling the world government scientist Dr David Kelly did not commit suicide in 2003 joins Tony and Martin – <a href=""></a> Difficulties in society because of Covid 19 and lockdowns</strong>. <a href=" ... b-rat">C19 and Induced Insanity in the UK, the Global Lab Rat There were several events typical of predictive programming. The WEF October 21stmeeting and the Great Reset was one (1). Here in Britain the orchestration of central, NHS and local responses to a respiratory disease suggested that plans were laid before the Wuhan outbreak was announced on the 12thof December 2019. For instance, the title of a most complex and lengthy bill nodded through in 48 hours in the Mother of Parliaments, was ‘The 2019/2020 Coronavirus Bill’. This would have required drafting lawyers and committees of MPs to crawl over this miscarriage for at least a month or so pre-Wuhan. The author spoke of an apocalyptic atmosphere being engendered by the ‘hype’ attached to this recent addition to the ubiqitous corona virus family, first characterised in the 1960s. That it was probably ‘engineered’ ie not of natural origin by mutation, might have been an excuse for more fear than logic determined. There was a feeling of ‘End Times’ under a blackening sky; an inevitable spiral into the failure of systems with increased suffering and loss, especially for that large majority world wide who live hand to mouth. The author feared, and still does, that under the vast and masked distraction, and without the possibility of publics gathering in protest, a long planned attack on Iran was in those many psychopathic minds. (2) The latter are the zealots for destruction of other humans calling a nuclear weapon ‘tactical’. The strategy has been to scare a large majority out of their remaining wits, and to keep repeating the big lie – that Covid_19 (C19) is very infectious and likely lethal. Every body set up to drive the policies, and there are hundreds, has been corrupt. The Chief Scientific Adviser, Vallance – previously of Pfizer, allegedly still owning £600,000 of shares in this firm with a criminal history in the USA, is one glaring example. And Professor Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer, is based at the London School of Medicine and Tropical Hygiene, which is said to receive large donations from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The corruption and mendacity is vast in scale, but ‘they’ press on without any accountability and ‘laugh in the faces’ of those who know. The gullibility is extraordinary in most, and obedience almost complete. Nine months from the start at least half the shoppers in the local country towns are masked as they move about or queue observing anti-social distancing. Some ride cycles in brisk winter weather with faces muzzled. Attempts to tell the wearers that they will have varieties of bacteria and viruses in the culture medium within the gauze are met with blank eyes. That some species in the masks which are fingered constantly, tucked into pockets and removed for every encounter, are probably pathogenic, evinces no reaction. The Behavioural Insights Team (3) will be measuring compliance via the masks as seen in CCTV footage at supermarkets, petrol stations etc. With the same title exactly in the US, these psychologists of the mass mind will know how the mask has many benefits for control of the polity. De-personalization, submission, stifling of speech, and anonymity are some of the gains as perceived in the fascist mind. Fascism – the author’s definition - the subjugation of the individual's will and freedom by an overweening state. Humanity withers, freedom of speech is stifled and the soul dies. Self preservation becomes a dominant drive. The suffering is largely silent, and the complacent middle classes spend time ordering their food on line for home delivery. The print and broadcast media is in lock step, the main message being that there are many thousands of ‘cases’ or ‘infections’ each day – conflating the many positive RT-PCR ‘tests’ (4) with disease. Many are oblivious to this obvious lie. Their ductility is ensured by their lack of logic, inquiry and a desert of information. ‘Funny’ money dished out, pacifies the many and memories are in milliseconds. That ‘austerity’ was enforced after the exchequer baled out the banks with an amount equal to five years worth of NHS spending - £540 billion, in 2008 is not remembered, and the consequences of a record National Debt now does not hit home. The current situation in this ‘demi-paradise’ is of accelarating fear and ever closer surveillance and control. This is the BBC ‘news’ today (5). “Covid-19: Concern at 'unprecedented' infection level in England”. ‘The mutant strain of C19 is very ‘infectious’ and the ambulance service and the receiving hospitals are being overwhelmed.’ There is no let up in the lying; the evil of it tends to overwhelm the conscientious. Locally, in Devon, are these things true? a. Is there a bounty to some health authority if C19 is on the death certificate – as was the case in the US? b. Did the relative dying of a ruptured aneurysm in hospital have C19 put on his death certificate? c. There was an accident on the coastal road in Torbay. A car rolled over and the road was closed, It was said the driver had just driven away from the English Riviera Centre where a C19 ‘vaccine’ had been injected. What are the facts? But all is not lost. At present it can be said that if the British were in 1939, what the morasse is like now, Hitler would have walked straight in. But there are many who see through the propagandare nero,and as poverty bites, the trampled will resist more and a revolution of the mind will restore the freedoms and the common sense. This was Trafalgar Square in late September (6)</a></p>
<p><strong><a href=" ... ent/"><img class="alignright wp-image-43245" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... e-gold.jpg" alt="" width="371" height="231" /></a>Dr Simone Gold</strong>, <a href=" ... ccine/">on how she was sacked from A&E for using chloroquine on her patients. </a> - <strong>Honest Healthcare Solutions ­ From the Ground Up The doctor-patient relationship is being threatened... </strong><a href=" ... ent/">That means quality patient care is under fire like never before. Powerful interests are undermining the effective practice of medicine with politicized science and biased information. Now more than ever, patients need access to independent, evidence-based information to make the best decisions for their healthcare. Doctors must have the independence to care for their patients without interference from government, media and the medical establishment. America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) stands up for every American looking for the best quality healthcare by empowering doctors working on the front lines of our nation’s most pressing healthcare challenges. We help to amplify the voices of concerned physicians and patients nationwide to combat those who push political and economic agendas at the expense of science and quality healthcare solutions. AFLDS is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization. Our growing community of member physicians come from across the country representing a range of medical disciplines and practical experience on the front lines of medicine. Our programs focus on a number of critical issues including: Providing Americans with science-based facts about COVID-19 Protecting physician independence from government overreach Combating the pandemic using evidence-based approaches without compromising Constitutional freedoms Fighting medical cancel culture and media censorship Advancing healthcare policies that protect the physician-patient relationship Expanding COVID-19 treatment options for all Americans who need them Strengthening the voices of front-line doctors in the national healthcare conversation</a></p>
<p><strong><a href=""><img class="alignright wp-image-43247" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... flccc-.jpg" alt="" width="443" height="219" /></a>Dr Scott Mitchell</strong>, A&E doctor from Guernsey, part of <a href="">FLCCC</a>, discusses why he thinks <strong>Ivermectin, an anti-parasite drug, should be approved for use in treating Covid 19 – there have been very good results from it in other countries. Covid 19 cover ups – news on bad reactions to new vaccines repressed, financial incentives for putting Covid 19 as part of death, government officials making money from Big Pharma</strong>. <a href=" ... ians/">The FLCCC Physicians The Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance was created by highly published critical care specialists from major academic medical centers with collectively over 1,000 medical publications. Based on the rapidly emerging research into COVID-19, the early clinical experience in China reflected by the Shanghai expert commission, and their decades-long clinical and research experiences in severe infectious diseases around the country, the 5 experts developed the MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol for Covid-19. It is intended for use early in the hospitalization of patients presenting with states of respiratory distress requiring supplemental oxygen. These 5 have since been joined by an increasing number of hospitalist and ICU physicians who recognize the sound physiologic rationale, the emerging published research in support of the components, and the data demonstrating good clinical outcomes in hospitals that have adopted the treatment regimen. Founding members / MATH+ developers Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP Endowed Professor of Medicine Chief, Div. of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk, Virginia Curriculum Vitae – Dr. Paul E. Marik Dr. Pierre Kory Pierre Kory, M.D., M.P.A. Pulmonary and Critical Care Specialist President, Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance) Curriculum Vitae – Dr. Pierre Kory Gianfranco Umberto Meduri G. Umberto Meduri, M.D. Professor of Medicine University of Tennessee Health Science Center Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine and Research Services Memphis V.A. Medical Center Curriculum Vitae – Dr. G. Umberto Meduri Joseph Varon, M.D., FCCP, FCCM Professor of Acute & Continuing Care Chief of Staff & Chief of Critical Care United Memorial Medical Center, Houston, Texas Curriculum Vitae – Dr. Joseph Varon Jose Iglesias Jose Iglesias, D.O. Assoc. Prof., Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall Dept. of Nephrology & Critical Care / Community Medical Center Dept. of Nephrology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune, New Jersey Curriculum Vitae – Dr. Jose Iglesias Keith Berkowitz, M.D., M.B.A. Medical Director, Center for Balanced Health Voluntary Attending Physician, Lenox Hill Hosp. New York, New York Curriculum Vitae – Dr. Keith Berkowitz Howard Kornfeld Howard Kornfeld, M.D. Board Certified: Emergency Med., Pain Med., Addiction Med. President, Pharmacology Policy Institute Clinical Faculty, Pain Fellowship Program, Univ. of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine Founder & Medical Director, Recovery Without Walls Mill Valley, California Curriculum Vitae – Dr. Howard Kornfeld Fred Wagshul Fred Wagshul, M.D. Pulmonologist & Med. Dir., Lung Center of America Clinical Instructor, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio Curriculum Vitae – Dr. Fred Wagshul Scott Mitchell, MRCS Associate Specialist Emergency Department Princess Elizabeth Hospital States of Guernsey Eivind H. Vinjevoll Eivind H. Vinjevoll, M.D. Senior Consultant Anesthesiologist Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesia Volda, Norway</a></p>
<p><strong>Dr Andrew Hill</strong> <a href="">from Liverpool University with detailed metadata presentation on Ivermectin studies saving the lives of roughly three-quarters of patients.</a></p>
<p><strong>Dr Stephen Malthouse</strong> in Canada, <strong>says there was no pandemic – also how animal and children studies of mRNA vaccines showed they were deadly.</strong> <a href=" ... ous/">Well, you have to differentiate COVID cases, which are people that have positive PCR tests, and those could be completely healthy people without any symptoms. And the majority of them are like that. Those would be determined to be cases. Now, normally in medicine a case is someone who’s actually sick. Now, these aren’t sick people. And then when you look at hospitalizations and death and also ICU admissions, we see that there’s been no change in the last year than what we’ve seen in previous years. So looking at all cause mortality is the most important measurement. And the reason behind that is because the COVID diagnosis is based on a PCR test. This is where they take a swab from your nose, and then they amplify it multiple times. Normally you would amplify that 25, maybe 30 times at the maximum. It’s a bit like taking a Xerox and then re-Xeroxing the Xerox then re-Xeroxing the Xerox and then re-Xeroxing the Xerox in attempt to actually identify and match up RNA, which is taken from that swab with the RNA from coronavirus.</a></p>
<p><strong><a href=""><img class="alignright wp-image-43250" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... randra.jpg" alt="" width="403" height="196" /></a>Helen Wildbore, from Relatives and Residents Association for care homes, <a href=""></a>, discusses why relatives are not being allowed meaningful visits. Plandemic and agenda behind Covid 19</strong>. <a href=" ... s/">R&RA’s director has called on Parliament to take action to ensure essential visitors are granted safe access to care homes to protect the rights of older people. Giving evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Helen Wildbore said: “In month eleven of visiting restrictions in care homes across England, our helpline continues to hear of the devastating impact isolation is having on residents, putting their human rights at risk. Many families feel bereft and abandoned, that the systems in place to protect and safeguard rights have let them down. Too many of our helpline callers are afraid to speak out and use their legal rights for fear of reprisals, including eviction. We need to address that power imbalance.” “As cases rise across England, protecting care users and staff from the virus is of upmost importance, but almost a year of isolation has created another risk to the well-being of older people living in care. Care homes need to manage both the risk to well-being from isolation and the risk posed by the virus via individual assessments. Essential visitors – providing crucial practical or emotional support – need to be granted access, to ensure residents rights are respected. Such visitors should be subject to the same safety precautions as staff (testing, appropriate PPE, access to vaccines) so they are seen as a vital part of the care team.” The Committee heard how the rights of older people in care are risk, including: right to family life: with life-long partnerships separated, parents alienated from children and people afraid they won’t meet their grandchildren before passing away right to well-being: with increased mental distress and confusion, and too many passing away without the love and support of their families right to be free from degrading treatment: where people have stopped eating/drinking/taking medication and have ‘lost the will to live’, this may cross the threshold to be degrading treatment right to liberty: for residents told, throughout the pandemic, they are not able to leave their care home Almost a year into visiting restrictions, time is of the essence. Urgent action is needed to end the human rights crisis in care.</a></p>
<p><strong>Dr John Campbell</strong> says it looks like you could have life immunity after catching Covid 19.</p>
<p><strong><a href=""><img class="alignright wp-image-43252" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... -laham.jpg" alt="" width="288" height="443" /></a>Dr Stanley Laham,</strong> immunologist, discusses how immunity from catching Covid 19 would work – <a href="">and how he treated his 70 year old friend for Covid-19.  Which Cells Do mRNA Vaccines Target? Dr Stanley Laham on mRNA autoimmune dangers</a></p>
<p><strong><a href=" ... 8_00"><img class="alignright wp-image-43232" src="https://politicsthisweek.files.wordpres ... oleman.jpg" alt="" width="510" height="340" /></a>Dr Vernon Coleman</strong> <a href=" ... -08_00">on how he thinks Covid 19 is an Agenda 21 population reduction plan.</a></p>
<p><strong>Dr Carrie Madej</strong>, on the spiritual side of the Plandemic.</p>
<p><strong>Tim Cohen, author of ‘The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea</strong>’ <a href="">looks at the new forms of worship of money, devil worship, through transactions, he believes that Prince Charles is the AntiChrist.</a> <strong>The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea: Charles, Prince of Wales, Foretold</strong> - <a href="">This is the SECOND EDITION of the definitive and foremost book on the subject of the AntiChrist. - In The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea, Tim Cohen provides biblical evidence to demonstrate that all of the prophecies pertaining to the coming AntiChrist — that can be fulfilled before he assumes control over a global government during the Great Tribulation — are already fulfilled in a living prince of Roman lineage; this is true of no one else. This prince, for example, has the lineage: he claims descent simultaneously from Israel's King David, Islam's false prophet Mohammed, and, by a false occult lineage, Jesus Christ Himself! This prince has the imagery: his personal heraldic achievement or coat of arms has the symbolism of the first beast of Revelation 13, representing the AntiChrist, and of Daniel 7 (i.e., the little horn having eyes like those of a man — a unicorn with human eyes). This prince's coat of arms also bears the red dragon described in Revelation 12 and 13, specifically representing Satan, and he was seen globally as he faced this dragon in 1969 to be coronated as "Prince of the Red Dragon" (i.e., Satan). This prince has the name calculation: his title, by which he is globally known, calculates to 666 in both Hebrew and English on the original biblical numbering system — the very system used in the underlying Greek text of Revelation 13:18 to specify six-hundred and sixty-six. This prince has the involvement in the Mideast peace process. In fact, the current Road Map, as well as the Oslo process from which it derives, and the Madrid Peace talks from which the Oslo process itself derived, are directly traceable to the London Agreement of 1987, which in turn is traceable to...THIS PRINCE. Also, this prince has the global authority.... That's right — he is not the ignored wimp that the masses have been misled to believe; rather, he is mankind's number one globalist, and has been for decades. Indeed, this prince is over the entire New World Order power structure—through the world's most prominent and oldest order of chivalry: the Order of the Garter. This order is very much more than merely a revival of King Arthur's legendary round table. And to top it all off, this prince HAS THE IMAGERY OF WHAT IS TO BE THE FUTURE ABOMINATION THAT CAUSES DESOLATION! What is that? In March 2002, while trekking through Brazilian rain forests, this prince was presented with a miniature version of a statue depicting himself as an angelic figure with large wings standing atop a mass of human bodies looking up to him (this prince) as savior! In fact, the inscription on the statue's base reads "Saviour of the World"!!! And it has this prince's face...with wings! So what did this prince say when Brazilian officials asked his permission to create a ten cubits high (12 or 15 feet) version of this statue, and to place it in a square named after him in their capital city? Instead of calling it blasphemy to identify him as "Saviour of the World", this prince remarked, "I am touched and deeply amazed," and then, with the small ego he has, this prince gladly gave permission to create the larger version! Now, bear in mind that the arrival of this statue was years after the 1998 publication of the first edition of The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea (ISBN 0-9662793-0-1), and there is no other man or woman who is being called "Saviour of the World" other than this prince whom Tim Cohen decades ago identified as the foretold AntiChrist — according to a true understanding of the prophetic scriptures. Coincidence? No. Just consider this: What would happen if even the miniature version of this princely idol, which has already been received by this prince and photographed by global media, were one day placed in a newly constructed holy place in Jerusalem? And what about the ten cubits high version? Would not all of evangelical Christianity suddenly scratch its collective head and wonder, "Gee, could this prince be the AntiChrist?" Well, you don't have to wait for that day to find out, nor do you have to be entirely unprepared: Get The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea and read it</a></p>
<p><br /><strong><a class="keychainify-checked" href=" ... ty+reports" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Radio4All download pages</a></strong><br />BCfm audio file - [right click to download]<br /><a href=" ... g>Complete 240 minute show - [right click to download]</strong></a><br /><a href=" ... .mp3">Full interview with Dr Simone Gold, USA</a><br /><a href=" ... .MP3">Full interview with Dr Scott Mitchell, Guernsey, FLCCC</a><br /><a href=" ... .mp3">Full interview with Dr Andrew Hill, Liverpool, FLCCC</a><br /><a href=" ... .mp3">Full interview with Dr Stephen Malthouse, Canada</a><br /><a href=" ... .mp3">Full interview with Dr John Campbell, Carlisle</a><br /><a href=" ... .MP3">Full interview with Dr Stanley Laham, Florida, USA</a><br /><a href=" ... .mp3">Full interview with Dr Vernon Coleman, Paris</a><br /><a href=" ... .mp3">Full interview with Dr Carrie Madej</a></p>
<p><!-- wp:paragraph --></p>
<p>The Traitors of Arnhem 4 Small Siege Of Heaven Small</p>
<p><!-- /wp:paragraph --></p>[/html]
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »


27 independent reasons why I believe that Prince Charles is the biblical Antichrist.
My father once requested that I would make an article where I list all the 27 different reasons why I believe that Prince Charles is the final Antichrist (1 John 2:18 says there are many antichrists, but only one the Antichrist). I made already such a listing in my 700-pages e-book summary, but here I’m trying to deal with each and every point in a little bit more detail. Without proper background information for each point – either biblical or other-, they can be easily twisted into a caricature. For this reason, I first presented my justifications in 12 Chapters of my book and after that, I made a short summary of my all arguments to intertwine its leads and to frame the complete overall picture. Of course, it is always easier to jump straight to the end of the book and look quickly at its summary. But in that case, the reader does not make a justification to the author or gets an appropriate picture of my book’s extensive arguments.

Note: This is an English translation of my Finnish article which you can find here: 27 itsenäistä syytä siihen miksi uskon Prinssi Charlesin olevan Raamatun Antikristus. A translation was made partly by Google and partly by manually (I also used Grammarly writing assistant for better English grammar). In this article, many links lead to my previous blog posts which are written in Finnish. You can translate them only with Google translation tool, but the quality is often very bad and misleading.

99419_COVER PPRINT - 6PP.jpg
Why is Prince Charles the most plausible Antichrist candidate at this moment?
This manifested well from a response I got on my book in September 2015. A certain person whose name I won’t mention – aka. Pekka Immonen – suggested that I should concentrate on former British Prime Minister Tony Blair instead of Charles. Our discussion soon went to my book 27 independent causes on behalf of Prince Charles. He wrote: ”Samuel’s prophecy fulfillment on pages 693-696, are over-interpreted trash. Sorry.” When I inquired into more specific reasons for such a harsh judgment, he went through all of my book’s summary of the prophecies and explained why he thought they were ”over-interpreted trash”. In fact, the only thing which was over-interpreted trash was his interpretation of my book’s summary.

I quickly noted that he had not read my entire book, but only its short summary and did not deny it either. He also complained about the lack of sources, although I specifically mentioned that detailed reasoning for each of the 27 prophecies, their fulfillment in Prince Charles, and their sources could be found in 12 Chapters of my book. You are free to criticize my book for many different reasons – I would rather rewrite it from start to finish – but such a ”straw man” which Immonen presented on my arguments was at least derogatory considering great effort I had put on my book. It was the result of ten years of research and two and a half years of writing. A straw man is a reference to ”an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent’s argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be ’attacking a straw man.'” (

Of course, in this article, it is not possible to comprehensively look over all of my book’s arguments in favor of Prince Charles. Handling each individual prophecy in detail would require a whole Chapter of the book. If one Chapter corresponds to 26 pages, then 27 prophecy fulfillment could comprise 702 pages. This is just one page more than my actual book. It has not been constructed, of course, in this way, and a more laconic person could have presented its reasoning in a much smaller space. But since I have already addressed my book’s numerous arguments in many previous blog posts, I put the link into them so you can read further if you need more specific information on my each and every claim. I try to handle each of the 27 prophecy fulfillment on one page so that my article would not stretch much longer than 27 pages. Let’s see how I succeed here (on one page I refer to the print scale 70, so if you print this article, make sure that the page’s output scale is not 100 where one page is equivalent to two).

