FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Henry Makow on 'The Protocols of Zion'

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:31 am    Post subject: Henry Makow on 'The Protocols of Zion' Reply with quote

Maurice Joly Plagiarized "Protocols of Zion" (not vice-versa)

Henry Makow Ph.D. – Save the Males July 30, 2008


It is forbidden to mention the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" (1905) without the Disclaimer that, of course, they are a "forgery" of Maurice Joly's "Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" (1864.)

The assumption is that since Protocols appeared some 40 years after Dialogue, it plagiarized the earlier work. But I will suggest that Protocols actually predated Dialogue and Joly borrowed from it. In other words, far from being an anti-Semitic ruse, the "Protocols of Zion" are authentic.

I have already argued that the two documents are neither similar nor derivative, although they have some lines and words in common. "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is essentially a brilliant Master Plan for tyranny, i.e. the New World Order. It is the key to understanding our present predicament. (This is not a condemnation of all Jews, only the nucleus of bankers and high-level Masons directing this diabolical war against the human race.)

"Dialogue in Hell" was a veiled Masonic Jewish attack on Napoleon III, an example of how they championed liberalism to undermine the Old Order and usurp power, as described in the Protocols themselves. (The author of Protocols is contemptuous of liberalism and all egalitarian programs. They are just gimmicks to manipulate the masses.)

Reading Kerry Bolton's monograph "The Protocols of Zion In Context" (Renaissance Press, 2003) it became obvious that Joly was plagiarizing from The Protocols and not vice-versa.

Joly, a Jew whose real name was Joseph Levy, was a lifelong Mason and member of the "Lodge of Mizraim." He was the protege of Adolph Cremieux (Isaac Moise Cremieux 1796-1880) the head of the lodge and a Minister in the Jewish-backed government of Leon Gambetta.

The plot is described in the Protocols as "centuries-old." It most likely predates "Dialogue." Joly was well versed in the Protocols and borrowed from it to flesh out the unpopular authoritarian position of Machiavelli, which he ascribed to Napoleon III.

Joly, who committed suicide in 1879, was in the habit of "borrowing." He is accused of plagiarizing a popular novel by Eugene Sue, namely "Les Mystères du Paris." (1845) Also his work is predated by one by another of Cremieux's proteges, Jacob Venedy, entitled, "Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Rousseau." (1850)

In 1884 Mme. Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian General living in Paris, hired Joseph Schorst, a member of Joly's Mizraim Lodge to obtain sensitive information. For the sum of 2500 francs, Schorst provided Glinka with "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." He was subsequently tracked down and murdered in Egypt.

The Tsarist government, already heavily infiltrated, sat on the document. Glinka subsequently gave it to a friend who passed it on to Professor Sergius A. Nilus who published it for the first time in 1901.

After the Bolshevik Revolution, Nilus was arrested in Kiev in 1924 ,imprisoned and tortured. The President of the Court told him he had "done them incalculable harm in publishing the Protocols." ("Waters Flowing Eastward" by Paquita de Shishmareff, 1999, pp.74-76.)

CONCLUSION

If your plan for World Domination leaked out, what would you do? Would you admit it? "You got me! My bad!"

No, you'd employ an army of ciphers to convince everyone the document is a hoax motivated by "prejudice" and "anti-Semitism." They have executed this "damage control" perfectly, a measure of their power to deceive even in the presence of the truth.

This is the only Conspiracy that has prevailed in spite of the Blueprint being freely available. It demonstrates the credulity (or venality) of the intelligentsia and the masses.

They have colonized our minds first. We cannot name our oppressor for fear of being accused of "anti-Semitism." It's as though Black slaves working on cotton plantations were taught it was "racist" or "prejudiced" to mention the White slave driver. Since the majority of Jews are ignorant of this plot, and are manipulated like everyone else, racism is a ploy to divert attention from a very dire problem.

The Illuminati (top-rung Masonic Jews and their non-Jewish allies) have distributed some wealth and power to the masses (liberalism, socialism) as a way of securing ultimate power for themselves. According to the Protocols, they will eventually withdraw these benefits once their "invisible government" is invincible. The "war on terror" should be seen in this context.

In my view, "Protocols Deniers" are complicit in this Conspiracy, which is responsible for most human suffering and will lead to a great deal more. As a Jew, I don't want this responsibility on my head, or on other innocent Jews or Masons.

"The Protocols of Zion: In Context" by Kerry Bolton, PO Box 1627 Paraparaumu Beach, Kapiti 5252 New Zealand $25 see Kerry Bolton's other work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
blackcat
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
this is not a condemnation of all Jews, only the nucleus of bankers and high-level Masons directing this diabolical war against the human race.


You will be accused of condemning ALL Jews nonetheless.

Quote:
As a Jew, I don't want this responsibility on my head, or on other innocent Jews or Masons.


Anyone for "Self-hating Jew"!!

Quote:
We cannot name our oppressor for fear of being accused of "anti-Semitism." It's as though Black slaves working on cotton plantations were taught it was "racist" or "prejudiced" to mention the White slave driver. Since the majority of Jews are ignorant of this plot, and are manipulated like everyone else, racism is a ploy to divert attention from a very dire problem.


Holocaust denier, Holocaust denier, Holocaust denier!!!!!

_________________
"The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AntonH
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 59
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You guys make me sick..
_________________
www.globalresearch.ca
www.fromthewilderness.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blackcat
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 3:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
You guys make me sick..


Awwww - you didn't use any of the usual!!

_________________
"The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blackcat
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.antiwar.com/ips/lubanlobe.php?articleid=13232

Quote:
Neocon Flap Highlights Jewish Divide
by Daniel Luban and Jim Lobe

A mushrooming media controversy pitting neoconservatives against a prominent Jewish-American political commentator could mark a new stage in the growing battle over who speaks for the US Jewish community on foreign policy issues, particularly regarding the Middle East.

Time columnist Joe Klein's accusations that Jewish neoconservatives, who played a particularly visible role in the drive to war in Iraq and have since pushed for military confrontation in Iran, sacrificed "US lives and money...to make the world safe for Israel," have spurred angry charges of anti-Semitismand personal attacks from critics at such neoconservative strongholds as the Weekly Standard, National Review, and Commentary.

But the fierceness of the controversy surrounding Klein, generally considered a political centrist, highlights the growing antagonism between neoconservative hardliners and prominent US Jews whose more moderate views are aligned more closely with those of the foreign policy establishment.

The controversy began Jun. 24, when Klein argued in a Time blog post that the "fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives – people like [independent Democrat Sen.] Joe Lieberman and the crowd at Commentary – plumped for this war [in Iraq], and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties."

Within a day, Abraham Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, accused Klein of espousing ,"age-old anti-Semitic canards about a Jewish conspiracy to control and manipulate government."

The reaction from the right-wing press was even harsher. Commentary editor John Podhoretz reiterated the accusation of "anti-Semitic canards," and called Klein "manifestly intellectually unstable."

Writing in National Review, former George W. Bush speechwriter Peter Wehner called Klein "a man who cannot control his anger and even hatred."

But Klein has refused to back down, accusing his attackers of using charges of anti-Semitism to silence criticism of neoconservative policies.

"When [Commentary writer] Jennifer Rubin or Abe Foxman calls me anti-Semitic, they're wrong," he said in an interview. "I am anti-neoconservative."

In its broad contours, the controversy is a familiar one, as critics accuse neoconservatives of exercizing pernicious influence on US Middle East policy and neoconservatives reply with charges of anti-Semitism and conspiracy-mongering.

What distinguishes the recent furor over Klein, however, is that it involves someone who is widely regarded as an exemplar of the centrist political establishment.

Klein is best known for his 1996 novel Primary Colors a thinly-veiled and largely unflattering portrait of Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign that was originally published anonymously and subsequently made into a Hollywood movie. A frequent critic of Clinton, Klein has at times expressed admiration for George W. Bush.

He also endorsed the invasion of Iraq in 2003 (although he has since expressed regret for his support) and describes himself as "a strong supporter of Israel."

The Klein dust-up is the latest in a series of events over the last several years that have placed neoconservatives both in the spotlight and on the defensive.

Neoconservatism, a predominantly – but by no means exclusively – Jewish movement, got its start in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when a small but influential group of Democrats began distancing themselves from the party which, in their view, had become too dovish toward the Soviet Union and too sympathetic toward Arab demands against Israel.

By 1980, most had become strong supporters of Ronald Reagan. A number of prominent neoconservatives joined his administration, including many who would later play key roles in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war.

