Eminent Monsters BBC Scotland examines Ewen Cameron MK Ultra

Recommended viewing and listening which relates to the War on Freedom or War of Terror. Often this is material which the monopoly broadcasters/publishers censor and it is only available on the web.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Eminent Monsters BBC Scotland examines Ewen Cameron MK Ultra

Post by TonyGosling »

Eminent Monsters BBC Scotland examines Ewen Cameron MK Ultra
Eminent Monsters Trailer - World Premier at Glasgow Film Festival

Mark Fallon - ‘Do No Harm’ is an abiding principal of psychiatry. It is abandoned time after time in this shocking, utterly compelling exploration of the profession’s collusion with state sponsored torture over the past 70 years. In 'Eminent Monsters', Director Stephen Bennett untangles a web of secrecy, denial and complicity to explore the legacy of Scottish-born psychiatrist Dr Ewen Cameron and the experiments that helped devise systems of torture employed across the globe, from Northern Ireland to Guantanamo Bay. Experts, victims and families provide chapter and verse on fundamental violations of human rights.

Documentary tracing the shocking truth of our governments' love affair with torture. In 1950s Montreal, Scottish-born psychiatrist Dr Ewen Cameron experimented on his unwitting patients. His techniques included sensory deprivation, forced comas and LSD injections. His work was covertly funded by the Canadian government and the CIA and since then, his techniques have been used in Northern Ireland, Guantanamo and 27 countries around the world.
Featuring extraordinary first-hand testimony from Guantanamo Bay survivors, the Hooded Men from Northern Ireland and senior American psychologists and military personnel.
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »

Eminent Monsters: British doctors, human experimentation and the origins of psychological torture
https://www.thecanary.co/feature/2020/0 ... l-torture/

“For the last 60 years doctors working for the British and American governments have used psychological torture to destroy people”. So begins Eminent Monsters, a chilling new documentary about the development and application of “psychological torture” techniques which have been, and continue to be, used by the UK and US governments as well as others around the world.

The Canary attended the UK premier at the Bertha DocHouse, on the bottom floor of the Curzon Theatre at the Brunswick Centre in London, on 16 February 2020. In the film, the director Stephen Bennett takes the viewer on a decades long journey which begins with eminent Scottish psychiatrist Dr Ewen Cameron and his experiments in sensory deprivation and sensory overload which he subjected many of his own psychiatric patients to, against their will, and as part of a secret CIA funded programme known as MK Ultra.

Cameron’s patients were forced to wear goggles; had headphones placed on their ears while various sounds, phrases, and sentences were repeated for hours on end; with their arms were forcibly encased in tubes so that they could not use their hands, even scratch themselves (*viewers are advised the enactments are at times disturbing and some scenes contain flashing images). If this sounds familiar, it should, as these techniques exploded into the wider public consciousness after the attacks of 11 September 2001. In particular, many of these torture techniques became publicly known as organisations like WikiLeaks started to reveal what the US was subjecting its detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantanamo Bay Cuba to.

Sign up to our FREE Daily News Digest
Your first name (optional)
Enter your email
We will not share your information with third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy for information on how we use your data and data protection rights.
Those familiar with the “the Hooded Men” in the north of Ireland who were beaten, forced into stress positions for hours on end, and subjected to sensory overload and sensory deprivation in the 1970s, by forces backed and trained by the British military, will also be familiar with the techniques developed from Cameron’s research. The story of the Hooded Men also features prominently and is told from the point of view of the survivors and their legal team.

As Amnesty International explain, in addition to beatings and threats of murder made against the hooded men by their captors, they were also subjected to the following five techniques:

Julian Assange
After UK government silence, over 100 medical doctors urge Australia to defend Assange
John McEvoy , 16th December 2019
Nils Melzer, left; Julian Assange, right
UN torture expert says Assange’s persecution ‘very similar to historic witch-hunts’ in exclusive interview
John McEvoy , 6th June 2019
Police raid ABC offices
Journalists now fair game as police raid public broadcaster following US hounding of Assange
Tom Coburg , 5th June 2019
1. Hooding

2. Stress positions

3. White noise

4. Sleep deprivation

5. Deprivation of food and water

These techniques stem directly from Cameron’s work as the film makes painfully clear. The depravity of Cameron’s actions are particularly ironic given the fact that he participated in evaluating Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg, and would later write about the necessity of socially re-engineering German society after the war.

“The first ones to actually systematically experiment with [psychological torture] were the Nazis in the Dachau concentration camp”, UN torture expert Nils Melzer told the audience during the post-film Q&A at the Bertha DocHouse. Melzer sought to dispel the impression that “psychological torture is somehow torture light” by explaining that the Nazis introduced their programme because they “couldn’t break” resistance fighters in the Auschwitz concentration camp using ‘normal’ means of physical torture.

Melzer also said that billions of pounds have been spent worldwide over the decades to develop methods of torture that will “not leave marks” and will actually “erase the personality of the victim”.

With a combination of dramatic re-enactments; interviews with torture survivors and their families, medical experts, and former government officials; and readings from the medical notes of Cameron, Bennett takes the viewer on an immersive and at times painful journey. The journey charts the development of psychological torture techniques from a now abandoned facility in Canada, to its implementation by British military-trained Royal Ulster Constabulary on Irish civilians, to its use against detainees in Guantanamo Bay by the US military.

Amazingly, not one person involved in applying any of these torture techniques, or any of the medical professionals involved in crafting and directing them, has ever been held accountable. Although, as Melzer noted, CIA whistleblower John Kiriako was prosecuted following his revelations that the spy agency used waterboarding.

The film is especially timely given that UN torture expert Nils Melzer has – along with two other medical experts – concluded that WikLeaks founder Julian Assange shows the symptoms of being psychologically tortured.

“The really important elephant in the room here is impunity”, Melzer told The Canary.

He added:

We’ve had impunity for all these torture programmes that are documented in the film and because of this consolidated impunity it is not possible for a country like the UK to expose someone like Assange, who is just a journalist, who has just done his lawful work, to ill treatment in order to intimidate the rest of the world.

Complicity from the medical profession did not stop with Cameron. As the film shows, even the highly influential American Psychology Association (APA) collaborated with the CIA and the US military to help torture detainees in the Guantanamo military base on US-occupied Cuba. The battle to keep the APA out of the torture business is, shockingly, still not over despite the laudable activism of many of its members, as psychologist Steven Reisner explains in the documentary.

Bennett, who was inspired to make the film after reading Naomi Klein’s The Shock Doctrine, said he has been trying to make the film “unsuccessfully” for 13 years. But he has now finished this decade and a half long project, and it’s certainly been worth it. Bennett has successfully illustrated what happens when state power remains unchecked and accountability is in short supply. Part Taxi to The Dark Side and part Touching the Void the film does not disappoint and deserves to be viewed far and wide.

Mezler informed the audience that the film (which he’d already seen in 2019) inspired him to draft a report on psychological torture for the UN. He’s due to present this report to the UN’s human rights council in Geneva on 28 February.

BBC Scotland, Creative Scotland and the National Lottery financed the film, and HopScotch Films produced it, which means it should be broadcast on TV and via BBC IPlayer in due course. If you can’t wait, check out one of the screening dates here.

Eminent Monsters
"If you want to understand what governments have been doing in your name, go and watch #EminentMonsters"

- @NilsMelzer UN Special Rapporteur on Torture#EminentMonsters will play in cinemas across the UK from 16th Feb. Tickets: https://buff.ly/36jZ5R5

Embedded video
16:51 - 6 Feb 2020
Twitter Ads information and privacy
72 people are talking about this

Eminent Monsters is essential viewing for anyone who wants to have a better understanding of the state of our ‘democracies’ and what happens to any society when they dispense with the rule of law.
User avatar
Posts: 18429
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

Post by TonyGosling »

Eminent Monsters: A Manual for Modern Torture, directed by Stephen Bennett
By Jean Shaoul 20 February 2020
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/0 ... s-f20.html

Eminent Monsters is a documentary by Stephen Bennett involving extensive research and interviews. Focusing on the use of psychological torture that breaks the mind without physical evidence of harm, the film is a devastating exposure of the shocking and systematic abuse by the governments of Britain and the United States of their own citizens.

It has immediate relevance regarding the treatment being meted out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, which Professor Nils Melzer, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture, has described as psychological torture.

Nils Melzer speaking at the showing of Eminent Monsters in London this week [Credit: Eminent Monsters twitter page]
The film was screened at the United Nations Human Rights Council in 2019 as part of a special event discussing the use of psychological torture by governments and will be used to develop International Protocols on Non-Coercive Interviewing by Member States. It is currently screening in several cities in the UK and US.

On February 28, Melzer will present his annual report, to be published on Friday, to the UN Human Rights Council. His report this year focuses on psychological torture and inhuman and degrading treatment, both of which violate the 1984 UN Torture Convention and the 1987 European Convention on Human Rights, irrespective of whether the treatment was intentional.

Melzer has criticised the UK government for its inhuman and degrading treatment of Assange that has placed his life in jeopardy. He has cited Eminent Monsters as a key factor motivating his research.

The film is the first feature documentary by Bennett, who has worked for 23 years on international prime-time television commissions for BBC, Sky, NHK (Japan), Discovery and History (US). He has won three BAFTA Scotland awards: Best Features & Factual Series (The Council, 2017), Best Documentary (Dunblane: Our Story, 2016) and Best Current Affairs (Walking Wounded, 2011), as well as two Celtic Media Torcs (Dunblane and Walking Wounded) and an RTS Scotland Award for Best Specialist Factual: History (Brian Cox’s Russia).

Stephen Bennett
The film starts with a clip of US President Donald Trump voicing his approval of waterboarding, reluctantly banned by the Bush administration in 2006 as potentially illegal and ineffective, saying, “I like it a lot. I don’t think it’s tough enough.”

Eminent Monsters’ original title was Do No Harm, after the Hippocratic Oath that includes the promise “first, do no harm” that medical students make.

The Montreal-based, Scottish-born psychiatrist Dr. Ewen Cameron pioneered, with funding from the CIA and Canadian intelligence between 1957 and 1964, sensory deprivation, mind-altering chemicals, the use of forced comas, repetitive aural stimulation and so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques.”

Bennett shows how Cameron’s techniques were later used by the CIA as part of its controversial MK Ultra Project 68 during the Cold War, and by the British government against detainees in Northern Ireland in the 1970s, the US in Afghanistan, Abu Ghraib in Iraq, the CIA secret prison “black sites” and at Guantanamo Bay, and by 27 countries around the world. Cameron’s results were later published as Kubark Counter-Intelligence Interrogation Manual.

A prisoner at Guantanamo
The experiences gained from each conflict were used to inform the next, even though it was clear that these techniques were useful not so much in extracting information as in terrorising and traumatising people.

Bennett interviews the families of Cameron’s private patients, who were subjected to his supposedly therapeutic work. They described their loved ones as “having completely lost their personalities.”

The Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) in Northern Ireland used what has become known as “the Five Techniques”: wall standing, hooding, white noise, sleep deprivation, and a diet of only bread and water. It also used a sixth technique, making a prisoner wear a loose-fitting boiler suit, which in combination with the others, meant that the prisoner experienced unvarying sensory information from his environment—an effect known as “perceptual deprivation.”

One of the most well-known cases involved the 14 Republican “Hooded Men,” interned without trial in 1971. They were forced to listen to constant loud static noise; deprived of sleep, food and water; forced to stand in a stress position and beaten if they fell. Most horrifying of all, they were hooded and thrown from helicopters a short distance off the ground having been told they were hundreds of feet in the air.

Tim Shallice, professor emeritus and past director of the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience at University College, London, was present in the audience. He became a vocal critic of Britain’s “interrogation in depth” methods. His research showed that these methods resulted in extreme sensory deprivation, were likely to cause serious psychological damage and constituted a form of mental torture, contributing to the UK government’s official ban on interrogation in depth and the closing down of publicly funded research in Canada in the mid-1970s.

The Republic of Ireland took the UK to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), accusing it of torture. In 1978, the ECJ perversely ruled that the prisoners had not been tortured, “but their treatment had been inhuman and degrading,” repeating its verdict in 2017, thereby admitting that the treatment was indeed illegal according to both international and European law.

Nine of the 14 who are still alive are continuing their fight for justice against the Northern Ireland police. In September, the Belfast Court of Appeal ordered a criminal investigation into the treatment of the “Hooded Men,” with the Lord Chief Justice Sir Declan Morgan, Northern Ireland’s most senior judge, saying the treatment of the men “would, if it occurred today, properly be characterised as torture.”

Crucially, the ECJ’s 1978 ruling was used as the legal basis to justify state-endorsed torture, including by the Bush Administration after the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 and its subsequent “War on Terror.”

Mohamedou Ould Slahi
Bennett interviewed Mohamedou Ould Slahi, held for 14 years without charge at Guantanamo and believed to be the most tortured detainee. Another interviewee, British citizen Moazzam Begg, also imprisoned at Guantanamo, said he wanted to be killed after the interrogators used their strategy of “demonstrated omnipotence” against him.

The film was followed by a Q&A session with the director, Nils Melzer and Katie Taylor, the deputy director of Reprieve, which provides legal and investigative support to those facing execution, rendition, torture, extrajudicial imprisonment and extrajudicial killing.

Bennett explained how the film had a long gestation. In 2007, he read about Dr. Cameron, who was born and raised near his own home. He decided to find out more, and his research ended 10 years later in the release of Eminent Monsters. It was a story of great perseverance, he said. “It’s been quite an odyssey. You think getting the film made is hard—but getting it seen is just as hard!”

Moazzam Begg family photo [Credit: Hopscotch Films]
Katie Taylor of Reprieve stressed that the psychological effects of torture last a lifetime: “As well as suffering the psychological impact, Guantanamo’s victims have had problems rebuilding their lives, as the stigma of detention permeates everything. Never having been charged, they faced no trials, they were never able to clear their names and were hounded by the security services.”

She added, “Yet the perpetrators get off scot-free. Gina Haspel, the chief of a CIA black site in Thailand in 2002 in which prisoners were tortured with so-called ‘enhanced interrogation techniques,’ including waterboarding, now heads the CIA.”

Melzer stressed that the discussion was not just about the past, but the present. Every day he received requests for intervention in cases of torture. The film reveals the scale of the activity, the use of psychological methods of torture pioneered at Dachau, because the Nazis could not break people otherwise.

The ECJ’s decisions over Britain’s interrogation methods in Northern Ireland “were simply wrong,” he said. The UN definition of torture that underpins the European Union’s definition stresses that the purposeful infliction of pain or suffering, whether physical or psychological, constitutes torture. He explained that the “Hooded Men suffered way beyond torture. The state’s purpose was to show power, intimidate and break people, not to obtain information.”

In the case of the CIA’s torture, he added, no one has been brought to justice. But John Kiriakou, the first US government official to confirm in December 2007 that waterboarding was used to interrogate al-Qaeda prisoners, which Kiriakou described as torture, was convicted for passing classified information to a reporter and given a prison sentence in 2013.

Melzer noted, “The British Parliament had reported that the government was involved in torture, but the government refused to investigate. We are supposed to tolerate a system of torture.” He made the comparison to the Nuremburg Trials, saying, “We punished the Nazis, but what about our own governments, when they do these kinds of things? We have a system that punished the whistle blowers like Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange, not the perpetrators of torture. This means that as a society, we identify with the perpetrators not the victims.”
Post Reply