YouTube's New Rules Of Engagement?

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:44 pm

If you see it rip it!!
Try Orbit downloader or FLV downloader etc.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3gLVoImfXw[/youtube]

Post by **TonyGosling** » Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:53 pm

Here's another one
EMERGENCY - YouTube DELETING ACCOUNTS Imposing Mass Censorship NOW at the request of US Government
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3gLVoImfXw
But the guy does over-dramatise. How about a bunch of links or info about potentially censored videos that have and haven't been?

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:29 am

how certain are people that they are removing alternative information as oppose to violent and offensive hatred?

ive long said youtube needs some sort of moderation(not on here), if you read some of the comments and see some of the things people put on there you soon see something needs to be done.

i understand the concerns but untill some sort of proof can be shown they are taking down none offensive material and targetting alternative information its hard to know wether to see this storey as a bad thing or a good thing.

remember its a family site and targets all age groups. even this site has some form of moderation, youtube dos'nt, it relys on other people to flag things up, it seems they are changing their policy. but what are they targetting?

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:07 am

How about the other thread recently posted with the copper pushing the girl? (mind you he did say back, its just edited out, but even so)
'Marshal Law down at the DNC' I believe it is called
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=15579

Ooh KMFDM rock

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHwicSZ9 ... re=related[/youtube]

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:59 am

AceBryan7ox Make up your own minds:-
From the following page, note the comment section is frozen presumably by the user?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=p9eCuqR_KLY&NR=1
ShineHunter (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam Someone cloned and had aceBryan7ox account suspended, it's happening to alot of truth seekers.
Xanzzu (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam Ace did not insult anyone with his videos, and still his accounts was suspended.You are happy coz you think you won the battle (and that is just stupid to think), but what you closed mind does not see is that freedom of speech was broken. And even if you are against him this should bother you, but instead you use it to divert attention to yourself like YOU did something good. If there is no harmful content he can post it. It is called democracy. People have a right to choose what they believe in
Xanzzu (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam ace had a LOT of videos. If video has been edited that DOES NOT MEAN that he did it. He could have just get the video form email or from someone and posted it coz he tough it was interesting. In fact it would be unlikely that all videos were real. You are not proving that ace was a leech not by a long shoot.
s3ansk1 (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam /hmmm very strange!!! normally when i type in ebe part 1 all the serious ufo videos come up, not there are all the fake silly ones, very odd plud then i see ace has gone, and we are being told he was a leech, hmmmmm very interesting and again lies!! dont beleive anything anyone tells you beleive in what you beleive in!! hope to see you back ace if he does can someone message me with his new account name cheers.....middle finger to the corrupt goverment!!
dbz5450 (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam Ugh, Ace was the best! I really hope he makes another account. (Doubt it)
OwnageFury (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam Are you going to post that AceBryan7ox was a leech on all of your videos? Because it's kind of childish
Astrodicted (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam 1)the ufofleets are vids from mexico,not this bs
2)yr using gray scale so it looks infrared(like the mex vids)= stupid&funny
3)brian compiled vids,not create
4)yr a smartass
5)read 4
gnatbuzz (1 week ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam Snow geese migration! And not the ones that head down to Florida.

