Just over a year after Helric Fredoun discovered the lifeless body of the third ranking police officer SRPJ of Limoges, the second ranking service officer has committed suicide yesterday at his workplace with his service weapon.
We learned this morning, a Commissioner Helric Fredoun SRPJ Limoges has committed suicide last night in his office with his service weapon .
Information confirmed by his superiors. It is unknown at this time the reasons for his actions. He would have killed himself that night or in the early hours of the morning.
The Commissioner Helric Fredou aged 45 years was from Limoges began his career in 1997 as a police officer at the regional office the judicial police of Versailles, before returning to Limoges. He was deputy director of the regional police service since 2012. His father was a former police officer, his mother was a nurse in the emergency context CHU Limoges. He was single and had no children.
According to the police union, Commissioner was depressed and experiencing burnout.
In November 2013, the Commissioner Fredou had discovered the lifeless body of his colleague, the 3rd ranking police officer of SRPJ (service régional de police judiciaire) Limoges, who had also committed suicide with his service weapon in his office. He was also 44 years old.
The Commissioner Fredou, like all agents SRPJ worked yesterday on the case of the massacre at the headquarters of Charlie Hebdo .
In particular, he surveyed the family of one of the victims.
He killed himself before completing its report.
A psychological cell was set up in the police station.'
“ Stay updated on the go with The Medhaj New’s mobile apps. Click here to download it for your device.”
MOSCOW, January 11 (Sputnik) — Police commissioner Helric Fredou, who had been investigating the attack on the French weekly satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, committed suicide in his office. The incident occurred in Limoges, the administrative capital of the Limousin region in west-central France, on Thursday night, local media France 3 reports.
Helric Fredou, 45, suffered from depression and experienced burn out. Shortly before committing suicide, he met with the family of a victim of the Charlie Hebdo attack and killed himself preparing the report.
Fredou began his career in 1997 as a police officer at the regional office of the judicial police of Versailles. Later he returned to Limoges, his hometown. Since 2012 he had been the deputy director of the regional police service.
"We are all shocked. Nobody was ready for such developments", a representative of the local police union told reporters.
On January 7, 2015, two gunmen burst into the editorial office of Charlie Hebdo magazine, known for issuing cartoons, ridiculing Islam. The attackers, later identified as brothers Said and Cherif Kouachi, killed 12 people and injured 11, and escaped from the scene. Following two days of nationwide manhunt, the suspects were killed on Friday by French police some 20 miles northeast of Paris.
_________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
A daily Hamburg (northern Germany) which published the Mohammed cartoons from Charlie Hebdo was Sunday morning the target of an attack with an incendiary device, police said stating that there was no injuries.
"Stones and incendiary device was thrown through a window" of the Hamburger Morgenpost, triggering a small fire, said a police spokesman. "Two parts have been damaged but the fire was extinguished quickly," he said. Two people were arrested and an investigation was opened.
The German regional newspaper had published his A three caricatures from Charlie Hebdo after the attack of the French magazine Wednesday by two jihadist killers, who made twelve dead, including five of the top designers of the newspaper. "As much freedom should be possible," had headlined the Hamburger Morgenpost.
The police spokesman said it was "too early" to say with certainty that the attack against the newspaper was linked to the publication of the cartoons, but he confirmed that it was "a key issue" that the investigation would try to determine.
Citing an unidentified source in the US intelligence agency NSA, the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag said for his part that the Sunday massacre in Charlie Hebdo could herald a wave of attacks in Europe by jihadist terrorists. The NSA intercepted communications in which the leaders of the organization Islamic State announced new attacks, the newspaper said.
Hayat Boumeddiene the Most Sought woman in France, for a time in Syria at the beginning of January. Would she visited Turkey on January 2 , with a stopover in Madrid, THEN Is Passed in Syria on 8 January.
She had a return to France via Madrid dated January 9, But She never returned to France .
A police source Confirms That Coulibaly 's companion a UN PRI flight between Madrid on January 2 and Turkey. " The Images of Formal surveillance video are " provide La Source.
Thursday, January 8 , the authorities of Istanbul room Have seen a woman go Correspondent profile to the young woman at the Syrian- Turkish border . That is - to say the day Where Coulibaly shot Montrouge Municipal Police .
In other words they had spent time in Syria, not returning as normal with a return ticket.
'...Pascali: There is no doubt, of course, we are in the middle of a terrorist operation. A real terrorist operation has two aspects. First the actual act with people killed. But second, and most important, the capability of terrorizing the targeted population. A terrorist action is a tactic, a military tactic one can call it, that targeted a must larger group than the immediate victims. The real target — beyond the men and women who were cynically slaughtered, often under the eyes of the camera – is the population. To terrorize the population and to blackmail the leadership of a country. The message for the government is: You are not able to defend your people, we have taken over; now you have to accept our conditions!
A terrorist act that does not reach – and affect — the vast public does not accomplish its purpose. The purpose is to terrorize everybody, to terrorize us. One should be well aware of this, keep one’s head cool and understand what’s really going on and who is doing what to whom. Of course there is the element of un-clarity, of fear, of “how could that happen? How could that happen in the center of Paris against an obvious terrorist target with terrorists that were well known to the France, US, British security and intelligence? How? What’s next?… In military text books this is called the “fog of war” and it’s a great advantage to be able to provoke and hysterical or paralyzing reaction in the adversary.
Question: You say the target is to “terrorize the population and to blackmail the government.” What’s the purpose of all this?
Pascali: This is the question one has to answer now. France has a large Muslim population, it has been involved in military attacks against Arab countries and areas. During the presidency of Nikolas Sarkozy it implemented a strong policy of domestic repression especially in the Arab inhabited French cities’ periferies. The measures against the Islamic veil… etc. And yet there was nothing comparable to this. ISIS or ISIL, the terrorist umbella organization created with the men financed and trained by Western intelligence to destroy Syria, and devastate Lybia, Iraq, Yemen and so on – This phantomatic ISIS, never attacked France or Europe. Consider also that the killers at the Charlie Hebdo were clearly well trained men, militarily trained. They had inside intelligence. They dressed in special forces attire, not like fundamentalist suicide squads. They were masked, the opposite of what fundamentalists would do. They spoke native French. They did no destroy the “blasphemous material” they supposedly came to destroy – again as the modus operandi of ISIS dictates. If we have to believe the first reports on their identity, they were French citizens, they were well known to the security forces of France and above all their name, data and profile was in a special list compiled by US and British intelligence. Despite their obvious military training, they acted like in a rehearsed movie scene. They put up a show: “Tell people we are Al Qaeda from Yemen.” They moved slowly, too slowly as if they wanted to be seen and maybe filmed.
