Beam Weapon Theory Summaried

[rodin]

I just looked again @ the slowmo of the plane entering the building. It's a real plane IMO. As it goes in it will be sliced like a potato hitting a tennis racket...

Get a grip you lot. Time is short.

[Leiff]

[utopiated]

Yup - w0w !!

Nice pic that.

[commanderson]

Hi Veronica

That was an excellent post.

I wish you would post more frequently on this site.

More and more people are accepting that conventional CD of the whole building is no longer plausible - however as you can see from the last couple of posters some are still in denial.

Don't let them put you off - they still believe that planes can cut through buildings like a knife through butter

setus3!
Will you stop trying to divide opinion here, trying to link the beam weapon argument with no planes.
The plain facts are-
1. There is NO need, or evidence for no planes (other than recently appearing video footage with planes disappearing behin the buildings), the origonal footage shows no such anomolies.
2. There may be a need to have something else pulverising the concrete ALONG WITH conventional controlled demolition, as this alone does not explain the concrete powder or pyroclastic flows.

Don't try to link them, they are nothing to do with oneanother, one explains the way we saw the towers collapse and pulverise, the other is a strawman argument predicated on some mocked up footage thats only been seen recently- go and watch the naudet bros doco, or road to tyrany and see if the anomolies are there.

p.S. Yea thanks Veronica for a great post, I think the beam weapon argument has much validity to it, but it seems like we're really getting hung up on squables about detail right now.

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Hi Veronica

That was an excellent post.

I wish you would post more frequently on this site.

More and more people are accepting that conventional CD of the whole building is no longer plausible - however as you can see from the last couple of posters some are still in denial.

Don't let them put you off - they still believe that planes can cut through buildings like a knife through butter

setus3!
Will you stop trying to divide opinion here, trying to link the beam weapon argument with no planes.
The plain facts are-
1. There is NO need, or evidence for no planes (other than recently appearing video footage with planes disappearing behin the buildings), the origonal footage shows no such anomolies.
2. There may be a need to have something else pulverising the concrete ALONG WITH conventional controlled demolition, as this alone does not explain the concrete powder or pyroclastic flows.

Don't try to link them, they are nothing to do with oneanother, one explains the way we saw the towers collapse and pulverise, the other is a strawman argument predicated on some mocked up footage thats only been seen recently- go and watch the naudet bros doco, or road to tyrany and see if the anomolies are there.

p.S. Yea thanks Veronica for a great post, I think the beam weapon argument has much validity to it, but it seems like we're really getting hung up on squables about detail right now.

Don't Panic Commanderson - it's only a game (life that is)

Go and lock yourself in a darkened room and say to yourself

Another day another crocodile