Now they are IFO (Identified Flying Objects)
condorito64 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam why was acebryan7ox a leech, what did he do with his videos?
UFO6NewWorldOrder (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam great vid. but unfortunately acebryan7ox is gone, i made a vid trying to find him.
HotSh0t602 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam btw, AgentEnigma, wtf is your problem. So even if Ace did alter some part of the sound in ONE of his videos out of what, hundreds? He was just giving us information about UFO's there is nothing wrong with that.
AgentEnigma (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam Disinformation can not tolerated.
grandemperor (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam aceBryan7ox Is gone? WTF? Bring the account back up now! I demand to know what happend and why!
AgentEnigma (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam The account is in limbo and will be processed accordingly.
HotSh0t602 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam The Government! lol but yeah I agree with you, hopefully he'll make another one soon.
MetalManDan7 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam These types of accounts get closed alot. For any tiny thing they jump on them like a totalitarian police force. Kinda fishy. just like AgentEnigma. Why would a fellow UFO Enthusiast be so dead set on riding youtube of AceBryan? dosent make sense, you'd think he would be supporting him. Unless hes just that pissy about people using other people videos, most have been stolen from other things anyways ex. documentarys ect. Aces motive was to spread information not steal other peoples thunder.
MetalManDan7 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam oops my bad its a parody. the discription wouldnt show up unless i highlighted it. never mind about the whole UFO enthusiast bit haha. but your stand point, makes alot more sence to me now. oddly your alot like other people whos names start with agent, that ive seen on posts relating to ufos. people who like the name agent..hate ufo's i guess haha. watch the intire series (i only have a few of them favorited) on nasa UFO's. im in the grey area about ufo's i just dont know. interesting tho
AgentEnigma (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam Hey no probs man, I do believe in them. Unfortunately there so much nonsense on YT concerning UFO's and end of the world * that it gets too ridiculous.
AgentEnigma (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam Because aceBryan7cox was a YT leech.
ben5424 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam You keep saying he was a leech, but why? What do you mean by that, and what made him a leech?
Blacksnyder (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam How long was it since Ace got suspended?
shortcut007 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam yea i saw that ace got removed :O wth :O all he posted recently was some video on a texas sighting before there was any planes :O and a video on stolen pics and negatives :O wth !!
deluxchixbone (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam Ace is gone
bassplayeroceanside (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam something foul has happened to AceBryan's youtube account. He posted NOTHING defamatory. Something fishy is going on. * Patriot Act!
Ericbranson3 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam why did they remove aceBryan7ox!?
petrolhead85 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide Marked as spam | Spam acebryan fox removed goverment disclosure ?

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Wed Oct 01, 2008 11:20 am

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Wed Oct 01, 2008 11:31 am

More Alex Jones on internet censorship.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFhbSolK ... re=related[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzSw30qP ... re=related[/youtube]

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:42 am

Also the other way this can be censored of course is by cost, take this case for example! Obviously there is nothing in this site but imagine if they had a list of targets

You have been warned!

Tiscali/Pipex/Webfusion charges for this website
http://www.isengard.co.uk:80/
Those who have followed this story for the last 12 months may recollect that your webmaster was charged £450.76 in September 2007 by an illegal midnight raid on the credit card used to pay the annual fee for this website (this itself in breach of contract terms). The charge was made for alleged excess use of bandwidth during August 2007. Bandwidth is a measure of server access time. Although the web hosting was organised on the basis of a more expensive 'unlimited' bandwidth' account, Tiscali took over Pipex in July 2007 and did not advise customers of any contract changes. Your webmaster took his wife on an R&R holiday for 2 weeks in August following her heart attack earlier in the year. During this time traffic rose on the website as it was not updated. Tiscali chose to treat its customers as a cash cow rather than shut down the website when they reached the bandwidth limits they had unilaterally imposed without informing customers.

Tiscali did not honour contract terms, refused to answer letters, phone calls or engage in its own disputes procedures as required by Ofcom. Your webmaster's credit card company determined that the charge was illegal and refunded the money and your webmaster took legal advice. Supporters of this website contributed to a fund that just about covered the charge and legal costs. In August 2008, Tiscali turned the debt over to 'arvato finance services Ltd' of Hull who wrote asking for the charge to be settled. Phone conversations followed advising them that the credit card company had already rejected the payment. However a week later 'Smiths' of the same address as 'arvato finance services Ltd.', purporting to be acting on their behalf, wrote threatening legal action. Consequently the debt has now been paid using the monies donated by generous supporters.

Your webmaster will not now be able to return the monies donated to the WHRS as previously promised if the matter had been dropped by Tiscali. A campaign has being started with MPs, Ofcom and the Press concerning Tiscali's business methods and illegal used of credit card information. Your webmaster leaves readers of this website to make their own minds up about the advisability of dealing with Tiscali given his experience!

