911 Eyewitness Hoboken Wins LA and NY Film & Video Festi

[chek]

Since I had first seen this DVD I found it disturbing for its’ cover showing a WTC building (not WTC1 2 or 7) completely engulfed in flames, supporting the official story that the hot fires caused the collapse of the towers. The building shown did not collapse and was not "demolished" but the title “Demolition” is featured over this background.

Demolished, collapsed, destroyed, razed - what semantic game are you playing here?

When viewing it at minute 3:22 a man in a Harley Davidson Motor Cycle hat and t-shirt, he is portrayed as an eyewitness and featured describing, at the scene for reporters, what would later become the official storyline. "I witnessed both towers collapse, one first and then the second, mostly due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense." Here was an obvious planted disinfo witness used to reinforce the official story. Not identified as such and Sophia glides just like a Harley Davidson over it into the film.

For her to do so without being present at the time, would only be speculative - but she does comment about how 'the myth' was born on the street. It is however plain to the average viewer with an IQ only slightly above that of a mouse that such a slick, faultlessly delivered 'analysis' is highly suspect.

But that, at least for me, is not the real problem. The real problem is in what this AKA Monica Smallstorm, AKA Sophia; whose real name is Sofia Shafquat along with Brad Waddell, have done to my 911 Eyewitness footage. The woman has seriously altered and mutilated my original footage without asking permission, paying a royalty or using her normal paperwork she used for rights with other creators. I had no control and she took advantage creating this travesty.

Sofia's version of events related to use of 911EW material is different and related elsewhere.

I have not gone through the whole film, as it was not my intention of debunking her work. For that you may go to Screw 9/11 Mysteries

First Mark Roberts anti-Rodriguez hit piece and now th eScrew911 team - you surely are reduced to some fine allies aren't you?

My intention was to see what she had used of my original footage without permission and how it was used. What I found was a nightmare. Following is a list of time codes to find these errors, omissions, distortions, and wideo with altered and overdubbed audio, which twisted the story being told. Instead of telling the truth and let science do the work Sophia has taken my works and twisted them to present a totally different image than what was originally there.

You mean like melodramatically highlighting helicopters and adding 'mission accomplished' in support of whatever theory you now seem very coy about giving any detail about? The rest of your nitpicking tirade can be disregarded as she was not reproducing another version of 911EW, but using the relevant footage in support of her narrative which was 'Demolitions'.

All in all these 3 major errors with the additional omissions, edits and misrepresentations by Sophia and 911 Mysteries are misinformation at best and are most likely, considering the need for physical editing of the sound over the destruction sequences, on purpose and therefore disinformation. Worse is this is just what I see as I look at what Sophia has done to my original footage. What about the rest of the hour plus of other peoples footage she has done this too?

It's called editing and is common in film production.

The reason I want control of my work is to keep such trash from happening. To be placed in this disinformation video in such a way twists the meaning of the original work and now it has been corrupted, changed, and mutilated where it is no longer representative of that day.

Like helicopters captioned with 'mission accomplished you mean?

I can’t imagine what this “fertile mind” in Sophia has done to other evidence as she edits, over dubs and twists the content to as she said on “The Edge AM” radio recently “911 Mysteries takes the myth by its tail and swings it around right next, to make it fit right next to the science". Whatever twists, swings or smashing it needs apparently.

...like helicopters captioned with 'mission accomplished' you mean?

Since October I have told Sophia to cease and desist and she continues to manufacture and sell these distortions of my work. I asked her to stop, pull my stuff and she has hired a lawyer to keep her stolen, mutilated disinfo piece in tact. Money means too much to her even after aledgedly making almost half a million on this mutilation.

Seems to me that Blue Star Media should have taken more care about rights and conditions of use beforehand - but then who knew that this whole 911 gig would turn into such a massive business opportunity, huh?

[Stuart]

Any new when 9/11 Mysteries part 2 and 3 are likely to be released?

