DEW exist! Proof at last!

kc · Post by kc » Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:24 am

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/02 ... _ii_ships/

Clearly they misplaced the blueprints for the frickin lazers they used to bring down the WTC all those years ago, looks like they finally found them again! Judy was right (as long as she can now proove they also invented a time machine to go back in of course)

Lee · Post by **Lee** » Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:44 pm

Always gives me a chuckle to think of the many people walking around hoping to initiate a 'conspiracy chat' with the opening line..."did ya know DEW's brought down the twin towers.." (earwigger runs off to phone the ADL)

chek · Post by **chek** » Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:51 pm

In a similar vein, one of my fave chuckleworthies are people who wouldn't know how to change a fuse, let alone anything about standard physics can suddenly become expert in the implications of quantum physics.

ewing2001 · Post by **ewing2001** » Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:50 pm

still too many ignorants *here on both sides of the spectrum ;

History of 'Directed Energy Weapons'
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=4329
Jun 9 2008

chek · Post by **chek** » Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:48 pm

ewing2001 wrote:still too many ignorants *here on both sides of the spectrum ;

History of 'Directed Energy Weapons'
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=4329
Jun 9 2008

The knowledge of the existence of energy weapons isn't the issue.
The overestimation of their capabilities certainly is, and a link to a forum for ignoramuses doesn't change that, mashboy.

As for this site, it could really (imo) do with less morons, not more.
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewto ... ght=#78644

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:58 am

well archery exsists to. does that proof archery was used to bring down 3 buildings? simply because it exsists?

http://www.bowsports.com/

sycorax82 · Post by **sycorax82** » Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:21 pm

Considering 9/11 was a huge money-making scheme (amongst other things...) just think of the cost of pulling off a potential DEW demolition of the towers. We're talking way WAY beyond the cost of controlled demolition of any kind. Worth it? Er, no. Not even in the long run.

I've never seen it explained in enough detail how any DEW demolition could look as controlled as we all know the tower demos were. It always seems to me the towers couldn't fall in their own footprint if DEWs were used.