Consigned to the political wilderness under President George H.W. Bush, the neoconservatives became increasingly identified in the 1990s with Israel's right-wing Likud Party. It was also during the same period that they began agitating for "regime change" in Iraq, arguing that such a move would transform the balance of power in the Middle East decisively in favor of both Israel and the US.

They experienced a rebirth with the election of Bush's son in 2000, and particularly after the 9/11 attacks, when they played a major role, both inside the administration and in the media, in rallying the public and Congress behind war in Iraq.

But with the deterioration of the situation in Iraq, the influence of neoconservatives inside and outside the administration began to wane, and critics began charging that they had led the US astray.

A series of incidents also focused critical scrutiny on the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful lobbying group whose hawkish right-wing leadership has often defied both the views of the broader US Jewish community and the policies of Israeli governments.

In 2004, the Justice Department charged Pentagon staffer Lawrence Franklin with passing classified US government documents to two AIPAC lobbyists, who had then given the documents to an Israeli Embassy official. In January 2006, Franklin was sentenced to more than 12 years in prison, while the AIPAC staffers are still awaiting trial.

In March 2006, the well-respected and staunchly realist international relations scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt published the article "The Israel Lobby" in the London Review of Books. That article, which charged that the lobby had for decades skewed US policy towards Israel in a direction detrimental to US interests, became the basis for their 2007 book, The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy.

Mearsheimer and Walt's thesis was instantly controversial. Like Klein, they were accused by critics, including the ADL and Commentary, of anti-Semitism and of perpetrating stereotypes about shadowy Jewish conspiracies.

But as a result of their stature, the two authors' work clearly created political space for those, both within the foreign policy establishment and within the US Jewish community, who had been long privately critical of the neoconservatives but had been worried about the consequences of going public with their misgivings.

More recently, AIPAC has come under fire for its close alliance with right-wing Christian Zionists, particularly controversial pastor John Hagee and his organization Christians United for Israel (CUFI).

Hagee views an undivided Israel as a precondition for precipitating the Armageddon, and his group has accordingly pushed for hawkish US policies in the Middle East that have been consistent with the neoconservatives' own preferences.

Matters came to a head earlier this year, when Republican presidential candidate John McCain was compelled to repudiate Hagee's endorsement after comments came to light in which the pastor suggested that the Holocaust was biblically ordained in order to force Jews to resettle in Israel.

Nonetheless, Hagee and CUFI have maintained close ties with the neoconservatives, and a collection of prominent Israel hawks, including Senator Lieberman, spoke at CUFI's summit in Washington earlier this month.

The belief that AIPAC has failed to accurately represent the views of the US Jewish community led to the foundation earlier this year of J Street, a Jewish lobbying group that aims to push for a more moderate stance on Middle East issues.

In the wake of these developments, many observers have taken Klein's comments – and particularly his refusal to back down in the face of withering criticism from neoconservatives – as a sign that new political space is being created for the public airing of more moderate views on Middle East policy.

M.J. Rosenberg, a former AIPAC staffer now associated with the moderate Israel Policy Forum, expressed the hope that commentators would stop equating neoconservatism with Judaism and start treating it as a political movement subject to political criticism.

"Although most neocons are Jews, few Jews are neocons," he wrote Wednesday. By equating the two groups, "[the neocons] want Americans not to follow the trail of war-mongering that leads not to Jews but to them."

_________________
"The conflict between corporations and activists is that of narcolepsy versus remembrance. The corporations have money, power and influence. Our sole influence is public outrage. Extract from "Cloud Atlas (page 125) by David Mitchell.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kbo234
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

AntonH wrote:
You guys make me sick..


Forget the 'Jewish' part for a moment(we should because this is not the point)

Have you read the 'Protocols'?

Do you think that they in any way describe how government, the media, the banks and society at large operates today?

Are you closing your eyes because you see this as an 'anti-semitic' thing. It isn't. It is a 'TRUTH' thing.

See the quote from a strong supporter of Israel on blackcat's last post:

"Although most neocons are Jews, few Jews are neocons," he wrote Wednesday. By equating the two groups, "[the neocons] want Americans not to follow the trail of war-mongering that leads not to Jews but to them."

The use of the charge of 'anti-semitism' does massive damage to us all. Real antisemitism (blind hatred of Jews) is very rare indeed IMO. There are, however, many Jewish criminals who are in the forefront of the war against humanity in general. I think they are put there by the masonic oligarchy which is both gentile and Jewish (but really Luciferian inasmuch as it acts purely and solely in its own interests and against the interests of broader humanity) because this group can be defended effectively by use of the 'anti-semite' meme that frightens nearly everybody.

The fiends that threaten us all use it most effectively against the majority Jewish population WHO DO NOT SUPPORT THEM AT ALL BUT HAVE BOUGHT INTO THE BELIEF THAT ANTI-SEMITISM AND NOT THE ACTIONS OF THE JUDEO-MASONIC ELITE IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO THEM. ORDINARY DECENT JEWS SHOULD WAKE UP. THESE PEOPLE ARE A DISASTER FOR EVERYBODY, YOU INCLUDED.


Last edited by kbo234 on Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Alexander
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 143

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Henry Makow interviews Brother Nathanael...both were born into jewish families before anyone accuses them of being Nazis or anti-semites. I guess they could be described as "self-hating" though. Rolling Eyes

http://216.240.133.177/archives32/Makow/2008/06/Makow_061508_220000.mp 3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17805
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HIDDEN HISTORY, ZIONISM AND ANTI-SEMITISM

World events do not occur by accident. They are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse string. (Denis Healey, former British Secretary of Defence.)

Political Zionism is an agency of Big Business. It is being used by Jewish and Christian financiers in this country and Great Britain, to make Jews believe that Palestine will be ruled by a descendant of King David who will ultimately rule the world. What delusion! It will lead to war between Arabs and Jews and eventually to war between Muslims and non-Muslims. That will be the turning point of history. (Henry H. Klein, "A Jew Warns Jews," 1947)

There have of old been Jews of two descriptions, so different as to be like two different races. There were Jews who saw God and proclaimed His law, and those who worshiped the golden calf and yearned for the flesh-pots of Egypt; there were Jews who followed Jesus and those who crucified Him... --Mme Z.A. Rogozin ("Russian Jews and Gentiles," 1881)

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Illuminati-Cult-that-Hijacked-World/dp/143921 1485/

Kreëmart at the MoCA Annual Gala 11/12/11 with Marina Abramovic and Deborah Harry from Kreëmart on Vimeo.


https://vimeo.com/36061419

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17805
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The fact remains that there is no documentary proof that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are what they say they are. Allegations of forgery and fraud have dogged their public history. However, despite many opinions to the contrary, the documents have never been proved to be fraudulent.
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_zion04.h tm

I have provided here some tiny amount of the vast amount of circumstantial evidence which indicates that the Protocols are simply one of many documents to betray an agenda of world domination which remains unchanged, stretching back through time to its first incarnation as the Book of Deuteronomy - the Second Law as given to Moses by Yahweh. The fact that the Protocols are demonstrably the agenda to which the world’s politicians have orchestrated public and secretive maneuvers to bring the world to the brink of a New World Order under a One World Government, is almost impossible to refute.

That such a proven agenda could have arisen in the 19th century, contemporary with the unfolding political events therein - the Bolshevik Revolution, two World Wars and Zionism - is possible, but extremely unlikely. Because it also fits very well many of the events which unfolded in the previous centuries too. In fact, the very centuries considered - stretching all the way back to the 7th Century BC, where I have shown, a remarkably similar document was written by the Levitical priests who ruled the people of Jerusalem. And no conspiratorial document of its type has ever been found to pre-date this period.

As we have seen, to declare the Protocols a ’Catholic’ conspiracy blamed upon Jews would be tantamount to calling Deuteronomy one too, and many other biblical books which predate the formation of the Roman Church by many centuries. Nevertheless, there is ample proof to show that the Catholic Church has played an enormously useful role in the implementation of the ancient conspiracy by acting as a carrier for Judaic ideas, and as a vehicle for infiltration by Marranos, Jewish popes and Illumined Freemasons (such as the P2 lodge).

It is my belief that the Protocols are what they say they are. However, to believe that this conspiracy against mankind is purely orchestrated and executed by Jews would be nonsensical. Even the most cursory glance through the pages of history proves the fact that Gentiles of all denominations have played major roles in the implementation of this plan - never more so than under the banner of ’Christianity’ - knowingly or unknowingly; whilst the majority of the world’s Jews have had no knowledge of, or have given no support to, the plan to which they have signed their name by declaring themselves to be ’Jewish’. In fact, the largest opposition to Zionism in the formative years of this century (XX Century) came from Western Jews and native Palestinian Jews. However, since the Second World War and the Holocaust, it has even become somewhat of a faux pas and considered anti-Semitic for even Jews to declare opposition to Zionism and Talmudic extremism.

This is a great testament to the truth that history is written by the winners. And the winners always use history to programme the next generation to accept their own agenda unquestioningly. As the following Protocols will so ably demonstrate.

The Publisher’s (Flanders Hall Publishing Company, New Orleans) Foreword to the revised edition of ’Waters Flowing Eastward’ mentions the following:

Several arguments against the authenticity of the Protocols are examined in the book. It may be well to mention here a completely new argument, for their authenticity. In 1937, a Russian ex-officer of the Czarist Intelligence Service asked to see a friend of ours. The Russian ex-officer was accompanied, on the occasion of the meeting, by a man well and favorably known to our friend. The ex-officer informed our friend and his wife that, in 1897, he had been called from Washington, where he was working for the Czarist government, and sent to Basle, Switzerland, where the first Zionist Congress was being held that year. He was given a small detachment of picked secret service men. While the Jews were in secret conclave, his men staged a sham fire and dashed into the room shouting Fire! Fire! In the ensuing confusion he made his way quickly to the President’s or Lecturer’s table and took possession of all the papers that were on it. These papers contained the originals of the Protocols.

This Russian officer escaped out of Russia in 1917 and lived mostly in Paris. He was an old man in 1937. Needless to say our friend’s veracity and reliability are unquestioned.

Critics of the Protocols’ genuineness have claimed that they were a forgery, derived from earlier documents and used as propaganda against the Jews by their opponents. As I hope I have shown here, the documents most certainly do derive from an earlier common source, but that does not make them forgeries, any more than latest encyclopedia can be condemned as a deliberate forgery because previous works of an almost identical nature already exist.

This argument also falls down on another point, which actually operates in favor of the theory of the Jewish origin, rather than against it. It has often been argued that the Protocols bear remarkable likeness to a book called ’Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu’ (also known as the ’Geneva Dialogues’), published anonymously in Brussels in 1865. However, the passages quoted as being plagiarized from the Geneva Dialogues for the Protocols are remarkably similar to those in a book published in 1850, called, similarly, ’Machiavelli, Montesquieu and Rousseau’ by Jacob Venedy. And Venedy was a Jew and a Freemason! He was a revolutionary and also a close associate of the Jew Karl Marx (real name Mordecai,) and Maurice Joly, the true author of the Geneva Dialogues! ’Marx’s father Heinrich, whose original name was Hirschel ha-Levi, was the son of a rabbi and the descendant of talmudic scholars for many generations.’ (Encyclopaedia Judaica, 1997). Marx’s Communist Manifesto is clearly Illuminist, and very much in parallel with the Protocols.

One can’t have one’s cake and eat it on this line of enquiry, I am afraid. All roads lead to Zion!

"...there is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself. In the fact that so many Jews are Bolsheviks. In the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism."
(The Jewish Chronicle, April 4, 1918)

’Some call it Marxism I call it Judaism.’
(The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5, 1935)

The Protocols were initially published in the Russian newspaper Snamia in 1903 and are believed to have been also published in 1902/1903 in the newspaper Moskowskija Wiedomosti. Despite a copy of the book written by Professor Sergyei Nilus (an official at the Department of Foreign Relations at Moscow) being registered in the British Museum on August 10th, 1906, they were otherwise unknown outside of Russia until after the Bolshevik Revolution when Russian emigrants took copies to North America and Germany. In Bolshevik Russia, they carried the death sentence for anyone found to be in possession of them. (As far as I am aware, the entire document deposited in the British Museum has never been fully translated into English).

The Protocols gained widespread recognition upon their translation into English, in 1920. They soon became notorious. Esteemed newspapers such as The Times and The Morning Post (whose Moscow correspondent Victor E Marsden was responsible in 1921 for the translation used in this document) covered the story in numerous articles, much to the chagrin of world Jewry, who immediately began the propaganda bandwagon rolling. They not only denied that the Protocols were a Jewish plot, but also that there was any plot whatsoever. The latter was quite clearly false to all educated men and women of the time.

