I made this one earlier? A different angle maybe?

arthur two sheds jackson · Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:35 pm

Most of the discussions on video fakery assume that if indeed there was any video fakery that it was done in real time or at least on the same day.

If I was asked to carry out video fakery I would be concerned that that chances of mistakes would be too high if it had to be done in real time or on the same day.

I would have filmed the twin towers on a date before 911, then gone to the film lab or whatever you call it and added the required effects.

Then you could have added planes, gashes in buildings, explosions and people jumping out of buildings...........impossible you may say, but then isn't this exactly what happens at the movies?

I would then have my doctored film fed into all the news reports at the appropriate moments............hey presto

What are you thoughts?

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:02 am

that dos'nt explain all the amatuer footage that was taken by people who witnessed the event in real time showing all the same identical things.

to believe tv fakery you have to believe everyone in new york are liars and everyone who filmed the event independantly had all their footage took away and altered without them noticing it or the changes.

arthur two sheds jackson · Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:55 am

There was no amateur footage other than that masquerading as amateur, all the so called amateur footage has been discredited.

If you have any amateur footage I would like to see it.

chek · Post by **chek** » Mon Dec 24, 2007 1:26 pm

arthur two sheds jackson wrote:There was no amateur footage other than that masquerading as amateur, all the so called amateur footage has been discredited.

LOL.
Who told you that? In your dreams maybe, reincarnated sunshine.

arthur two sheds jackson wrote:If you have any amateur footage I would like to see it.

LOLOL

You don't think a no planer reincarnated or not is gonna do any actual work, do ya marky?

LOL

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Mon Dec 24, 2007 6:25 pm

If you have any amateur footage I would like to see it.

are you incapable of looking for the amatuer footage yourself?

im certainly not going to go looking for all the amatuer footage to show npt'ers yet again. luckily however i found the last thread requesting such stuff where i found and linked known amatuer footage by doing a search and linking the videos which took about 5 minutes of my time in each case.

if i had done a whole day of looking for 9/11 amatuer footage amongst the numerous youtube style sites im pretty sure i would of find double the amount, however i did'nt think it was needed as the links i gave in this thread were ample enough to show the problem of tv fakery and strenghtens and highlights the problem i mention here

to believe tv fakery you have to believe everyone in new york are liars and everyone who filmed the event independantly had all their footage took away and altered without them noticing it or the changes.

check out these links in this thread as a starting point, and nobody is stopping you looking for more if you can bring yourself to look for them.

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=12282

arthur two sheds jackson · Tue Dec 25, 2007 9:07 am

Marky is unable to show any genuine amateur footage because none exists.

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Tue Dec 25, 2007 2:24 pm

arthur two sheds jackson wrote:Marky is unable to show any genuine amateur footage because none exists.

well i think that comment says it all. totally denying what is obviously there proves your game.

arthur two sheds jackson · Tue Dec 25, 2007 2:42 pm

You have no proof that any are genuine

marky 54 · Post by **marky 54** » Tue Dec 25, 2007 2:53 pm

arthur two sheds jackson wrote:You have no proof that any are genuine

you have no actual proof thatr stands up that say they are not.

alot of assumptions and misguided judgements yes, proof no.