No more Stonewalling from the BBC re WTC 7

Twenty minutes after Reuters and the BBC announced WTC7 had collapsed - it finally obliged - a controlled demolition at free fall speed despite only some minor fires and not having been hit by any plane - no wonder so many talk about Building 7 as 9/11's 'smoking gun'.
Post Reply
TheSea
New Poster
New Poster
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:20 pm

Engineers say official 911 story impossible

Post by TheSea »

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/F ... 01391.html

mmm lets do it, lets keep up emailing the press outside US and UK infocoverup structure. We'll get there.
Linda
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 560
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:46 pm
Location: Romford Essex

No more Stonewalling from the BBC re WTC 7

Post by Linda »

No more Stonewalling from the BBC re WTC 7

http://www.petitiononline.com/wtc7bbc/petition.html

To: The British Broadcasting Corporation
So Mr. Richard Porter of the BBC wants the whole 'BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell' scandal (and believe me, it IS a scandal even if you don't see it on the evening news) to just go away. The BBC is under the impression that knocking down a couple of straw-men and proclaiming 'nothing to see here folks' is going make us all just forget the monumental 'c*** up' which is the BBCs attempt at damage control. The BBC is also under the impression that it is only a few 'lone nuts' out there hammering the YouTube and Google Video counts and that this story is going to lose all it's steam by next week.

Well Mr. Richard Porter. This is where you are so very wrong...

We the Undersigned formally demand the following information from the BBC.

1. Who was the source who told your station that the Salomon Building had collapsed?

2. Who from the BBC ordered YouTube and GoogleVideo to immediately start pulling the videos from their sites the day this story broke?

3. Who from the BBC ordered Archive.Org to block and then remove their copies of the footage which (until this story broke) were freely available online?

4. Who is responsible for and what were the circumstances surrounding the 'c***-up' which led to the loss of BBC World News' 9/11 footage?

5. Who cut reporter Jane Standley's live feed from NYC at 5:18pm (EST) on 11/09/01?

Until you answer these 5 questions IN FULL, you can expect the BBC's phones to be ringing daily with people asking these 5 questions over and over until they are answered.

Take a good look at the number of signatures here Mr Porter. These are the people who are demanding these answers and these are the people who WON'T go away.

Welcome to the Digital Age Mr. Richard Porter. You're either a news outlet or a supermarket tabloid. Which is it?

Sincerely,
http://www.petitiononline.com/wtc7bbc/petition.html
User avatar
mark_e
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:24 am
Location: Ipswich

Post by mark_e »

1849 signatures! That's quite incredible. It would be even better if all those people also signed the petition on the front page of this website too.
User avatar
flamesong
Major Poster
Major Poster
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 5:33 pm
Location: okulo news
Contact:

Post by flamesong »

Bongo
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm

Post by Bongo »

That is definately possitive TheSea :wink: , it is just a shame that it is not a mainstream canadian paper, only a minor not for profit publication.

Getting this into the living rooms of every home in the western world will be the difficult bit! but thats not to say that it is certainly another step in the right direction.
Bongo
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm

Viacom V's YouTube

Post by Bongo »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6446193.stm

Just reported on the BBC Evening news tonight... very strange how this has made headline news just two weeks after the big battle us truthers had with Google and Youtube to keep the BBC prediction of building 7 from being pulled?

An telling comment from the article...
Separately, the BBC has struck a content deal with YouTube to showcase short clips of BBC content.
Make your own mind up? :evil:
User avatar
illeagalhunter
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 9:04 am

Post by illeagalhunter »

Iam there now 3109 sigs
MagsUK
Minor Poster
Minor Poster
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:52 pm

Post by MagsUK »

I am in at 1710 have forwarded it to friends who didnt even know I have an interest and they signed lol
Skeptic
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 484
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:25 pm

Post by Skeptic »

signed

it's up to 3208 now
Ravenmoon
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Post by Ravenmoon »

Done !
"The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." George Orwell
User avatar
Chaos Warrior
Minor Poster
Minor Poster
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: Land Of The Scots

Post by Chaos Warrior »

I've already signed this ...nice to see it is doing so well.
Keep writing to the complaints dept of the BBC too...don't let them off the hook. :thumbsup:
It is only one who is thoroughly acquainted with the evils of war that can thoroughly understand the profitable way of carrying it on.
-Sun Tzu

Our dreams do not fit in their ballot boxes!!

www.rinf.com
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18428
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

just to point out to peeps on this thread that there was a rather wonderful piss take of Richard Porter and BBC World in this week's Press Gazzette which goes out to tens of thousands of journalists and editors across UK - which I may or may not have had something to do with ;-)

see here
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=8017
Post Reply