Note. The conversation between me and Pekka is already on my homepage, so I do not see a problem to use this person’s name in this article. My intention is not to attack him personally. If you read this, Pekka, you are still my dear brother in Jesus Christ. Our dispute is only between issues, not between people. Our eschatological differences should not undermine the most important thing that unites us all as Christians, namely Jesus Christ, who is Head of the Body of Christ and the Savior of all Christians. As Jesus prayed, ”That they may all be one; even as You, Father, are in Me and I in You, that they also may be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me.” (John 17:21)

Prophecy fulfillment #1

The first prophecy and its fulfillment in Prince Charles were following:

The Antichrist arises during that generation that sees Israel’s national revival (Ezek. 36:24: Matt. 24:32-34, 2 Thess. 2:4). Fulfillment: Prince Charles was born the same year as Israel became the independent nation from the British Empire in 1948; for the first time since the Kingdom of Israel and Judah and 2,500 years of diaspora.

Immonen’s brief and to the point of objection to this: ”Not found in the Bible”. Indeed, this was not in any way even controversial claim, as virtually all dispensationalists have endorsed it. Numerous prophecies on the Old and New Testament require Israel’s national revival, the return of Jerusalem to the Jews, and the third temple before the Antichrist’s 42 months reign and the Second Coming (and that all that should happen within one generation). These prophecies could be dealt with more broadly, but above I already mentioned three Scriptures in this area. This prophecy alone, of course, would be a very weak argument for Prince Charles, when he is hardly the only person on our planet who was born in or after 1948. But I also emphasized here, that he was born of the very Gentile nation which gave birth to the present Jewish state. There are perhaps millions in the United Kingdom who were born in 1948, so at this moment we are still on very thin ice (and no prophecy in Scriptures specifically requires that Antichrist should have been born in 1948). This prophecy (or prophecies) schedule the birth of the Antichrist to the time of Israel’s rebirth or later, and Prince Charles is thus suitable for this criterion.

Prophecy fulfillment #2

Prophecy: The Antichrist is a prince within the boundaries of the ancient Roman Empire (Dan. 9: 26-27). Fulfillment: Charles is the Prince of Wales (England and Wales belonged to the north-western provinces of Roman Empire).

Immonen’s objection: ”Where is the connection to Prince Charles?”, quoting after that Daniel’s Chapter 9 of the prince who ”shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate”. It is clear that a layman, who is not familiar with the interpretation of the prophetic Scriptures, may not understand here the explicit reference point. Precisely for this reason, I explored in my book so thoroughly Daniel’s prophesies like the 70 weeks and others. There is not so much controversy in this argument either. In practice, all dispensationalists prophecy teachers say that Dan. 9:27 is the prophecy of the Antichrist. To deal with this matter with more precise details would, of course, require many additional pages, but suffice it to say that some of the earliest Church Fathers taught Dan. 9:27 as the prophecy of the Antichrist. This was taught, for example, by Bishop Irenaeus (Against Heresies, Book 5, Chapter 25), who lived in the First Century AD. Irenaeus was a disciple of Polycarp who, in turn, was a disciple of Apostle John whose letters are only in the Bible, of which the word ”Antichrist” has become to common usage. Thus it is not a new doctrine but the very original one that our Lord himself upheld when He said:

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains… For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. – Matt. 24:15-16, 21

Roman Empire in 69, a year before the temple was destroyed. According to the map, present Wales was not yet a part of the Roman Empire but its conquest began in 43 AD and was completed by the year 79 when Titus became the Emperor of Rome. Titus was also personally involved in the Conquest of Britain.
On the ”abomination of desolation” Jesus refers here to such passages in the Book of Daniel as Dan. 9:27 and 11:31. These Scriptures speak of the Antichrist whose coming He attaches to the Day of His Second Coming. The context of Dan 9:27 associates this person to preceding verse about ”the people of the prince that shall come [and] shall destroy the city and the sanctuary”. This verse referred to Prince Titus and his people to the Romans. Titus destroyed the city of Jerusalem and its temple in 70 AD. This was the beginning of the Jewish diaspora which lasted nearly two millennia. Verse 27 does not speak of Titus but the coming Antichrist, as Irenaeus also understood in the First Century AD. Sir Robert Anderson, who was knighted by Queen Victoria, published in 1881 a book called The Coming Prince, which had a significant impact on the dispensationalist prophecy school of the 20th Century. The rest of my claim is unquestionable historical fact. England and Wales also belonged to the old Roman Empire, so Charles is thus a prince within boundaries of ancient Roman Empire, like Dan. 9:27 seems to hint. But the next prophecy takes this picture into more precise details about the national origin of the Antichrist.

Prophecy fulfillment #3

Prophecy: Antichrist is associated with ”the people of the prince that shall come [and] shall destroy the city and the sanctuary”, i.e. to the Prince of Romans (Dan. 9:27, Luke 21:20). Fulfillment: After Germanic tribes invaded the Western Roman Empire, Wales maintained its independence and Roman heritage yet for many Centuries; for this reason, its name derives from the old Germanic word which means ”Romans”. Thus, the title ”Prince of Wales” signifies etymologically and also ethnically the Prince of Romans.

Wales (Roman Wales) and the Eastern Roman Empire at the end of Heraclius’ reign in 633 – which was also predicted in the Book of Daniel – just before the Arab conquest. In 410, the Western Roman Emperor Honorius handed over to the British their independence in order to focus on defending continental Europe from the Germans. With the exception of Wales, the entire Western Empire was captured by the Germans, while Eastern Empire was absorbed eventually by the Arabs and the Turks.
Here I refer to Dan. 9:26-27 and at its parallel passage, Luke 21:20, which both connects the Antichrist to Titus and thus to the Romans. He is therefore not only a prince who will rise within the boundaries of ancient Roman Empire (what also Dan 7:24 insist), but he must also be specifically the Prince of Romans like Titus was. Thus this prophecy seems to exclude those areas within Roman Empire which belong today to Arabs, Turks or Slavic nationalities. In other words, the whole area around the Mediterranean, which once belonged to the Eastern Roman Empire (note: In my book, I have also dealt with details such topic as the ”Assyrian Antichrist” which explains why he should arise from the parts of Eastern Roman Empire, or modern Syria, see prophecy fulfillment #7 and 8). Alongside with Italy, all those peoples of Europe who speak Romanic languages, heirs to the ancient Latin, could be seen today as heirs to the ancient Roman peoples. This includes countries such as France, Spain, Portugal, and Romania. Germany, England, and Sweden belong to the Germanic peoples and Germanic linguistic groups. Nevertheless, even the Romanic peoples of Europe are not purely the heirs of ancient Romans. During the Migration Period of Fifth Century, the Germanic tribes that came from the Scandinavian and Germania occupied the entire Western Empire.

The present peoples of Europe are the heirs of those ancient Germanic tribes of Western Europe. Visigoths and Sueves settled to current Spain and Portugal, Ostrogoths to Italian peninsula, Franks to modern France and Gebids, among others, to modern Romania. All of them were Germanic peoples. With the collapse of Western Roman Empire in 476, they formed those ten kingdoms of Rome, which Daniel 7:24 saw beforehand. This is an issue I have dealt in details here (from biblical and historical perspective). The only people who maintained their independence and Roman traditions for centuries after the Germanic invasions were the Welsh people. Unlike Anglo-Saxons, Wales is part of Celtic peoples as well as Scotland and Ireland. So they are not actually a Roman people (if you mean by the ”Romans” merely of ancient Italians), but Wales was a part of ancient Roman Empire and retained Roman culture and traditions for centuries after the Germanic Migration Period. That is why they called them in their Germanic neighborhood the ”Welsh people” which is Germanic root word for the Wales and Cornwall and which meant ”Romans”.

As web article The Dragon and the Eagle says: ”It is cognate to Waalsch (the Dutch word for the Walloons, their Romance-speaking neighbours in Belgium), to Welsche (until recently the German word for all their Romance-speaking neighbours, still used in Swiss German for French-speakers in Switzerland, and by German-speakers in the Tyrol for Italians), and to Wallachia (the part of Romania bordering on German-speaking settlements in Hungary)”. Charles’s second most renowned title after the Prince of Wales is the Duke of Cornwall. The word ”Duke” is derived directly from the Latin word dux, which meant a military leader, a commander, or a provincial governor of Rome. Thus Charles’s two most important titles refer to the Roman Prince and the Roman military commander, such as Titus was when he led the Roman armies against Jerusalem in 70 AD. Along with some other Scriptures, Daniel 9:27 also excludes the origin of the Antichrist in the Middle East, and thus refutes the theory of the Assyrian Antichrist (see also prophecy fulfillment #6 and #8). Immonen’s objection to this was again compelling: ”Where’s the link with Prince Charles?”

Interesting side note: Prince Charles was born 666 years after Edvard I conquered Wales in 1282. Edvard I was the father of Prince Edward II, the first Prince of Wales. Edward II was born in the Caernarfon Castle. There was also held the investiture of Prince Charles as the Prince of Wales in 1969, which is related to prophecy fulfillment #17

Note. For more detailed information on Daniel’s vision of the 70 weeks, see my article here .

Prophecy fulfillment #4

Prophecy: Many Bible verses calls the Antichrist as a ”man” (Dan. 7:8, 2 Thess. 2:3, Rev. 13:18). Fulfillment: Name ”Charles” is derived from an ancient Germanic word for a man.

Immonen’s objection: ”Where is the source? The word ’ruler’ can also be translated as’ Prince ’and’ the man ’in the power, establishment, those in authority, the man.'” The source of the etymological origin of name ”Charles” can be found here: At this point, I do not even understand Immonen’s objection as this prophecy fulfillment related to the expression ”man” used of the Antichrist. When Jesus is called the Son of Man (Dan 7:13, Matt. 24:30, Rev. 1:13), the Antichrist is called a man. For example, I mentioned three Bible passages on the generally recognized Antichrist prophecies. Dan. 7: 8 says: ”I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man [Charles], and a mouth speaking great things.” 2 Tess. 2:3 says, ”Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man [Charles] of sin be revealed, the son of perdition.” Revelation 13:18 says, ”Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man [Charles]; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.”

