911 Amateur Part 2 - North Tower Fakery

[sidlittle]

http://www.livevideo.com/video/embedlin ... part2.aspx

Posted in another thread but I thought I would give it more views.

Hopefully we can avoid knee-jerk childish insults. Lets avoid the playing of the man rather than the ball as Anthony Lawson might say..

So, what are your thoughts on this video from simon shack?

Are we going to now accept the Naudet footage is indeed faked?

[John White]

I scratched my head over what to post or whether to post

I saw the pros and cons, as it were of do either

I thought: "Is there really any point me pointing out the obvious on a brand new shack production"?

And then decided: no there isnt really

But decided to say this:

"I watched it"

[chek]

http://www.livevideo.com/video/embedlin ... part2.aspx

Posted in another thread but I thought I would give it more views.

Hopefully we can avoid knee-jerk childish insults. Lets avoid the playing of the man rather than the ball as Anthony Lawson might say..

So, what are your thoughts on this video from simon shack?

Are we going to now accept the Naudet footage is indeed faked?

No sidlittle, that is not the conclusion to be drawn, other than for hopeless cases who swallow Shacks three major deceptions hook, line and sinker.

If you particularly care (which I doubt, because you wouldn't need to be prodded into doing it otherwise) on finding out what those deceptions are, look a little further afield at other sources to discover them.

Rather than relying on being spoonfed tripe, try and do some research on what actually happened for yourself and you may discover - for yourself - how Simple Simon is misleading you.

[jfk]

to skeptics,
what is your explaination for what shack points out as evidence of 'linear cutting charges'

[John White]

to skeptics,
what is your explaination for what shack points out as evidence of 'linear cutting charges'

What other explanations can you consider/think of/be aware of other than "Wow! Simon Shack is right!"?

[jfk]

What other explanations can you consider/think of/be aware of other than "Wow! Simon Shack is right!"?

that's why i am here, to listen to other people's explainations

[John White]

What other explanations can you consider/think of/be aware of other than "Wow! Simon Shack is right!"?

that's why i am here, to listen to other people's explainations

So you have no thoughts of your own on the matter?

I'm just wondering: do you always accept the provided surface explanation just becuase it is "alternative" information?

[jfk]

'

m just wondering: do you always accept the provided surface explanation just becuase it is "alternative" information?

no john, otherwise, i'd end up believing you!

[gruts]

So, what are your thoughts on this video from simon shack?

Are we going to now accept the Naudet footage is indeed faked?

your questions have been answered so it looks like the ball's in your court sid....

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=13099

....what are your thoughts about the fact that your hero's been shown up as a liar and a fraud yet again?

are you now going to accept that he's taking the piss out of you or - like so many times before - will you run away from the truth and continue to spread shack's lies?

[gruts]

and as if our intelligence hasn't been insulted enough....

here's "911 amateur" - the tits & techno remix

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek3wmlGB_yY

[arthur two sheds jackson]

More brilliant stuff from Simon Shack

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM

[arthur two sheds jackson]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyM

[John White]

Arther "two sheds" jackson

Users posting from this IP address
my left bollock [ 33 Posts ]

Easy Rider [ 18 Posts ]

Laetrile [ 7 Posts ]

arthur two sheds jackson [ 2 Posts ]

BANNED

[Newspeak International]

For an organised disinfo movement they don't seem very good at
hiding their tracks!

[gruts]