...what exactly?
I am also interested whether Plane son and Co have actually spoken to their friends and relatives about their research into this issue and what the reaction has been.
So this TV fakery is meant to demonstrate or prove...
Moderator: Moderators
-
scubadiver
- Validated Poster
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 3:42 pm
- Location: Currently Andover
- Contact:
So this TV fakery is meant to demonstrate or prove...
Currently working on a new website
i am convinced that some of the footage they have provided has been faked, there is no doubt about it on certain video's, other video's they have provided i have wondered what they are suppose to show as i don't see what they are claiming.
so it proves some video's were faked, however they have provided no evidence that can be pinned on anyone therefore they have proved the video's have been faked and thats it.
who faked them? the news channels? 9/11 researchers in order to get supporters by decieving? a youtuber haveing a laugh? or is it just pyops which researchers pick up and believe and spam on other boards.
overall it actually proves nothing because if all the footage is faked(like they claim) we can not accept it as a representation of what actually happened on the day therefore cannot use video footage as evidence as it has been tampered with. leaving the situation at a point where we cannot prove or disprove planes did'nt hit or did hit the towers etc, as there is no real footage to know this unless you were witnesses to the events firsthand.
so it all means nothing unless they can prove who faked some of this footage and give me a reason to believe it was'nt them themselves who faked it then posted it to try and sway us.
so it proves some video's were faked, however they have provided no evidence that can be pinned on anyone therefore they have proved the video's have been faked and thats it.
who faked them? the news channels? 9/11 researchers in order to get supporters by decieving? a youtuber haveing a laugh? or is it just pyops which researchers pick up and believe and spam on other boards.
overall it actually proves nothing because if all the footage is faked(like they claim) we can not accept it as a representation of what actually happened on the day therefore cannot use video footage as evidence as it has been tampered with. leaving the situation at a point where we cannot prove or disprove planes did'nt hit or did hit the towers etc, as there is no real footage to know this unless you were witnesses to the events firsthand.
so it all means nothing unless they can prove who faked some of this footage and give me a reason to believe it was'nt them themselves who faked it then posted it to try and sway us.
Hi Markymarky 54 wrote:i am convinced that some of the footage they have provided has been faked, there is no doubt about it on certain video's, other video's they have provided i have wondered what they are suppose to show as i don't see what they are claiming.
so it proves some video's were faked, however they have provided no evidence that can be pinned on anyone therefore they have proved the video's have been faked and thats it.
who faked them? the news channels? 9/11 researchers in order to get supporters by decieving? a youtuber haveing a laugh? or is it just pyops which researchers pick up and believe and spam on other boards.
overall it actually proves nothing because if all the footage is faked(like they claim) we can not accept it as a representation of what actually happened on the day therefore cannot use video footage as evidence as it has been tampered with. leaving the situation at a point where we cannot prove or disprove planes did'nt hit or did hit the towers etc, as there is no real footage to know this unless you were witnesses to the events firsthand.
so it all means nothing unless they can prove who faked some of this footage and give me a reason to believe it was'nt them themselves who faked it then posted it to try and sway us.
I would be interested to know what footage you believe is faked, regardless of who faked them.
cheers
'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity.' Oscar Wilde
i don't have the link i just remember it of the top of my head so ill try to explain it incase you know the one i mean untill i can find it to post it.sidlittle wrote:Hi Markymarky 54 wrote:i am convinced that some of the footage they have provided has been faked, there is no doubt about it on certain video's, other video's they have provided i have wondered what they are suppose to show as i don't see what they are claiming.
so it proves some video's were faked, however they have provided no evidence that can be pinned on anyone therefore they have proved the video's have been faked and thats it.
who faked them? the news channels? 9/11 researchers in order to get supporters by decieving? a youtuber haveing a laugh? or is it just pyops which researchers pick up and believe and spam on other boards.
overall it actually proves nothing because if all the footage is faked(like they claim) we can not accept it as a representation of what actually happened on the day therefore cannot use video footage as evidence as it has been tampered with. leaving the situation at a point where we cannot prove or disprove planes did'nt hit or did hit the towers etc, as there is no real footage to know this unless you were witnesses to the events firsthand.
so it all means nothing unless they can prove who faked some of this footage and give me a reason to believe it was'nt them themselves who faked it then posted it to try and sway us.
I would be interested to know what footage you believe is faked, regardless of who faked them.
cheers
the one where it has who appears to be a fake actor and they claim the scene behind him is spinning(i don't think this part is faked by the way), also in the video it has the towers moving of to the left but the rest of the buildings stay where they are, i think its 10 mins plus in lenght and is a compilation of differant 'faked' clips. some of the clips in that video have been faked 100% IMO.