I admit that an argument of this short on its own would be very weak on behalf of Prince Charles, but my faith is not based on any individual prophecy fulfillment, but a sum of their all. This should be categorized rather to the section of ”interesting coincidences”. In Biblical times, the names that were given to children always had some prophetic meaning. For example, the Hebrew name of Jesus, Yeshua, is a verbal derivative of the word ”to save, to deliver.” In the gospel of Matthew, the angel told Joseph: ”And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS [Yeshua]: for he shall save his people from their sins.” (Matthew 1:21) It must also be mentioned that the Antichrist was unveiled already in the extra-biblical prophecies of the Middle Ages as a Western-European prince whose name would be Charles, but since such prophecies do not come directly from the Bible, I left them out of the prophecies of these 27 prophecy fulfillment. I will return to this issue later. The next prophecy fulfillment is one of the most important biblical criteria for any Antichrist candidate and one of the most important justifications for Prince Charles.

Prophecy fulfillment #5

Prophecy: The name of the Antichrist should count up 666 by using Greek-Hebrew gematria (Rev. 13:18). Fulfillment: Prince Charles’ official title Charles, Prince of Wales, sums up 666 both in English and Hebrew by using the decimal system of Hebrew-Greek gematria (what earliest Church Fathers also used).

Immonen’s objection to this was again completely silly: ”Also Bill Gates, Barack Obama, the current Pope, etc. count up 666”. If the names of dozens of dead and still alive people can be derived the number 666 by using several different calculation methods, does it mean that the correct method of calculation does not exist then? So how can we count the Number of the Beast when the right Antichrist appears? This kind of answer shows the same intellectual laziness as the atheists’ objection that the Bible cannot be inspired by Almighty God when there are so many contradictory interpretations, or that Jesus cannot return to earth as expected for 2000 years since it has been subjected to a number of misguided predictions. Such an answer reminds me of the famous fairy tale of The Boy Who Cried Wolf. It is an instructive story of lying but is also well suited to the eschatological context. People – including the saints of Christ – have heard so often the false alarm about the wolf (ie. Antichrist) so now that they also ignore the right warnings of the real wolf.

But if there is a pseudo-science, then why can not we talk about pseudo-eschatology as well? As if all Bible interpretation would be on the same line and no one could distinguish the wrong interpretations from the right. Most of the examples where the names of different persons are counted 666 are very artificial and non-biblical. Immonen mentions, for example, Barack Obama, Bill Gates and the current Pope. Obama’s full name Barack Hussein Obama does not get on the biblical gematria – number system where every letter of the alphabet corresponds to a particular number – number 666 but 793. That number 666 is calculated by using the difference (subtraction) between Barack Hussein Obama and Obama’s childhood nickname Barry Soetoro (Obama’s Indonesian stepfather surname was Soetero). The numerical value of that last mentioned is 1458, so 1458-793 is not actually 666 but 665. Advocates of this theory may say that if you include number 793, you get 666 between those two numbers.

As for Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft and the richest man in the world, his name has been transformed to 666 by using the ASCII code for ”Bill Gates III”. ASCII code is American Standard Code for Information Interchange which way our computers communicate with each other and internally. But this belongs more to the myths of the Internet era, which have been repeated on several websites over and over again, and no one has been bothered to find out the truth about it. The ASCII code for BILL GATES (in capital letters) generates a numeric value of 663. The Number of the Beast has been obtained by adding III or 3. However, in ASCII code III does not represent 3 but 147 (if the Roman number I corresponds to number 1 in the keyboard) or 219 (if I correspond to the capital letter I in the keyboard). Thus, BILL GATES III has a numeric value of either 810 or 882. Additionally, why does this counting method ignore his full name William Henry ”Bill” Gates III?

I am not even aware of current Pope’s name alleged 666 connection, but I bet that you end up there with just as stupid calculation methods as in the aforementioned examples. I know already that the Vicarius Filii Dei (Representative of the Son of God), a title that was used by Popes for several centuries, forms 666 in Roman numerals. The popes apparently noticed this (when the Protestants brought it out in their anti-Papacy writings) and thought it was a bad PR for their institution when they changed it to Vicarius Christi or substitute of Christ (whom the Pontiffs have called themselves since Innocentius III). This didn’t help much their case as name ”antichrist” in New Testament literally means substitute or surrogate Christ (alongside opposite Christ). The Pope (or rather the Papal institution) is one of the many prophecied antichrists in the Bible, as I have already argued in my book with historical details. The Pope, however, is not the First Beast of the Revelation, whose name count up 666 (the pope is much more likely to fill the place of the Second Beast of Revelation).

Immonen ignores the fact I already emphasized in this prophecy fulfillment; that the title of Prince Charles sums up 666 by using the Greek-Hebrew decimal -system where Revelation 13:18 refers in its original context. At the time of St. John there was no computers or ASCII code. John’s lifetime, the most widely spoken language in the Church was neither Latin but Greek and the roots of the Church were in Judaism. For this reason, Johannes refers to the Greek-Hebrew number system that was most commonly known to Christians of his lifetime, and where the first letter of the alphabet corresponded to number 1, the second letter to number 2, the third letter to number 3, … The 10th letter to number 10, 11th letter to number 20, 12th letter to number 30,… 19th letter to number 100, 20th letter to number 200, 21st letter to number 300, etc. Since there are only 22 letters in Hebrew alphabet, the maximum value was 400.

GematriaChart-Nov01-bwIn this method – applied to the English alphabet – the official title of Prince Charles, Charles, Prince of Wales, calculates the Number of the Beast 666. Letter ”W” is the 23rd letter of the English alphabet, so it is more faithful to the original Hebrew gematria to count its value to zero instead of 500. If its numerical value would be 500, Charles, Prince of Wales would not add up number 666 but instead 1166. Furthermore, Charles’ Hebrew name צרלס, נסיך מוילס – the Greek word for ”name” in Revelation 13:17 is an onoma, which refers equally to the titles of rulers – counts also 666 as the adjacent chart shows, and as the Messianic Jew Monte Judah already noticed at the beginning of the 80s when he visited in Israel and saw how his title was written in Hebrew newspapers. However, to be honest, I have noted that Charles’ title in the Hebrew spelling, for example, in Wikipedia, and many Hebrew websites does not correspond to the way it is written in Tim Cohen’s book The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea. I personally asked this Tim Cohen, who emailed me the following answer:

Shalom Samuel,

Actually, you raise a very good question, and it has surprised me over the years that others have not similarly raised it. This said, it is a question I have addressed in detail in the upcoming second edition of The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea. You may rely upon the spelling that Monte and I have given, as it is actually correct, whereas Wikipedia is not. Beyond this, I also address issues surrounding trying to calculate the name in Greek in the second edition, and why that is highly problematic and impractical, irrespective of spelling in Greek. As for Monte, may God bless him, he probably did not answer because he probably does not know the answer, likely not having looked at the Wikipedia spelling nor considered it. I believe it is true to say that I know a great deal more on many subjects, including that of Prince Charles as the foretold AntiChrist, than Monte, though The LORD did use him to point me in Prince Charles’ direction in 1987, and he is to be credited as the individual, so far as I can tell, who first knew that Prince Charles is the foretold AntiChrist on the basis of hard evidence. Some of my forthcoming books are going to shake the entire world,and all of those books together cover a great deal more than just Prince Charles, as important as he is.

Yours in Messiah Yeshua,

Note: If you copy this Hebrew version of Charles name צרלס, נסיך מוילס and put it to Google Translate, it translates to Charles, Prince of Wales. So I assume that Tim Cohen is right. You can also visit this website: and check out for yourself that it counts up 666 in Hebrew gematria. Other note: One mentioned to me after I published this article in Finnish that 666 (χξϛ) is not original Number of the Beast but instead 616 (χιϛ) as some early manuscripts of Revelation 13 from Third Century has shown (like Papyrus 115). But Irenaeus already knew this χιϛ spelling and argued against it in his book Adversus Haereses (Against Heresies) which was written some 80 years after the Book of Revelation. As this website put it: ”For external testimony to the correctness of the 666 reading, Irenaeus cites both the presence of 666 in the best and most ancient texts available to him and the explicit approval of this reading by ’those men who saw John face to face.’ Therefore, in the face of appeals Irenaeus regards the reading 666 as sufficiently well established and sufficiently significant to result in deleterious consequences for those who opt for the alternative 616; Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 5.30.2)”.

Prophecy fulfillment #6

Prophecy: Dan. 9:27, Dan. 7:8 and Rev. 17:9-13 accociates the Antichrist with the Roman Emperors. Fulfillment: As a descendant of Charles the Great, Prince Charles has the legal right to the crown of the Holy Roman Emperors.

Immonen’s objection: ”The prince has a legal right to the crown of the Holy Roman Emperors. Where you find this from the Bible?” Maybe Immonen would not be so puzzled if he had really read my book. My book title is Muhammad, Charles the Great and the Antichrist because the guiding principle of its content was that Antichrist should be both the direct offspring of Muhammad and Charles the Great and the heir of their power. My book thus combines the idea of Islamic and European Antichrist. It was difficult to maintain this lead story throughout the writing process when its content became fragmented into so many different topics, but this is the central message that connects my book from its first chapter to the last. This was also a key idea in Chapters 10-11 where I reconciled the prophetic interpretation of the historicistic and futuristic traditions.

Early Reformers, who represented the tradition of historicism, taught that antichrist is manifested in both the Roman Pope and the Islamic caliphate of Turkish Ottoman Empire. Some modern prophecy teachers, such as Roman Catholic Walid Shoebat, put these two against each other and see antichrist being represented only in Islam. He also teaches the theory of the Assyrian Antichrist, which has gained an increasing foothold among many modern prophecy teachers who represent the tradition of futurism and dispensationalism. According to my own book, a question is not whether one or the other is the right interpretation, since both schools are on the right track, but they both miss the big picture. The most important clue for this prophetic puzzle is finally found when we reconcile the eschatological traditions of historicism and futurism, as I have demonstrated in Chapters 10 and 11 (which is divided into sections A, B, and C).

In the Middle Ages, the office of Roman Emperors continued in the Holy Roman Empire with the political support of Roman Papacy. From Charles the Great to Charles V each of the rulers of the Holy Roman Empire was crowned by the popes with the title of ancient Roman Emperors. From time to time, the power of the Pope was greater than the Emperor, and sometimes they were also at war with each other. But together, they formed the most important power system in the Middle Ages. With Reformation, the power of the Holy Roman Empire began to crumble and broke up in the early 19th Century when Napoleon I gave the ultimate kiss of death to its millennial rule.

Immonen asks where the Bible says that the Antichrist is the Emperor of Rome. I mentioned those Scriptures already in this prophecy fulfillment, but he did not even bother to find out about them. Daniel 9:27 as mentioned earlier is one of these. This verse connects the Antichrist to Titus, who was later also Roman Emperor. Daniel 7: 8 also connects him with the Roman Empire, where the prophecy associates him with the Little Horn that would rise after ten kings of the Fourth Beast (i.e. Roman Empire). Rev. 17:9 attach his kingdom and his throne with ”Seven Hills of the Rome”, as this prophecy has been understood since the early Church Fathers. Then there is also the prophecy of Daniel 7 and the Little Horn which refers to in its first fulfillment phase to the rise of Papal Power in 8th Century AD (as I already have reasoned in my book and here).

Papacy (Daniel’s Little Horn) rose after those ten kings of Rome which were foretold in Daniel 7 (and predicted by most early Church Fathers) in its first fulfillment phase. Some modern dispensationalists and futurists have said that there were never those ten kings in Roman history but this is simply false as this chart shows (Rome in 476 after the collapse of Western Roman Empire).
It was at this time when Charles the Great, also known as ”Father of Europe”, was crowned the Emperor of Rome by Pope Leo III. Since Little Horn of Daniel 7 is a prophecy of the Antichrist, therefore its first fulfillment in the papacy would make it (and with it also the rulers of the Holy Roman Empire like Charles the Great) to the paragon and archetype of the final Antichrist person. Prince Charles is a direct descendant of Charles the Great and thus legitimate heir to his Crown. It was also foretold in many prophecies of the Middle Ages in the writings of Roman Catholic mystics that the Antichrist would be a Western European prince who will descend directly from the bloodline of Charles the Great and whose name would be Charles. Following is from website (emphasis mine)

These writers have included Caesar of Arles (469-543), and the Blessed Rabanus Maurus(d.856) is quoted as ’Our principal doctors agree in announcing to us that towards the end of time one of the descendants of the Kings of France shall reign over all the Roman Empire; and that he shall be the greatest of the French Monarchs and the last of his race’. These eminent doctors understand him to lay down his crown and sceptre in Jerusalem also when this will signify the end of the Roman and Christian Empires. This is repeated by Monk Adso (d.992), who states that ’This will be the end and consummation of the Empire of Rome and immediately afterwards Antichrist will come’. The Chronicle of Magdeburg (12th century?) is quoted ’Of the blood of the Emperor Charles the Great and the King of France shall arise as Emperor named Charles who shall rule imperially in Europe, by whom the decayed estate of the Church shall be reformed and the ancient glory of the Empire again restored.’ Aystinger – the German (also in the 12th century) places this prince in the last times, who is sprung from the Emperor Charles. He is to recover the land of promise, i.e. the promised land Jerusalem, and reform the church as Emperor of Europe.

It is not at all surprising that Prince Charles descends from Charles the Great of the Frankish Carolingian dynasty. All the royals in Europe do. I’m amused when those who are interested in their family background are so excited when they find that there is some royal blood in their genealogy. According to genealogists, almost every person in the earth descends from the Royals. It is thought that every European would be in one way or another related to Charles the Great or his direct offspring. I would not be so proud of if one of my grandfathers belonged to British Royal Family, who used to punish their foes by cutting off their genitals and removing their viscera one by one in front of the condemned own eyes. I am rather the offspring of poor peasants than ruthless tyrants. However, what distinguishes Prince Charles from the peasantry is that he has a verified consanguinity with Charles the Great because the family trees of royal families of Europe are carefully recorded and goes back to royal families of the ancient world.

Basic RGB
The book of internationally recognized scholars Tom Horn and Cris Putnam, which associates the medieval prophecies of the Final Roman Emperor with the biblical Antichrist. Horn and Putnam, however, can not associate these prophecies with Prince Charles even though in them it is specifically mentioned that the Final Roman Emperor would be a prince whose name is Charles and who is offspring Charles the Great.
Secondly, these prophecies say that the Antichrist would also have the forename of his forefather Charles the Great and that he would be the prince who rises to the Emperor of revived Roman Empire. According to these prophecies, this prince would inherit the whole splendor of the former Roman Empire. Christian scholars Thomas Horn and Cris Putnam addressed in more details these medieval prophecies related to the Last Roman Emperor in their book The Final Roman Emperor and Vatican’s Last Crusade. I wrote them in August 2016 almost 30 pages letter, but because they did not respond to it, I decided to publish it on my tab in English. Tim Cohen, however, answered my letter and promised to advertise it to others. In this article, I note one of the things that Horn and Putnam had mentioned in their own book on page 260. They mentioned the prophecy of Bartholomew Holzhauser, who lived in the 17th Century, according to which the Last Roman Emperor would be ”a descendant of Louis IX [of France] yet a descendant also of an old German imperial family, born in exile. He will rule supreme in temporal matters.” ” I mentioned to them the fact that Prince Charles is also the direct descendant of Louis IX and his family belong to the old German Royal Family of Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha. Are you starting to be already convinced that Prince Charles is the Biblical Antichrist? Hopefully, you do not. This was just the beginning. There is still 21 other prophecy fulfillment in front.

Prophecy fulfillment #7

Prophecy: Dan. 8:8-9 – in its first and second fulfillment – link the Antichrist with the King of Greece, heir to the Alexander the Great and Emperor Heraclius of Eastern Roman Empire (in fact medieval Grecian Empire which was foreseen in Daniel 7, 8 and 11). In its first phase the vision about the Little Horn of Daniel 8 fulfilled in Antiochos Epiphanes of Seleucide Empire and in its second phase the Little Horn of Daniel 8 fulfilled in Turkish Ottoman Empire, successor state of the Byzantine Empire. So the final Antichrist (the Little Horn of Daniel 8) is connected those both modern Greece and modern Islamic world. Fulfillment: Prince Charles descends from his father’s side of the Royal House of the modern Greece. He descends also from ”Prophet” Muhammad and is well-known pro-arabist and the defender of Islam (possibly a Christian apostate who may have turned to Sufism, Islamic mysticism, whose conversion some Islamic eschatologists has already seen the decisive sign of the closeness of Mahdi’s appearance).

Note: Much of my prophecy interpretations like this are already reasoned and justified with very systematic and thorough historical demonstration and Scriptural validation in my 700 pages book. In many cases, I have used several hundred pages of my book to justify prophecy interpretations like this one. Without more detailed understanding into this, these prophecy fulfillments may not say much to my English readers or those Finnish readers who have not read my book. Unfortunately, my e-book is only available in the Finnish language. Finnish readers of my book have already endorsed my ideas saying that reasoning behind my prophecy interpretation was coherent and convincing, and they also thought it was the most interesting part of my book. See prophecy fulfillment #25.

Re-reading of those Immonen’s so-called ”objections” is the most entertaining part of this writing. His answers to me are mainly comedic entertainment, as he is completely unaware how deep my research really is. At this point, it was, ”Where in the Bible we found that Prince Charles is the believer in Islam and the precursor of their Mahdi?” Here Immonen also misunderstood what I wrote. I did not say that the Antichrist should be the precursor for Mahdi (a Messiah of Islamic eschatology). I said that some teachers of Islamic Sufism have taught how Prince Charles is the harbinger of Mahdi’s coming reign (see, for example, this). I went through my book to document Prince Charles’s decades-old love affair with Islam and the Arab world. This love is not only one-sided but also resonates in the Muslim world where Prince Charles has been reported to be the most admired person in the West. Some Islamic scholars, like Sheikh Nazim Al-Haqqani, have been so excited about Charles’s Islamic devotion and the alleged conversion to Islam that they have said he is a man who would gain a place of honor in Mahdi’s worldwide administration (here you can see how his disciple Hisham Kabbani bows before Prince Charles).

Immonen asks where the Bible predicts the Antichrist to be Islamic. I do not know whether he is aware of the eschatological school that teaches him to be an Islamic Shiite or a Sunni Muslim and the Incarnation of their expected Mahdi. Whole books have been written for this theory, so maybe he should first order a few books related to this and return to the same question after reading them. I already addressed this theory in my book, what Immonen would know if he just would have read my book. In fact, I did not say in my book that the Antichrist should be a Muslim, whether Shi’a, Sunni or Sufi, a radical Salafist or a moderate. On the contrary, I have argued, for example, from 1 John 2:19, that Antichrist should come from ”us”, that is, a Christian Church. Prince Charles is still a member of Anglican Church and comes to its head after he takes the throne. In my book, in Chapter 4, I explicitly rejected this theory of fanatical Muslim Antichrist. I also rejected, in Chapter 3, the idea of his Middle Eastern origin (and argued this with deep Scriptural illustration).

In fact, the Book of Daniel in Chapter 8 and 11 connect the national origin of the Antichrist not to Syria, but to Greece and thus the Western civilization which is heir to ancient Greece (Dan. 8:9 also says that his power will ”exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land”, i.e. the Land of Israel, meaning that his nation of origin is in Europe where the Land of Israel is ”toward the south, and toward the east”, i.e. toward southeast). In its first fulfillment, this vision of the Little Horn of Daniel, fulfilled, of course, in Antiochus Epiphanes, as most of the prophecy scholars know this. Antiochus Epiphanes was also a Greek origin and not the Middle-Eastern origin, as verses 9 and 22 predicted. But there is also second and third historic fulfillment for this vision, as I have demonstrated in my book in details. In its second phase, this vision refers to medieval Greece (i.e. Byzantine Empire) and Sasanian Persian Empire. A notable horn between goat’s eyes refers to Emperor Heraclius, whose reign (610 – 641) preceded the rise of Islam, which was also foretold in Daniel 8 and 11 (in their second fulfillment phase).

Antiochus Epiphanes, the first paragon for the final Antichrist, rose from the ancient Greece heir to Alexander the Great as Daniel 8:9 predicted. Prince Charles’ national origins are not only in Western Civilization, which is heir to ancient Greece, but he is also heir to the throne of modern Greece through his father Philip, former Greek prince.
Vision predicts also rise of the Ottoman Empire, which rose within Byzantine Empire and came eventually to its Islamic successor state. Ottoman Empire was the Little Horn of vision’s second fulfillment phase as a Papacy in Western Europe was the Little Horn of Daniel 7 in its first fulfillment phase. Those both were successors to the Eastern and Western Rome of Antiquity. This was basically a classical eschatological view of early Reformers from 14th Century to 19th Century. I have illustrated its historical and Scriptural validity in my book’s Chapters 10 and 11. I demonstrated this also in my three-part prophecy teaching series (see link on below). The fulfillment of the prophecy is not only in Charles’s unusual devotion for Islam and in the fact that he descends directly from Muhammad – as the Muslim scholars say about Mahdi – but also in that that he is a legitimate heir to the Greek throne because his father Philip was in his youth the Greek Prince. Both Prince Philip and Prince Charles have maintained close contact with Greece until today, and they are regular guests on the Mount Athos.