Question: So why?
Pascali: You have to ask yourself: what did France do that could brought this “punishment”? It cannot be a small tactical thing. Well the biggest strategic change in the strategy of the French government was the declaration by Hollande on the necessity to put an end to the sanctions against Russia and to launch an era of cooperation between Europe and Russia. On Janury 4, three days before the massacre he gave an unprecedented two-hour interview to France Inter radio: “The sanctions must stop now!”
“If Russia has a crisis, it is not necessarily good for Europe, I’m not for the policy of attaining goals by making things worse, I think that sanctions must stop now… Mr Putin does not want to annex eastern Ukraine. He has told me that. What he wants is to remain influential. What he wants is for Ukraine not to fall into the NATO camp.”...' _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Last edited by outsider on Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, who was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, made the remarks in an article published on Thursday.
“The suspects can be both guilty and patsies. Just remember all the terrorist plots created by the FBI that served to make the terrorism threat real to Americans,” he wrote.
He said that the French economy is suffering from the US-imposed sanctions against Russia. “Shipyards are impacted from being unable to deliver Russian orders due to France’s vassalage status to Washington, and other aspects of the French economy are being adversely impacted by sanctions that Washington forced its NATO puppet states to apply to Russia.”
Dr. Roberts stated that French President Francois Hollande this week said that the sanctions against Russia should end. “This is too much foreign policy independence on France’s part for Washington.”
He added that the CIA has apparently resurrected a policy that it followed against Europeans during the post-WW II era when the US spy agency would carry out attacks in European states and blame them on communist groups.
Dr. Roberts said now the US agencies have planned false flag operations in Europe to create hatred against Muslims and bring European countries under Washington’s sphere of influence.
He noted that “the attack on Charlie Hebdo was an inside job and that people identified by NSA as hostile to the Western wars against Muslims are going to be framed for an inside job designed to pull France firmly back under Washington’s thumb.”
The widely read columnist stated that the US “government tells Americans whatever story the government puts together and sits and laughs at the gullibility of the public.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le-Qy56-cdw _________________ --
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
I don't see how anyone can disprove this one!! SOMETHING is being staged; there is no way a wounded (or even supposedly dead) policeman would have been ignored by the group of police yards away in the middle of the road. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
And yet the Sky News report after the event shows the police cordon around the area. The reporter refers to the flowers and candles left there and then shows the blood on the pavement "which was put there". No I am not making this up. Those were his exact words.
"The blood that was put there".
But like so many other videos, this is now gone from Youtube and now doubt you will not find it on Sky's website.
Well, well! Still available! Also, another 'oddie'!
Can anyone save these, before they get taken off? _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
A video purporting to show the gunman who took part in the Paris terror attacks has been posted on the internet.
In it, Amedy Coulibaly - who died in the police raid on the Kosher supermarket in Paris - says he carried out the attack on behalf of Islamic State.
The search for some of the accomplices in continuing including the hunt for Coulibaly's partner, Hayat Boumeddiene.
I'm honored that they chose to include me in this historic event. My articles exposing and ridiculing the incredibly lame and obvious Charlie Hebdo false flag have gotten hundreds of thousands of reads, and been attacked by right-wing media and the ADL. Check them out, in chronological order:
Paris "Charlie Hebdo" attack": another Zionist false flag?
And if this somehow snowballs and the Gladio B network behind this event - as well as 9/11, Bali, Madrid, 7/7, Mumbai, Boston and so much more - gets taken down, and the mainstream media start doing their job…making my alternative journalism redundant…I'm ready to accept a chair in False Flag Studies at the University of Wisconsin, home of "fearless sifting and winnowing." https://kb.wisc.edu/ls/page.php?id=21911
PS Please support my writing and radio shows by joining or donating at http://TruthJihad.com , in case that False Flag Studies position doesn't open up right away. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 5814 Location: East London
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:31 pm Post subject:
This, although included in above, is particularly worth reading (and passing on to 'Conspiracy Theory Sceptics':
'By KEVIN BARRETT
French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve says the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo would never have been caught had they not made one fatal mistake: They conveniently left an ID card in their abandoned getaway car.
Since when did criminals leave their identification cards in abandoned getaway cars?
An ordinary citizen, taking no precautions, might accidentally leave a wallet or purse in their parked car. I have driven automobiles approximately 50,000 times in my life, and I think my wallet might have slipped out of my pocket and fallen into the crack between the driver’s seat and the door...once.
What are the odds that skilled terrorists who have just carried out an ultra-professional special-forces style attack will accidentally leave their ID card in the abandoned getaway car? Answer: Effectively zero.
So why are police reporting an event that cannot have happened?
Assuming that French police really did find “terror suspect” Said Kouachi’s ID card in an abandoned getaway car, that ID card must have been planted by someone wishing to incriminate Kouachi. Even the legendary French idiot detective, Inspector Clouseau, could not fail to make this thunderingly obvious inference.
The discovery of Kouachi’s ID does not implicate him; it exonerates him. It shows that he is an innocent patsy who is being framed by the real perpetrators of the attack.
Police and intelligence agencies routinely plant evidence to support false narratives, convict innocent people, and exonerate themselves. American police who kill unarmed citizens often plant a gun on the corpses to support their claims of having killed in self-defense. Such throw-down guns, which the police call “ham sandwiches,” are kept in police locker rooms and carried in police cars in case they are needed.
Likewise, throw-down ID cards and other “incriminating” documents are routinely used by the military, intelligence, and special forces professionals who orchestrate false flag operations. Consider the ludicrously-obvious planted evidence used in the mother of all false-flag operations: the September 11th, 2001 inside job.
