Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:14 am Post subject: Unaccountable Accounts from Powerdown to Stand Down
|UG#568 - 9/10 Anniversary (Unaccountable Accounts from Powerdown to Stand Down)
Robin Upton | 10.09.2011 11:54 | Analysis | Social Struggles | Terror War | Sheffield | World
This week's show is released 10 years to the day since Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon could not account for 1/4 of all its spending. Like the $2,300,000,000,000 he spoke about, many details from the next day are still unaccounted for, a decade later - including most notably the sudden (though not unexpected) implosion of WTC7. We hear the soundtrack of a new video by http://ae911truth.org.
ug568-hour2mix.mp3 - mp3 27M
We start the show by recalling that on Monday, September 10th, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld announced that the US Pentagon could not account for 1/4 of all its expenditure. This is the mother of such smaller frauds as the $20,000,000,000 annually spent on air conditioning tents in Iraq and Afghanistan which we noted in UG#565. In the face of such vested interests, how much sense does it make to demand an investigation? Who should we demand an investigation from... the same bunch of liars and crooks who organised the first one??
We note how some elements of the story were emphasised (WTC1&2, Bin Laden) and others quickly discarded (WTC7, explosions, Bin Laden's denial) by commercially controlled media. We hear a section of New World Notes on the complete lack of effective air defence on the day.
According to the NIST report, the hypothesis that bombs were present in the building was too incredible to bother testing for, yet audio and video recordings made on that day document the countless eye witness accounts of detonations inside the World Trade Center, both before and after the planes hit. We hear that independent researchers have determined chemical residues consistent with explosives (nano-thermite) and published their findings in the peer reviewed scientific literature. What are we to make of NIST's glib response was that such ideas are too whacko to be taken seriously. Why have a committee at all then? And why have some members of the 9/11 commission resigned amidst claims of a 'whitewash'?
A 2005 interview by Tony Gosling provides first hand testimony from two important witnesses to the WTC events. First, Janitor William Rodriguez tells how his actions on the day saved many lives of those trapped in the building, and how he saw direct evidence of bombs and those who had been hit by them. Next Scott Forbes tells that he had 9/11 off due to work he had done the weekend before shutting down the computers during an unexplained power outage in the building. He reports seeing a team of unidentified workmen carrying out some 'cabling', an activity which would have given them access to the building's critical support columns. Noting that although given to NIST these testimonies were unaccountably omitted from the final report, we reflect on the importance of taking action outside the prescribed institutional framework, such as the independent questioning of Larry Silverstein regarding WTC7 carried out by Luke Rudkowski.
Then we hear an abridged soundtrack of one engineer's private investigation into the question of whether thermate could be used to cut the WTC's support columns. Jonathan Cole's video shows how some modifications of the technique presented in National Geographic's 'investigation' yielded success; he could cut box steel using thermate, something which could explain both the orange molten metal which was filmed dripping from one of the WTC towers and the firefighters' testimony (and subsequent thermal images) of molten metal inside the buildings.
Ending on an enigmatic note, we conclude with a speculation about one possible motive for the destruction of WTC7, we hear Rudoplh Giuliani confirm that it housed the headquarters of various secret agencies that said he couldn't(sic.) mention.
Thanks to BCFM, Kenneth Dowst and Laurie
This is a special edition in the sense that I have tried to make it approachable to new listeners. You are encouraged to pass it to your UnwelcomeGuests naive friends Also note that quite a lot of visual content this week, so you may wish to try the videos used to make this show. As usual, they are available from this episode's webpage at http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/568
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
|Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:50 pm Post subject:
|It does seem to appear that part of the multiple point agenda was to cover up Financial Fraud.
When listening to the news from September 10th, I cannot help but think that the declaration by Rumsfeld of a war on pentagon bureaucracy was a coded trigger for the events of 11/9.
[quote]Initially the official designation of "terrorist attacks" made it difficult to discern a pattern. However if the destruction of the World Trade Centre, a segment of the Pentagon, four commercial aircraft and the loss of 2,993 lives is not considered as a "terrorist attack" but rather as a crime with specific objectives, there is a compelling logic to the pattern of destruction, not only of the buildings but of specific offices within each building. [/quote]
[quote](The following is an attempt to present in a compact form the claims made by Dick Eastman, Tom Flocco, V.K. Durham, Karl Schwarz and put together in an the article by E.P. Heidner dated 28th June 2008 to the effect that the September 11th attacks were intended to cover-up the clearing of the 1991 issuance of $240 billion in covert securities to fund an economic war against the Soviet Union during which "unknown" western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry. A crime presented by official sources as a "terrorist attack" and used as an excuse to attack Iraq.)[/quote]
WAS SEPTEMBER 11 A COVER UP OF A FINANCIAL FRAUD?
Project Mc Hammer
Mc Hammer (aka Hammer) was utilised post 11/9 to boost moral with an album entitled "Active Duty" The album was released on the 20th of November 2001
Sounds like he rushed it. (WARNING contains extremely cheesy lameness and has no artistic merit)
[quote]This patriotic album, originally planned to be titled The Autobiography Of M.C. Hammer, donated portions of the proceeds to 9/11 charities. Hammer shot a video for the anthem "No Stoppin' Us (USA)" in Washington, D.C., with several members of the United States Congress, who sang in the song and danced in the video. Present members of the United States House of Representatives included J.C. Watts, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Thomas M. Davis, Earl Hilliard, Alcee Hastings, Rep. Diane Watson (D-Calif.), Rep. Corinne Brown (D-Fla.) and Jesse Jackson Jr..[5[/quote]
I know this is a long shot but could this be a hint (aka A revelation of the method type event)
The rap singers, er, you've seen them on the top of the pops.
The following sentence is true. The previous sentence was false.