FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

9/11's delayed legacy: cancer for many of the rescue workers

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Articles
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hatsoff
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 173
Location: liverpool; the city that speaks out, always, scouseland, in the island formerly known as the UK

PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:15 pm    Post subject: 9/11's delayed legacy: cancer for many of the rescue workers Reply with quote

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/11/cancer-new-york-rescuers?C MP=AFCYAH

in yesterdays guardian

mentions
Quote:
Amid the pollutants within the giant pile of 1.8m tons of debris and the surrounding air were 90,000 litres of jet fuel from the two stricken planes

hmm thought fuel combusted...

_________________
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good people to do nothing.
Edmund Burke


Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.
Einstein


golden ratio


mass and gravity both exist only as a means to acheive mathematical self-embedding of everything.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GodSaveTheTeam
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 575
Location: the eyevolution

PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:38 pm    Post subject: Re: 9/11's delayed legacy: cancer for many of the rescue wor Reply with quote

hatsoff wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/11/cancer-new-york-rescuers?C MP=AFCYAH

in yesterdays guardian

mentions
Quote:
Amid the pollutants within the giant pile of 1.8m tons of debris and the surrounding air were 90,000 litres of jet fuel from the two stricken planes

hmm thought fuel combusted...


Interesting point, either the jet fuel burned up in the huge fireballs seen, or is Pilkington suggesting that regardless of the fireballs all the fuel somehow remained "in the air" without any combustion whatsoever.

If all the fuel remained uncombusted then what "weakened the steel" Laughing

I suppose we'd have to find out how much under fuel capacity each flight was at the "planes point of impact" Wink ...

Perhaps Pilkington is hypothesisng that the kerosene combusting with all the other materials in the towers creates a different effect than burning just in air.

Whatever he means, and I'm certainly not clued-up enough for the "science" of it, he seems to omit the clearly suspicious behaviour by the EPA regarding the air-quality at GZ in the days post-9/11.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/08/earlyshow/main1985804.shtml

Quote:
Insider: EPA Lied About WTC Air
Scientist Says It Covered Up Truth In Saying Ground Zero Air Was Safe

James M Klatell

Thousands of people who worked to clear the wreckage of the World Trade Center after 9/11 have had lung problems. Could their illness have been prevented? Tracy Smith has an exclusive report.

(CBS) A scientist for the Environmental Protection Agency is charging that the agency lied when it claimed the air at ground zero was safe to breathe in the weeks after the 9/11 attacks.

In an exclusive interview, Cate Jenkins. Ph.D., tells The Early Show national correspondent Tracy Smith that wasn't so, and EPA officials knew it, but covered up the truth.

Many workers who sifted through the wreckage have since come down with serious respiratory illnesses.

On Sept. 13, 2001, then-EPA head Christine Todd Whitman told reporters at ground zero, "We have not seen any reason any readings that have indicated any health hazard."

Asked by Smith if EPA officials lied, Dr. Jenkins responded, "Yes, they did."

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/bobzimmerfan?feature=mhum#p/a
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
fish5133
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 2556
Location: One breath from Glory

PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One presumes the Guardian reporter meant the emissions of burnt jet fuel or maybe not,.

The bi products of burnt kerosene are the same stuff that comes out of the jet engines every day in our skies and consist of hydrocarbons, co2 and other nasties (nitrous oxide?) The hydrocarbon particles from spent jet fuel would have been spread all around ground zero and beyond.

_________________
JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Articles All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group