’Probably so much money and energy were never before in history expended on the effort to suppress a single document.’ The period of 1920 ’marks the end of the time when the Jewish question could be impartially openly discussed in public.’
(Reed - ’The Controversy of Zion ’)

The Press was firmly under the thumb of the vested interests. Those that went against the grain and published information on the Protocols were soon brought into line or brought down by financial and political pressure. As an example, in 1920, Lord Northcliffe, the owner of several newspapers, as well as being joint proprietor of The Times, caused to be published in The Times an article called ’The Jewish Peril, a Disturbing Pamphlet, Call for Enquiry’. This article on the Protocols called for a proper investigation into the documents. In February 1922, he set about a fervently anti-Zionist mission, a series of articles about what was really going on in Palestine. On August 14, 1922 Northcliffe died of ulcerative endocarditis. He had been confronted on a train to Evian-les-Bains in June by the editor of The Times, Mr Wickham Steed, with a doctor who had certified Northcliffe ’insane’. On the strength of this he was barred from entering the offices of The Times by a police guard, and his communications were ordered to be ignored by the staff. All of this despite showing no outward signs of madness to those who later commented on his appearance or state of mind. However, he had stated that he believed his life was in danger and that he was being poisoned. This whole story was suppressed until the publication of ’The Official History of the Times’, thirty years later in 1952!

Thus, one man who had enough power and will to challenge the Protocols and Zionism on an international stage to an audience of millions, who was committed to illuminating the world as to the true agenda, had been removed.

The often cited ’fact’ that the Protocols are a ’proven fraud’, is easily dismissed, as it is actually entirely untrue and based upon a very specific court case. Numerous unsuccessful attempts had been made by world Jewry to have the Protocols denounced as a forgery. But it was not until 1933 that any legal action was taken in this respect:

On 26th June, 1933, the Federation of Jewish Communities of Switzerland and the Berne Jewish Community brought an action against five members of the Swiss National Front, seeking a judgment that the Protocols were a forgery and a prohibition of their publication. The procedure of the Court was astounding, the provisions of the Swiss Civil Code being deliberately set aside. Sixteen witnesses called by the plaintiffs were heard, but only one of the forty witnesses called by the defendants was allowed a hearing. The judge allowed the plaintiffs to appoint two private stenographers to keep the register of proceedings during the hearing of their witnesses, instead of entrusting the task to a Court official.

In view of these and similar irregularities, it was not surprising that, after the case had lasted just on two years, the Court pronounced the Protocols to be a forgery and demoralizing literature. The decision was given on 14th May, 1935, but it was announced in the Jewish Press before it was delivered by the Court?

On 1st November, 1937, the Swiss Court of Criminal Appeal quashed this judgment in its entirety. Jewish propagandists, however, still declare that the Protocols have been "proved" to be a forgery.

It was natural that the Jews should try to discredit the Protocols, for their growing fame was focusing more public attention on other revealing utterances.
(Waters Flowing Eastward - revised and updated by Rev. Denis Fahey)

The second trial found in favor of the Jewish lobby and fined the defendants 100 francs costs. But this had nothing to do with the Protocols. It was due to another article which was included in the prosecution, entitled Schweizermädchen hüte dich vor schändenen Juden (Swiss Girls Beware of Dishonourable Jews). The court had stated that this was ’Jew-baiting’ and an ’attempt to defame the Jews as a body’. The Jewish lobby, who had written in their journals that the Protocols were a proven forgery later were forced to change their stance to that their authenticity had not been furnished. But a popular myth survives of the former stance.

The fact remains, that the Protocols are NOT a proven forgery.

The fact also remains that since their publication, world events have unfolded exactly according to their description. We are gradually being mobilized into a New World Order. The One World Government is being facilitated by the gradual movement of nation states into larger power blocks such as the European Union and NAFTA etc. The United Nations has come into power as a global police force under the excuse of being a protector and benefactor of the world, exactly as outlined in the Protocols. The Jews have symbolically ’returned to Palestine’, as the State of Israel now exists as the official universal ’homeland’ of all Jews, despite the vast majority of Jews having no racial connection with Israel whatsoever.

I sincerely hope that the Protocols are a fraud and that there is no conspiracy. But I believe that the information here presented, which is but the tiny tip of an enormous iceberg, constitutes ample evidence of an ancient conspiracy orchestrated by a self-appointed elite, who are at least intimately associated with the core elect of international Judaism and have been for a very long time.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group