The TV Newscasters were Reading from Scripts on 9/11

CB_Brooklyn · Post by **CB_Brooklyn** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:11 pm

These two videos prove the TV newscasters were reading from scripts on 9/11:

VIDEO ONE

VIDEO TWO

Fallious · Post by **Fallious** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:16 pm

Patrick Brown · Post by **Patrick Brown** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:38 pm

flamesong · Post by **flamesong** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:00 pm

Heads up for CB_Brooklyn...

Drum roll...*

Newscasters or 'news readers' read from scripts every fücking day. They don't write the news. Ever heard of autocue?

It kinda comes with the job title.

Know what I mean?

I don't need to watch (yet another) one of your stupid youtube clips.

Clear off!

*Apologies to Bill Hicks RIP

Johnny Pixels · Post by **Johnny Pixels** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:03 pm

So was I reading from the terrorist script when I formed the opinion that it was terrorism after seeing the footage on 9/11?

Post by **fish5133** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:16 am

Can you explain in words what it is your trying to show by these videos? I think I must be missing something. (a screw or two maybe)

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:16 am

the octapus video again?

telecasterisation · Post by **telecasterisation** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:41 am

CB

Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.

The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.

Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?

Explain how you see this working in practice.

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 · Post by **THETRUTHWILLSETU3** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:26 pm

telecasterisation wrote:CB

Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.

The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.

Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?

Explain how you see this working in practice.

I'm sure CB will answer you in due course Telly

The reason that "The Media" will do everything in their power to discredit no planes is because the no planes con trick could not have taken place without them. If it is exposed then they are guilty as hell.

How do they control their "battle hardened professional newscasters"

Firstly they would carefully select who works for them in the first place.

They would know what their fears are, virtually everybody fears for their life, some would fear being exposed as homosexuals, others as paedophiles, others would fear for their job or threats made against their family.

The most important control on that day would be of the eye witness journalists and those at the scene after the event who interviewed the public.

The remaining studio based newcasters would only see what appeared on their monitors the same as you and I, and they would in some cases (as in the case of Dan Rather and controlled demolitions) report what they see.
Others would have a brief to steer away from these areas.

Everybody in public life has a file on them.

Remember the leadership battle for the Liberal Democrats when Charles Kennedy stepped down because of a drink problem?

Do you think it was just a coincidence that one of the contenders was exposed in The News of The World as having sex with a rent boy and another contender (when it looked like he would win) was exposed as a closet homosexual?

The same sort of things go on in the military, I'm sure you have seen the Kay Griggs interviews but if not they are posted below

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 2963487862

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:55 pm

THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
telecasterisation wrote:CB

Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.

The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.

Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?

Explain how you see this working in practice.

I'm sure CB will answer you in due course Telly

The reason that "The Media" will do everything in their power to discredit no planes is because the no planes con trick could not have taken place without them. If it is exposed then they are guilty as hell.

How do they control their "battle hardened professional newscasters"

Firstly they would carefully select who works for them in the first place.

They would know what their fears are, virtually everybody fears for their life, some would fear being exposed as homosexuals, others as paedophiles, others would fear for their job or threats made against their family.

The most important control on that day would be of the eye witness journalists and those at the scene after the event who interviewed the public.

The remaining studio based newcasters would only see what appeared on their monitors the same as you and I, and they would in some cases (as in the case of Dan Rather and controlled demolitions) report what they see.
Others would have a brief to steer away from these areas.

Everybody in public life has a file on them.

Remember the leadership battle for the Liberal Democrats when Charles Kennedy stepped down because of a drink problem?

Do you think it was just a coincidence that one of the contenders was exposed in The News of The World as having sex with a rent boy and another contender (when it looked like he would win) was exposed as a closet homosexual?

The same sort of things go on in the military, I'm sure you have seen the Kay Griggs interviews but if not they are posted below

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 2963487862

and if the media are not hiding anything how would they beable to prove it in your mind?

or is it just a case of they did it and if they dont admit it they are covering up?

NO PLANES THE CONSPIRACY THEORY TO DESTROY THE TRUE CONSPIRACY BEING EXPOSED!

CB_Brooklyn · Post by **CB_Brooklyn** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:14 pm

telecasterisation wrote:CB

Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.

The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.

Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?

Explain how you see this working in practice.

I honestly didn't know the newscasters were in on it, not until I saw this video. Although I knew for a while that the media broadcast fake planes, never in a million years did I think anyone in the media knew about it (except for the very higher ups), until I saw this video.

I can't really answer your question. But I think the wordings of FOX5 and WB11 are too similar to be pure coincidence.

btw, what "administration" are you talking about? Certainly not Bush's. They had, imo, absolutely nothing to do with the actual attacks. Impeaching Bush will do absolutely nothing. The secret government (aka Illuminati, aka global elite) must be exposed and removed from power.

I posted the video links in another forum. See the comment someone made:
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic ... 4969#14969

Fallious · Post by **Fallious** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:09 am

CB_Brooklyn wrote:
telecasterisation wrote:CB

Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.

The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.

Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?

Explain how you see this working in practice.

I honestly didn't know the newscasters were in on it, not until I saw this video. Although I knew for a while that the media broadcast fake planes, never in a million years did I think anyone in the media knew about it (except for the very higher ups), until I saw this video.

I can't really answer your question. But I think the wordings of FOX5 and WB11 are too similar to be pure coincidence.

btw, what "administration" are you talking about? Certainly not Bush's. They had, imo, absolutely nothing to do with the actual attacks. Impeaching Bush will do absolutely nothing. The secret government (aka Illuminati, aka global elite) must be exposed and removed from power.

I posted the video links in another forum. See the comment someone made:
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic ... 4969#14969

What a steaming pile of turd. Anyone can go back and read CB_Brooklyns posting from the start. See how "undecided" CB has been throughout its career on this forum.

CB_Brooklyn · Post by **CB_Brooklyn** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm

Fallious wrote:
CB_Brooklyn wrote:
telecasterisation wrote:CB

Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.

The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.

Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?

Explain how you see this working in practice.

I honestly didn't know the newscasters were in on it, not until I saw this video. Although I knew for a while that the media broadcast fake planes, never in a million years did I think anyone in the media knew about it (except for the very higher ups), until I saw this video.

I can't really answer your question. But I think the wordings of FOX5 and WB11 are too similar to be pure coincidence.

btw, what "administration" are you talking about? Certainly not Bush's. They had, imo, absolutely nothing to do with the actual attacks. Impeaching Bush will do absolutely nothing. The secret government (aka Illuminati, aka global elite) must be exposed and removed from power.

I posted the video links in another forum. See the comment someone made:
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic ... 4969#14969
What a steaming pile of turd. Anyone can go back and read CB_Brooklyns posting from the start. See how "undecided" CB has been throughout its career on this forum.

You'd better be careful with that disinfo of yours

Fallious · Post by **Fallious** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:40 am

No... My post prompted people to look at your posting history. Other than that, there was no information. So I assume you are refering to your own posting history as disinfo.

Thanks for clearing that up.

CB_Brooklyn · Post by **CB_Brooklyn** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:57 am

Fallious wrote:No... My post prompted people to look at your posting history. Other than that, there was no information. So I assume you are refering to your own posting history as disinfo.

Thanks for clearing that up.

you've outed yourself as a disinfo agent. Or perhaps you're just not man enough to admit the truth about TV-Fakery and must therefore act like a child. Wah Wah Wah.

Micpsi · Post by **Micpsi** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:19 pm

CB_Brooklyn wrote:
Fallious wrote:No... My post prompted people to look at your posting history. Other than that, there was no information. So I assume you are refering to your own posting history as disinfo.

Thanks for clearing that up.

you've outed yourself as a disinfo agent. Or perhaps you're just not man enough to admit the truth about TV-Fakery and must therefore act like a child. Wah Wah Wah.

People equally accuse you of being the same for pushing the no-plane/TVfakery theory that few in the 9/11 truth movement believe. So I guess the kettle is calling the pot black.

StopThe9/11CoverUp · Post by **StopThe9/11CoverUp** » Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:53 am

Just thought id say that if you look closely at the first news clip from the camera you can see some sort of streak heading towards the tower. very vague but visible enough to see it, once you see it, rewind and see if you see it again. Its a bit of a b* to suss exactly where to look but once you do u see it every time.

Just as newsreader says "when you get up to this high level" just after camera zooms in.

david carmichael · Post by **david carmichael** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:55 pm

telecasterisation wrote:CB

Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.

The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.

Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?

Explain how you see this working in practice.

Well... the "hundreds of people would have had to have been in on it" motif is annihilated, in toto ,by the evidence of the murder of 34 US Sailors abaord the USS Liberty....

..in other words, that type of argument means NOTHING since the same thing was said about the USS Liberty and we now know that indeed was a "false flag" op.

I don't however know if these videos prove anything... nothing is "proof positive" as is claimed on the videos.

9/11 indeed was an inside job...but these TWO videos add nothing to the evidence.

9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom

The TV Newscasters were Reading from Scripts on 9/11

The TV Newscasters were Reading from Scripts on 9/11

Re: The TV Newscasters were Reading from Scripts on 9/11

u can see something heading towards the tower.