OK I have had a brief retelling of your experience. And in your above reply you say that investigation about accounts is OK as long as it isn't attacking people?
Well, maybe sometines when one tries to investigate it may SEEm like attacking by the one who is being investigated, or the subject they believe in,
no you totally misunderstand, what im saying is it is the information that needs to be addressed, the information on the subject not the person and unrelated things to do with people. for example your levitating example with greer, lets say for arguements sake greer was lieing about being able to levitate, does that disprove the many people who have witnessed u.f.o's ? does calling into question each persons credibility rather than tackling the information prove anything? therefore it's attacking the person whilst avoiding the information when that happens.
You have made an image of me i find quite amusing actually. Because I many times have been on the receiving end of speudo-skeptics that have been VERY absuive to me and others. Calling us 'woo woo' and even 'mentally ill' etcetc. Now THAT is attacking. so lets remember this
not at all, i have simply observed that your arguements entail what i have said above, ie: somehow calling in to doubt someones credibility disproves the information presented. rather than tackling the disclosure projects information you seem'd obsessed with greer and his credibility, when there are numerous people all over the world who say the same things, it aint just greer.
So looking at your experience I ask/investigate. Why would a bright light up in the sky move about so strangely?
am i suppose to know the answer?
what would be the point of that?
there has to be a point? what if the point in it is unknown? what if the point in it would only make sense if you knew what the point was?
are you saying it did'nt happen because you car'nt see the point in it?
if not why does it matter what the point was? it happened and has happened to many, get over it.
Going very swiftly from location to location?
yes, is'nt that what most flying things do especially when being controlled? even a bird flys swiftly from location to location, however none known to us do it whilst executing 90 degree turns.
either by black ops with humans flying whatever it is, or ETS, or interdimensional beings, OR is it UAP, Unidentified Aerial Phenomena?
aerial phenomena it certainly was not, ive looked into that, nothing matches. nothing moves in the same way.
if you think something does why not run it by me.
How do we know? You admit you do not know. But you keep claiming millions of people have seen UFOs. but that statement is too vague, because any serious UFOlogist will admit that many reported sightings CAN be explained.
What do we know of UAP? I feel we should also pay attention to that, which might explain SOME sightings. Have you also heard of Earth Lights?
exactly how do we know? by hazzarding a guess of what it could of been? like earth lights? the answer is looking at other evidence, like this if we are ever going to understand anything about these sightings.
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doc ... &plindex=3
i linked it before to get your take on it, but you seem to of missed it. nasa says they are space debris, the problem is there is something to measure them against as they pass behind a 12 mile long tether which snapped of during a space mission, you can calculate the size yourself just by using a ruler on the tether then dividing the measurement into 12, then use the divided measurement on the pulsing orbs that are supposidly space debris.
2-3 miles is claimed by the guy in the video for the size of them, why not try it yourself. nasa asked the guy in the shuttle what he see's because they can see lots of things swimming about, he replies that some debris are being dragged with them, but if you look how far away the tether is and then bare in mind the objects passing behind the tether then it is very unlikely the 'debris' are anywhere near the space shuttle, the guy doing the talk says the tether is 77 miles away, but i cannot confirm that.
anyhow this type of video and incident is evidence and if your serious about investigating then this is the stuff you need to look at, not sightings people cannot prove because they were the only ones who saw it, and then making up random guesses of what was seen inorder to explain it away. nor attacking the person who bring the information forward, ie: bob is talking rubbish about u.f.o's because he believes in the moon landing!
This is NOT saying that actual crafts don't exist, but that investigation is not jumping to conclusions until we know the evidence.
but is'nt ignoring what people tell us and then coming up with explainations like earth lights and UAP when nobody else was there to see and is just guessing at an explaination jumping to conclusions?
to you things like earth lights and UAP sounds sensible, but to me where my sighting is concerned i know the object was to well controlled for that type of stuff because i was there and i witnessed it, however i can understand the need for people to keep coming up with silly explainations for what are obviously intelligently controlled craft of some sort.
the only thing i do not know for certain is manmade/alien.
--> You've gotta be taking the piss. Either that or you live in such a paranoid world that you check the tea your mom brings you each morning for mi5 poisoning.
