Posting on other non-truth forums?

[Frank Freedom]

While we are generally comfortable up to a point in posting on Truth forums,what are your views about posting on non-truth sites,and if you do how are you received by the regular posters,and admins?

I guess this will be a short lived thread!

[paul wright]

It can be a lot of fun trying to rile them up in an intelligent fashion.
I've long abandoned such a mission, probably since being hassled on ATS for being too 'conspiracist'

[Frank Freedom]

Well I've just been suspended for an innocuous offence,but I suspect it was for being specific (for a change) in relating the philosophy of Leo Strauss to the neo-con agenda coupled to the BBC's 2004 'The Power Of Nightmares' that no one wants to touch!

[Frank Freedom]

It can be a lot of fun trying to rile them up in an intelligent fashion.
I've long abandoned such a mission, probably since being hassled on ATS for being too 'conspiracist'

Yes it has been "a lot of fun"over an extended period of time.Unfortunately the off topic rule applies quite rigiously on some forums which makes it kinda awkward on most occasions.
I understand if you can talk to regular folks at their level ,go for it in an appropriate way,other than that we as a "movement" are just talking to ourselves.

Tell me where I maybe mistaken here?

[paul wright]

No, you go with whatever you have to do, Frank
It just pissed me off a long while back arguing with idiots

[scienceplease 2]

Its my opinion that the truth must be discussed outside of truther forums.

There is a sustained campaign from JREFers, other conformists and OCTopushers to bash down anything remotely questioning about 9/11 on "other blogs" - on truther blogs there are other problems.

I participated in the 5614 comment session on Mike Rudin's bbc blog post

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2 ... ml?page=12

And we covered all manner of subjects, there were at least 2 JREFers on the blog and at least one of them was intelligent (but, uh, wrong): Choosing the evidence to fit your argument seems to be their stock in trade.

I try a little bit with YouTube comments - but that is rather hopeless cause.

I have vowed not to return to HuffingtonPost, but many other sites give opportunity to state your views.

[Pugwash]

Its my opinion that the truth must be discussed outside of truther forums.

I concur - I have had some success on farmers weekly, not 911, but Monsanto operations and climate change, topics relevant to the forum.

Generally I do not argue that my opinion to be believed but introduce counter views linking to other sources.

Where a signature is allowed - add link as appropriate to the full picture your trying to convey.

There are many music and film forums to slip-in if not upload video clips or documentary's.

[fish5133]

Just sow some seeds wherever you go. Recently a couple of photos on Orange front page asking for readers to guess what the conversation was. One picture was an Aborigine speaking to Prince William, another was David Cameron with a child in a classroom.

Abo to Prince Charles
hiya mate did you know 911 was an inside job.We abos are clever ba**ards you know. Buildings dont fall at free fall speed unless all the supports below are removed. I learnt that at Cambridge your highness

http://blogs.orange.co.uk/news/2010/01/ ... lliam.html

The latter received some comment from me about planes crashing into famous London land marks and mr Cameron remarking on pilot error as he continued to read My Pet Goat.

http://blogs.orange.co.uk/news/2010/01/ ... meron.html

Just a bit of imagination lightens the heavy load now and again. Doesnt even have to be funny.

[scienceplease 2]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-ven ... l#comments

Huffington Post has banned Jesse Ventura's post on 9/11 with the following statement.

"Editor's Note: The Huffington Post's editorial policy, laid out in our blogger guidelines, prohibits the promotion and promulgation of conspiracy theories -- including those about 9/11. As such, we have removed this post."

Comments closed.

Only blindfaithers are allowed to post.

Talk about Thought Crimes!!!

[Disco_Destroyer]

I started at Quakeshit.com before I even found a UK 911 group

I'm gonna spread that Huff Post nonesence :0

[Hagbard Celine]

There is a sustained campaign from JREFers, other conformists and OCTopushers to bash down anything remotely questioning about 9/11

"Onus... onus... Occam's Razor... onus... please try to read my posts more carefully... onus... onus... parsimony... onus... that old chestnut again... onus... onus..."

[satya]

I done a feature on this very issue

http://alerta-alerta-antifacista.blogsp ... roded.html

I think we should start listing sites that conspire for disinformation

[satya]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-ven ... l#comments

Huffington Post has banned Jesse Ventura's post on 9/11 with the following statement.

"Editor's Note: The Huffington Post's editorial policy, laid out in our blogger guidelines, prohibits the promotion and promulgation of conspiracy theories -- including those about 9/11. As such, we have removed this post."

Comments closed.

Only blindfaithers are allowed to post.

Talk about Thought Crimes!!!

worst case of fascism i have ever seen.........

[scienceplease 2]

...

worst case of fascism i have ever seen.........

Probably not the worst case...

[TonyGosling]

While we are generally comfortable up to a point in posting on Truth forums,what are your views about posting on non-truth sites,and if you do how are you received by the regular posters,and admins?

I guess this will be a short lived thread!

[Frank Freedom]

I'm still pre-modded on the BBC forums,been a couple of years now.Mind I was a bit hardcore on there to be fair

Yes 7 weeks or so now, the point is noted Tone

[Thermate911]

Well, I'll help to keep this thread running ;-)

Might I suggest that where there is already an agenda (eg: ThinkProgress, DailyKos, JREF etc etc ad nauseum) that we don't bother any more?

Some of us have been batting away on the net since 1989 and ISTM there's no longer any need to go looking to sway the unswayable on 9/11, person by person, as it's now pushing and clamoring its way into the mainstream and even on to the floor of some governments' chambers.

The evidence is in place - it's now just down to numbers and a clear recognition of just who is driving this present global insanity.

Perhaps if Jay Rockefella's understandable paranoia over the power of the web translates into more repressive action from the banksters, it would be useful to have a clear understanding of what the backbone of the net is all about? Study ARPANET and its spinoffs, especially Usenet and the Freenet Project - they cannot be brought down without badly damaging the NWO itself - nice Catch22 in our favour? ;-)

Meanwhile, FWIW, Carl Herman at examiner.com is providing a useful platform for commentary for those who still feel the urge to impart knowledge to the 'great uncaring' {:>
http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-Coun ... n-Examiner

"I will use such comments to point-out the propaganda or delete them at my discretion. Again, all relevant and polite questions, and factually accurate comments are welcome. As a professional educator I’m in agreement with my experience and research: we learn best from multiple perspectives in mutual commitment to understand the facts, see those facts from diverse points-of-view, and consider various policy proposals of what we should do." Carl Herman

[satya]

@Thermate911

Its actually illegal for anyone connected with the government in any way to enter mirc server or channel. Im sure its connected with the clinton regime in some way (legally)

[satya]

Probably not the worst case...

any contenders then?

[redadare]

I confine myself to harrassing MP's or posting occassionally on stuff like Comment Is Free, when there is something so outrageous, that I just can't shut up. Often there are already so many sensible comments before I even get there and then the Zionist lobby gets there and it is all racist, rambling, sh**.