is David Ray Griffin a fraud?
Moderator: Moderators
- Patrick Brown
- 9/11 Truth critic
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:18 pm
- Contact:
DDD911
You might find this article about the aircraft impacts of interest: http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=7094
Well better than wasting your time with these no brainers!
You might find this article about the aircraft impacts of interest: http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=7094
Well better than wasting your time with these no brainers!
We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE<
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE<
I still don’t see how SEJ has done a disservice to 9/11 truth, the fact he’s saying “controlled demolitions” brings more unwanted questions.THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Yes it does because Steve Jones was brought in to discredit cold fusion
he has done the same with 911
This thread has been a total waste of everyone’s time, it doesn’t surprise me if the truth movement is going stale.
In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act: George Orwell
-
- Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:10 pm
- Location: Leeds
SEJ has done nothing wrong.DDD911 wrote:I still don’t see how SEJ has done a disservice to 9/11 truth, the fact he’s saying “controlled demolitions” brings more unwanted questions.THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:
Yes it does because Steve Jones was brought in to discredit cold fusion
he has done the same with 911
This thread has been a total waste of everyone’s time, it doesn’t surprise me if the truth movement is going stale.
Agreed the thread is a waste of time.
Are we going to need another subforum for those who like to start threads along the lines of 'X is a Shill'.
I would be wary of anyone who appears eager to point the finger a little too quickly.
Btw. Excellent avatar!
Thx,uselesseater wrote: SEJ has done nothing wrong.
Agreed the thread is a waste of time.
Are we going to need another subforum for those who like to start threads along the lines of 'X is a Shill'.
I would be wary of anyone who appears eager to point the finger a little too quickly.
Btw. Excellent avatar!
Yeah the avatar goes with me everywhere

In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act: George Orwell
- THETRUTHWILLSETU3
- 9/11 Truth critic
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:51 pm
It would appear that Ian is refusing to answer the question, now why is that?THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:You have not answered my questions?- I will spell them out for you.ian neal wrote:TTWSU3
If Richard Falk, Professor [Emeritus] of International Law and Practice, Princeton University wants to write in say what a great forum and website this (unlikely me thinks) I don't really have problem with that
You see just because the CFR is an extremely dodgy organisation that appears wedded to the NWO agenda does not mean that every single one of their members is equally dodgy. The same with Chatham House or World Business Forum.
And then getting Richard Falk's recommendation on your book and then using this for a guilt by association attack. It means nothing to me. If you want me to suspect DRG on the back of this association, you need to show me some real dirt on Richard Falk
Similarly with the Rockefellor Foundation
Sure the Rockefellor's are an extremely dodgy clan at the heart of the NWO agenda. And their foundation supports some dodgy organisations/work. That does mean that every organisation that gets part of its funding from the Rockefellor Foundation is also equally dodgy.
It's a bit subtler than that. Take some other dodgy characters. Bill Gates and George Soros. Are you telling me that all the organisations their charitable trusts fund are also knowingly (and I stress knowingly) working for the NWO agenda
If so, you are welcome to your beliefs. I don't share them and I don't think many others do either.
I suggest these charitable trusts have a more subtle purpose. More about presenting these men as reasonable and benevolent whilst creating vehicles to promote favourable propaganda and offsetting tax liabilities.
But who knows you might be right. DRG might be a major mole in our midsts who for years has been cultivating a quiet calm persona of a studious and grandfatherly theology professor (guffaw) whilst all the while he has just been waiting for 9/11 to happen so he can hijack the inevitable truth movement and corrupt it with his devious ramblings about a new world based on christians (and other people of good faith) standing up against the evil empire. Ah, now you explain it, it is all so obvious
This is not real evidence or real dirt. Until you have proper evidence these are just more highly unhelpful and devisive speculation.
Would you be happy for the homepage of this site to have an introduction to the site by a member of the CFR?
Would you be happy for this site to receive funding from the Rockefeller Foundation?
A simple yes or no to each will do.
