9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom

I am not sure if the falls under common law type issues because it's a criminal investigation - or should be - property and people were harmed and killed. This is too big for the system to deal with - but as I said above, as peaceful people, only certain channels are open in trying to hold the perpe...

So why bother filing a case that she knew would stand no chance? She likely didn't know when she filed it. In any case, if you file a court case based on the evidence you speak about in public, it means you know that it is correct and the truth. This is yet another reason which proves that what AE9...

Gosh - an anonymous poster refusing to acknowledge evidence related to 9/11 court cases and the energy cover up. Why am I not surprised? I wonder if he/she will ever reveal their real name, website and any effort they've made to putting the evidence they believe proves what happened on 9/11 into som...

Here's a question for you, how come Johnson, a man who claims to have a background in Software Engineering, can make a simple schoolboy error when searching a pdf document? See Thermite Free sig below.? Oh dear, dear dear.... you don't seem to have registered this do you? http://911thermitefree.blo...

http://www.deweapons.com/Event.aspx?id=245020 Not sure where to put this but for those with an interest in DEW this conference in London should be of interest Not that the debate is about whether or not DEW exist (they do), but how far they have developed and what is and is not possible using DEW. ...

Yes, lots and lots of paper generated before and during "collapses". For obvious reasons. Also, thanks for the picture of burning cars which is another one to add to the many which cast serious doubt over the "toasted cars" assertion. Cheers. So where are the documents you will ...

So let me get this straight... Instead of debating research on a forum dedicated to building a credible case for a new investigation into 9/11 you believe that we should all come up with our own theories and submit them as a court case? Madness. . Nope. You haven't got it straight at all - very CRO...

Just highlighting a point from this post, though the intent behind it is laudable. we should be considering Dr. Wood's theory It is not a theory - it is a conclusion based on evidence. To others on this thread, submitted to court. As repeated multiple times, Dr Wood has taken ACTION not simply "...

gruts wrote:
what exactly is the point of starting not one but two threads about a topic that's already been covered ad nauseam - neither of which contain anything new?

Umm - as a test? Look what the result was.

PS I think PookztA was carrying out a test. As I sort of alluded to, I think you provided him with the result he was predicting.

I predict this thread will probably be moved within a few hours.

The biggest flaw in the Moonbeam ;) idea imo is that if anybody owned such a powerful and accurate weapon it would already have been put to good use subduing the world!! We would already be in a distopian nightmare with the only way out frazzled to a crisp :P Funny how you've been posting on here s...

Hi folks, Thanks to Daniel for posting the note. I just got back!! I just wanted to mention something about tonight's broadcast. Though it went reasonably well, one thing struck me as I left the place to drive home. They included a number of images of John Hutchison's metal samples which I didn't su...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Andrew Johnson [mailto:ad.johnson@ntlworld.com] Sent: 12 February 2010 09:18 Subject: FW: Daily Mail Censors factual comments on the Photos On here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1249885/New-Wo...

Still waiting... Please retract the many elements of your "theory" which have been proven to be incorrect. 1) No debris at Ground Zero. This assertion is based on one piece of photographic evidence. It has been debunked. See thread below. Interested readers can see what happened on this f...

Still waiting... Please retract the many elements of your "theory" which have been proven to be incorrect. Incredible. Thanks for making it abundantly clear to readers. You have not explained what you are doing to help expose 9/11 crimes. You don't even have th ecourage or ability to use ...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017# What is Dr Judy Wood's bio? Wow - another 3 year old repost. So what did it Science Please? What is your real name, your website, your action and your research? What turned the towers to dust? Greg Jenkins didn't attempt to answer this qu...

Hmmm - you missed out 2 of the photos that Dr Wood had found in the various archives I SHOWED in the presentation - you can see them here: http://tinyurl.com/911key people walking around in the basements - all these items have been addressed. In any case, your basic position is this, it seems - Dr W...

You see the whole point is to get to an explanation - one which covers all the evidence. There are only 3 other explanations apart from Hutchison Effect and Field Effects related to the Hurricane which just so happened to be closest to NYC at 8am in the morning on 911. To summarise, the 3 available:...

Yes, I have. I just don't need to go to your extremes to explain this evidence. Swirling, storm- or hurricane-strength blasts of air, caused by air rushing into the partial vacuum created by all the explosions in the tower, that blew people off their legs or turned over already damaged cars would n...

So what did it then? Guys working hard here to say it wasn't HE related stuff. So what was it? Put into a paper and submit it to a legal process of some kind. Thanks. The effects you describe only partly explain what was seen when you take into account ALL the evidence - witness testimony AND photos...

I made the post below on a new Thread in "Controversies". Sadly, one of the moderators moved it to the Bin. So, it seems the truth seekers here want to deny admission of a mistake and a "right of reply". Wow. ========== Lee Woudberg recently posted a YouTube video [youtube]http:/...

I had indeed missed this (it wasn't a deliberate error on my part) . It goes to show that everyone should indeed, "check the evidence" to find errors. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Oh dear Tony - you don't give people a "right of reply" Dustbin ay? Fun fun fun!! Nice intellectual ...

Whilst thermite does not cut it, neither does DEW. Debris crashing to the ground would push air out of the way, sucking in strong draughts of surrounding air that might tilt a car over. Ever notice the strong draught left by trains once they have past the platform? Rather than exotic physics levita...

Lee Woudberg recently posted a YouTube video [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmrB8VKUPw0[/youtube] in response to my earlier video [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AGBTuFKxyc[/youtube] I have to commend Lee on finding a mistake in my video in that Thermite IS (sort of) mentioned in J...

I sigh again, Andrew, as I have never seen evidence which explains the theories of yourself and Judy Wood in such a way that convinces. I have watched some pretty spectacular videos showing the levitation power of the Hutchison effect; I have studied Judy Wood's website which I find muddled and not...

No Andrew, The vast majority of the entire 9/11 Truth movement are not convinced by your presentations. You are not facing facts my friend. You are at liberty to discuss absolutely anything here in the controversies section but I will only actively promote stuff when people out in the real world ar...

PIkey, You should know not to "push" 911 evidence and research that has been put into a legal framework and left out of independent adverts. It's OK for people to be woken up to some of the truth (like the Indi advert will probably do), but the real danger for the perps is 911 getting link...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AGBTuFKxyc[/youtube] Stephen. The video doesn't prove anything. Just because thermite is only mention 3 times or not even at all so what? The first doc "analysed" by Johnson has the name Bob McIlvane and Bill Doyle attached to it. Is Johnson sugges...

In response to your question above the simple and honest answer is I dont know as I am not Stephen Jones and any attempted answer would be speculation. Your own speculation as to the reason (i.e unreacted thermite doesnt exist in the dust samples) is borne from a closer relationship to Mr Jones tha...

P.S Andrew i didnt answer the question raised "Why wasnt Hurricane Erin mentioned on 9/11" Possibly because of 9/11. Thanks for the report. I wasn't trying to convert anyone to any way of thinking. I was presenting evidence for people to "take or leave" as I said at least twice ...