Read more: How the 2500-year history of Persia, Greece, and Israel has been foretold in Chapter 11 of Book of Daniel? Part 2: Antiquity/Middle Ages (164 BC – 1517 AD)

Prophecy interpretation #8

Prophecy: The Antichrist is also associated with the Syria/Babylon (Isaiah 14:4-25). Fulfillment: England represents end-time parallel for ancient Babylon (Dan. 7:4); The king of Babylon in Isa. 14:4-25 therefore means the king of UK. Some believe that the Anglo-American world power (end-time Babylon) moves its economic and political hegemony to Iraq as a fulfillment of Zech. 5:11. See prophecy fulfillment #7

Immonen’s objection: ”It may be true if you forget New York as the end-time Babylon and economic hegemony is transferred to the ruins.” This is a little strange objection, but basically, Immonen says that I am right if the end-time Babylon is not New York as many believe. I am a little reluctant to believe here mentioned prophetic theory what many Christians support; that the Anglo-American world power would shift the global economic power concentration to the Middle East according to (interpretation of) Zech. 5:11. However, if Islam plays a significant role in Antichrist’s future reign, – as prophecy fulfillment #7 indicates – such a scenario is not completely excluded. Many prophecies in the Bible – most notably Isa. 14:13 – attach the Antichrist to the King Babylon (some passages also refer to him as ”Assyrian”).

In a literal sense, these passages can also be also understood in such a way that the Antichrist moves his government and royal palace eventually to the Middle East. Some Bible verses indicate already in this direction (see, for example, Dan. 11:45 and Revelation 12:18). However, according to an alternative interpretation, this can also be understood in the sense that ”Babylon” in Isa. 14.13, etc., does not refer to ancient Babylon of modern Iraq, but instead the Mystery Babylon of Revelation 17-18. According to those Chapters Babylon has been called as the center of global economy and as a city ”which reigneth over the kings of the earth.” This can hardly be said of ancient Babylon – which is still on its ruins – or any Middle Eastern city (except perhaps of Dubai). Many think incorrectly that New York City would be best suited to the role of economic Babylon of Revelation 18. But in the Book of Daniel Babylon is represented in the lion with wings of an eagle. As I have illustrated in my book, this prophecy refers to Anglo-American world power in the third fulfillment of this vision. The lion represents the lion of England and eagle the eagle of USA (see How the 2500-year history of Persia, Greece, and Israel has been foretold in Chapter 11 of Book of Daniel? Part 3: Modern Age/Tribulation (1517 – 2023?)).

It was only Jewish Prime Minister of British history, Benjamin Disraeli, who said, ”London is a modern Babylon.” This could hardly have been said of London of 19th Century, but the present London meets all biblical criteria for Babylon of Revelation 17-18 (economic Babylon, not necessarily the religious Babylon, which refers to Rome and the Roman apostate Church). London, what has been called ”a world capital of 21st Century”, has overtaken New York as a global trading center. The mayor of London has said: ”We are the center of international economy and trade, the world’s largest global economic center without any doubt” (The New York Times, October 26, 2006). This has not changed in post-Brexit Britain (Bloomberg: London Retains Its Crown as World’s Top Financial Center). I wrote more of those several reasons why I believe that the London – not New York City – is economic Babylon of Revelation 17-18 in the article ”Great Baby(Lon-don) – Unveiling the mystery of Great Harlot of Revelation 18. So if London is the end-time Babylon, the ”king of Babylon” in Isaiah 14:13 refers to the future king of England or Prince Charles.

Read more: The Antichrist-heresies, Part 1: The Syrian Antichrist.

Prophecy fulfillment #9

Prophecy: The Antichrist must ”fulfill” the expectations of Jews for their awaited Messiah (John 5:43, Luke 21: 8, 1 John 2:18). Fulfillment: Just like Jesus, Charles, who as a child was circumcised by the Jewish rabbi, can trace his lineage back to King David of Israel as a ”fulfillment” Jes. 11:1.

And Immonen answers … ”Does this man of the Lord fulfill a role of the Antichrist?” At this point, my thoughts are no longer printable, but I try to maintain an academic self-control. I am jealous of those internet trolls whose freedom of expression is not limited by linguistic eloquence. I mean there was a few swearwords in my mind. As an anonymous writer, it would be easier to be more plain-spoken. I start to suspect that maybe Immonen himself was such a troll who intentionally annoyed and provoked me with these extremely stupid counter-arguments. Maybe by answering him, I made the mistake of what I should not have. Namely, a commonly known rule that you should not feed the trolls. Well, at least I got the subject for a new article. Either Immonen does not understand the purpose of the use of quotation marks or then he tried to irritate me quite intentionally. I did not say, that Prince Charles was the fulfillment of the Bible’s promised Messiah. I said that he would be a fulfillment of Israel’s False-Messiah.

A genealogy of Elizabeth II that show her all royal ancestors up to King David.
I have referred in my book to the many prophecies in the Scriptures that require the Antichrist to have such a position. As a False-Messiah of Israel, of course, he must also ”fulfill” the biblical criteria that the Jews would expect from their awaited Messiah. The most prominent criteria for any Messiah candidate would be his certified lineage from the Royal House of King David. For this reason, the gospel of Matthew begins with a description of the genealogy of Jesus, which shows that He was from the House of King David, as Isaiah 11:1 and others predicted. The British-Israeli movement promoted during the 20th Century a genealogy chart that shows all the descendants of King David up to Queen Elizabeth II. A question is not about how authentic or accurate this genealogy is.

The point is that such a genealogy exists and thus Prince Charles is able to prove to the Jews that he is entitled to the throne of Israel’s upcoming Messiah. Sandy Rashty published a very prophetic news in The Jewish Chronicle, in February 2015 under the title: ”Why I’m sure that Charles will be a King for the Jews?” For more biblical arguments that the Antichrist should be either a Jew or meet the Scripture’s criteria of Israel’s False-Messiah, you can read my article The Antichrist-heresies, Part 2: The Jewish Antichrist.

Prophecy fulfillment #10

Prophecy: Alongside the Jews, the Antichrist must fulfill the Messianic expectations of all false religions (Rev. 13:8). Fulfillment: Prince Charles descends from Muhammad’s lineage as prerequisite for Islamic Mahdi and is a prominent Western leader who defends all world religions, including Tibetan Buddhist community against the Chinese occupation (the Messiah of Buddhist eschatology is often interpreted as the Western leader). He is also perfectly suitable for the character of the ”New Age Messiah” Maitreya, in terms of his history, residence, worldview and mission.

Immonen’s objection: ”Where in the Bible? And how related with Mahdi?” I specified expressly those biblical passages to which these prophecy fulfillments are related to, and still, Immonen asks ”Where in the Bible?” A hint: See abbreviation in parentheses after the first sentence. Immonen focuses on extraneous details, such as ”Where does the Bible predict that Antichrist is the offspring of Muhammad?” I did not even claim anything like this in this prophecy fulfillment. I paid my attention only to one scripture that predicts on the Antichrist: ”And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” From here I draw the conclusion that the Antichrist should fulfill the Messianic expectations of all the world’s main religions. All world religions are currently waiting for such a global savior who would fulfill the prophecies of their religions at the end of the present world era. For Christians, it is Jesus Christ, to the Jews, it is the Messiah of Israel, for Muslims, it is Mahdi, and the Buddhists/New Agers are waiting for their Maitreya.

The fulfillment of the prophecy in Prince Charles is that he has the potential to fulfill the Messianic expectations of all the world’s main false religions. In the previous prophecy fulfillment, I mentioned his alleged kinship with Israel’s King David as a necessary precondition for the Jewish Messiah. In addition to this, he is also a direct descended from Muhammad, through his daughter Fatima, as the Muslim teachers say about the Mahdi. He has called himself a ”defender of faith” (not defender of the faith like his predecessors are known) because he wants to be seen as a hero and champion for all world religions against secularism and atheism. He is known, especially as an advocate of Islam, but in fact, he has been a fierce defender of all faiths. He does not make difference between the dogmatic disagreements of different world religions. He does not care if the Eastern religions believe in polytheism and the religions of the West in monotheism. He does not care that Christianity teaches that Jesus was the Son of God born of a virgin, who bore the sins of mankind on the Cross of Calvary, while Islam teaches that He was just a man who never died on the Cross (Surah 4:157, 171).

He is a friend of Dalai Lama, aka. Tenzin Gyatso, current spiritual leader of Tibet who lives in exile. The West has cultivated the romanticized image of Dalai Lama’s Tibetan paradise, the ”land of milk and honey” or mythical place of ”Shangri-Lan” where humans lived in harmony with nature until the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1959. In fact, Tibetan ”paradise” was a hell on the earth, the feudal theocracy of hierarchical priest-class where everyday life was a very harsh and cruel for serfs or for those who were not part of privileged priest-class. Nazis, by the way, admired this medieval Tibetan feudal society and made some early documentaries of its cruel life for Tibetan serfs (read this) The current Dalai Lama, 82-years old Tenzin Gyatso, had many Nazi friends in his youth and had also a friendship with such Buddhist terrorists as Shōkō Asahara. Recently, he has been connected to New Age sex cults like NXIVM, which recruited Hollywood Actors in their sex cult where women were branded with the initials of its leader Keith Raniere. Raniere was arrested on the basis of accusations that he raped as young girls as 12 and forced his followers to his slaves.

Prince Charles has a well-reported relationship with the New Age movement, to which he converted in the late 1970s under the direction of his spiritual mentor Laurens Van Der Post. Prince Charles is also well suitable to the role of Maitreya, a Messiah of Buddhists and New Age movement, whose coming Scottish New Age guru, Benjamin Creme, has preached since 1982. He is known as ”John the Baptist” of coming New Age Messiah who, according to Creme, lives in London and will soon appear as a world teacher for all world religions with miracles and signs (2 Thessalonians 2:9).

Prophecy fulfillment #11

Prophecy: The Antichrist deceives the Jews, who are returned to their fathers land and established the state of Israel, into deceitful ”peace treaty” with their Islamic Arab neighbors who seek their destruction (Dan. 9:27). Fulfillment: Prince Charles had a significant role in the implementation of the Oslo ”Peace” Accord (in 1993 and 1995), which is why the British Foreign Office has used him as a Middle East peace envoy. It has been also said that he will not visit the Israeli soil until a peace agreement has been reached between Israelis and Palestinians.