Please answer the question Ian
Potentially the answer to both is yes
If Richard Falk wants to write something in support this site, I would have no problem in publicising the fact. It wouldn't put it on the front page since the whole site is soon to be revamped anyway.
If the Rockefeller Foundation wants to give the campaign a load of dosh without compromising our independence then again I would not have a problem with this (although I'm not holding my breathe however).
I would even take money direct from Bush provided it had no strings attached.
What dastardly work did the grant from the Rockefeller Foundation that you link to DRG actually fund? Did the grant perhaps date to a time before DRG converted to 9/11 scepticism?
If Richard Falk wants to write something in support this site, I would have no problem in publicising the fact. It wouldn't put it on the front page since the whole site is soon to be revamped anyway.
If the Rockefeller Foundation wants to give the campaign a load of dosh without compromising our independence then again I would not have a problem with this (although I'm not holding my breathe however).
I would even take money direct from Bush provided it had no strings attached.
What dastardly work did the grant from the Rockefeller Foundation that you link to DRG actually fund? Did the grant perhaps date to a time before DRG converted to 9/11 scepticism?
I tell you what TTWSU3
I set you a challenge. You would appear to have doubts about my genuineness, trustworthiness and sincerity.
I guess this because you ask "now why is that?"
If you genuinely know who's who and how we came about, you will have no problem in doing a little research and finding out about me. My background, where I work, how I became involved in the movement and so forth.
If I am not in some way genuine you should have no problem in being able to demonstrate this and present an evidence based case for your suspicions.
I've yet to type this up, but the new improved moderation policy will ban any evidence free speculation as who is or is not a shill. Just FYI like.
I set you a challenge. You would appear to have doubts about my genuineness, trustworthiness and sincerity.
I guess this because you ask "now why is that?"
If you genuinely know who's who and how we came about, you will have no problem in doing a little research and finding out about me. My background, where I work, how I became involved in the movement and so forth.
If I am not in some way genuine you should have no problem in being able to demonstrate this and present an evidence based case for your suspicions.
I've yet to type this up, but the new improved moderation policy will ban any evidence free speculation as who is or is not a shill. Just FYI like.
- THETRUTHWILLSETU3
- 9/11 Truth critic
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:51 pm
there's no such thing as a free lunchian neal wrote:I tell you what TTWSU3
I set you a challenge. You would appear to have doubts about my genuineness, trustworthiness and sincerity.
I guess this because you ask "now why is that?"
If you genuinely know who's who and how we came about, you will have no problem in doing a little research and finding out about me. My background, where I work, how I became involved in the movement and so forth.
If I am not in some way genuine you should have no problem in being able to demonstrate this and present an evidence based case for your suspicions.
I've yet to type this up, but the new improved moderation policy will ban any evidence free speculation as who is or is not a shill. Just FYI like.
i swallowed a fly once so strictly speaking thats not trueTHETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:there's no such thing as a free lunchian neal wrote:I tell you what TTWSU3
I set you a challenge. You would appear to have doubts about my genuineness, trustworthiness and sincerity.
I guess this because you ask "now why is that?"
If you genuinely know who's who and how we came about, you will have no problem in doing a little research and finding out about me. My background, where I work, how I became involved in the movement and so forth.
If I am not in some way genuine you should have no problem in being able to demonstrate this and present an evidence based case for your suspicions.
I've yet to type this up, but the new improved moderation policy will ban any evidence free speculation as who is or is not a shill. Just FYI like.

not a meal of my choice but it wa'nt like i had a choice.
I stopped posting on this board because I got tired of petty infighting and fruitless arguments that went in circles and never evolved into anything productive. Too many people get wrapped up in this one issue leading them to focus far too much on the problem and divert their attention away from any potential solution.
Don't get me wrong, this place opened my eyes to a lot and I dare say i'd still be clueless without it, but I reached a point where rabid arguments for NPT and the widely held view that 911 is the only issue just drove me away. I wasn't certain I had made the right choice until I came back and stumbled on this thread. What a joke. Perfect example of submission to fear. Truthwillsetu3, is there anyone you DO trust? If you step back and look at the bigger picture you'll see that villains don't await at every turn, and the solution is in overcoming fear, not submitting to it.