For the last 12 months this website has been hosted by Peter Bowyer of Narrow Gauge Heaven and Maple Design and your webmaster is grateful that no charge has been made for this service.

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Thu Oct 02, 2008 2:53 pm

well it seems you could well be right. but why only certain videos? i mean you used alternative information from youtube to prove your point.

a positive if they do end up censoring everything, won't that just push people onto the streets? to be heard.

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:52 pm

marky 54 wrote:well it seems you could well be right. but why only certain videos? i mean you used alternative information from youtube to prove your point.

a positive if they do end up censoring everything, won't that just push people onto the streets? to be heard.

At the moment its only ones that recieve complaints. Once people realise they can complain about anything a whole load of different stuff will start dissapearing.
I see no problems with that UFO guy even if some of the vids were dodgy what happened to artistic license

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:47 am

Small quote says it all really:-

Oh yeah, YouTube, please stop censoring the view counters on these videos, it is beyond obvious now and just about every YouTube user knows that you fiddle the view counters to keep videos like this off the most-viewed lists. Why bother when it is just so blatantly obvious?

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:49 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVhaSbYpTyI[/youtube]

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:36 am

Saturday 6 December 2008, 11:50 PM
http://community.zdnet.co.uk/blog/0,100 ... 77b,00.htm
UK ISPs switch on mass Wikipedia censorship
Posted by Rupert Goodwins

The following notice has appeared on Wikipedia today when many UK users attempt to edit content:

"Wikipedia has been added to a Internet Watch Foundation UK website blacklist, and your Internet service provider has decided to block part of your access. Unfortunately, this also makes it impossible for us to differentiate between different users, and block those abusing the site without blocking other innocent people as well."

According to discussions on the Wikipedia administrators noticeboard, this is because a transparent proxy has been enabled for customers of Virgin Media, Be/O2/Telefonica, EasyNet/UK Online, PlusNet, Demon and Opal. This has two effects: users cannot see content filtered by the proxies, and all user traffic passing through the proxies is given a single IP address per proxy. As Wikipedia's anti-vandalism system blocks users by IP address, one single case of vandalism by a single UK user prevents all users on that user's ISP from editing. The effect is to block all editing from anonymous UK users on that list of ISPs. Registered users can continue to edit.

The content being filtered is apparently that deemed to meet the Internet Watch Foundation's critera for child pornography – in one case, this involves a 1970s LP cover art which, although controversial, is still widely available.

Reports on the admin noticeboard say that this filtering is easy to circumvent, either by using Wikipedia's secure server or by sending a request to find the page via parameters in the URL. However, no fix has been found – nor is one expected – for the proxy address problem.

"This is the first I've come across UK wide internet censorship, and I'm shocked. I had no idea until now that like China, we too have built a great firewall - only we keep quiet about ours.", user Hahnchen said, on the noticeboard.

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:29 pm

NufffRespect on The Alex Jones Show"Censorship"1/2

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlR7TQIGmiA[/youtube]

NufffRespect on The Alex Jones Show"Censorship"2/2

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1mSRKjjMRw[/youtube]

YouTube Boycott December 19th 2008 (Blackout)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3d3NWP7TnoE[/youtube]

Here is the link to download the video if you wish to upload it to your channel:
http://uploading.com/files/G0WUFBYI/YouTube
Boycott December 19th 2008.avi.html
**Special Thanks Goes Out To dekionplexis for providing the link! Thanks for all of your hard work dekionplexis!**

Here is another direct download link as well:
http://files.filefront.com/YouTube+Boyc ... einfo.html
Thanks goes to figonapetter for the link above

Here is yet another link

http://rapidshare.com/files/172375736/Y ... mber_t.avi
Credit for this link goes to Jonas from the channel SCX2k. Thanks!

We want to thank Andie Tang for creating a FaceBook event to further spread the message of this movement. The FaceBook event is called Boycott Youtube December 19th for Free Speech. Please join the event if you wish to attend, and share this with all of your contacts

Thanks!