Immonen’s objection: ”Where is the source that Prince Charles was neither part or parcel in Oslo’s peace process?” Once again, Mr. Immonen: sources and details for each of the 27 prophecy fulfillment are already in my book. If you had just bothered to read it, you would not have to ask such stupid questions. The source for this claim that Prince Charles played a prominent role in the Oslo ”Peace” Accord is mainly from Tim Cohen’s book, The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea (Chapter 12). Your sentence, by the way, should also go ”Where is the source [for the claim] that Prince Charles was part and parcel in Oslo’s peace process?” I already went through many other sources in my book, for example in Israeli Haaretz newspaper, about how Prince Charles is planning a first public visit to Israel but expects a peace agreement between Israel and Palestine to be implemented first to avoid ”controversy”. His son, Prince William, will become the first member of the royal family who visits in Israel and Palestine this summer, as I wrote already here. Daniel 9:27 predicts that the Antichrist would make a fraudulent seven-year peace treaty in the Middle East, between Israel and her Arab neighbors. In the midst of that treaty, he will visit in Jerusalem at the reconstructed Jewish temple and places on the holy of holies the ”abomination of desolation”. According to that verse 27, the Antichrist should be a ”Prince of Romans”, what title Prince of Wales means as we already have seen in prophecy fulfillment #3.

Prophecy fulfillment #12

Prophecy: The deceptive nature of Antichrist is revealed to the Jews in the midst of the 70th week when he will arrive in Jerusalem to abolish sacrifice and the oblation on the third temple and instigate the satanic persecution of the Jews for three and a half years (Dan. 8:11, 9:27, 11:31, 2 Matt. 24:15, Luke 21:20, 2 Thessalonians 2:4, Rev 11:2, 12:14). Fulfillment: Prince Charles descends from a family with strong ties to the Third Reich. In his private discussions, he has shown disdain for the Jewish state of Israel and secretly supported the openly antisemitic Hamas.

Immonen’s objection: ”Source criticism?” Now that you criticized my source criticism, why you do not just go through all about two thousand source references in my book (if there are three footnotes on average on one page, then there are 2100 on 700 pages) or even tenths of them. I admit that most of the footnotes come from very popular sources, such as Wikipedia, but I already added a footnote on the introduction that refers to the Nature magazine’s investigation which concluded that Wikipedia is as reliable as Encyclopaedia Britannica, as far as its scientific articles are concerned. I am very suspicious of Wikipedia’s nature when it comes to its articles on religion and politics (topics that are inclined to biased prejudices of its editors). But most of my Wikipedia sources concerns university-level history research. However, I made the mistake by linking directly to Wikipedia’s articles and not to its sources itself. This is problematic because Wikipedia content change over time, which means that citations are not necessarily exactly the same today as they were at the time of my writing.

Queen’s uncle, Duke of Windsor, aka. Edvart VIII and previous Prince of Wales met Hitler in 1937. He was a most notorious Nazi sympathizer in the House of Windsor. But also Queen’s parents were proponents of Chamberlain’s Nazi appeasement policy and fervent supporters of the antisemitic White Paper of 1938 which was aimed against Zionism and the Balfour declaration, during those fateful moments in Jewish history when they had no other safe haven from Nazi genocide than the Eretz Israel, the Land of Israel.
I do not really know how to answer to Immonen’s ”objection”. The answer is the same as before: Sources and precise details are already in my book. In Chapter 9, I discussed in details on the historical Nazi connections of the Royal House of Windsor (in fact Germanic House of Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha) as this is already documented in many academic books published by the prestigious University of Oxford, and also acknowledged by Prince Philip himself, Duke of Edinburgh. I have written on this in my many previous blog posts (see, for example, Elizabeth the Second grew in fanatical Nazi family! The mainstream media is now finally begun to reveal the dark side of the British royal family). A letter from Prince Charles from 1986 has also recently been published, which clearly show his contempt for Jews and the Jewish state of Israel. According to some earlier reports in the Guardian, US support for Israel was the main reason why he was so reluctant to visit the United States. The biblical passages that the Antichrist starts to persecute the Jews after halfway of the Tribulation period, I already mentioned in this prophecy fulfillment.

Prophecy fulfillment #13

Prophecy: The Antichrist receives global authority from all nations, peoples and tribes of the world (Rev. 13:7). Fulfillment: Prince Charles comes from a family that has been at the top of luciferian freemasonry for more than two centuries and has led an plan of Bavarian Illuminati to build one world government, world economy and world religion under the British Crown. Prince Charles has been personally at the forefront of such effort and campaigned for a one world government and urged the all nations, peoples and tribes to join the global revolution to create a new global world order.

Immonen’s objection: ”I compare to my previous comment” (Deep Sigh). I understand if someone doubts the source criticism for such a conspiratorial claim, since the many conspiracy theories about Illuminati, Freemasonry, etc., may come from very questionable source literature. But the fact that the British royal family has been at the top of British Freemasonry for over two centuries is not a conspiracy theory. This is acknowledged on the website of the United Grand Lodge of England (the oldest lodge of worldwide Freemasonry) and just last year it boasted on this royal connection in the 300th anniversary of its founding, which was attended by their Grand Master, Edward, Duke of Kent, the cousin of the Queen. The British royal family has also proven links to the Bavarian Illuminati, a seditious secret society founded in 1776, which infiltrated European Freemasonry at the end of the 18th Century and sought a global revolution to overthrow all nation-states of Europe and their Judeo-Christian values to form the new world order based on Luciferian doctrines of the secret societies (according to organization’s own writings that went public in the 1780s and was a subject of many books at that time).

This London-based conspiracy of the British roundtable societies and Anglophile elite families is also revealed in such books as gigantic 1348-pages chronicle Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (1966), written by Georgetown professor Carroll Quigley, a mentor of Bill Clinton. The claim that ”Prince Charles has been personally at the forefront of such effort and campaigned for a one world government and urged the all nations, peoples, and tribes to join the global revolution to create a new global world order”, comes not only from such books as The Sustainable Prince by Joan Veon, but also from Prince Charles’ own book Harmony (Blue Door, 2010), which declares in its opening statement: ”This is a call to revolution. The earth is under threat. It cannot cope with all that demand of it. It is losing its balance and we humans are causing this to happen. ’Revolution’ is a strong word and I use it deliberately.” Here, Prince Charles calls for global revolution to overcome the environmental problems of our planet. Mr. Immonen, I’m afraid you again jump to conclusions without reading my book first.

Prophecy fulfillment #14

Prophecy: The most significant change in the new world order of the Beast will be the creation of a global economic system in which no one can buy or sell without the mark of the beast in/on the right hand or the forehead (Rev 13:16 – 18). Fulfillment: Prince Charles has called for a reform of the global capitalist economic system. He was also the first person to show public support for the human RFID (Radio-frequency identification) technology by microchipping his sons William and Harry in 1995, and has collaborated with Walmart, world’s largest retailer, to extend RFID technology to all areas of global trading.

Immonen’s objection: ”Prince Charles has called for a reform of the global capitalist economic system. Not true. He has taken a position mainly on climate change: ’Prince Charles: rewire the global economy to stop climate change’ ”. Again wrong. He has taken a stand on the climate change he sees to be mainly caused by the global capitalist economy. That is why he has called for a renewal of the global economic system. In November 2010 NBC’s Brian Williams said after interviewing Prince Charles: ”In case you missed it, Prince Charles wants nothing less than the re-make of world’s economy.” In 2011, he mocked in Brussels those who believe that he and other climate alarmists are part of a malicious conspiracy to destroy a capitalist world system. In 2014, he delivered a speech where he called for a complete renovation of the capitalist economy to save the planet from the environmental damage. I really wonder that Immonen does not get straight any of my arguments. In addition, he quotes a news article, which in itself proves his argument wrong.

Immonen neither take a stand on the remainder of this prophecy fulfillment where I addressed the issue of Prince Charles being the first public person who promoted a human RFID technology by microchipping his sons William and Harry in 1995. Christian prophecy teachers
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »


Prince Charles delivered a stunning speech to the Center for Islamic Studies at Oxford in June of 2010 wherein he called for a western pantheistic religious synthesis with Islam to help save the world from the impending environmental catastrophe looming on the apocalyptic horizon. Shockingly, Prince Charles strongly believes that Islam can play a critical role in bringing back ancient religious traditions that will promote a much needed check on western man’s unbridled enthusiasm for capitalism, power and money where science has been inappropriately exploited by commerce since the Industrial Revolution. Prince Charles presumes that such a course of action will return the western world back to a more reverent attitude toward Nature. Tracing the wedding between science and capitalism to Galileo and his mechanistic view of the natural world, Prince Charles asserted that such views has brought modern civilization to the precipice of an environmental apocalypse, especially as the Third World tries to catch up. Mother Nature has become objectified as an “it,” and hence exploited as such. He then concluded his speech by quoting an old saying from Islamic nomads, “the best of all Mosques is Nature herself.”

Prince Charles Muslim

Although Prince Charles did briefly cite from the book of Genesis in the middle of his speech and appealed to Christian apologists G.K. Chesterton and C.S. Lewis toward the end, his lecture was far from a Christian one. Not only did he mix up pantheism with classic Judeo-Christian theism, but also with Islamic monotheism as well. As the future heir of the Head of the Church of England, this may not bode well for the future of Anglicanism. Furthermore, his blending of pantheism with theism is much more an issue of his own wishful thinking than it is something that can be theologically defended with intellectual integrity.

Pantheism is the belief that God is everything. The Greek word ‘pan’ means ‘every’ and ‘theism’ means belief in ‘God.’ Built on pagan foundations, pantheism stands in sharp contrast to Judeo-Christian theism precisely because the Bible unabashedly asserts that God is the transcendent Creator of the universe. This means that God stands outside the universe. He is thus completely independent of His creation, all of which is perfectly illustrated in Genesis 1 where He speaks the entire universe into existence through His all-powerful Word. God’s existence is thus not contingent upon the universe, but rather the universe is contingent upon Him. While it is true that since the God of the Bible also declares Himself to be omnipresent, or everywhere at once, this suggests that He also lives immanently within the world. However, this is not be confused with pantheism where God is not only reduced to the level of Nature, but in fact is a part of Nature. In pantheism, God is the universe, or Nature Herself. In other words, pantheism is a form of Nature worship where Nature is worshiped as god, usually in the name of Mother Earth or “Gaia.”

As such, Prince Charles’s reference to Genesis was thus extremely brief, reducing Adam and Even to mere environmental conservationists whose primary job was to protect the garden of Eden for future generations. Only a modern environmentalist could possibly understand the opening chapters of Genesis in this way. He conveniently ignored the most salient point in Genesis about man, i.e., that although Adam is formed from the soil of the earth, he was also made in the image of God (Gen 1:26-28). This marks off Adam from the rest of creation (Gen 1-2; Psalm 8). Genesis clearly teaches that this makes Adam and Eve the king and queen of the earth (Gen 1:26-31), something which modern environmentalists have been bristling at for some 200 years now. To add insult to injury, God then commands Adam and Eve to be fruitful and multiply and subdue the earth (Gen 1:28). Such commands are an absolute anathema to the modern green movement as it constantly obsesses over human population growth and sustainable development, always trying to force people to reduce their human footprint. What’s more is that this Genesis mandate has never been rescinded.

Neither is it a coincidence that original scientists like Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton were all Christian theists. Contrary to popular opinion these days, their brand of science was a continuation of the Genesis mandate, something which Francis Bacon certainly recognized when he coined the phrase, “knowledge is power.” By this, he specifically meant power over nature, something which Prince Charles criticizes throughout his lecture. It must also be remembered that Copernicus, Kepler and Galileo challenged the semi-pantheistic Aristotelian view of the universe, not the biblical one, something which is almost always completely misunderstood and misrepresented with regard to the Copernican revolution. The Catholic scholastics of the Middle Ages gave too much deference to Aristotle, which has unfairly given Christianity a bad reputation in the scientific community. Strangely, it is this pantheistic Greek ‘science’ that Prince Charles wishes to return to when he criticizes modern science for being too mechanistic and too beholden to capitalistic consumerism. What he also completely fails to realize is that science in the hands of progressive socialistic engineers with a government whip has been far more brutal to people than anything free market capitalism has ever tried.

The Genesis mandate was designed by God for Adam and Eve to convert the wilderness into a garden through work, marriage and procreation (Gen 1-2). The garden of Eden was in fact their model or pattern to follow. In Genesis 2, God planted a garden right in front of Adam’s eyes to show him the difference between the wilderness and the garden. The wilderness has thus never been the divine ideal in the Bible, even as far back as Genesis 1. Even ancient Israel after the Exodus from the house of slavery in Egypt continued the Genesis mandate. The Conquest of Joshua was specifically intended to turn the promised land of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob into beautiful privately owned farms parceled out to each Hebrew family for the glory of God. This was something that the ‘green’ nature worshipers of Canaan were not doing. In fact, after the Conquest, Israel often found themselves completely seduced by the Canaanite Baal nature worship practices that surrounded them on all sides. The Old Testament time and time again declares that the reason why the divided kingdom of Israel was subjected to its respective captivities into both Assyria (722 BC) and Babylon (606-586 BC) was precisely because of their Baal nature worship (2 Kings 14:28-17:18; Hosea; Jeremiah 19:1-15).

As such, even more troublesome for Prince Charles is that after Adam and Eve fell into sin, the distance between the environmental and Judeo-Christian worldviews sharpens even more. Adam and Eve were subsequently banished from the garden paradise that God created for them (Gen 3:24). Harmony between man and nature is henceforth forbidden – and this by the edict of God. In fact, the Lord purposefully frustrated nature to frustrate and discipline man in his sin (Gen 3:17-19; Rom 8:20-22). Still more troublesome is that the Lord then shockingly introduced animal sacrifice to cover their shameful nakedness in sin (Gen 3:21; 4:4; Lev 1:1-5). Ritual animal sacrifice was thus inaugurated to teach Adam and Eve about the serious consequences of sin, i.e., death. Redemption must therefore be accomplished through a sacrificial substitute to die in the place of the sinful worshiper, all looking forward to the ultimate sacrifice of the Messiah on the cross (John 1:29; 10:1-17). In other words, in the brave new world of sin, nature is sacrificed for man, not man for nature. This hard lesson was quickly rejected by Cain (Gen 4:1-16). His ‘green’ gifts were outright rejected by God, but Abel’s sacrificial lamb was accepted. At this, Cain becomes extremely angry and kills his brother. Thus environmentalism was at the heart of the first murder in human history. Cain did not appreciate the fact that the ground from which he offered his green offering to God was in fact cursed.

As a deep ecologist, it is not likely that Prince Charles is unaware of this biblical albatross. He thus had to go elsewhere to find a spirituality that is more compatible with environmentalism. At this particular juncture, Prince Charles goes to the Muslims rather than to Brahmanism, Hinduism, Buddhism and the like. He points out that the Koran repeatedly “describes the natural world as the handiwork of a unitary benevolent power. It very explicitly describes Nature as possessing an ‘intelligibility’ and that there is no separation between the natural world and God. It offers a completely integrated view of the Universe where religion and science, mind and matter are all part of one living, conscious whole. We are therefore finite beings contained by an infinitude, and each of us is a microcosm of the whole. This suggests to me that Nature is a knowing partner, never a mindless slave to humanity, and we are Her tenants, God’s guests for all too short a time.” In the mind of Prince Charles, therefore, Islam and western pantheism thus have much in common.

Fretting over Nature’s finite resources by using Malthusian math, which has been completely discredited for over 200 years now, Prince Charles warned everyone present that “we are living beyond our means, already consuming the Earth’s capital resources faster than she can replenish them.” Throughout the speech, he often refers to what he calls the “ever widening division we are seeing in so many ways between humanity and Nature.” He also parroted the typical environmental obsession that the planet’s “life support systems are now struggling to cope under the strain of global industrialization.” Even more typical, he tied together the current financial crisis with the looming environmental crisis, which he believes reflects an “inner crisis of the soul.” He then sermonized that the resolution to this great crisis cannot consist of better green technology, but a return to western pantheistic religious traditions that even stretches farther east to ancient Islam, “the traditional way of life within Islam is very clear about the center that holds relationships together. From what I know of its core teachings and commentaries, the important principle we must keep in mind is that there are limits to the abundance of Nature. These are not arbitrary limits, they are limits imposed by God and, as such, if my understanding of the Koran is correct, Muslims are commanded not to transgress them.” Here Prince Charles makes Islam’s traditions perfectly consistent with the modern environmental drive to force sustainable development upon the western civilized world.

Here, by joining together environmentalism and western pantheism with Islam, Prince Charles gets himself into all manner of troubles compounded by ten. The last time the green movement became involved with a group as Anti-Semitic as Islam was in Nazi Germany. At a time when more than a few environmental historians have been forced to write some books to downplay, the historical connections between National Socialism and the early German green movement, Prince Charles opens up Pandora’s Avatar box all over again.

To the surprise of many, National Socialism was a green movement in some important, fundamental ways. Its god was a western pantheistic god of Nature whose totalitarian will cannot be overcome as many Jews, Christians, liberals, and communists falsely presume. Herein lies the Nazi hatred for both capitalism and communism. Its Anti-Semitic racism and love for biology was rooted in the Social Darwinian ecology of Ernst Haeckel. Its holistic nationalism and geopolitics was grounded in the environmental indigenous ideas of Goethe, Humboldt and Arndt. Its Germanic green socialism was derived from Riehl, the father of sustainable development and public forestlands. Its romanticized “blood and soil” agrarian pipe dream was borrowed from the nature loving Monist League. The Nazi love for animals was acquired from Arthur Schopenhauer, the Anti-Semitic guru of environmental ethics and animal rights who blamed Genesis 1 and Judaism for what he calls the “odor of the Jews,” i.e., animal cruelty, “the fault lies with the Jewish view that regards animals as something manufactured for man’s use.” Hitler could quote Schopenhauer verbatim. Schopenhauer was Hitler’s favorite philosopher. It was thus no coincidence that the first Anti-Semitic measure that was passed in Nazi Germany in 1933 was an animal rights law. That the Jews would ultimately find themselves stuffed in cattle cars and sent off to concentration camps set up like stockyards, is thus perhaps not so curious. Hitler brought to fruition Schopenhauer’s great wish that “Jewish view of the animals world must, on account of its immorality, be expelled from Europe.” The end result of Nazi Germany was a ghastly green sacrifice of the so-called ‘Eternal Jew’ who tried to live above nature through capitalism in the west, and communism in the east.

Finally, National Socialism’s wild, artistic romanticism was further elicited from Richard Wagner, the famous opera composer who hated the Jews for commercializing art. Wagner also absorbed the Anti-Semitic environmentalism of both Schopenhauer and Haeckel into his life as well. As such, when Hitler once remarked that “whoever wishes to comprehend National Socialism must first know Richard Wagner,” this certainly included a strong respect for romantic green ideas, racial and otherwise. Hitler even attributed his own practice of vegetarianism to Richard Wagner. Indeed, on November 11, 1941, right as the Germany Army was within striking distance of the gates of Moscow, Hitler trumpeted, “but there is one thing I can predict to eaters of meat, that the world of the future will be vegetarian.”

Eco-fascism is thus no metaphor. Greenpeace’s founder, Patrick Moore, who left the group because of their increasingly extremist views, has warned of a coming eco-fascism “where the planetary police would answer to no one but Mother Nature herself.” However, it is one thing to call someone an eco-Nazi using metaphors, but quite another to discover that the Nazis had incorporated a green agenda into their political policymaking as well. For obvious reasons, putting these two things together is exactly what modern environmentalists do not want. When such a label begins to match its history at some important junctures, it becomes much more explosive, and the bringing together of environmentalism with Islam will not dispel the strong suspicion that the modern green movement wreaks of fascism. It only injects much more octane into an already highly volatile atmosphere.
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Re: King Charles Megalomaniac Chief of GCHQ MI5 MI6 & Great Reset Cult Guru

Post by TonyGosling »

Background on HRH’s relationship with the Intelligence Agencies

The Prince of Wales maintains a close interest in the work of the Intelligence Agencies. In 2011, he became the first Royal Patron of all three main intelligence Agencies (MI5, SIS and GCHQ), and he has regular meetings with senior representatives from each agency. His Royal Highness presents the Intelligence Agencies annual awards, officially known as ‘The Prince of Wales’s Intelligence Community Awards’. The awards were The Prince’s idea, as a way to honour those whose vital work could never be celebrated publically. ... with-hill/

Prince Charles marks 100th anniversary of GCHQ
Updated 12 July 2019 ... 12762.html
Prince Charles visited Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire on Friday to mark the intelligence and security organisation's 100th anniversary. The Prince of Wales became the first Royal Patron of all three major Intelligence Agencies (MI5, MI6 and GCHQ) in 2011. His Royal Highness met community groups working with the agency and visited the GCHQ Museum to view a series of historical artefacts, including intelligence reports and the Royal Codebook. Before departing The Prince opened the GCHQ Centenary Garden.
Post Reply