I found Mysteries part 1 to be the most convincing and best doc i have seen to date so am keen to see the others. I am not sure any of this arguing really concerns the likes of us lowly readers, especially when we are talking about sirens being ommitted from the sound spectrum - hardly a major peice of disinfo.......is it or am i being stupid again?

Cheers

[Thermate911]

What a sad, self-absorbed siegel. Here we are on the brink (well, mega-psy-op anyway) of nuclear war and folks are arguing copyright!?

Hello?

Is any exposure better than none? Not judging by this thread. What I know of Sophie's dispassionate professionalism leads me to suspect a certain odour of sour grapes here.

"I don't care what you print just get my name right" - Barnum or Hearst?

Whoever, let's focus, as 911 Mysteries does, on that which can be proved. Please?
----

As for the black-hatted plant on 9/11, yes, he is exercising many legal minds on more than one continent. He has still to be identified for certain but Jerome Hauer will no doubt 'enlighten' us about him, once he is on the witness stand at Nuremberg II.

Hence no further comment from Sophie at that point, yet much private discussion.

We are all fallible, Mr Siegel - even you...

[Dogsmilk]

Any new when 9/11 Mysteries part 2 and 3 are likely to be released?

I found Mysteries part 1 to be the most convincing and best doc i have seen to date so am keen to see the others. I am not sure any of this arguing really concerns the likes of us lowly readers, especially when we are talking about sirens being ommitted from the sound spectrum - hardly a major peice of disinfo.......is it or am i being stupid again?

Cheers

I have heard that that they can't afford it and are in debt from the 1st one.

Apparently some guy who's prone to grandiose ideas has become irrationally fixated with Sophia and won't leave her alone; I'm sure that hasn't helped either.

[John White]

Since Rick's Ego can't resist controversy, guess what?

[911Eyewitness]

Since Rick's Ego can't resist controversy, guess what?

Excellent "moderation". Promote it to controversey instead of moderating the pigs porking it. The only people pushing "ego" and "child prodigy" are you and the porkers of the thread. No "John White" moderatiing personal attacks to keep threads on track? A pity this is not a surprise.

Ahh well, looks like Andrew was right and this experiment helped him prove it out. Thank you all for your unwitting yet triumphant participation. You have performed as predicted by Andrew.

I might add that closing the forum to the public makes this place worthless. 90 precent of traffic is never logged in - they just read. I post for them. Your sad response time for pages is not from those readers and punishing them is destroying your sites visibility and page rank. That is, if your goal is to get your message out?

So, cheers on your choices.

[John White]

Duh, rick, its YOU you plonker

Can't resist putting the boot into sophia can you?

guess what?

Attacking the integrity of any 9/11 personality gets a thread into controversies

[911Eyewitness]

Duh, rick, its YOU you plonker

Can't resist putting the boot into sophia can you?

guess what?

Attacking the integrity of any 9/11 personality gets a thread into controversies

Anyone reading the thread can see you are the plonker John buddy. If "attacking the integrity of any 9/11 personality gets a thread into the controversies" then the thread should have been there when your buddies marky and checkout started their attack on this personality dragging the anti-Semite Hufschmid/Sophia and Hoffman works into the mix.

But your ancient vision can't see past the myopia of your own ego. So what the hey? This is better and more read as news. At least you finally got the thread back on, edited as it is. Great example of you’re "even handed" and effective policies.

I never can resist an opportunity to drop the truth in forums or wherever eggs should forment.

[marky 54]

Duh, rick, its YOU you plonker

Can't resist putting the boot into sophia can you?

guess what?

Attacking the integrity of any 9/11 personality gets a thread into controversies

Anyone reading the thread can see you are the plonker John buddy. If "attacking the integrity of any 9/11 personality gets a thread into the controversies" then the thread should have been there when your buddies marky and checkout started their attack on this personality dragging the anti-Semite Hufschmid/Sophia and Hoffman works into the mix.

