Moderator: Moderators
zoomer wrote:he's not who he says he is. He's a shyster!
Ok smartarse. Where's YOUR great indepth evidence for this guys utterances? Be honest. You are just gullubly accepting whatever nonesense he is shpeelin at ya.........................right?utopiated wrote:zoomer wrote:he's not who he says he is. He's a shyster!
A detailed and well argued response from zoomer who's just been on google for 3 seconds as usual. That's right - black ops / Naval Intel arrive at your house and threaten your family, tell you to take down your websites beccause you are a "shyster".
We're f*cked when the Neo-Cons try to immanentize the eschaton at this rate.
I'm not at all interested wasting my energy or time arguing with any of you about these matters.Personally I don't believe any of these theories/stories/hypotheses 100%. Naturally human has a tendancy of exagaretting and changing the real thing but that doesn't mean everythings not true. I listen to all and pick the credible parts, those seems logical to me and fit or help to connect the dots. It's like collecting the pieces of a huge puzzle. It's very much possible many pieces are not parts of the real puzzle, not even close, but It's impossible to detect them as 'they' are trying their best to hide the truth. But the more pieces I have and collect now, the more chances I have to take the right decision and to understand this big puzzle when the time comes - which I believe is coming quite soon.zoomer wrote:This man is not who he says he is, and is a charlatan!
That sole article/link you found on your slightly increased visit to google [12 seconds?] is not one I need to visit. It's from the 99% intolerant Dyson Devine from Gaiaguys who follows Michael Horn's line that Billy Meier is the ONLY contactee on the planet - that's the only link to Collier.zoomer wrote:
Ok smartarse. Where's YOUR great indepth evidence for this guys utterances? Be honest. You are just gullubly accepting whatever nonesense he is shpeelin at ya.........................right?
I mean for a kick off. LOOK at him! would YOU buy a car of that man
You didn't investigate anything. You found one link and pasted some of it. Don't change your middle name to "Sherlock" just yetzoomer wrote:It is not being some 'self-righteous prick' to investigate fraudulent claims and then reveal the evidence of such. However much it may hurt.
utopiated wrote:zoomer wrote:
Ok smartarse. Where's YOUR great indepth evidence for this guys utterances? Be honest. You are just gullubly accepting whatever nonesense he is shpeelin at ya.........................right?
I mean for a kick off. LOOK at him! would YOU buy a car of that man
And you dont use Google I take it? You use very old tomes in your library.....right? why do you question my judgement? Do you think i'm some kid whose never read a book...already? get off off your high horse. You who believe wild unproven statements from some dude using an aliasCode: Select all
That sole article/link you found on your slightly increased visit to google [12 seconds?] is not one I need to visit. It's from the 99% intolerant Dyson Devine from Gaiaguys who follows Michael Horn's line that Billy Meier is the ONLY contactee on the planet - that's the only link to Collier.
I've read the whole exchange between Salla and him before - it's just laughable - Michael Salla is patient beyond belief as the other guy claims he is a Mason, disrupts the exopolitics forum and other such rubbish.
Your just a Salla fan. What you mean 'disrupts'. You mean he challenges Salla? And then Salla ejects? I am familiar with that attitude. Its hardly debate is it? That guy is making staments about who that guy is and his experience. Why--in YOUR book--is HE lying --about quite mundane affiar, and the one you are believing with his wild * you believe? seems odd that!
The point is zoomer you write two lines on something, make your mind up and throw out some inane comment - this is part of this internet trend in recent years where the kids seem to think they know it all because they have a digital database at their fingertips.
haha
I dont avoid, as you'll find out. I asked you to show me the evidence for what he says happened is what i said....Plus you *totally* avoided the main point I was making - if he is speaking lies - why did he get shut down the way he did? [that's not a request for a response].
You didn't investigate anything. You found one link and pasted some of it. Don't change your middle name to "Sherlock" just yetzoomer wrote:It is not being some 'self-righteous prick' to investigate fraudulent claims and then reveal the evidence of such. However much it may hurt.
.
.run that by me agaın....telecasterisation wrote:Given that space is infinite, then so too are the potential outcomes. The odds of me existing somewhere are therefore infinitely higher than me not existing. In fact, I exist somewhere in the universe at any given moment.rodin wrote:And you have been around for even less time. Is it not extraordinary, given the age of the universe, that the human race, and more to the point, YOU, are alive in this present time. As Harry Hill would say - what are the chances of that happening...
Fate, circumstance, destiny, chance/whatever has deemed I exist within the soup of infinite possibilities. As the potential for my existence is just as high here as it is anywhere else in the universe, I must therefore exist somewhere at any random location at any given time, the same with you, even Blackcat.rodin wrote:run that by me agaın....telecasterisation wrote:Given that space is infinite, then so too are the potential outcomes. The odds of me existing somewhere are therefore infinitely higher than me not existing. In fact, I exist somewhere in the universe at any given moment.rodin wrote:And you have been around for even less time. Is it not extraordinary, given the age of the universe, that the human race, and more to the point, YOU, are alive in this present time. As Harry Hill would say - what are the chances of that happening...
concrete debunkers?Cruise4 wrote:Be careful with that phrase "'concretize' dynamically". It might get the debunkers attention.
I'm tired of this. Thing is I'm not trying to convert/promote anyone or anything - I just linked to a video and commented on it as it was posted by a 3rd party newcomer to this forum. It's zoomer who seems to want to push people forcefully into the pointless and over-simplistic "true/false" dichotomy.zoomer wrote: well at LEAST i HAVE pasted some kinda evidence. All you do is ask us to believe that man, who is called something else about crazy claims where he provides no proof whatsoever. Its for you to show this proof wiseguy. you bein so well read an all. present it here, and give us all a lesson in how to research propa
There's an increasing amount of flaps [as they're called] all over the world - especially here but also in the UK. Linda M Howe even noticed what we've pointed out at http://exopolitics.org.uk - that there seems to be a new phrase/excuse being pushed by someone or some intel organisation here - that is that all these sightings are of course "Chinese lanterns".amber wrote:Yes i have had three experiences of seeing unidentifieable lights in the sky.
It seems theres a new wave of sightings, or maybe I just keep finding new articles on UFOs these days.
Just get the link to it online [can't upload them here I think] and hit the 'img' button. If you have nowhere to put it up - email it me and I'll send the link to you once up.Louise wrote: Yes, I'll try to get a pic posted of the craft on here ASAP although i've never posted a pic before on here so i'll have to figure out how to do that.
16 pages??! Wow. You get a book with it... I don't think anyone but the chief's at Area 51 or S4 know where it comes from but Bob Himself has said it is like this one... bet this is close to your model??Louise wrote: Really?
In the 16 page manual that comes with the model, it explains how the technology of the craft works with ellement 115 and the gravity amplifyers.
It also says that the ET's of this craft come from Reticulum 4 which is the 4th planet out from the star Zeta 2 Reticuli in the Zeta Retuculi 1 and 2 star system in the constellation of Reticulum whitch is 38 light years from earth.
It dosen't mention anything about it being a Pleiadian craft.
I have it on video. I got it on VHS about 6 years ago and two years back I put it up after converting it onto google video. It got loads of hits and next thing I get a 'cease and desist' type email from Bob Lazar's publisher citing the DMCA. I had to remove it. I guess Bob is still making the odd $ out of it. Lots of it is science on how the craft you have worked using 115 and the tripod anti-gravity system. As it says in your booklet - they have two ways of using gravity - the 3 stick in a triangle for wArP speeds and 3 sticks used at slow speeds to move it round.Louise wrote: It also mentions something about the Lazar Tape.
Do you know where i can get this tape or an mp3 of it?.
