Thanks for bringing this to my attention. There is no "analysis" in the above - merely statements which are just unsubstantiated contradictions.
I posted the following comments:
This is basically just a list of "Judy Wood says this" and genghis6199 saying "it's not that". Fair enough. As you should know, a "nuclear bomb" is not a sufficient explanation:
No long term radiation.
No noticeable blast wave.
No hot flames as the towers went down.
No loud explosions as the towers turned to dust.
Car Door handles may have a plastic coating, but they aren't made entirely of plastic. And, even if they were, what melted them 1/4 mile away from the towers? If it was an EMP heatflash from a nuclear detonation, why didn't people die all around the towers as they went down, or near that time?
I AM an unashamed supporter of Judy Wood. My name is Andrew Johnson - so this is another flaw in your video.
I was surprised you posted this video - are you the same genghis as on the 9/11 Researchers site, or someone else?
Further comments: bad language used in several places in the captions and, as I said above, he just contradicts Wood, without really explaining why the evidence he highlights is consistent with a nuclear detonation or some version thereof.
And who is Genghis6199 - what are his qualifications? He doesn't tell us.
If you want to listen to a more reasoned (but still extremely bogus) discussion of "mininukes" read this transcript:
very funny - but why bother to debunk judy wood when she's so good at debunking herself? just watch her trying to explain how....er....some sort of beam....er....of energy....er....was applied....er....somehow....and....er....the steel just went "POOF!"
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum