BBC's Jane Standley "Too Busy" To Discuss WTC 7 Fi

Twenty minutes after Reuters and the BBC announced WTC7 had collapsed - it finally obliged - a controlled demolition at free fall speed despite only some minor fires and not having been hit by any plane - no wonder so many talk about Building 7 as 9/11's 'smoking gun'.
Post Reply
User avatar
blackcat
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 6:02 am

BBC's Jane Standley "Too Busy" To Discuss WTC 7 Fi

Post by blackcat »

Newspeak International
Validated Poster
Validated Poster
Posts: 1158
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: South Essex
Contact:

Post by Newspeak International »

Come on, would we really expect her to comment about wtc7 after all the stick she said she had?

Besides she was too busy listening to Blair bullsh!t about NI.

Truth or lies, see the dilemma these reporters have to deal with every day :?
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18428
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

Oa professional level she should clear it up and be happy to do so. Nevertheless she may be being leant on to keep schtum by lizard man Richard Porter

see
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/article/1 ... der_160307
Monday, 19 March 2007
God bless the web's truth seekers
Axegrinder is not one to indulge in idle conspiracy theory speculation, but could it be possible that the BBC is run by shape-shifting lizard people who are in league with Al Qaeda?
I only ask because of a much-watched piece of BBC World footage on Google Video which shows reporter Jane Standley reporting the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (also known as WTC 7) on 11 September, 2001 ¡ª 20 minutes before it actually fell.
You can see the building clearly still standing behind her.
As cattleprods911 says in the Google Video comments section: "Now that 9/11 is unravelling, as is Waco, the anti-conspiracy theorists are quickly becoming the ¡®NUTS', and my guess is they are sucking on one kind of government tit or another! God bless you truth seekers!"
Here, here.
Richard Porter, head of news for BBC World, has issued a response on The Editors, the BBC editors'
blog. But does he protest too much? He says: ¡�re not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on 11 September. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.
¡�-134610; the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inac- curate ¡ª but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did ¡ª sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.
¡�-134219;r reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks and, like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and, unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did ¡ª like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing, what she was being told, and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.
¡�-133723; no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of c***-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another.
¡�-134618; we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error ¡ª no more than that.
Pull the other one lizard man.
User avatar
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor
Posts: 18428
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by TonyGosling »

On a professional level she should clear it up and be happy to do so. Nevertheless she may be being leant on to keep schtum by lizard man Richard Porter

see
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/article/1 ... der_160307
Monday, 19 March 2007
God bless the web's truth seekers
Axegrinder is not one to indulge in idle conspiracy theory speculation, but could it be possible that the BBC is run by shape-shifting lizard people who are in league with Al Qaeda?
I only ask because of a much-watched piece of BBC World footage on Google Video which shows reporter Jane Standley reporting the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (also known as WTC 7) on 11 September, 2001 ¡ª 20 minutes before it actually fell.
You can see the building clearly still standing behind her.
As cattleprods911 says in the Google Video comments section: "Now that 9/11 is unravelling, as is Waco, the anti-conspiracy theorists are quickly becoming the ¡®NUTS', and my guess is they are sucking on one kind of government tit or another! God bless you truth seekers!"
Here, here.
Richard Porter, head of news for BBC World, has issued a response on The Editors, the BBC editors'
blog. But does he protest too much? He says: ¡�re not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on 11 September. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.
¡�-134610; the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inac- curate ¡ª but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did ¡ª sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.
¡�-134219;r reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks and, like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and, unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did ¡ª like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing, what she was being told, and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.
¡�-133723; no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of c***-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another.
¡�-134618; we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error ¡ª no more than that.
Pull the other one lizard man.
Post Reply