FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Covid-19 PCR Test: is it an abominable scam?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Campaigning
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5977
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sat Oct 03, 2020 10:05 pm    Post subject: Covid-19 PCR Test: is it an abominable scam? Reply with quote

I am starting this thread with the hope Tony will make it a 'Sticky', and others can add relevant articles they find.
The unsuitability of the PCR test is legendary, and is our best chance to fight back against the draconian arbitrary regulations governments are enacting.
I'll start the ball rolling with a NY Times article from January 2007 (so no government or 'Health Authority' can claim ignorance, or if they do, they really are ignorant and should be sacked).
'Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t':
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html
The PCR proved it's unsuitability for diagnosis (it took, even in 2007, a long time for the article to mention it was the PCR test they used - I was thinking I would need to contact Dr. Herndon to ask, but eventually the article named it.
Interestingly, the F/B 'Fact Checkers' (Censors) mark other links up as 'False News', but they let this NY Times article alone.
'COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless':
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifical ly-meaningless/
'False News' as far as F/B Gestapo are concerned.
'The Infectious Myth - Stephen Bustin on Challenges with RT-PCR':
https://infectiousmyth.podbean.com/e/the-infectious-myth-stephen-busti n-on-challenges-with-rt-pcr/
'The Truth about PCR Test Kit from the Inventor and Other Experts':
https://www.weblyf.com/2020/05/the-truth-about-pcr-test-kit-from-the-i nventor-and-other-experts/
'The COVID-19 Test Wasn’t Meant for Detecting Viruses':
https://delgadoprotocol.com/the-covid-19-test-wasnt-meant-for-detectin g-viruses/
'BOMBSHELL: WHO Coronavirus PCR Test Primer Sequence is Found in All Human DNA':
https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/04/06/bombshell-who-coronavirus-pcr-te st-primer-sequence-is-found-in-all-human-dna/

'Homo sapiens chromosome 8, GRCh38.p13 Primary Assembly':
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/NC_000008.11?report=genbank&lo g$=nuclalign&from=63648346&to=63648363
Bottom of page:
'...ORIGIN
1 ctccctttgt tgtgttgt ...'
'COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless':
https://bpa-pathology.com/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaning less/
'...And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.

Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.

But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and NB., nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see below).

Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine, March 2020
Replying Author: Malik Peiris
Date: May 12, 2020
Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”

Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19”, Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020
Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han
Date: May 6, 2020
Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”

Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020
Replying Author: Wan Beom Park
Date: March 19, 2020
Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020
Replying Author: Wenjie Tan
Date: March 18, 2020
Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”

For more read the article here.'
and re the above article, which F/B Gestapo say is 'False News':
'DEBUNKING THE DEBUNKERS: PCR TESTS SCIENTIFICALLY MEANINGLESS':
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/blog/debunking-the-debunker s-pcr-tests-scientifically-meaningless


That should suffice to get the Thread going. We need to contact our Councillors, Mayors and MP's with samples of the evidence for this abominable scam.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 3005
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2020 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Luckily the coronavrius tests are conducted by professionals though


Coronavirus: Health and safety breaches at testing lab – Exclusive: Health and safety watchdog finds ‘material breaches’ in five areas at coronavrius lab handling 40,000 tests a day –
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-testing-lighthou se-labs-safety-whistleblowers-b1041495.html

Dr Harris, who started working in laboratories dealing with highly infectious diseases in the 1980s, said he quickly became concerned at what he saw when he started work in the lab on 6 July. He described the initial training as “rushed” with no reference to specific issues linked to working in a biosafety level-two lab such as Milton Keynes. He also said there had been a lack of signage, spill kits in case samples were dropped on the floor and there was a lack of knowledge by staff about what to do when this happened. “At the induction I felt I was surrounded by people who didn’t know anything about biosafety or handling infectious pathogens,” he said. “These people don’t realise that they’re in harm’s way. And it’s quite easy and quite straightforward to train them. They’re not and this is what’s deplorable.” He added: “I saw complete overloading of the biosafety cabinets and when you do that the air flow has nowhere to go. “They actually had racks full of tubes plonked right on the front grate and I saw that numerous times. So people were getting no protection whatsoever. I am convinced they were putting themselves at risk of infection but they didn’t know it because they hadn’t been properly trained.” The UK Biocentre said two staff were used to operate the safety cabinets with the second worker witnessing and supporting the scientist using the cabinet. It said staff had three days of mandatory training first. Another former worker at the lab told The Independent: “I immediately began to question some of the most basic practices that were being employed in the labs. It was like we were set up to work on a war-footing with massive enthusiasm for the task but many of the things we could implement from existing industry and lab practice to make things more efficient and safer for the work team were not used.” The insider, who asked not to be named said: “On my shifts I was sitting in front of a biosafety cabinet for hours and each hour was opening 320 sample bags, making repeated actions requiring significant force. There were no rotations between tasks, not enough breaks for this type of work and basic lab practices to avoid injury from this repetitive work did not appear to be a consideration. “We had disposable visitors lab coats with gloves taped to the sleeves with brown parcel tape to reach into cabinets, no plastic sleeves like at other facilities.” In a statement the lab said staff did now have access to both cloth and disposable lab coats and tape was used as an extra safety measure because staff are told to wear two pairs of gloves. Reacting the concerns of the whistleblowers, Professor Deenan Pillay, a professor of virology at University College London, said he believed part of the problem had been an “obsession with outsourcing” by government….

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Campaigning All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group