Moderator: Moderators
People who don't conform to your idiosyncratic and self-adopted diktats is what you mean, corky.Killtown wrote:Don't worry dh, shek is just scared because if I'm mod, him and the rest of his merry bunch of attacking trolls are done for.
But people who want to debate and be civil have NOTHING to worry about.
I don't fear it because it ain't never going to happen, champ.Killtown wrote:Liars like sh*t would be gone, that's why he so fears me becoming a mod.chek wrote:People who don't conform to your idiosyncratic and self-adopted diktats is what you mean
No, more because known promoters of known frauds aren't welcome.Killtown wrote:Because this forum is a shill operation, sh*t?chek wrote:I don't fear it because it ain't never going to happen, champ.
You can count on that.
No I mean frauds proven by evidence that you can't refute, like Simon Shack that you actively promote, makes you a liability and not welcome..Killtown wrote:You mean:chek wrote:No, more because known promoters of known frauds aren't welcome.
That's always a good guide on any site, champ.
"known promoters of [who I, sh*t, thinks are] known frauds aren't welcome"
utopiated wrote:Bump.
Give Killtown a mod job. I think it would provide some balance.
arthur two sheds jackson wrote:TonyGosling wrote:What sort of balance is that?
Half way between truth and disinformation?
utopiated wrote:Bump.
Give Killtown a mod job. I think it would provide some balance.
Killtown would make an excellent moderator, what evidence do you have that he is giving out disinformation?
paul wright wrote:In some ways I'd love Killtown to be moderating
It would be fair and transparent
However Killtown has a long history of emotion and attack
I dont by any means agree with the aministrators here in every respect but neither would I want to fight with them on particular viewpoints
Killtown obviously would, and if the admins invited him in I'd agree, but well, this viewpoint is getting a showing. So let it be
That's not strictly true.utopiated wrote:You need someone to do the "other controversies" area[s]. All the mods support the basic Con Demo theory.
Yes, I'd just like to say I dont support the Con Demo theory, whatever that is. If it's conventionnal demolition, then I'd support as building 7, but not the Towers. They certainly had a relatively small amount of conventional explosives in from the basements to the top, But that isn't how they were brought downutopiated wrote:You need someone to do the "other controversies" area[s]. All the mods support the basic Con Demo theory.
I was more making a general point than saying wither of these ppl should be made mods. I actually agree that if you take a cursory glance thru posting content in the "alt theories" area you'll find a lot of *really* bad posters who are lumped as being on the minority or kookier side of things.chek wrote:That's not strictly true.utopiated wrote:You need someone to do the "other controversies" area[s]. All the mods support the basic Con Demo theory.
As any review of Killtown's debates will show, he has the reasoning abilities of a brick. He knows how to block and deflect but that's about it.
You might as well make Prole Art Threat a mod - he's just a more surly version.
But you see Paul has a waaaay harder task than the others. Gosling and JW are prepared to simply dismiss anyone or any content that radically opposed their consensus viewpoints. Someone like Paul I bet feels he has to justify his being tolerant of other areas to the other admins here.Whereas I think that Paul probably detests a lot of my views but I would never for a moment think that would be a factor in him moderating me should he ever feel the need to do so.
You've read more of Killtown's content than me. So maybe you're right. As I said it wasn't specific to one person.Trust and respect is a major factor in successful moderating, and I'd suggest Killtown is a long way from having that trust and a million miles from having widespread respect other than within his faction.
Discussed this with Ian a few months before this board underwent a huge overhaul. I admitted I couldn't do the straight 9/11 material but I did offer to do certain topic areas if they ever got introduced on the forum. On top of this there's the matter of finding time to moderate a whole forum - just doing the day-to-day stuff I do now I'd do without food and sleep if it was biologically feasible - but then I guess I'd look even skinnier than I do at the momentWhat about yourself David?
Why shouldn't you be one?
utopiated wrote:I was more making a general point than saying wither of these ppl should be made mods. I actually agree that if you take a cursory glance thru posting content in the "alt theories" area you'll find a lot of *really* bad posters who are lumped as being on the minority or kookier side of things.chek wrote:That's not strictly true.utopiated wrote:You need someone to do the "other controversies" area[s]. All the mods support the basic Con Demo theory.
As any review of Killtown's debates will show, he has the reasoning abilities of a brick. He knows how to block and deflect but that's about it.
You might as well make Prole Art Threat a mod - he's just a more surly version.
But you see Paul has a waaaay harder task than the others. Gosling and JW are prepared to simply dismiss anyone or any content that radically opposed their consensus viewpoints. Someone like Paul I bet feels he has to justify his being tolerant of other areas to the other admins here. I'm not saying he actually does this - but may feel like it sometimes.Whereas I think that Paul probably detests a lot of my views but I would never for a moment think that would be a factor in him moderating me should he ever feel the need to do so.
You've read more of Killtown's content than me. So maybe you're right. As I said it wasn't specific to one person.Trust and respect is a major factor in successful moderating, and I'd suggest Killtown is a long way from having that trust and a million miles from having widespread respect other than within his faction.
Discussed this with Ian a few months before this board underwent a huge overhaul. I admitted I couldn't do the straight 9/11 material but I did offer to do certain topic areas if they ever got introduced on the forum. On top of this there's the matter of finding time to moderate a whole forum - just doing the day-to-day stuff I do now I'd do without food and sleep if it was biologically feasible - but then I guess I'd look even skinnier than I do at the momentWhat about yourself David?
Why shouldn't you be one?
Code: Select all
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
- I blame my journey down the birth canal. Way too bumpy. utopiated wrote: You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
Those are my settings - seems strange to be able to post and not edit your own content.
Maybe I get these board settings as punishment for not being a "Validated" member of the human race.
Where's that at?Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /board/posting.php on this server.
I noticed that my status changed to "moderate poster" a few days ago and "moderate" is a word that I really don't like. could it be changed to something like "not very prolific" instead?Dogsmilk wrote:What's with this new 'critic' tag? How come Telecasterisation is suddenly a "911 truth critic" (?) and Alex V - a definite critic - is a regular poster?
How come Killtown is a "911 truth critic" too? I mean, he's a buffoon with a head full of straw, but Jesus when did he become a "911 truth critic"? What's the definition of this exciting new label?
If everyone on this forum is going to be filed and classified according to someone's whim, might I suggest an attractive scheme of coloured stars and triangles to be displayed underneath avatars?
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
