End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill, 2010

Discussions amongst the UK 911 Truth movement's Scottish group

Moderators: Moderators, Scottish moderators

Post Reply
Minor Poster
Minor Poster
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:02 pm
Location: Scotland

End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill, 2010

Post by letthemeatmadeiracake »

Margo MacDonald (Lothian Independent MSP) who introduced The End of Life Assistance Bill, is about to speak in Committee Room 1, Scottish Parliament (today, Monday 20 September). It's an Edinburgh Humanist group meeting but non-members can attend. I can't be there so I'm registering my protest here (have already done so via postcard).

MSPs are taking evidence on her bill at Scottish Parliament hearings from early September. Ms MacDonald has said there was public support for the measure, but she said: "There are aspects I have had a chance to discuss with medical professionals and people who have long-term degenerative conditions. I am more than willing to introduce some amendments myself if I think we can improve it. There is no false pride about this."

Margot writes: To help MSPs to assess the public mood and to support the The End of Life Assistance Bill, could you ask five friends, acquaintances, neighbours etc to contact their MSPs by letter, e-mail or phone, and ask them to support the Bill? If you are able to do this, it will help the Bill’s passage immeasurably, starting from the beginning of September. Should you need any further help or information, please contact my Parliamentary Office:

Margo MacDonald MSP

Room MG0.2

Scottish Parliament HQ

Edinburgh EH99 1SP

Tel 0131 348 5714

Email: margo.macdonald.msp@scottish.parliament.uk This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
http://www.scotlandquovadis.net/earlier ... ll-38.html

The other side of the argument from Care Not Killing:
Margo Macdonald's End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill - A brief critique from CNK
- The scope of the Bill is incredibly broad. It would offer assisted suicide to people who are to some degree dependent on others and would include those with life threatening and non life-threatening disabilities, and those with relatively common conditions such as, for example, insulin-dependent diabetes, heart or lung disease. Tens of thousands of seriously ill and disabled people throughout Scotland would fall within its remit.
- The Bill purports to allow assisted suicide (where a patient is provided with lethal drugs by a physician for self-administration). In fact it goes much further. It would also legalise euthanasia (where a physician administers lethal drugs to a patient directly).
- The drafting of the Bill is vague and full of euphemisms and ambiguities. Among others, there is no definition of what it is to find life 'intolerable' and the methods by which life would be legally terminated are not identified.

-The bill is not clear on what means can be used to end a person's life. One might assume that it is envisages lethal drugs but this is not specified and therefore the 'means of administration' might conceivably include gas (carbon monoxide or helium), hanging, a bullet or a push off a cliff.
- Safeguards are seriously defective. Among others, there is real doubt that the suggested medical assessments would be sufficient to discern that the patient is not under external pressure to request assisted suicide.
- The Bill contains no specified procedures by which doctors would report their involvement with an assisted suicide. This makes meaningful audit of how the law was working highly problematic.
- It places responsibility for providing “end of life assistance” on the shoulders of Scottish doctors, for whom it contains no 'conscience clause' and the majority of whom would not be prepared to participate in implementing the proposals of the Bill.

- The Bill is intended to 'enable a person to die with dignity and a minimum of distress'. This is already provided through good health care and particularly palliative medicine.

General Points
- The vast majority of medical practitioners and all the Royal Colleges of Medicine do not support assisted suicide.
- The Scottish Parliament has already had two opportunities to discuss assisted suicide. On both occasions the legalization of assisted suicide was convincingly rejected.
- For society to accept assisted suicide or euthanasia means it agrees that some lives no longer have any meaning, value or worth.
- Having assisted suicide legislation in place sends a message to vulnerable, ill, and elderly people that they should take up the option of assisted suicide so as not to be a burden.

- Evidence from the Netherlands and the US state of Oregon – where assisted suicide is currently legal - shows that it is impossible to prevent abuses from occurring.

Care Not Killing Alliance

The bill was introduced on 20 January, 2010, and is currently being considered at Stage 1
"For truth has now come to light, and falsehood [by its nature] is bound to perish; for, falsehood cannot bring forth anything new, nor can it bring back [what has passed away]."
Post Reply