But your ancient vision can't see past the myopia of your own ego. So what the hey? This is better and more read as news. At least you finally got the thread back on, edited as it is. Great example of you’re "even handed" and effective policies.

I never can resist an opportunity to drop the truth in forums or wherever eggs should forment.

attacking? if asking questions about subjects you want to avoid and still never answered is considered attacking then so be it.

but remember you linked your radio interview ON FOX RADIO, you made comments in that interview, not me. you claimed it was the truthers who saw something in your work and you were dragged into it, then you say truthers are making things up to prove CD.


but on the other hand your documentary promotes CD theory, and you accepted the awards and prasie for you documentary and you give none to the so called truther who 'dragged' you into it. you were giving the jmovement a bad name to on FOX with pure lies and not admitting the whole truth. you want to paint a picture of MR angel seigel to both sides and you cannot, without come across as a * to one side or the other.

you aint honest when your blaming a group of other people for what was put in your documentary, but then in the next breathe taking the awards for it!

are you really that stupid you cannot see how you seem to contridict yourself and lie depending on who your talking to?

you bash the truthers when your with fox, then expect the truthers to praise you when your here.

i lost any respect i had for you as soon as i heard your fox interview, it disgusted me you were not intirely honest.

[911Eyewitness]

Duh, I am a plonker

attacking? .

i lost any respect i had for you as soon as i heard your fox interview, it disgusted me you were not intirely honest.

I was absolutely honest. Perhaps you did not like the snapshot of honesty portrayed in the few seconds I had?

You just expected me to perform to, and for, your expectations? I am sorry that your respect is so fickle and thick. I have high hopes one day you will attain rational thought above the grunt level. In the meantime you should ponder again the value of something lost that you never had?

That interview was killer. Regrettably the people in mass media are smarter than you Marky, so I won't get another chance like that.

For readers that do not know about the interview http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=10393 the thread is here with links to the audio interview.

Markey, you should be happy I took the time, but don't be. Do you know what a shill is Markey? If you look in the mirror right now you will see one looking at you. Did you even know you were one?

[chek]

Rick - it's totally obvious to me that you are only too clear on what a shill is.

You've been shilling for your tattered reputation for weeks now, but it hasn't worked with anyone I know.

Don't take out your frustrations on others less fabulous than your vapid self - you did this all on your own.

In those famous and fitting words, you could have been a contender - but instead you became a plonker. But maybe that's what you intended from the start, in which case lucky you.

Congartulations, Rick! There, I said it!

[marky 54]

Duh, I am a plonker

attacking? .

i lost any respect i had for you as soon as i heard your fox interview, it disgusted me you were not intirely honest.

I was absolutely honest. Perhaps you did not like the snapshot of honesty portrayed in the few seconds I had?

You just expected me to perform to, and for, your expectations? I am sorry that your respect is so fickle and thick. I have high hopes one day you will attain rational thought above the grunt level. In the meantime you should ponder again the value of something lost that you never had?

That interview was killer. Regrettably the people in mass media are smarter than you Marky, so I won't get another chance like that.

For readers that do not know about the interview http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=10393 the thread is here with links to the audio interview.

Markey, you should be happy I took the time, but don't be. Do you know what a shill is Markey? If you look in the mirror right now you will see one looking at you. Did you even know you were one?

you still avoid the main issues i raised, but nevermind, i suppose its like trying to get water from a stone, if your as good at dodging physically than you are verbally, i suggest you take up dodgeball, you never know you may just get a few more awards.

you blame truthers for you being involved(saying you were dragged in it by truthers), then you say truthers are making up evidence for CD(does that include you? afterall your documentary strongly suggests it).

don't bother answering the question you have not done so so far, and you avoid the issues and go in it attack mode and sling accusation. not bad for a man who trys to promote honesty but can never demonstrate it.