Intelligence agents planted not just one, but two “magic suitcases” designed to incriminate Mohamed Atta, the innocent patsy framed for the crimes of September 11th. According to Der Spiegel’s book Inside 9/11: What Really Happened, the first Atta suitcase was handed to German police by a self-described “good Samaritan burglar.” The so-called burglar claimed to have stolen Atta’s suitcase during the course of a burglary and discovered terrorism-related information in it. As an honorable citizen, this kind-hearted burglar felt compelled by his conscience to deliver the suitcase to the authorities.
According to Der Spiegel, the German police, not being fools, knew that the self-styled burglar was not really a burglar at all, but an intelligence agent planting fake evidence against Atta. Der Spiegel quotes German police as saying: “The only question is, which intelligence agency was he working for?” (“CIA and Mossad,” answered former German Intelligence Minister Andreas Von Bülow in his book The CIA and September 11th.)
Despite its absurd origins, this suitcase full of fabricated documents provides virtually the only purported evidence supporting the official story of Atta’s supposed terrorism-related activities in Germany. Aside from the good Samaritan burglar’s suitcase, it seems that the original Egyptian Atta – the one in Germany – was a gentle, shy, sensitive, soft-spoken architecture student with no connections to terrorism of any kind. Yet the “Atta” who made a spectacle of himself in Florida before 9/11, staging memorable public scenes while all but wearing an “I am an al-Qaeda terrorist” sign around his neck, was a coarse, obscene, violent loudmouthed braggart who dated strippers, disemboweled kittens, and spoke fluent Hebrew.
The Hebrew-speaking Atta’s second and better-known “magic suitcase” was the one he allegedly checked in on his early morning flight from Portland, Maine to Boston on September 11th, 2001. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, the suitcase was miraculously preserved and delivered to the authorities when it somehow failed to make the transfer from Atta’s Portland-to-Boston commuter flight onto Flight 11, which Atta supposedly piloted into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Had the suitcase been transferred as it should have been, we are told, it would have been destroyed in a fireball at the World Trade Center.
This magic suitcase provided the only evidence allowing authorities to identify the alleged 19 hijackers within 24 hours of the event. (None of the 9/11 passenger lists contained any Arab names; no airline employees remember having ticketed or boarded any of the alleged hijackers; and none of the hundreds of security cameras at Boston’s Logan Airport, Washington D.C.’s Dulles Airport, or Newark Airport took a single authenticated frame of any of the 19 Arabs blamed for 9/11.)
This suitcase not only contained a list of the 19 patsies, but also Atta’s supposed last will and testament. (Why would a suicide hijacker check his will onto a doomed plane?) Britain’s dean of Middle East journalism Robert Fisk has ridiculed Atta’s alleged will, pointing out that it begins with a botched bismillah: “In the name of God, myself, and my family...” No Muslim would ever write such a thing. As Fisk suggests, the document purporting to be Atta’s will must have been forged by an incompetent intelligence agent. The suitcase was obviously planted.
And that is not just Robert Fisk’s opinion. Seymour Hersh, the dean of American investigative journalism, quotes a senior US intelligence source as saying, with regard to Atta’s magic suitcase: “Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the FBI to chase.”
Atta’s two magic suitcases are not the only examples of clumsily-planted 9/11 evidence. Another is the “magic passport” of alleged 9/11 hijacker Satam al-Suqami. That passport, looking as pristine as the “magic bullet” of the JFK assassination, was allegedly discovered by an anonymous individual, with no chain of custody, near the two flat spots of smoking ground where two 110-story towers somehow exploded into very fine dust.
But Atta’s magic suitcases, the magic passport, beside the most pathetically-planted 9/11 item of them all: The “Fatty Bin Laden confession video” supposedly discovered in December 2001 by an anonymous US soldier in Jalalabad, and delivered with no chain of possession to be brandished by the Bush Administration as supposed proof of Bin Laden’s guilt.
Professor Bruce Lawrence, a respected expert on Bin Laden, has categorically stated of this video: “It’s bogus!” Lawrence adds that his many acquaintances in the US intelligence community’s Bin Laden units know that the video is bogus – but are afraid to say so in public, because they are afraid of the implications of Bin Laden’s innocence.
These and other examples show that the intelligence agents who orchestrate false-flag terror spectacles often do not even bother to disguise the blatantly-fabricated nature of the planted evidence used to implicate patsies.
So we should not be terribly surprised when the French police tell us – with a straight face – that a highly professional fleeing terrorist would leave his ID card in an abandoned getaway car.
(Well, gee, thanks Mr. Minister Cazenouve! You have, I'm sure, emboldened many potential 'terrorists' to carry out 'copy-cat' attacks, now that you have indicated that they will get away scot-free, as long as they don't take their ID cards or passports with them and 'unfortunately' drop them at the scene, or in their getaway car) (outsider). _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2557 Location: One breath from Glory
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 1:14 am Post subject:
Timeline of events and locations would be handy. One guy in his youtube clip is questioning why people and a guy with bullet proof vest are doing on the roof and why someone is conveniently positioned to film it.
The rooftop footage is AFTER the attack on the Hebdo offices--the guys on roof have fled there.
The gunmen must have stopped and got out of the car several times because the footage from the roof doesn't show parked vans and metal railings where the police man is alledgedly shot through head.
Ive seen at least 3 different clips from high up at different locations--so plenty of people at the ready with video _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
Well, they may have 'led' by the peasants being held back, or was it just a side street?
And we should take the 3 million with a pinch of salt; just as THEY drastically underestimate OUR demos, we can safely assume THEY will drastically overestimate demos THEY agree with. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
'Organisers say up to 1.6m attended the march as well as more than 40 world leaders including British Prime Minister, David Cameron, as well as Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and others' - and that's the Telegraph!! _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
An ultra-orthodox Jewish newspaper removed German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other female leaders from a photograph showing European politiciansattending the Paris solidarity march.
Chancellor Merkel was not the only women to be photoshoped out of the image – Israeli newspaper HaMevaser, or The Announcer, also decided to remove Paris Mayor Ann Hidalgo and the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini. Dannish PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt has also been cropped out of the image.
The march was held to remember the 17 victims of the Paris terror attacks. It was attended by millions of citizens as well as political leaders from around the world and across the political spectrum.