Andy.

We urge everyone on YouTube to participate in a blackout on December 19th 2008. We have chosen this date because we needed enough time after this video was posted to gather enough attention and supporters in order to have an effect on the traffic on YouTube. So we figured almost two weeks from now would be a credible amount of time. The blackout can last how ever long each user feels is appropriate. We sincerely hope that everyone who is watching joins us on that day for this civil protest. Please do not forget that all of your clicks and video posts made this site what it is today. Without your clicks, watches, and videos there would be no YouTube. Thank You.

Honors So Far:

#34 - Most Discussed (Today)
#1 - Most Discussed (Today) - Education
#11 - Most Discussed (This Week) - Education
#64 - Most Discussed (This Month) - Education
#6 - Most Responded (Today) - Education
#23 - Most Responded (This Week) - Education
#7 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Germany
#2 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Australia
#2 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Canada
#3 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - United Kingdom
#4 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Ireland
#14 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - India
#3 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - New Zealand
#38 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Israel
#5 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education
#25 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Spain
#34 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Mexico
#33 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - France
#75 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Italy
#47 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Japan
#17 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - South Korea
#5 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Netherlands
#42 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Poland
#25 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Brazil
#79 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Hong Kong
#65 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Taiwan
#26 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Czech Republic
#6 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Sweden
#32 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Education - Australia
#32 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Education - Canada
#24 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Education - United Kingdom
#19 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Education - Ireland
#28 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Education - New Zealand
#39 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Education
#87 - Most Viewed (This Week) - Education - Sweden
#7 - Top Favorited (This Week) - Education
#30 - Top Favorited (This Month) - Education
#5 - Top Rated (This Week) - Education
#26 - Top Rated (This Month) - Education

Lets make this happen people!

Post by **TonyGosling** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:15 pm

Could this ADL involvement have something to do with YouTube's new policy?

ADL Works with Youtube to Help Censor Videos
http://americanfreepress.net/

Anti-Defamation League joins YouTube to fight online 'hate'
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1046428.html

......The YouTube Abuse & Safety Center features information and links to resources developed by ADL to help Internet users respond to and report offensive material and extremist content ........

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:48 pm

Urgent: The Information War Has Truly Begun
Category: Life

Urgent: The Information War Has Truly Begun
9/11 airliner 'still flying' AFTER it crashed into WTC?
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=16493

No Plane Debris at Pentagon!! GRAB Video
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=16492

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:45 am

Move to End Internet Neutrality Seen as Blow to Ordinary Bloggers
by Lawrence R. Velvel

Go To Original
http://atlanticfreepress.com/oped/7739- ... gers-.html
If the cable and phone companies that transmit Internet data are allowed to charge higher rates to some producers for faster service the result will be “a ten pin strike against political freedom,” a prominent legal authority warns.

That’s because the change will enable the wealthy to “quickly take over the high speed transmissions (for their trash commercial content) just as they completely monopolize radio and TV, and just as their incredibly greedy profit-seeking has had a very deleterious effect on print journalism,” writes Lawrence Velvel, dean of the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover.

Velvel’s plea for “internet neutrality” comes in his new book “An Enemy of The People,” subtitled “The Unending Battle Against Conventional Wisdom(Doukathsan).” Essentially, he writes, the proposed change is an “attempt by the wealthy to make the internet into yet another repository of their power…”

Under the new scheme sought by transmission firms, Velvel writes, “large companies would pay more, no doubt a lot more, in order to have their messages, videos, audios, and any other content transmitted rapidly. The rest of us peasants, who could not afford to have our content move fast, would pay less and have it move more slowly.”

“One can be sure that the average guy with something he wants to say will be relegated to lower speed transmissions,” Velvel writes. “Blogdom, and the use of the internet by average people for political purposes, will likely be as good as dead.”

