no arabs on flight 77

[marky 54]

this has been ignored in the pentagon holes thread, but intrested in critics veiws and a chance to prove differant, so here it is again.

http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm

thank you. this is not what im saying but im trying to give critics a chance to prove it wrong as much as i can to get a fair prospective on info, yet seem to be ignored.

[marky 54]

also see here

http://whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers_flt_77.html

[Ignatz]

this has been ignored in the pentagon holes thread, but intrested in critics veiws and a chance to prove differant, so here it is again.

http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm

thank you. this is not what im saying but im trying to give critics a chance to prove it wrong as much as i can to get a fair prospective on info, yet seem to be ignored.

I clicked the autopsy list on site, and the enlarged version was illegible.

[marky 54]

qouting the link this was the point along with the covering letter first document on the page. but just ignore them.

64 were “passengers” on the plane. The AA list only had 56 and the list just obtained has 58. They did not explain how they were able to tell “victims” bodies from “hijacker” bodies. In fact, from the beginning NO explanation has been given for the extra five suggested in news reports except that the FBI showed us the pictures to make up the difference.

No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab; however, three ADDITIONAL people not listed by American Airline sneaked in. I have seen no explanation for these extras. I did give American the opportunity to “revise” their original list, but they have not responded. The new names are: Robert Ploger, Zandra Ploger, and Sandra Teague. The AFIP claims that the only “passenger” body that they were not able to identify is the toddler, Dana Falkenberg, whose parents and young sister are on the list of those

[kc]

Sierra Times is a neo con website



are we taking their word for it now? Just curious

[marky 54]

then it dosnt make sense that they would question there own storey

[chipmunk stew]

this has been ignored in the pentagon holes thread, but intrested in critics veiws and a chance to prove differant, so here it is again.

http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm

thank you. this is not what im saying but im trying to give critics a chance to prove it wrong as much as i can to get a fair prospective on info, yet seem to be ignored.

[marky 54]

ok thank you. anyone firstly know why there were 64 being stated on tv and also why the autopsy list is 58 without hijackers, yet the flight manifest linked above is 57 including hijackers as one number is missing,and another barely visible but can tell its there.

http://www.sierratimes.com/03/07/02/article_tro.htm

[Bushwacker]

This is another example of people making false assumptions about what lists actually are. The list given by CNN is an early and partial list, as can be seen by going back to the index page, where it says:
"Lists of victims
In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon near Washington, D.C., and the crash of United Airlines flight 93, officials across the country are working to piece together lists of victims.

While the official number of those missing and dead will inevitably rise over the next few weeks, authorities from American Airlines, United Airlines, the Department of Defense, the New York City Medical Examiners Office and the New York City Fire Department, have released partial lists. They are linked below."

I assume some names may have been omitted because relatives had not not given their permission for names to be released at that stage. AA did know how many had died, the list is headed:
"American Airlines Flight 77, from Washington to Los Angeles, crashed into the Pentagon with 64 people aboard."
That number clearly includes the hijackers, and shows again that the lists are of victims, they are not manifests.

[marky 54]

who mentioned any list by cnn? i mentioned the list chipmonk provided and the documents in the link i gave saying offical autopsy list. autopsy list has 58 people on with no hijackers names, and the list chipmonk linked has 57 people on with hijackers but let just say 58 allowing for for error as number 25 is missing.

so 58 people on offical autopsy list no hijackers identfied.

58 people on chipmunks list hijackers accounted for.

[Bushwacker]

58 passengers on manifest + 6 crew = 64 people on board.

Passenger 25 is missing from copy manifest

Autopsy list 58 + Dana Falkenberg not found + 5 hijackers = 64 people on board

[Bushwacker]

who mentioned any list by cnn?.

The Sierra Times article which said there were 56 passengers

[marky 54]

ok that matches now, i wasnt allowing for crew on chipmonks list

[marky 54]

who mentioned any list by cnn?.

The Sierra Times article which said there were 56 passengers

i wasnt questioning that though just autopsy list.