when are you going to take responsibility for what you put in your own documentary instead of blaiming it all on truthers whilst laping up the rewards?

you think im a shill? ok, but is'nt everyone a shill who disagrees with rick seigel and "9/11 researchers"? i was once suspected as a shill for simply spelling errors by some in your crowd, it must of been compelling research to come to that conclusion, but at least their reason for thinking it was not baseless unlike your reasons, oh wait what reasons? ah their aint one so it was just an accusation of shill with NO evidence, how grown up of you.

also i have never claimed to be over the top brainy or be top of the class, but i aint a fool or a push over either i know my capabilities, however your level of IQ is there for all to see in your responses which results to the very low tactic of attack and ridicule, i'd expect a better response from a child.

thanks for pointing out the spelling error, is that your evidence im a shill?

p.s you may find more wrong spellings in here because i aint double checking through fear of rick seigel pointing them out.

[gg allin]

anyway what does this mission acomplished thing mean in your documentary,i read through the post and i saw no answer,can we have an answer,its not a criticism,just a query,what mission was acomplished ?

[911Eyewitness]

anyway what does this mission acomplished thing mean in your documentary,i read through the post and i saw no answer,can we have an answer,its not a criticism,just a query,what mission was acomplished ?

You have to ask "Dave Shaw" the narrator for that one. I did not have full control over those releases. Perhaps you might want to see my latest video on Youtube, search for "chopper 4 identified" or look easier at http://www.911bloggertv.com as it is only 9/11 videos.

Chopper 4 circled the North Tower and was the one I saw the guy hanging out on a harness from just before the South Tower went. He was hanging out with a winch onto a rope as they circled and I thought it was going to be a rescue and that is why I went to zoom at that moment.

If you see the new video you might understand that there is more to that chopper than has been reported.

Chopper 4 is not the news chopper 4. It is the 4th chopper to pass in the tape I recorded and therefore named "chopper 4" by 911 eyewitness.

There is a lot more on the tape and I suggest buying the original so you have full resolution if you are really interested in seeing the evidence. There is much more than has ever been made public on it. That is the reason it remains buried and distorted by 911truth.

If you don't like the commentary, get the original and find the stuff yourself. Get the 911raw.com and the detail will scream out.

Check out "The Tower's didn’t Fall" video. You do not need more than that to understand there is a problem.

After wining all the festivals in the US while the boys at Louder than words break into 3000 theaters nationwide I feel we are left behind. But I plod along doing whatever I can to keep putting the word in mainstream.

I am proud that I did not slip into fictionalized works to "enhance the audience experience" or I would have slipped a nuke cloud in the video or the sound of one - like others have. (This is in controversy no?)

I am debating the King of Morocco’s invitation for that festival but cannot afford such luxury and expense as that. As you know 911 truth never supports my DVDs and cuts off the funds that way (ever see them sell my DVD?). I only get the word out when it is free, like the John Gibson interview. My presentations have only a bit about 9/11 and are mostly about freedom and liberty and 911truth hates that too. I am surprised the King invited me, as I will most certainly target his royalty. But what the hey, I do the best I can with what I can.

In the meantime I take my time in the sun and continue to farm for my living instigating for change every chance I get.

[KP50]

anyway what does this mission acomplished thing mean in your documentary,i read through the post and i saw no answer,can we have an answer,its not a criticism,just a query,what mission was acomplished ?

You have to ask "Dave Shaw" the narrator for that one. I did not have full control over those releases.

.......

I am proud that I did not slip into fictionalized works to "enhance the audience experience"

So is this your film or isn't it? Are you happy to accept awards but the valid criticism is due to someone else's work?

[911Eyewitness]

anyway what does this mission acomplished thing mean in your documentary,i read through the post and i saw no answer,can we have an answer,its not a criticism,just a query,what mission was acomplished ?

You have to ask "Dave Shaw" the narrator for that one. I did not have full control over those releases.