According to Save The Internet.com(STI):

“The nation’s largest telephone and cable companies — including AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner — want to be Internet gatekeepers, deciding which Web sites go fast or slow and which won’t load at all.”

“What we have here,” Velvel explained, “is a bunch of unregenerate capitalists, who think that nothing else is important except trying to make as much as they can conceivably get away with. As with the oil companies and the investments banks, huge profit margins and scores of millions annually for their chairmen and CEOs isn’t enough for them. They want more. Always more. Nothing else matters to them. The pipes (transmission) companies are no different.”

Velvel pointed out, “The average guy can’t be published in a newspaper, and cannot afford the money to pay to be on radio or television. His voice is limited. The great benefit of the internet, the reason it bade fair to be the new version of the poor man’s printing press (which is what picketing and marching were once called), is that it gave everyone a chance to have his or her say in a way that was immediately available to anyone who found it or knew of it and wanted to read it.”

“That is why tens of millions of blogs sprang up,” Velvel continued, “with (at least) many thousands of them being on political subjects, and with blogdom sometimes having major political impacts.”

Others besides Velvel have also commented on efforts to destroy net neutrality. As a consequence of a 2005 decision by the Bush Federal Communications Commission, Internet Neutrality, “the foundation of the free and open internet — was put in jeopardy,” STI says. “Now cable and phone company lobbyists are pushing to block legislation that would reinstate Net Neutrality.”

“Without Net Neutrality, startups and entrepreneurs will be muscled out of the marketplace by big corporations that pay for a top spot on the Web,” STI says.

“If Congress turns the Internet over to the telephone and cable giants, everyone who uses the Internet will be affected,” STI continues. “Connecting to your office could take longer if you don’t purchase your carrier’s preferred applications. Sending family photos and videos could slow to a crawl. Web pages you always use for online banking, access to health care information, planning a trip, or communicating with friends and family could fall victim to pay-for-speed schemes.”

STI warned the consequences of abandoning Internet Neutrality would be “devastating.” “Innovation would be stifled, competition limited, and access to information restricted. Choice and the free market would be sacrificed to the interests of a few corporate executives.”

Post by **TonyGosling** » Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:01 am

Latest antic of YouTube is to use MUSIC as a truth smashing weapon in the information war.

This video contains an audio track that has not been authorized by WMG. The audio has been disabled. More about copyright

DianaIsLove Only just uploaded thios one in an amazing series
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUas9_UHiYY

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:28 pm

Google ‘on verge’ of buying Twitter
Google ‘on verge’ of buying Twitter

Google is in “late stage” talks to buy the microblogging service Twitter, according to reports on the influential technology blog TechCrunch.

Michael Arrington, editor of the site, says that “two separate people, close to the negotiations” have told him that Google is on the verge of acquiring Twitter. He says that he does not know how much the deal will be worth, but expects it to be well in excess of the $250 million valuation that Twitter attracted in its last round of funding.

Twitter’s founders, Biz Stone, Evan Williams and Jack Dorsey, last year rejected overtures from Facebook to buy the microblogging service for a rumoured $500 million in stock. Peter Thiel, one of the executives involved in the negotiations, hinted that the two companies had been unable to reach an agreement on a price for the deal, or the future structure of the company.

Google today distanced itself from the claims of a possible takeover bid. “We do not comment on rumours and speculation,” said a spokesman.

Twitter has enjoyed an explosive growth in popularity over the last year, with traffic to its site up by around 974 per cent. Celebrities, politicians and companies alike have embraced the service as means of directly communicating with fans, customers and voters.

It famously broke the news of several major events, including the terrorist attacks in Mumbai and the Hudson plane crash in New York. The immediacy of the service, and the fact that messages, known as “tweets”, are visible to all web users, has made it a powerful reporting tool and a source of some startling eyewitness accounts.

The acquisition of Twitter, one of the hottest properties on the web, would make sense for Google. One of Twitter’s greatest strengths is in providing a real-time feed of the topics that are interesting its users. Twitter has been slow to capitalise on the search potential of this stream of data, with companies such as Twitscoop and Twitterfall filling the void. Google would no doubt seek to integrate this real-time trending data into its existing search results online.

“Google knows well how to treat new sources of information as signals that weigh into search results,” said Stephen Shankland, a technology reporter at Cent. “The company has been gradually blending into its search results data sources such as blogs and news stories that reflect new information arriving on the web.”

“We’ve been arguing for some time that Twitter’s real value is in search,” said TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington. “It holds the keys to the best real time database and search engine on the Internet, and Google doesn’t even have a horse in the game.”

Twitter has also struggled to settle on a business model that would allow the microblogging service to turn a profit without alienating users, and a deal with Google would resolve at least some of these issues.

If the deal went ahead, it would be the second time that Evan Williams and Biz Stone had sold a company to Google. The pair founded Blogger, the blogging service, which was bought by Google in 2003 for an undisclosed fee.

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Wed May 06, 2009 2:57 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJgfH-hhNPo

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJgfH-hhNPo[/youtube]

QuitTheirClogs · Post by **QuitTheirClogs** » Wed May 06, 2009 10:47 pm

YouTube Suspend “Alex Jones” Channel

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o26N2SE2zOs[/youtube]

NuffRespect:

The Official Alex Jones account has been suspended from YouTube. Spread the word! We all need to take action to get YouTube to reinstate TheAlexJonesChannel.

Firstly, please subscribe to the new home of The Alex Jones channel: http://www.youtube.com/THElNFOWARRlOR

New Backup Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheInfowarsChannel

We need to build these channels back up again as quickly as possible. DON'T LET GOOGLE WIN!

QuitTheirClogs · Post by **QuitTheirClogs** » Wed May 13, 2009 5:33 pm

Bermas and AJ kicked off Youtube

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_kMqWcFNwQ[/youtube]

And TheInfoWarrior account is suspended:

Firstly, please subscribe to the new home of The Alex Jones channel: http://www.youtube.com/THElNFOWARRlOR

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Tue May 19, 2009 8:26 pm

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Thu May 28, 2009 7:39 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX1igCNnBdk

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX1igCNnBdk[/youtube]

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:10 pm

I have just succumbed to the Facebook just in time to see Cindy Sheehan threatened with account closure!

Cindy Sheehan maybe FB deleted the pictures of dead Iraqi children that I posted about a week ago? But it is so far down on my wall, I can't find the posts? Sure, YouTube deleted our video and I wrote the article "War is Unsuitable for Children." B/C our video was removed because of that.

Cindy Sheehan Please Read This! Warning! Your account could be disabled. Your behavior indicates that you may be in violation of Facebook's Terms of Use. Continued misuse of Facebook's features could result in your account being disabled. If you have any questions or concerns, you can visit our FAQ page. This is what FB sent me...I have bad behavior, but it doesn't say what I did.

Aron Dawson If I dissapear :0 this will be why. As if Cindy Sheehan posted anything, maybe it was a cop beating someone or something :0
Here are 2 coments out of 15 on the post:-
Lonnie Lopez at 01:18 on 03 June
Facebook rules are unclear and would not hold up in court, yet they kick people off every day for violating their fuzzy rules. They tried to block me because I was sending antiwar news articles to antiwar friends and antiwar groups I'm a member of. They call that "spam."Show 15 more comments...Evan Ravitz at 02:49 on 03 June
When Facebook "disabled" my account for 15 days in Dec., Lauren at "User Operations" was helpful, though she couldn't say what the "policies" are. I think their computers are full of bugs and paranoia. Email her at: appeals+nse0vrr@facebook.com

Thermate911 · Post by **Thermate911** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:42 pm

I have just succumbed to the Facebook

Bet that must have hurt! I suppose you'll be visiting Langley next? [;-/
Poor Cindy caught up in such a maelstrom...

.

Hopefully sufficient folk are taking AJ seriously, despite that mandatory rant at the end of the clip you posted previously?

I would propose not only reposting all these 'favourites' on alternative nnnTubes but also starting them up as torrents - that's where the new seekers (ie.18-28 year olds) are most likely to go looking,imo.

http://torrentfreak.com/how-to-create-a-torrent/

infowars · Post by **infowars** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:00 pm

TonyGosling wrote:Here's another one
EMERGENCY - YouTube DELETING ACCOUNTS Imposing Mass Censorship NOW at the request of US Government
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3gLVoImfXw
But the guy does over-dramatise. How about a bunch of links or info about potentially censored videos that have and haven't been?

Hi
Its Geting Beyond A joke Will have to upload via Pirate satalite oneday

But I Have Put Up a U.K Video Upload Site, Please Upload any relevent vids for safe storage.

Http://www.info-wars.tv

Regards
Webmaster S.o.S
http://www.infowars.tv Alternative news & media Network

scienceplease 2 · Post by **scienceplease 2** » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:30 pm

The BBC's Interactive reporter Siobhan Courtney talks about the investigation into the 'video attack'.

Video-sharing website YouTube has removed hundreds of pornographic videos which were uploaded in what is believed to be a planned attack.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm

Thermate911 · Post by **Thermate911** » Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:00 pm

infowars wrote:
TonyGosling wrote:Here's another one
EMERGENCY - YouTube DELETING ACCOUNTS Imposing Mass Censorship NOW at the request of US Government
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3gLVoImfXw
But the guy does over-dramatise. How about a bunch of links or info about potentially censored videos that have and haven't been?

Hi
Its Geting Beyond A joke Will have to upload via Pirate satalite oneday

But I Have Put Up a U.K Video Upload Site, Please Upload any relevent vids for safe storage.

Http://www.info-wars.tv

Regards
Webmaster S.o.S
http://www.infowars.tv Alternative news & media Network

Excellent - and a truly effective way to use them moneybombs!

Alex Jones & Tony Gosling -

05/22/2009 Tony Gosling, Bilderberg researcher joins Alex to discuss the Nazi roots of Bilderberg and the group's globalist agenda. Visit his great website at bilderberg.org http://www.bilderberg.org/ http://www.infowars.com/ http://www.prisonplanet.com/ http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

Whatever people might think of AJ personally, he sure knows how to organise

Disco_Destroyer · Post by **Disco_Destroyer** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:54 pm

This little Youtube deletion has me curious!!

[TRANSLATED] Laibach - Divided States of America (part 1/6) [video unavailable]
Divided States Of America, directed by award winning Slovenian film maker Sašo Pod...

Ooh and I cannot upload an image of the page

Ah well could be copyright stuff but??

Divided States Of America, directed by award winning Slovenian film maker Sašo Podgoršek, is a unique document of Laibach’s US tour, set during the traumatic 2004 post-election atmosphere in a country deeply divided by two opposite political and cultural poles.
Laibach conducted its first tour of North America in 1989, two years before the disintegration of its mother country, Yugoslavia. It was called "Sympathy for the Devil Tour" and was followed by two further tours in 1992 and 1997.

In 2001 came the attack on WTC, then followed the avenging wars on Afghanistan and Iraq, and the universal offensive against terrorism, events which radically marked the new millennium - but also tightened the doors to the USA for many foreigners. Despite that, in election year 2004, in a tensely divided atmosphere between President Bush and Democratic candidate Kerry, Laibach successfully slipped again into the country to carry out their latest 15-concert North American tour. The first stop was in Washington, D.C., only a gunshot from the White House and only one day after the election results had been announced. In the air was a feeling of uneasiness, dark clouds covered the sky and rain fell all day...

Divided States Of America is released on 13th November 2006 and comes with bonus footage of Laibach Live In Paris. For further information and to see the film’s trailer, please visit: http://www.laibach.nsk.si/dividedstates.html

9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom

YouTube's New Rules Of Engagement?

YouTube's New Rules Of Engagement?

Alternative Upload and store your videos

Re: Alternative Upload and store your videos