The editing, first spotted by Jewish site Walla, is not the first time a Haredi newspaper has been criticised for removing women from their coverage. The newspapers have previously defended the changes, by claiming that
Following the death of Osama Bin Laden, Brooklyn-based ultra-orthodox Jewish newspaper Der Tzitung photoshopped Hilary Clinton and another woman out of the photograph of US president Barack Obama and his security team watching the raid that killed the terrorist leader.
The newspaper later apologised for the altered picture.
It was less than 48 hours ago when Turkey’s prime minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, joined millions marching in Paris to pay tribute to the 17 people killed by ISIS-supporting extremists. Then, almost the moment he got back, things changed, and as the FT politely paraphrases what transpired, the "country’s president struck a much more confrontational tone." That's one way of putting it. Another is that the former PM and current president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, of NATO-member Turkey did the unthinkable: accused the west, and French citizens in particular, of staging the Charlie Hebdo murder in order to blame Muslims, even as the mayor of Ankara said "Mossad is definitely behind such incidents . . . it is boosting enmity towards Islam."
"The duplicity of the west is obvious,” Recep Tayyip Erdogan said at a press conference on Monday evening. “As Muslims we have never sided with terror or massacres: racism, hate speech, Islamophobia are behind these massacres.”
His punchline: "The culprits are clear: French citizens undertook this massacre and Muslims were blamed for it,” he added.
The FT is confused: "Although political leaders in Turkey have repeatedly condemned the attacks on the Charlie Hebdo magazine, a Jewish supermarket and a policewoman, a parallel narrative has emerged in the country, with conspiracy theorists blaming the murders on foreign intelligence agencies rather than radical Islamists."
It's not just the French who were said to be behind the attack: so is Mossad:
Melih Gokcek, mayor of Ankara for the ruling AK party, said on Monday that “Mossad [the Israeli intelligence service] is definitely behind such incidents . . . it is boosting enmity towards Islam.” Mr Gokcek linked the attacks to French moves towards recognising Palestine.
Ali Sahin, a member of Turkey’s parliament and foreign affairs spokesman for the AK party, last week set out eight reasons why he suspected the killings were staged so that “the attack will be blamed on Muslims and Islam”.
But back to Erdogan:
In his own remarks on Monday, Mr Erdogan added: “Games are being played throughout the Islamic world”. He expressed bewilderment that French intelligence services had not followed the culprits more effectively.
The FT is further confused that Turkey is not the only place which has dared to offer conspiratorial theories: Russia is too.
In Russia, some pro-Kremlin commentators sought to link the killings to geopolitical machinations by the US.
Komsomolskaya Pravda, one of Russia’s leading tabloids, ran the headline: “Did the Americans stage the terror attack in Paris?” and posted a series of interviews on its website that presented various reasons why Washington might have organised the attack.
In one interview, Alexander Zhilin, head of the pro-Kremlin Moscow Centre for the Study of Applied Problems, claimed the terror attack was US retribution against President François Hollande for a January 6 radio interview in which Mr Hollande urged the EU to lift sanctions against Russia. Washington used the attacks as “a quick fix for consolidating” US and EU geopolitical interests in Ukraine, Mr Zhilin claimed.
The FT is most stunned that in Russia the events in Charlie Hebdo are being equated to the 9/11 tragedy:
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 5814 Location: East London
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:59 am Post subject:
At least 'The Guardian' supports free speech (when it agrees with it!!!):
'I wonder why nobody seems to have compared the CH atrocity to the '80's bombings and killings of the 'Gladio' gangs? They were done by right-wing thugs, and blamed on the 'Reds' in a calculated 'Strategy of Tension', to demonise the Euro-Communists and left in general.
Could the CH murders be of the same ilk, but this time to demonise the Muslims?
I believe the cover of latest CH was a mistake, but hopefully most Muslims will not take too much offence at it, it is not as bad as their normal tripe.'
G: (no, that's not 'God'!):
'This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.'
Guess I'll remain on 'Moderation' with the Grauniad. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Great stuff!! I wonder if Malaysia, Iran, N. Korea and Latin America will follow through! _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Безебдносните служби на Франција пред нападот во весникот „Шарли ебдо“, а и потоа, правеа обратно од тоа што мора да го прават и за тоа мора да трпат последици. Од друга страна, во целава ситуација својата улога ја играат мејнстрим медиумите кои пренесуваат информации само од еден извор без притоа подлабоко да ги анализираат сите прашања поврзани со терористичките напади, вели за „Дневник“ Тони Гослинг, познат аналитичар од Велика Британија, чија експертиза му е тероризмот и кој порано токму на тоа прашање работел како новинар во Би-би-си. Познат е по откривањето на тајната група Билдбергер на почетокот на 90 години на минатиот век и нивните годишни тајни состаноци, а потоа гневен на медиумското замрачување тој работи сам како истражувачки новинар, а подоцна ги отвора и веб-страниците public-interest.co.uk/ и 911forum.org.uk, а со свои анализи е застапен и на „Раша тудеј“. Во неговата биографија е запишано дека бил уапсен, а имотот, како што се компјутерите, му го запленила британската полиција.
Во една радиоемисија кај Пипа Џонс рековте дека настаните во Париз се премногу сомнителни, дека во тоа своја улога одиграла и медиумската пропаганда и практично понудивте една теорија на заговор во која главна улога имаат САД, односно НАТО. Врз кои аргументи го засновате вашето тврдење?
- Безбедносните структури правеа с` обратно од тоа што требаше да го направат. Најнапред затоа што велат дека многу добро знаеле кои се терористите, дека тие биле под надзор, а тоа го кажаа и Американците. Па, како тогаш тие успеале да се снабдат со оружје ако биле следени од безбедносните служби? Kако и од каде набавиле „калашникови“, па дури и ракетни фрлачи? Потоа, како дозволија претседателот Франсоа Оланд веднаш по масакрот во магазинот да замине во тие простории? Зарем беше безбедно, а имавме терористички напад? Потоа, зарем не е чудно како се собраа толку многу државници на маршот во услови на безбедносни закани од највисок вид? Сето ова зборува и за многу пропусти и за многу сомнежи за целата операција на француските безбедносни служби.
Сакате да кажете дека целава работа е наместена од некого? Kој би профитирал од тоа?