DRG?! Are you serious???

Don't get me wrong, this place opened my eyes to a lot and I dare say i'd still be clueless without it, but I reached a point where rabid arguments for NPT and the widely held view that 911 is the only issue just drove me away. I wasn't certain I had made the right choice until I came back and stumbled on this thread. What a joke. Perfect example of submission to fear. Truthwillsetu3, is there anyone you DO trust? If you step back and look at the bigger picture you'll see that villains don't await at every turn, and the solution is in overcoming fear, not submitting to it.
DRG?! Are you serious???


War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
- THETRUTHWILLSETU3
- 9/11 Truth critic
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:51 pm
DRG --- supports a one world governmentlostpomme wrote:I stopped posting on this board because I got tired of petty infighting and fruitless arguments that went in circles and never evolved into anything productive. Too many people get wrapped up in this one issue leading them to focus far too much on the problem and divert their attention away from any potential solution.
Don't get me wrong, this place opened my eyes to a lot and I dare say i'd still be clueless without it, but I reached a point where rabid arguments for NPT and the widely held view that 911 is the only issue just drove me away. I wasn't certain I had made the right choice until I came back and stumbled on this thread. What a joke. Perfect example of submission to fear. Truthwillsetu3, is there anyone you DO trust? If you step back and look at the bigger picture you'll see that villains don't await at every turn, and the solution is in overcoming fear, not submitting to it.
DRG?! Are you serious???
![]()
DRG --- associates with a member of the CFR
DRG --- has accepted funding from The Rockefeller Foundation
DRG---- has done work for The Club of Rome
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:DRG --- supports a one world governmentlostpomme wrote:I stopped posting on this board because I got tired of petty infighting and fruitless arguments that went in circles and never evolved into anything productive. Too many people get wrapped up in this one issue leading them to focus far too much on the problem and divert their attention away from any potential solution.
Don't get me wrong, this place opened my eyes to a lot and I dare say i'd still be clueless without it, but I reached a point where rabid arguments for NPT and the widely held view that 911 is the only issue just drove me away. I wasn't certain I had made the right choice until I came back and stumbled on this thread. What a joke. Perfect example of submission to fear. Truthwillsetu3, is there anyone you DO trust? If you step back and look at the bigger picture you'll see that villains don't await at every turn, and the solution is in overcoming fear, not submitting to it.
DRG?! Are you serious???
![]()
DRG --- associates with a member of the CFR
DRG --- has accepted funding from The Rockefeller Foundation
DRG---- has done work for The Club of Rome
Links?
War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:DRG --- supports a one world governmentlostpomme wrote:I stopped posting on this board because I got tired of petty infighting and fruitless arguments that went in circles and never evolved into anything productive. Too many people get wrapped up in this one issue leading them to focus far too much on the problem and divert their attention away from any potential solution.
Don't get me wrong, this place opened my eyes to a lot and I dare say i'd still be clueless without it, but I reached a point where rabid arguments for NPT and the widely held view that 911 is the only issue just drove me away. I wasn't certain I had made the right choice until I came back and stumbled on this thread. What a joke. Perfect example of submission to fear. Truthwillsetu3, is there anyone you DO trust? If you step back and look at the bigger picture you'll see that villains don't await at every turn, and the solution is in overcoming fear, not submitting to it.
DRG?! Are you serious???
![]()
DRG --- associates with a member of the CFR
DRG --- has accepted funding from The Rockefeller Foundation
DRG---- has done work for The Club of Rome
Links?
War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
- THETRUTHWILLSETU3
- 9/11 Truth critic
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:51 pm
lostpomme wrote:THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:DRG --- supports a one world governmentlostpomme wrote:I stopped posting on this board because I got tired of petty infighting and fruitless arguments that went in circles and never evolved into anything productive. Too many people get wrapped up in this one issue leading them to focus far too much on the problem and divert their attention away from any potential solution.