I am proud that I did not slip into fictionalized works to "enhance the audience experience"

So is this your film or isn't it? Are you happy to accept awards but the valid criticism is due to someone else's work?

Frankly your confused state is probably due to your dishonesty. You can't figure out if you have critizied or not. You are too transparent.

I explained the chopper 4 question you asked. Your other problems are for doctors and I cannot help you there. It is a shame government education left us with the kind of diserning power you display. If you were not my shill I would have better things to do, but you serve the purpose.

[911Eyewitness]

The saga of 9/11 Mysteries is going to continue with Hijackers and Planes in the same vein as Demolitions according to the admitted liar, fraud and self styled "queen of 911 media", Sofia Shafquat. Using Hollywood sci-fi editing Sofia Shafquat will continue to alter anything that will distract her viewer from the fantasy story she wants to tell. She stated she will continue to create more fraudulent evidence portraying government malfeasance. Her story is a fraud made up from creative destruction of real evidence punctuated through her delusions of grandeur.

Let's review some of what James Fetzer calls Retrospective Fallacies(1) in her "9/11 Mysteries, Demolitions". First a retrospective fallacy is something that you find out is wrong at a later date. It is not something you do wrong and get found out. But even with all his badges James Fetzer is a clown (8) not to be listened or trusted for much, but often amusing as the clown. Sophia decided that she could erase the helicopters and the sounds from the actual evidence produced by Richard A. Siegel on his Hoboken tape.(5) While crediting Richard Siegel with the footage she resample and alters the footage where the radio was not at all what was taped that day. (3) She now has crossed another legal line by corrupting someone elses work and presenting it as theirs. Somehow she thinks I was such a good editor (actually she states I did not even make my own tape!) that the radio 1010 wins reports was synced perfectly and I had a separate recording of the radio to edit in later?(2) We are surrounded by fools.

In fact Sophia Shafquat admitted to lying over 21 times in her radio interview and we have only sampled some of them for you into these educational videos. Sophia claims that Richard Siegel inserted the radio sound track over the original video as sound design.(4) She claims it was not there on the original.(6)

Sophia Shafquat and Brad Waddell present the case that the South Tower had the North Tower pre-explosions and that the North Tower fell with the South tower. (7) She is either utterly disturbed or a patent liar and fraud pushing a foreign agenda.

Sophia is not content with a singular lie; she is a patent liar, a serial liar. Sophia Shafquat is an incessant liar and goes on to admit she inserted sound to create a fallacy with her partners and Brad Waddell.

Sophia Shafquat, the fraud and disinfo artist, has gone on record admitting to the lies and frauds around her first production giving fuel to the debunkers and adding to the garbage spewed by the 9/11 truth organizations. The very act of defending her lies, theft and illegal actions with more lies and obfuscations such as "retrospective fallacy" and Fetzer's every ready "lie for truth" motto should give any sentient being great pause.

The expectations for this September 11, 2001, the sixth anniversary, is many more years of video and lies as the people are busied with warp tours of 911 untruth wrapping their freedoms in a basket for the government to have safely in a corner where it is told not to be disruptive.

After all, who every heard of a disruptive revolution? You might get hurt

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

[KP50]

You have to ask "Dave Shaw" the narrator for that one. I did not have full control over those releases.

I am proud that I did not slip into fictionalized works to "enhance the audience experience"

So is this your film or isn't it? Are you happy to accept awards but the valid criticism is due to someone else's work?

Frankly your confused state is probably due to your dishonesty. You can't figure out if you have critizied or not. You are too transparent.

I explained the chopper 4 question you asked. Your other problems are for doctors and I cannot help you there. It is a shame government education left us with the kind of diserning power you display. If you were not my shill I would have better things to do, but you serve the purpose.

Diserning? Nice combination with the term "government education" there Rick.

I never asked a "Chopper 4" question - I am just amused by the hypocrisy you display not to mention your brave stabs at eloquence.