- Знаете, разговарав со еден пријател од Париз кој се нашол во близина на местото каде е извршен нападот на весникот и тој вели дека целата атмосфера била многу чудна. Луѓето на улица се многу сомничави за целата операција, не ~ веруваат на владата. Од сето ова најмногу ќе профитира НАТО, а мотивот за да се изведе една ваква акција која јас ја нарекувам провоцирачки тероризам, е западната алијанса да го прошири своето влијание во светот. Од друга страна, Франција, која не е во голема љубов со НАТО, сега ќе биде ставена во позиција да влезе во војна со ИСИС. Потсетете се на филмот „Денот на чакалот“ кој е за обидот за атентат врз Де Гол што беше и причината Франција да не влегува во НАТО. Тие сеќавања сега треба да ги снема.
Вие тврдите дека е многу важно да се земе предвид и тајмингот на овој напад. Зошто?
-Да, се случија некои важни нешта, како на пример повикот на Оланд дека треба да се укинат санкциите кон Русија, а слични барања имаше и од Германија, потоа протестот на британските фармери, кои трпат економски последици заради тие санкции, на економски проблеми во Европа...И одеднаш, бум! Во Париз. Работите добиваат нов тек. Претходно, пак, имаше заложничка драма во Сиднеј, пред тоа во Kанада во парламентот.
Па, да заокружиме, што според Вас се случи во Париз тие денови?
- Првин мислам дека имаше целосно потфрлање на безбедносните служби и на медиумите кои се целосно централизирани и тие не изнесоа податоци што точно се случува на теренот, односно беа пристрасни. Потоа, доказите за тоа кој е бекграундот на извршителите на терористичките напади се многу тенки, а уште поважно е што исламистите се ликвидирани и нема да има судски процес, па од тука и веројатно никогаш да дознаеме што точно се случи во Париз.
Наместо казни, безбедњаците добија награди
Иако имаше многу безбедносни пропусти, сепак наместо тие да бидат соодветно казнети тие добија награди, вели Гослинг.
- Јас веднаш би им дал отказ на најмалку петмина во безбедносните структури за многубројните пропусти. Но, наместо казни, тие добија награди, односно повеќе пари од буџетот. Така, сега гледаме слики на илјадници војници на улиците.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 16145 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:49 pm Post subject: Re: Belgium training camps
Worth noting that this 'Jihadist training camp' is supposed to have been located in the Ardennes region of Belgium/Germany.
Only about 50 miles from NATO Headquarters, on the outskirts of Brussels, at Boulevard Leopold III, 1110 Brussels, Belgium.
Belgian police launch probe into ‘jihadist training camp’
Photo of alleged would-be jihadists training in Belgium's Ardennes region
Article text by FRANCE 24 Follow france24_en on twitter
Belgian law enforcement officials opened an investigation Friday into an alleged jihadist training camp in the Ardennes region of northeastern Belgium, according to local media reports.
Photos of so-called combatants at the site were recently posted on Facebook.
Sporting combat fatigues, balaclavas and bullet proof vests, the men stomp around the sylvan Belgian countryside, wielding what appears to be dummy guns and looking incongruously menacing in the Western European forest.
But in a tiny European nation that has seen a disproportionate percentage of its population joining jihadist groups in Syria and Iraq, the photographs sparked alarm, prompting a police investigation into the possibility that Belgium’s Ardennes region was being used to train would-be jihadists, Belgian media reported on Friday.
“This looks nothing like a simple game of paintball with friends, but more like a radical training camp,” Belgian newspapers Het Nieuwsblad and De Standaard quoted a police source as saying.
The photos were posted on the Facebook page of a man named Abd Al Wadoud Abu Daoud under the title, “A Beautiful Day Among Brothers”.
An investigation by FRANCE 24’s Observers team found little information available on Abu Daoud and that his Facebook page has been suspended since September 29, the same date the photos were uploaded.
However, Belgian newspapers Het Nieuwsblad and De Standaard reported that Abu Daoud is a Brussels-based Muslim with links to known jihadists from the infamous Elouassaki family, whose members have joined Islamist groups battling President Bashar al-Assad’s forces in Syria.
Hussein Elouassaki was believed to be the leader of a Belgian “katiba” – or brigade – that has been fighting in Syria before being killed in battle in August, according to media reports.
His brother, Hakim, returned to Belgium from Syria in March after being seriously wounded and is now awaiting trial on terror charges.
Belgium’s jihadist problem
The phenomenon of foreign fighters travelling to Syria to take up arms alongside extremist Islamic groups has been a cause for alarm for many Western governments, but has been a particular problem for Belgium.
According to research by the UK-based International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR), of up to 11,000 foreigners fighting in Syria as of December 2013, as many as 296 were from Belgium, giving it the highest per capita level among western European countries.
Belgium has already witnessed the deadly blowback that can result from the return of radicalised fighters from the battlefields of Iraq and Syria.
Four people were gunned down in May at the Jewish Museum in the capital Brussels in an attack allegedly carried out by Mehdi Nemmouche, a Frenchman who authorities say fought with Islamic State group in Syria.
Last week, the country opened its biggest ever terror trial against Islamic extremists when it launched court proceedings against 46 members of the Sharia4Belgium group, a now disbanded organisation that wanted sharia law adopted in Belgium.
Prosecutors claim the group was a terrorist organisation that brainwashed young Belgians into fighting in Syria.
It is also not the first time the Ardennes, an extensive region of forest and hills popular with tourists, has served as an alleged training ground for jihadists.
Last year, Belgian media reported that a radical Islamist named Abu Moussa had used Facebook to recruit young people to take part in a training camp in the region.
Officially three police officers were killed and were honored by president Hollande in a State funeral on January 13. The ceremony was held at the Paris prefecture de Police. The French president and prime minister Manuel Valls met with members of the families. A fourth policeman assigned to the Charlie Hebdo investigation “committed suicide.” His death was barely acknowledged, presented as a “fait divers” with no relationship to the Charlie Hebdo police operation.
The three police officers were posthumously awarded the Légion d’honneur.
French municipal Police officers watch the French president pays tribute to the police officers.