Don't get me wrong, this place opened my eyes to a lot and I dare say i'd still be clueless without it, but I reached a point where rabid arguments for NPT and the widely held view that 911 is the only issue just drove me away. I wasn't certain I had made the right choice until I came back and stumbled on this thread. What a joke. Perfect example of submission to fear. Truthwillsetu3, is there anyone you DO trust? If you step back and look at the bigger picture you'll see that villains don't await at every turn, and the solution is in overcoming fear, not submitting to it.
DRG?! Are you serious???
![]()
DRG --- associates with a member of the CFR
DRG --- has accepted funding from The Rockefeller Foundation
DRG---- has done work for The Club of Rome
Links?
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id24.html
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id25.html
This website is affiliated with verizon who has significant ties with military and government operations, including FEMATHETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id24.html
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id25.html
http://news.tmcnet.com/news/2007/02/09/2328245.htm
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/0 ... -army.html
http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2007/02/14/2336303.htm
See how easy it is?
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
- THETRUTHWILLSETU3
- 9/11 Truth critic
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:51 pm
You don't half talk some * FalliousFallious wrote:This website is affiliated with verizon who has significant ties with military and government operations, including FEMATHETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id24.html
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id25.html
http://news.tmcnet.com/news/2007/02/09/2328245.htm
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/0 ... -army.html
http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2007/02/14/2336303.htm
See how easy it is?
Verizon in this instance is the ISP (nothing more)
Is that the best you can come up with?
-
- Moderate Poster
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 1:06 am
- Location: Canada
Btw, DRG is the prime consultant helping to perfect the script for the upcoming release of Loose Change, Final Cut. I trust him. His NWO stuff is simply about an emerging global village framed within the context of Civility and mutuality.
Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime
“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth.” - George W. Bush
“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth.” - George W. Bush
And yet, her website IS affiliated with Verizon, she made a choice to associate with this provider should we examine at that choice more closely? Just making a simple point.
As far as I can see DRG defends his position perfectly well in the second link you provide. The fact that he's so open about the whole issue should should probably count for his integrity.
Before waking up I was quite content with the idea of a one world government and I understand his arguments. Not to say I agree, but I think that you and Angie need to have a long hard think about what DRG has and will do for the movement. You might want to including the fact that I haven't once seen him mix his OWG aspirations with Truth movement business, to date.
Bottom line. I personally see DRG's contributions to 9/11 truth to be outstanding, he is a great speaker and popular author, news shows in America are apparently scared to feature DRG because of his ways of presenting 9/11 truth so clearly, i'd much rather have him on our side than not.
As far as I can see DRG defends his position perfectly well in the second link you provide. The fact that he's so open about the whole issue should should probably count for his integrity.
Before waking up I was quite content with the idea of a one world government and I understand his arguments. Not to say I agree, but I think that you and Angie need to have a long hard think about what DRG has and will do for the movement. You might want to including the fact that I haven't once seen him mix his OWG aspirations with Truth movement business, to date.
Bottom line. I personally see DRG's contributions to 9/11 truth to be outstanding, he is a great speaker and popular author, news shows in America are apparently scared to feature DRG because of his ways of presenting 9/11 truth so clearly, i'd much rather have him on our side than not.
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
- THETRUTHWILLSETU3
- 9/11 Truth critic
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:51 pm
Fallious have you ever read a book or watched a film and the character you thought for the most part was the good guy turns out to be the bad guy?Fallious wrote:And yet, her website IS affiliated with Verizon, she made a choice to associate with this provider should we examine at that choice more closely? Just making a simple point.
As far as I can see DRG defends his position perfectly well in the second link you provide. The fact that he's so open about the whole issue should should probably count for his integrity.
Before waking up I was quite content with the idea of a one world government and I understand his arguments. Not to say I agree, but I think that you and Angie need to have a long hard think about what DRG has and will do for the movement. You might want to including the fact that I haven't once seen him mix his OWG aspirations with Truth movement business, to date.
Bottom line. I personally see DRG's contributions to 9/11 truth to be outstanding, he is a great speaker and popular author, news shows in America are apparently scared to feature DRG because of his ways of presenting 9/11 truth so clearly, i'd much rather have him on our side than not.
I don't assume DRG to be a "good guy" or "bad buy". This is a very similar theme to the Fittan Dunne thread over in the general forum, I suggest you take a look at it.THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote:Fallious have you ever read a book or watched a film and the character you thought for the most part was the good guy turns out to be the bad guy?Fallious wrote:And yet, her website IS affiliated with Verizon, she made a choice to associate with this provider should we examine at that choice more closely? Just making a simple point.
As far as I can see DRG defends his position perfectly well in the second link you provide. The fact that he's so open about the whole issue should should probably count for his integrity.
Before waking up I was quite content with the idea of a one world government and I understand his arguments. Not to say I agree, but I think that you and Angie need to have a long hard think about what DRG has and will do for the movement. You might want to including the fact that I haven't once seen him mix his OWG aspirations with Truth movement business, to date.
Bottom line. I personally see DRG's contributions to 9/11 truth to be outstanding, he is a great speaker and popular author, news shows in America are apparently scared to feature DRG because of his ways of presenting 9/11 truth so clearly, i'd much rather have him on our side than not.
When I consider DRG's record I see a man who has done a very great deal of good for the 9/11 truth movement, he's written books which have been accepted into the mainstream and done tireless work with other researchers and film developers. I'm sure he's directly responsible for the wake up of tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people to the reality of world politics and the war on terror.
Beyond that, I have no expectation for the man, if tomorrow he were to begin preaching NPT (though it would cause me to have a very serious look at his research) i'd probably begin debunking his work within hours. Would it make him a "Bad Guy"? No more than Judy Woods or Jim Fetzer, who have both in their time contributed some excellent research to 9/11 truth.
Do you see where I'm coming from?
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
And who wouldn't support that? A new world order isn't a bad thing, its THEIR new world order that's the problem. People would do well to separate the two. Anyone who invites division over unity is still sleeping soundly in the dream.Headhunter wrote:...his NWO stuff is simply about an emerging global village framed within the context of Civility and mutuality.
War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
- John White
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3185
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:25 am
- Location: Here to help!
Wordlostpomme wrote:And who wouldn't support that? A new world order isn't a bad thing, its THEIR new world order that's the problem. People would do well to separate the two. Anyone who invites division over unity is still sleeping soundly in the dream.Headhunter wrote:...his NWO stuff is simply about an emerging global village framed within the context of Civility and mutuality.
World Peace requires unity, World War requires division: what an elite cabal might imagine as "a new world order" is only one of many many possibilities: and its the one we get if we are passive spoon fed emotional infants to boot
There comes a time that anyone firmly into "New World Order = Evil" (as TWSU3 apears to be) has to confront the powerful questions: "What do I want if it is NOT a "NWO": after all consider how I see the world at the moment! My vision is hardly for it to stay the same!" and "How can there be Peace if their is NOT unity?"
From my perspective , the real choice is between Unity through Conformity (the totalitarian model exposed by Alex Jones et al) and Unity through Diversity (The spiritual promise of all mankind). A choice between Fear and Love in a nutshell
Free your Self and Free the World
And thats all it comes down to in the end... Spend you life paralysed or spend it free.A choice between Fear and Love in a nutshell
Just think of all those extra hours you'd be left with to make the world a better place instead of adding to the fear machine...
War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
And thats all it comes down to in the end... Spend you life paralysed or spend it free.A choice between Fear and Love in a nutshell
Just think of all those extra hours you'd be left with to make the world a better place instead of adding to the fear machine...
War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
reminds me of vern in stand by me.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuNujSaLwm4 1 min eight seconds


War is when the government tells you who the bad guy is. Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.