http://www.totallyjewish.com/news/natio ... nt_id=6096Gordon Brown this week announced a new government cash injection to help ensure British educators are prepared for teaching about the Shoah.
The announcement, which came towards the end of a wide-ranging address to Labour friends of Israel’s annual lunch, follows his £1.5m windfall in 2005 to help fund the Holocaust Educational Trust’s plan to send children and teachers from every school on visits to Auschwitz.
For ‘government cash’ read ‘money from British taxpayers’. This ill-disguised, Zionist-instigated propaganda is designed to deflect attention away from the on-going holocaust, which began shortly after the end of World War Two: the holocaust still being visited by the State of Israel on the Palestinian people. But, if you read the full article, you will note that there is no mention that the future British prime minister brought this up, during his speech.
But will the children who visit Auschwitz be allowed to ask any questions? If the Simon Wiesenthal Centre has anything to do with it, the answer to that would be a resounding: ‘No!’ And that is because no one, anywhere, is supposed to ask or answer any questions on that particular subject, and there will soon be European laws to enforce that. These laws, commonly referred to as ‘anti hate laws,’ will carry the threat of a three year prison sentence and are designed to prevent any open discourse or discussion on any matters likely to be at variance with the ‘official’ Jewish Holocaust story. However, thanks to the sensibilities of the Turks (or possibly the geographical situation of Turkey), the Armenian genocide will not be given Holocaust status. Or maybe that should read: ‘The Armenian holocaust will not be given genocidal status.’ It’s hard to come to terms with Euro-speak, sometimes.
In any event, not being able to ask question may upset a lot of maths students, because the original plaque at Auschwitz stated that "Four Million People Suffered and Died Here at the Hands of the Nazi Murderers Between the Years 1940 and 1945". However, that number has since been reduced to just over a million.
Source: What is Holocaust Denial? http://www.the7thfire.com:80/Politics%2 ... denial.htmIn July 1990, the Polish government's Auschwitz State Museum, along with Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust center, conceded that the four million figure was a gross exaggeration, and references to it were accordingly removed from the Auschwitz monument. Israeli and Polish officials announced a tentative revised toll of 1.1 million Auschwitz dead.12 In 1993, French Holocaust researcher Jean-Claude Pressac, in a much-discussed book about Auschwitz, estimated that altogether about 775,000 died there during the war years.
Yet the emotive figure of Six Million, as the total number of Jews who died at the hands of the Nazis, persists, largely because the Anti Defamation League and other Jewish organizations, including Hollywood, feel that to reduce this figure would, somehow, posthumously diminish the suffering of those who died. Or could it be to bolster the living martyrdom of those who share the same religion, and to allow them to get away with doing much the same thing to others?
The calculations are as follows: If all of those who died at Auschwitz were Jews (which was, apparently, not the case), then, if the Auschwitz figure is revised downwards by 2.9 million, the total must also be revised downwards, by the same amount: 6 million minus 2.9 million equals 3.1 million.
The figures are tragic, anyway you look at them, so why is it so important to stick to the Six Million figure?
No sane historian would deny that a lot of unfortunate people, many of them Jews, suffered terrible hardships, including torture and rape, and were killed or died of disease in Nazi Germany, or in the concentration camps in Nazi occupied territory, before and during WWII, but to even question how many, or how and why they died has now become ‘defamation’; ‘denial’; ‘revisionism’, etc..
Normally, when disaster strikes, the fact that the death toll had been revised downwards, to just over a quarter of the number first published, would be cause, if not for celebration, then for a measure of relief. ‘Thank God that not so many of our brethren as we first thought suffered and died’ might have been spoken or at least thought by those with a religious background, but this does not seem to have happened; quite the reverse. Zionist organizations, including the ADL and Hollywood, stick to the Six Million figure, no matter what. In isolation, this is not such a terrible thing, but why should there be such an effort made to attack those who want to get at the truth about this, and other matters relating to the Holocaust, and, more generally, what led up to the deportations to the concentration camps in the first place? Could there have been other solutions to Hitler’s ‘Jewish Problem’? Solutions which were not acceptable to certain foreign Zionists, because it might have blocked the establishment of a Jewish state?
Whatever the answers, they will never become general knowledge, as long as the truth is being covered up in favour of the version which, apparently, allows the Israelis to ‘holocaust’ the Palestinians, which they started doing a long, long time ago, and which they continue to do, with apparent impunity, under the ridiculous proposition that the land they stole, and keep stealing had, long ago, been pledged to them by ‘God’.