Paris Police officers at Ceremony Photograph: Gonzalo Fuentes/Reuters
Lieutenant Franck Brinsolaro, 49, was a protection officer assigned by Paris police to ensure the security of Charlie Hebdo’s Charb. With the exception of Brinsolara who was shot on the premises of Charlie Hebdo, the official and media reports regarding the deaths of the three other policemen are shrouded in contradictions.
Ahmed Merhabet, 40, according to official statements was shot at point blank by one of the gunmen on the street close to Charlie Hebdo’s office.
Police trainee officer Clarissa Jean-Philippe, 26, an unarmed traffic policewoman in Montrouge, in south Paris, was “gunned down by a man wearing body armour and using an automatic assault rifle.”
A fourth policeman Commissaire Helric Ferou –who had been officially assigned to the Charlie Hebdo investigation– allegedly committed suicide at his office at police headquarters in Limoges on Wednesday evening. He was discovered with a bullet in his head at 1am on Thursday morning. Ferou although involved in the Charlie Hebdo investigation, was not honored by the French government alongside his three colleagues.
Mystery surrounds the death of Ahmed Merhabet and Helric Fredou. The circumstances of the death of Clarissa Jean Philippe remain unclear.
According to official reports, Ahmed Merhabet was shot in the head at close range with an automatic weapon in the street of Charlie Hebdo’s office. The official report is refuted by video evidence. The shot fired from an AK47 visibly did not hit his head. If it had, there would have been blood all over the pavement.
An AK-47 bullet fired from close range would … have done something pretty dramatic to that policeman’s head. And if the video is real – and there doesn’t seem much doubt that it is – it clearly shows nothing significant happened to his head either as or after the bullet was fired. (Jonathan Cook, What the Charlie Hebdo Execution video Really Shows, Global Research, January 13, 2014)
Analysis of the video suggests that Merhabet may have been killed, but under different circumstances and possibly in another location.
While the video footage aired on network TV has since been removed, the French authorities as well as the media have stuck to their fake story: Merhabet was shot to the head in the street close to Charlie Hebdo’s office .
Commissaire Helric Fredou: “The Forgotten Policeman”
Fredou was part of the official investigation. His passing –while participating in the Charlie Hebdo investigation– has barely been acknowledged. His death in Limoges, South-West France is shrouded in mystery. He allegedly committed suicide within hours of a police debriefing and the preparation of his police report.
His body was found at 1am on Thursday morning with a bullet in his head. He allegedly committed suicide.
Ferou’s funeral was held privately in Limoges on the same day (Tuesday) as that of the other three policemen.
The official story is that he was depressed and had suffered from a burnout following a meeting with relatives of one of the victims. There are no details as to who these relatives are and where they are living, in the region of Limoges (Haute Vienne) or in Paris (400 km. from Limoges).
What the reports fail to mention is that the Kouali brothers had spent their high-school years in the Limoges region and that Commissaire Ferou’s police investigation was in all probability related to gathering information within the region on the Kouali brothers including their whereabouts.
”An autopsy was performed at the University Hospital of Limoges, “confirming the suicide” . The French media decided or was instructed not to cover the incident.
Commissaire Ferou committed suicide in his workplace, in his office at the police station.
Did he commit suicide? Was he incited to commit suicide?
Or was he an “honest Cop” executed on orders of France’s judicial police?
Has his report been released?
These are issues for France’s journalists to address. It’s called investigative reporting. Or is it outright media censorship? (Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, January 9, 2014)
With regard to Police trainee officer Clarissa Jean-Philippe, the press reports initially stated that she was shot by an unidentified gunman on Thursday. She was later reported to have been shot down, without concrete evidence, by Ahmedi Coulibaly. Clarissa Jean-Philippe was not in any way connected to the police operation.
Coulibaly was depicted as a Muslim fanatic in a video in which the insignia of the Islamic State is portrayed.
The media reports are full of contradictions focussing on an unknown jogger who was shot at by Coulibaly on Wednesday January 7.
Amedy Coulibaly began his terror rampage a day earlier than previously thought by shooting a jogger and planting a car bomb, … (Daily Mail) .
On Thursday, he was said to have killed traffic policewoman Clarissa Jean Philippe, and on Friday he was allegedly involved in the killing of four hostages Yoav Hattab, Yohan Cohen, Philippe Braham, and Francois-Michel Saada at a kosher grocery store at Porte de Vincennes. He was, according to media and police reports, shot dead by policemen “after” he had killed the four Jewish hostages.
While Coulibaly was, according to reports, not directly involved in the shooting at Charlie Hebdo on Wednesday, he was heralded by the media as the spokesperson of the Islamic State (ISIL), which ironically is covertly supported by US-NATO as well as the French Republic.
According to the Daily Mail:
The killer, who was shot dead by police after murdering four hostages in a Jewish shop on Friday, was thought to have struck first when he killed an unarmed policewoman last Thursday.
But now Paris prosecutors think he was responsible for seriously injuring a jogger in a suburb of the capital on January 7, the same day gunmen killed 12 during the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
A ‘martyrdom video’ of the fanatic, apparently filmed midway through the wave of terror attacks, appeared online yesterday. In it he urges Western Muslims to wage war against ‘enemies of Islam’.
Terrorist Amedy Coulibaly recorded a chilling 'suicide' video, in which he is seen seated in front of a flag used by Islamic State jihadists as well as an automatic rifle propped against the wall
Terrorist Amedy Coulibaly recorded a chilling ‘suicide’ video, in which he is seen seated in front of a flag used by Islamic State jihadists as well as an automatic rifle propped against the wall
In the slickly edited footage, the 32-year-old pledges allegiance to the Islamic State and its self-proclaimed Caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
The footage claims Coulibaly planted a bomb under a car on a Paris street, seemingly referring to an explosion on Wednesday night that authorities had not linked to the terror attacks.
Prosecutors said that tests on shell cases from the jogger shooting linked them to the weapon used at the kosher supermarket two days later.
French security forces also released details of a cache of weapons, including automatic rifles and explosives, found at Coulibaly’s last address, an an apartment in Gentilly, on the outskirts of Paris.
The narrative and video have the appearances of being staged: support of the Islamic State, weapons from the Islamic State, lest we forget the Islamic State is supported and funded by the US, Britain, France and Israel.
It is worth noting that Coulibaly who -according to reports– was shot dead at the kosher grocery store at Vincennes on January 9, had been invited in 2009 to a meeting at the Elysée Palace with former president Nicolas Sarkozy.
Coulibaly had a criminal record. Several years prior to the 2009 meeting with Sarkozy, Coulibaly had been on the radar of French police and intelligence. The stated purpose of his meeting was to discuss employment creation and poverty alleviation.
What was the relationship of this alleged terrorist to a former head of State? Nobody has bothered in the French media to ask Sarkozy to clarify the nature of his meeting with Coulibaly.
On Thursday, January 8, France 3, the second-largest French public TV channel, reported the death that morning of a police commissioner who had been investigating the January 7 attack on the French weekly satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.
The commissioner, Helric Fredou, 45, was found dead in his office in Limoges, the administrative capital of the Limousin region in west-central France, at about 1 a.m., having apparently taken his own life with his service gun. He reportedly met earlier with the family of a victim of the Charlie Hebdo attack and died before completing a report that he had been compiling.
So much so interesting. Almost as interesting is the lack of interest in the Western media at this added tragedy in the Charlie Hebdo "affair", a lack of interest one reporter summed up as a
"mainstream news blackout" - and so the ready focus of another conspiracy theory.
The counterpoint in those early reports that did surface was that he had suffered from depression and experienced burn-out. His death so soon after taking on a role in investigating the French equivalent of "9/11" was, apparently just coincidence, or the consequence of an added heavy burden that was just too much to take. Even so, the delay in, or near absence of, English-language media coverage is curious at best.
So a news blackout? Or just lazy journalism? And where best, then, to get breaking news - the West's leading news outlets (CNN, Fox, New York Times, the Guardian etc etc etc), or obscure outlets elsewhere that at least are awake, and not still in bed -- literally or metaphorically? Here's a timeline to help you decide.
Thursday Jan 8, 1 a.m.: Fredou is found dead.
Thursday, Jan 8, 11:24 a.m.: France 3, the second largest French public TV channel, breaks the story.
Sunday, Jan 11, 1 a.m: Sputnik, which in November 2014 replaced Russia's RIA Novosti news agency and Voice of Russia, seems to be the first "mainstream" outlet to carry the story.
Sputnik, however, was not the first to pick up the France 3 report, which can reasonably be taken as accurate at least so far as the key facts: that commissioner Fredou was dead, that he died from a gun shot, that he was found dead early that morning, and that he had been investigating, in some way, the Charlie Hebdo attack.
Few readers, however, will have heard of the news outlets that beat the rest to the story.
On Friday, Jan 9: Medha News in India ran the story.
Also on Friday, Jan 9: UprootedPalestinians ran the story.
Also on Friday, Jan 9: Free Radio Revolution was awake in the US.
On Saturday Jan 10: 21st Century Wire was not far behind.
On January 11, Epoch Times (German edition of a largely China-oriented site much concerned with and supportive of the harrassed Falung Gong sect) ran the story.
By then, questions were being asked about this absence of big-mdeia reporting on what might be an important story of great public interest - or might not be, but with next-to-no mainstream reporting, who could tell? Global Research was asking on January 11.
If some people want to argue that these are small sites given to sometimes questionable stories, in this case there was little reason to question their source - France 3 - or the key facts.
Yet it was not until January 12, that the British press started to wake up, the Mirror reporting just after midday, followed 3 hours later by the Daily Mail.
Dragging its feet, also on Monday (7:37 p.m.), the UK's Daily Telegraph gave its account of an event now more than 4 days old that took place only a few hours train ride away from the Telegraph’s London office, and considerably less than that from the newspaper's Paris office.
(Journalists will love the ambiguous urgency in the Telegraph’s opening use of "it has emerged" - "A high-ranking judicial police chief in Limoges committed suicide last Wednesday hours after being asked to file a report on the Charlie Hebdo killings, it has emerged." In other words, we were asleep (or worse) - but hey, we’re getting there.)
It was not until Tuesday, January 13, that the US press woke up, in the shape of the Washington Times - and by now it had absolutely no doubt about what line to take in its headline - "Helric Fredou, French police chief, kills himself amid pressure of Paris terror".
Writing this on January 15, there are now numerous stories in the non-English language press, but search on Google and it appears there is absolutely no coverage of this, if not strange then certainly worth a second look, death: not on CNN, not on the New York Times, not in the Washington Post, not in the Guardian, etc etc etc. (An article published by the Ron Paul Institute on January 14 that includes a reference to the police commissioner’s death has attracted some criticism for raising similar and more wide-reaching questions.)
We do not need a conspiracy theory (a confirmed autopsy report would be a start though). But we could do with some reporting. After all, a large part of the reaction to the Charlie Hebdo massacre concerned press freedom - and press freedom requires reporting in the first place.
'...“The shooting at Charlie Hebdo resembles a secret service operation but we have no proof of that,” the newspaper quoted Mr Le Pen as saying. “I don’t think it was organised by the French authorities but they permitted this crime to be committed. That, for the moment, is just a supposition.”
To justify his comments, Mr Le Pen pointed to the fact that one of the Kouachi brothers, who carried out the Charlie Hebdo massacre, left his identity card in a crashed getaway car. He compared this to the “miraculous fact” – beloved by conspiracy theorists – that one of the passports of the 9/11 hijackers was found on the ground in New York after two planes collided with the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in 2001....' _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Paris attacks: US politician Jack
Lindblad claims Charlie Hebdo
killings were by 'US and Mossad' to
keep Israel's Netanyahu in power
The politician has voiced the latest in a
line of conspiracy theories surrounding
the Paris attacks
By LOULLA-MAE ELEFTHERIOU-SMITH
Thursday 15 January 2015
A US Senate candidate has voiced his
own theories on what he believes is real
reason behind the brutal attacks in
Paris last week, claiming that the
killings were not the work of terrorists
but of the US and Mossad in a bid to
keep Israel’s current Prime Minister in
Speaking to PressTV, Jack Linblad, of
the Green Party of LA County Council,
claimed that the actions of the Kouachi
brothers and Amedy Coulibaby, who
collectively shot and killed 17 people in
three separate and shocking attacks in
Paris, were not acting on their
extremist religious beliefs but were
instead carrying out orders from the US
Mr Linblad added that he believed the
bloody attacks had been orchestrated to
keep Europe “under [Benjamin]
Netanyahu’s thumb” and to ensure the
Israeli leader stays in power.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 16145 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 1:36 am Post subject:
The French republic was built on one of the bloodiest revolutions in history which, some historians, including wartime deception planner and the greatest occult author of the 20th century Dennis Wheatley believes was the discharging a 450 year grudge held by the Knights Templar who French king Philip the Fair had arrested on Friday 13th October 1307.
Operation Gladio in the 1970s & 80s too is hardly understood by Europeans but it was a campaign of terror and murder where NATO and the Club De Bern killed hundreds of innocent civilians across the continent and the media blamed them on the extreme left Baader Meinhof, Red Brigades and Aktion Direct gangs. However Allan Francovich and Daniele Ganser heve made sure those who care about such things can be informed on Gladio.
All this is background to the Charlie Hebdo attacks which former White House adviser Paul Craig Roberts, Turkish President Erdogan and many others have been saying is a 'false flag' attack designed to discredit Muslims and also bring in a police state powers across the EU and Europe.
NoLiesRadio: Charlie Hebdo & The Curse Of The Knights Templar
I don't see how anyone can disprove this one!! SOMETHING is being staged; there is no way a wounded (or even supposedly dead) policeman would have been ignored by the group of police yards away in the middle of the road.
It's been removed from above link; an someone 'capture' this? It keeps disappearing, but is up here at present:
Paris Shooting Hoax Policeman Taking Selfies After 12 Murdered WTF:
Unfortunately, it doesn't show a picture of the guy's face. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
This is footage of the Charlie Hebdo shootings which has been
restricted or taken down from a number of websites. As you will
see it contains no blood, gore or graphic violence. It does
however punch a major hole in the official story.
(Go to link above for entire article with important
photographs for evidence.)
The Charlie Hebdo case was exposed almost immediately
by discerning eyes, such as those of Gordon Duff, Senior
Editor of Veterans Today, who observed that the
shooting of a police officer with an AK-47 did not
withstand critical scrutiny, since his brains were not
blown out of his head and there was no blood on the
sidewalk, which would have been impossible had this
been a real event. And it turns out that the scene
was framed so cleanly because there was an â€œ+â€
marked on the roadway where the right wheel of the
car had to stop for filming.
The Western domestic spying apparatuses are the first to
benefit from the latest terrorist attacks in France.
... the unedited video clip does leave a sour taste: because
unless someone has a good rebuttal, it does indeed seem
impossible that an AK-47 bullet fired from close range would
not have done something pretty dramatic to that policemanâ€™s
head. And if the video is real – and ... it clearly showss nothing
significant happened to his head either as or after the bullet
So what points am I making?
The first one is more tentative. It seems – though I suppose <
there could be an explanation I have overlooked – that the
authorities have lied about the cause of the policemanâ€™s death. ...
The second point is even more troubling. Most of the senior
editors of our mainstream media have watched the unedited
video just as you now have. And either not one of them saw
the problem raised here – that the video does not show what
it is supposed to show – or some of them did see it but did
not care. Either way, they simply regurgitated an official story
that does not seem to fit the available evidence.
That is a cause for deep concern. Because if the media are
acting as a collective mouth-piece for a dubious official
narrative on this occasion..
The lesson is that we as news consumers must create our own
critical distance from the â€œnewsâ€ because we cannot trust our
corporate media to do that work for us. They are far too close
to power. In fact, they are power.
Official narratives are inherently suspect because power always
looks out for itself. This appears to be a good example – whetther
what it shows is relatively harmless or sinister – to remind uus
of that fact.
Paris Terror Attacks: Who Was Behind This Dastardly Act of
Terror? The Suspects Killed by Police, Forecloses a Judicial
...The two brothers responsible for the massacre, Cherif and
Said Kouachi, were gunned down by the French police on the
9th of January...
...The massacre could well have been a Mossad operation to
arrest the growing tide of support and sympathy for the
Palestinians in their struggle for statehood among people in
France and in a number of other European countries. This is the
one really momentous development of the last few months that
has impacted upon the Israeli government and global Zionism.
Parliaments in Sweden and Spain to Ireland and Britain have
adopted resolutions endorsing the Palestinian struggle. France
has also taken a similar step. In my main article I alluded to the
French vote in the UN Security Council which some analysts
have described as the culmination of a major shift in the public
mood vis-a-vis the Israel-Palestine conflict within Europe.
By staging a massacre which once again reinforces the image
of the Muslim as a terrorist opposed to civilized values such as
the freedom of expression and incapable of living in harmony
with the majority population, Mossad and the Israeli government
may be seeking to drive a wedge between the majority European
citizenry and the Muslim minority. The aim may be to dissuade
governments and citizens in Europe from moving any further
along their newly discovered path of engagement with Palestinians
who they are now beginning to see as victims rather than as
aggressors which is how they have been portrayed all these
years by the Israeli elite and the Zionist controlled media. What
better way of doing this than by reviving that deeply entrenched
image of the Muslim in the European mind as a violence prone
creature hell-bent on wiping out the innocent?...
French far-right Front National (FN) party honorary president Jean-Marie Le Pen says in an interview published in the Russian newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda that the Paris attack at satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo "bears the signature of [French] intelligence services". AFP
According to a report, published in The Independent, founder of France’s far right Front National, Jean-Marie Le Pen has said that the Charlie Hebdo massacre may have been the work of an “intelligence agency”.
In an interview with a Russian newspaper Komsomolskaïa Pravda, Mr Le Pen, suggesting that the attack was the work of American or Israeli agents seeking to foment a civil war between Islam and the West, the report said.
The independent report further says, “The shooting at Charlie Hebdo resembles a secret service operation but we have no proof of that,” the newspaper quoted Mr Le Pen as saying. “I don’t think it was organised by the French authorities but they permitted this crime to be committed. That, for the moment, is just a supposition.”
To justify his comments, Mr Le Pen pointed to the fact that one of the Kouachi brothers, who carried out the Charlie Hebdo massacre, left his identity card in a crashed getaway car. He compared this to the “miraculous fact” that one of the passports of the 9/11 hijackers was found on the ground in New York after two planes collided with the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in 2001, the report added.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum