FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

21Apr21 When the Queen Abdicates will all hell break loose?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2921
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meghan Markle security order tennis fans not to take her picture at Wimbledon
https://www.metro.co.uk/2019/07/09/meghan-markle-security-order-tennis -fans-not-take-picture-wimbledon-10136984/

Meghan Markle security ‘order tennis fans not to take her picture at Wimbledon’

Mandatory Credit: Photo by Javier Garcia/BPI/REX (10327626gu) Meghan Duchess of Sussex watching Serena Williams on Court 1 Wimbledon Tennis Championships, Day 4, The All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, London, UK - 04 Jul 2019
Meghan Markle’s security warned Wimbledon spectators against snapping pictures of the royal (Picture: Rex)
Share this article via facebookShare this article via twitterShare this article via whatsapp
Author image
Martine Berg Olsen
Tuesday 9 Jul 2019 12:58 pm
Since joining the Royal Family, Meghan Markle has imposed some strict privacy rules – especially when it comes to her and Prince Harry’s son Archie.

So, it was really no surprise that tennis fans were ‘ordered not to take pictures of the Duchess of Sussex’ when she made a surprise appearance in the royal box at Wimbledon on Thursday to watch pal Serena Williams play.

However, Meghan has been branded ‘childish’ and a ‘control freak’ after her security crew warned spectators at Court 1 against snapping images of her – even though 12,000 people were sat in the crowds and millions watched on TV.

One guest was told off by Meghan’s bodyguard for pulling up his phone, but could clearly be seen snapping a selfie of himself with the court in the background.


PR consultant Sally Jones was also given a lecture, but said the security staff was left ’embarrassed’ when she told them she was taking a picture of Serena and had not spotted the royal.

Jones, 64, who was seated on the same row as the duchess, told the Daily Mail, Meghan was ‘clearly looking around to see who was looking at her’.

Man appearing to take a selfie in front of Meghan Markle at Wimbledon
One man could be seen taking a photo close to Meghan… (Picture: Rex)
She told of the incident: ‘I felt a tap on my shoulder and was asked not to take pictures of the duchess – but I had no idea she was there until then. I was absolutely gobsmacked.’

Jones added: ‘There were around 200 photographers snapping away at her but security were sent to warn an old biddy like me. It makes them look silly. It’s childish and takes us for fools.’

Jones said it was ‘another example of silly control freakery’ after the couple faced backlash for deciding to keep Archie’s christening and godparents private.

Piers Morgan also joined in and said it was ‘absurd’ for Meghan to ‘demand privacy as she sits in the royal box on a publicly-funded jolly with her mates’.

Piers told Meghan to ‘go back to America’ if she wants to be treated as a private citizen on Tuesday’s Good Morning Britain.

Kensington Palace has not commented on the incident, but a royal source told the Telegraph: ‘It’s not unusual for people accompanying members of the Royal Family at private, or public, events to ask members of the public not to take photographs. It is to enable members of the Royal Family to engage with people and events.’

Man appearing to take a selfie in front of Meghan Markle at Wimbledon
… the move caused her bodyguard to jump up… (Picture: Rex)
Security talks to a man appearing to take a selfie in front of Meghan Markle at Wimbledon
… and ask him to stop… (Picture: Rex)

… however, the man was just snapping a selfie (Picture: Rex)

She made a surprise appearance to watch pal Serena Williams play (Picture: Rex)

Meghan was surrounded by free seats at Court 1 as she watched pal Serena Williams at the Wimbledon Tennis Championships (Picture: Rex)
As many as 40 seats surrounding Meghan were kept empty by her security team.


Meghan, who wore blue jeans, a blazer, sunglasses and a hat, was joined by close friends Genevieve Hillis and Lindsay Roth as they watched Serena beat Slovenia’s Kaja Juvan on Thursday.

It was believed she broke the Wimbledon etiquette with her denim outfit, but All England Club refused to comment and insisted she was ‘perfectly well dressed’.

She arrived at the tournament two days after sister-in-law Kate Middleton attended – amid rumours of a row between the two royal couples.

Kate was happy to sit among the crowds on Court 14 last Tuesday.


The Duchess of Cambridge watches the action on Court 1 with the AELTC Vice Chairman, Ian Hewitt (left) on day two of the Wimbledon Championships (Picture: PA)

Kate with Katie Boulter (left) and Anne Keothavong (right) as they watch Harriet Dart in at Court 14 (Picture: Rex)
MORE: MEGHAN MARKLE DUCHESS OF SUSSEX


Meghan Markle takes Archie to watch dad at polo with cousins George, Charlotte and Louis


Is Prince Harry telling off his wife?

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:44 pm    Post subject: Meghan Markle - terminator agent? Reply with quote

Meghan Markle - terminator agent?

The Hidden Nuclear Bomb Meaning of 007 Movie, "Thunderball"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_digger

A gold digger is a person, typically a woman, who engages in a type of transactional relationship[1] for money rather than love. When it turns into marriage, it is a type of marriage of convenience.

Today, the courageous British people are under attack from both the sex-hedonist, Rothschild Illuminati (Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut") for BREXIT refusing to pay $BILLIONS each year to the evil Bilderberg secret society, European Union (EU) and the American Military-Industrial-Intelligence, Congressional Complex (MILINDCOMP) stoical-violence-loving, Rockefeller Illuminati (Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove") who have placed CIA sexpionage agent, gold digger and black racist, Meghan Markle (MM) --complete with fake baby--into the marriage arms of formerly-sound-military-officer-turned-drug-hedonist, Prince Harry to spy on and ruin the Royal Family and the UK's multi-billion dollar tourist industry. Those that grossly over-simplify the Illuminati as being totally united are constantly blind-sided by the viscious rivalry antics of the leftist and rightist factions catering to the sheeple's stoical or hedonist tendancies--vying for the character & control of the impending New World Order (NWO). The CIA's pro-Nazi traitor, war criminal (Operation SUNRISE/PAPER CLIP) and creator at the cost of conning Truman into wrongly disbanding the OSS, Allen Dulles placed Jackie into President John F. Kennedy's life as his wife to spy on him discretely as sex predator and stunningly-beautiful, Sharon Tate wife/baby murderer, Roman Polanski alludes to in his 2006 movie, Ghost Writer. Its no wonder the Ministry of Defense (MoD) is constantly broke and considering reducing its servicemen to an absurd 80K compared to the monstrously large and inept USMC populated by 200, 000 loud-mouthed incompetent egotists--who constantly whine they don't have enough moneies to stop wasting $BILLIONS on nonsense Precision Detonated Munitions (PDM) vulnerable 30 mph surface amphibious ships (google HMT Rohna) for instead 300 mph long-range seaplane transport/tankers that can actually get to global battlefields quickly.

007 Commandos: MC-130L HerkuSKIS Seaplanes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEkltTViAjY

The U.K. was betrayed after 1945 by the take-over of the USA by the pro-Nazi Rockefeller Illuminati faction's puppet POTUS Harry S. Truman witched out at the last minute for agricultural genius and decent human being, VP Henry Wallace--despite having helped America develop the atomic bomb. Using secret Swiss band account funds recovered from 2IC Nazi party leader Martin Bormann when Commander Ian Fleming, Royal Navy Volunteer Reserve (RNVR) and JAD's Royal Marine Commandos rescued him from Berlin in 1945, WW2-bankrupt Britain was somehow able to create their own atomic bombs as a deterrent against Rothschild-created, Soviet Russian attack & conquest.

James Bond is BORN: the True Story of Commander Ian Fleming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6z2Cm5mRdk

After the war, as a MI6-SIS master spy and propagandist, Fleming name-drops the RAF Vulcan bomber, Nassau and nuclear blackmail by S.P.E.C.T.R.E.--which really is an anagram for RESPECT--which is the main goal of the Nazi 4th Reich. In the 1961 book/1965 movie "Thunderball", the bomber has 2 x gravity nuclear bombs--which equivalates to the 2 x SkyBolt ASBMs which America reneged on their part of the development program at the Nassau conference--forcing them to give the RN Polaris SLBMs as a consolation prize--seen in the later James Bond films like "The Spy who Loved Me" in 1977.

Today, Rockefeller Illuminati Russian fear-mongers within the MILINDCOMP are whining about Russian "hypersonic weapons"--when we had Action Reaction Rockets (ARRs) back in the 1960s but because SAC bureaucrats were wings straight & level, pull-NO-G p****** not wanting to fly supersonic bombers like the B-58 and FB-111, ASBMs were not fielded. As soon as no one was looking, the supersonic B-58s and FB-111s were Type B personality, bureaucrats retired. Its a minor miracle the USAF owns & operates supersonic B-1B Lancer aka BONE heavy bombers--but without ASBMs. Vulcan bombers with SkyBolt ASBMs could have been camouflaged and hidden in the British isles to evade enemy targeting and able to take flight quickly to reach 1, 000 mile stand-off ranges avoiding having to fly into enemy SAM-infested, air defenses. SAC forward-basing its B-58s at remote locations in the CONUS was well-intentioned--but absurd since they would have had to be constantly air-refueled to reach Soviet Russia. SAC complained about B-58 lack of range when they could have been forward deployed in the UK like their slow, subsonic B-47s and B-52s and RAF Vulcans were--all of which could have been armed with SkyBolt ASBMs to solve their lack of enemy air space penetration problems. The Nazi CIA Gulag-murdered the USAF's best air reconnaissance experts by incendiary-bombing their unarmed, non-seaplane, C-124 Globemaster II transport resulting in the gaining control of U.S. spy flights from their NSA47 rival U.S. Air Force (USAF) in 1951.

CIA Sabotaged USAF C-124; 53 Men Lost to Soviet Gulags

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWES7ojTqNA

If Brigadier General Cullen and his staff not been captured by the Soviet Navy to torture-live in their Gulags, a 7th Air Division of 509th Bomb Group (dropped atomic bombs on Japan in WW2, based in Roswell AFB where Nazi Anti-Gravity Craft aka flying saucers paid them a recce visit in '47) bombers was to be set-up in the UK to deter Communist aggression.

Got Space Access, UK?

The UK crop of captured Nazi rocket scientists Fleming warns about in Moonraker were clearly inferior to the highly-competent, von Braun liquid rocket fuel team Dulles brought over that empowered the U.S. Army until prevented from putting the 1st satellite into orbit [combatreform.org/warandpeaceinthespaceage.htm] and stamped out their solid rocket fuel Jack Parsons, Rothschild sex fiend rivals who live on in the JPL and techno-demented, Scientology religious cult popular in Hollywood. However, this wasn't enough trouble instigation for the evil FBI--who also has no Constitutional right to exist like the horrid CIA--they also alienated America's top Chinese ethnicity rocket scientist who fled to Communist China to start their ballistic missile and space program successful to the current day and poses an existential threat to America.

combatreform.org/airrecon.htm

Immediately after the war, clever UK scientists figured they could upgrade captured German V-2 ballistic missiles with a pressurized re-entry capsule and placed the 1st man into space. Drained constantly of funds by WW2 debts and the Rothschild Illuminati's lavish lifestyles, this promising MEGAROC project was cancelled. The main thing holding the UK back from being a world super power again is the parasitic Rothschild Illuminati sucking them dry.

British V-2 - How the U.K. Almost Won the Space Race

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWFFzL65dEQ

Moreover, SkyBolt ASBM variants could shoot-down orbiting enemy satellites, place our own small satellites into space and launch MACH 5 aerospace spy planes like FISH using B-58's MACH 2 aerodynamic flight lift as the "1st stage". Vulcans could have destroyed the Stanley airfield runway better during the 1982 Falklands War with a huge SkyBolt ASBM bomblet payload than the tedious constant air-refueling needed to get them directly overhead to drop gravity HE bombs. Moreover, having SEAPLANE air refueling tankers can stay filled up by RN submarines and surface ships to extend RAF aircraft reach all over the world as the USN Tradewind tanker seaplane proved but failed because its faulty contraprop engines should have been instead powered by the proven British MAMBAs used successfully for years in their Fairey Gannett carrier-based ASW planes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Vulcan

The origin of the Vulcan and the other V bombers is linked with early British atomic weapon programme and nuclear deterrent policies. Britain's atom bomb programme began with Air Staff Operational Requirement OR.1001 issued in August 1946. This anticipated a government decision in January 1947 to authorise research and development work on atomic weapons, the U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (McMahon Act) having prohibited exporting atomic knowledge, even to countries that had collaborated on the Manhattan Project.[4] OR.1001 envisaged a weapon not to exceed 24 ft 2 in (7.37 m) in length, 5 ft (1.5 m) in diameter and 10,000 lb (4,500 kg) in weight. The weapon had to be suitable for release from 20,000 ft (6,100 m) to 50,000 ft (15,000 m).[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAM-87_Skybolt

At the same time, the Royal Air Force (RAF) was having problems with their MRBM missile project, the Blue Streak, which was long overdue [EDITOR: Fleming's warning in 1953 Moonraker that captured Nazi rocket scientists were sabotaging Britain's missile program]. Even if this was successful, it faced the serious problem of basing. No fixed land-based missile system could be credibly installed in the British Isles; they were well within the range of Soviet air strikes. The limited land mass available meant it would be relatively easy for missile sites to be spotted no matter what security measures were taken. Suitable locations for construction also carried a social and political cost. Fixed land-based ballistic missile sites need many thousands of acres per squadron (typically ten missiles); and the squadrons need to be apportioned over many thousands of square miles so that no single attack could conceivably destroy them all in one strike.

This left the deterrent based on their own bomber force, the V bomber fleet, which the RAF had already long concluded would be unable to penetrate Soviet defenses by about 1960. The RAF was in the process of introducing their own stand-off missile, the 950 kilometres (590 mi) ranged Mach 3 Blue Steel. While capable, the missile flew at altitudes and speeds that left it vulnerable to improving SAMs, and it had a number of reliability and serviceability issues that made it less than ideal. A faster, longer-ranged version was being designed, Blue Steel II, but it would be some time before it could enter service.

The long-range Skybolt would eliminate the need for both the Blue Streak and the Blue Steel II. Blue Steel II was canceled in December 1959 and the British Cabinet decided in February 1960 to cancel Blue Streak as well. Prime Minister Macmillan met [EDITOR: Rockefeller Illuminati puppet] President Eisenhower in March 1960 and agreed to purchase 144 Skybolts for the RAF. By agreement, British funding for research and development was limited to that required to modify the V bombers to take the missile, but the British were allowed to fit their own warheads and the Americans were given nuclear submarine basing facilities in [EDITOR: Faslane] Scotland.[4] Following the agreement, the Blue Streak program was formally canceled in April 1960 and in May 1960 an agreement for an initial order of 100 Skybolts was concluded.[4]

Avro was made an associate contractor to manage the Skybolt program for the United Kingdom and four different schemes were submitted to find a platform for the missile.[4] A number of different aircraft were considered, including a variant of the Vickers VC10 airliner and two of the current V bombers, the Avro Vulcan and Handley Page Victor.[4] It was decided to use the Vulcan to initially carry two missiles each on hardpoints outboard of the main landing gear.[4]

Development and testing

During development, it was decided that the system could not reach the required accuracy at the desired range without an update to the guidance system. This led to the introduction of a star tracker platform that would be used to further enhance the existing inertial navigation system. The system was capable of tracking bright stars in direct sunlight, a challenging requirement. This change meant that the missile could only be carried in locations where the front of the missile could continually observe the sky. This had always been the case on the USAF's B-52 bombers, where they were carried under the wings, but presented a problem for some of the UK designs. In the end, Skybolt was limited to the Vulcan.

By 1961, several test articles were ready for testing from B-52's, with drop-tests starting in January. In January 1961 a Vulcan visited the Douglas plant at Santa Monica, California, to make sure the modifications to the aircraft were electrically compatible with the missile. In Britain, compatibility trials with mockups started on the Vulcan.[4] Powered tests started in April 1962, but the test series went badly, with the first five trials ending in failure of one sort or another. The first fully successful flight occurred on 19 December 1962.[5]

Cancellation

By this point, the value of the Skybolt system in the U.S. had been seriously eroded. The Polaris had recently gone into service, with overall capabilities similar to Skybolt, but with "loiter" times on the order of months instead of hours. Additionally, the [EDITOR: large land mass] U.S. Air Force itself was well into the process of developing the Minuteman [solid rocket fuel, intercontinental ballistic] missile, whose improved accuracy reduced the need for any bomber attacks. [EDITOR: Secretary of Defense] Robert McNamara was particularly opposed to the bomber force [EDITOR: he served as a bombing target officer under General LeMay in WW2, go figure?] and repeatedly stated he felt that the combination of SLBMs and ICBMs would render them useless. [EDITOR: so much for the TRIAD's sound redundancy] He pressed for the cancellation of Skybolt as an unnecessary program.

The British, on the other hand, had canceled all other projects to concentrate fully on Skybolt. When McNamara informed them that they were considering canceling the program in November 1962, a firestorm of protest broke out in the House of Commons. Jo Grimond noted "Does not this mark the absolute failure of the policy of the independent deterrent? Is it not the case that everybody else in the world knew this, except the Conservative Party in this country?"[6] [EDITOR: former naval officer] President Kennedy officially cancelled the program on 22 December 1962.[1]

As the political row grew into a major crisis, an emergency meeting between parties from the U.S. and U.K. was called, leading to the Nassau agreement. Over the next few days, a new plan was hammered out that saw the U.K. purchase the Polaris SLBM, but equipped with British warheads that lacked the dual-key system. The U.K. would thus retain its independent deterrent force, although its control passed from the RAF largely to the Royal Navy. The Polaris, a much better weapon system for the U.K., was a major "scoop" and has been referred to as "almost the bargain of the century".[7] The RAF kept a tactical nuclear capability with the [EDITOR: gravity bomb] WE.177 which armed V bombers and later the Panavia Tornado force. The "Skybolt Crisis" was a major event in the eventual downfall of the Macmillan government.[citation needed]

A B-52G launched the last XGAM-87A missile down the Atlantic Missile Range a day after the program was canceled.[8] In June 1963, the XGAM-87A was redesignated as XAGM-48A[9]

****

Fleming's Nazi traitor, Hugo Drax in Moonraker is clearly embodied in today's rocket launch, Illuminati techno-industrialist, Elon Musk who works tirelessly for NWO goals--like planting an electronic 666 Mark of the Beast chip into all sheeple's brains to control them with TRANS-HUMANISM.

Musk's Neurolink Evil

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA77zsJ31nA

666 = www = Mark of the Beast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUhHXkgibhQ

Musk has broken the high cost riddle of ARR booster rockets by cheap fuels and tail-sitter landing recovery desired from the first days of space exploration and seen in countless science fiction movies but not possible until the advent of precise computer controls. Like Drax in Moonraker, Musk holds a near monopoly on space access for the U.S. MILINDCOMP and NASA whose poorly-engineered Space Shuttle fleet was retired because the Illuminati has denied the world of a Single Stage-to-Orbit (SSTO), easy space access, SPACEPLANE because they don't want sheeple in space--lest they realize we all live in God's creation as per the 1611 King James Bible--and not the Satanic hell they plan for us. Nolan's "Interstellar" meekly raises secret space program AGC superior efficiency over white public-consumption, ARR question to make space colonization viable--but "Little Spaceship on the Prairie" to build sheeple character is violently opposed by the evil elites.

The evil CIA has sabotaged both Burt Rutan's 2-stage mothership plus spaceplane tourism project and the Russian Soyuz re-entry capsule docked to the International Space Station (ISS). Its way over-due to DISBAND THE CIA whose non-stop dirty tricks are revealed to the world like their disgusting recent illegal spying of President of the United States (POTUS) Trump's phone calls to play a nit-picking impeachment GOTYA! game. They have done far worse; murdering POTUS JFK in Dulles, Texas, his brother RFK running for that office, black civil rights leader MLK, Congressmen Hale Boggs, Nick Begich...and the late Jim Marrs suspected MI6-SIS master spy Ian Fleming himself on a golf course in 1964 lest he blow-the-whistle on the BS Dulles-misled, Warren Commission white-wash to his global 007 fan base.

More CIA Sabotage: No SPACEPLANES for You!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GGb901I2_8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jt6cgUtp5qw

James Bond is REAL.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2019 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Battle of the Princes: Andrew character assassinated by Charles in royal succession battle?

Link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYMnjCeobDE
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/104324
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/richieallen/episodes/2019-11-21T11_ 11_29-08_00

Furious Prince Charles to confront Prince Andrew over ongoing Epstein scandal
PRINCE CHARLES is expected to confront his brother Prince Andrew over his disastrous Newsnight interview, it was claimed today.
By ALICE SCARSI
PUBLISHED: 09:27, Mon, Nov 25, 2019 | UPDATED: 11:39, Mon, Nov 25, 2019
http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1208906/prince-charles-prince-andr ew-bbc-interview-epstein-scandal-royal-family-news

The Prince of Wales was said to be incensed not only by the content of the interview but the timing - as it clashed with Charles’ 12-day tour to India, New Zealand and the Solomon Islands this week and broke a long-standing tradition that one royal does not upstage another. Charles’ royal visit was intended to focus on environmental issues close to the Prince’s heart bit it was massively overshadowed by Prince Andrew’s now-notorious Newsnight interview and the backlash that followed.

The painful blow Queen dealt Prince Andrew in wake of royal retreat

Royal outrage: Prince William reveals true feelings on Prince Andrew
The Prince of Wales has remained tight-lipped throughout the tour, part of it carried out with Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, over the Epstein scandal.

But it is understood Charles is gearing up for a showdown with his brother and is determined to get a grip on the situation once back to the UK to avoid any further fallout.

This comes after a Buckingham Palace source told the Mirror Prince Charles "will be having stern words" with Andrew upon his return from the tour.

PROMOTED STORY
Brighten That Smile With Affordable Dental Implants
Brighten That Smile With Affordable Dental Implants
(Yahoo! Search)
The source claimed: “The Queen has told Andrew he has her support but it is clear his brother Charles will be having stern words with him when he gets home.

prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news
Prince Charles is expected to confront his brother Prince Andrew when he returns from his overseas tour (Image: GETTY)
prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

Prince Andrew's interview with Emily Maitlis aired on November 16 (Image: GETTY)
“Her very public show of support is a clear indication she has forgiven him but he has been ordered to keep in line. The inquests have already begun inside the Palace.

“Charles will demand to know how on earth this could have been allowed to happen, who was advising Andrew and why he was not consulted about his decision to go ahead with the interview.

“He has been ordered to step back from royal life until he has unequivocally cleared his name or the Epstein case is over, which could be years. The road to redemption might not only be long, it could be completely blocked off.”

READ MORE: Prince Andrew passes the baton to Eugenie and Beatrice

prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

The Queen and Prince Andrew were spotted horse riding on Friday (Image: REUTERS)
RELATED ARTICLES

Prince Andrew interview: ‘Palace needs to shut him down!’

Royal showdown: Furious Prince Charles to 'read riot act' to Andrew
Prince Andrew’s link to the scandal is not going away any time soon.

The BBC is scheduled to broadcast an interview with Virginia Roberts, who claims to have been trafficked for sex, in December.

Following the disastrous interview aired on November 16, in which Andrew failed to express sympathy for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s victims or regret over their friendship, the Prince announced he was temporarily stepping down from public duties.

DON'T MISS
Shamed Andrew has ‘damaged monarchy’ - poll verdict on the Prince [POLL]
Prince Andrew fiasco sends chill through Royal Family’s Christmas [INSIGHT]
Prince Andrew interview done 'considerable damage to monarchy' [OPINION]
prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

Prince Charles and Camilla toured New Zealand last week (Image: GETTY)
prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

Prince Charles leaving the Solomon Islands this morning (Image: GETTY)
In recent days, as a growing number of companies said they would review their support to the Duke’s charities and organisations, Prince Andrew also stepped back from most of his patronages to avoid collateral damage.

While he will remain the patron of most organisations he has been supporting throughout the years, he will be taking no active part in them for the time being.

And, despite Buckingham Palace announcing last week the Duke would have continued to work on Pitch@Palace, his entrepreneurship scheme, it has been claimed Prince Andrew is also to cease any involvement in it.

This comes after 10 of the 35 companies backing the scheme withdrew their support and others announced they were reviewing it at the end of the year.

prince charles prince andrew bbc interview epstein scandal royal family news

Royal men and their military service (Image: EXPRESS)
Among the businesses who pulled out, there were KPMG, Standard Chartered and Bosch.

Prince Andrew, widely believed to be the Queen’s favourite child, was spotted horse riding with his mother on Friday on the grounds of Windsor Castle.

This outing was first seen as a show of unity and support.

However, the monarch is believed to have cancelled the lavish celebrations planned for Prince Andrew’s birthday, who turns 60 next February, The Times wrote.

Prince Andrew

Buckingham Palace said last week Prince Andrew will continue to work on Pitch@Palace (Image: GETTY)
TRENDING
Meghan Markle posts heartwarming Instagram update after receiving ‘special surprise’
Meghan Markle posts heartwarming Instagram update after receiving ‘special surprise’
Prince Charles and Camilla split: Why did Duchess return to UK as Charles continued tour?
Prince Charles and Camilla split: Why did Duchess return to UK as Charles continued tour?
Royal heartbreak: Kate and William send Twitter into meltdown with devastating update
Royal heartbreak: Kate and William send Twitter into meltdown with devastating update
Instead of throwing a party for Andrew, the Queen will host a small family dinner, the newspaper added.

The Epstein scandal could further worsen the relationship between the two brothers, believed to have been under strain since 2012, after Prince Charles announced his desire once King to slim down monarchy.

His intentions were made clear during the Diamond Jubilee celebrations, when wider members of the Royal Family were excluded from the symbolic appearance on the iconic Buckingham Palace balcony.

On the day, the only royals invited to stand next to the Queen were Prince Charles, Camilla, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince Harry.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Queen ‘to retire in 18 months’ for Charles to become Prince Regent
https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/27/queen-retire-18-months-charles-become-p rince-regent-11228168/

Faye BrownWednesday 27 Nov 2019 2:39 pm

Queen Elizabeth is reportedly handing over her duties to her son Charles, the Prince of Wales, when she turns 95 (Picture: Reuters) Prince Charles is preparing to take over leadership of the Royals when the Queen turns 95, it has been reported.

The Queen’s oldest son met with his father at Sandringham yesterday to discuss the continuing fallout from his brother’s disastrous TV interview about his links to Jeffry Epstein. Prince Charles’ key role in ‘retiring’ Prince Andrew from public life has fed speculation he is preparing to become ‘shadow King’, which would see him control day-to-day royal affairs while his mother remains monarch.

Her Majesty will turn 95 in 18 months – the same age at which her husband Prince Philip withdrew from his public duties. There is talk among courtiers that she may use the milestone to allow her son to become Prince Regent, the Sun reports.

Prince Charlies is rumoured to be stepping in as ‘Prince Regent’ in 18 months if the Queen retires (Picture: Rex) It is believed he met with his father Prince Philip to discuss the plan yesterday (Picture: Rex) A royal source told the paper: ‘The scandal surrounding Andrew and Epstein gave Charles an opportunity to step in to show that he can run The Firm.

No one is bigger than the institution of the Royal Family. Not even Andrew, the Queen’s favourite son. ADVERTISING ‘Charles recognised that and acted decisively — like the king he may well soon be. This was the moment when Charles stepped up as Prince Regent, the Shadow King.’

The Queen has been gradually reducing the number of public engagements she attends from 332 in 2016 to a 283 in 2018. The Prince of Wales has been on an official tour of New Zealand but headed straight for the Queen’s Norfolk estate when he landed yesterday. It is believed Charles will also be discussing the fall out from Prince Andrew’s car crash Epstein interview

Philip, 98, spends most of his time at Wood Farm, a small residence on the estate. It is believed that Charles will seek his father’s advise over what the family should do next amid continued scrutiny over Prince Andrew’s links to billionaire paedophile Jeffry Epstein.

The Duke of York appeared on Newsnight earlier this month to discuss his controversial friendship, in what was described as a ‘car crash interview’.

Since then, he has been asked to take a step back from public duties while many charities he was a patron of have chosen to distance themselves from him. It is been reported that Charles wants Andrew to ‘permanently retire’ from his royal role.

It comes after it emerged that Prince William was reported to be involved in the decision to sack the Duke of York. The second in line to the throne is said to believe that the decision to get Andrew to withdraw from public duties was ‘the right thing to do’.


Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/27/queen-retire-18-months-charles-become-p rince-regent-11228168/?ito=cbshare

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Royal revelation: Why Prince Charles may never become King Charles III
PRINCE CHARLES will one day take over the British throne from his mother Queen Elizabeth II, but the Prince of Wales may never be known as King Charles III. Here’s why.
By AMALIE HENDEN
PUBLISHED: 07:31, Tue, Dec 3, 2019 | UPDATED: 07:32, Tue, Dec 3, 2019
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1211535/prince-charles-news-regna l-title-king-royal-family-queen-elizabeth-ii-abdicate

Prince Charles will see change in attitude when King says expert
Play Video

Prince Charles, as the current monarch Queen Elizabeth II’s eldest son, will one day take over the British throne. The Prince of Wales has been the heir apparent since the age of three, when his mother was proclaimed Queen in 1952. But the Prince may never become King Charles III.

RELATED ARTICLES

Queen Elizabeth II shock: Can the Queen STOP Camilla becoming Consort?

Will Queen give Charles THIS title when she step down in 18 MONTHS?
The reason Charles might not become King Charles III is because he is free to choose his own regnal title.

Though most monarchs of the United Kingdom have used their first baptismal name as their regnal name, on three occasions monarchs have chosen a different name.

First, Queen Victoria had been christened Alexandrina Victoria, but took the throne under the name Victoria.

King Edward VII, Victoria’s eldest son, chose Edward as his regnal title, although he had been known by his first name of Albert.

PROMOTED STORY
Never Overpay Again - This Tool Finds Every Voucher Code on the Internet
Never Overpay Again - This Tool Finds Every Voucher Code on the Internet
(Honey)
READ MORE: Prince Charles title: Will Charles change his name when he is King?

Royal revelation
Royal revelation: The Prince of Charles may never become King Charles III (Image: GETTY)
Royal revelation

Royal revelation: Prince Charles crowned Prince of Wales by Queen Elizabeth II (Image: GETTY)
READ MORE

Revealed: How Prince Philip ‘never wanted royal title’
In 1936, after the abdication crisis, Prince Albert, Duke of York, assumed the throne as King George VI rather than "King Albert".

His full name was Albert Frederick Arthur George; like Edward VII and Victoria he used another of his names.

There has been speculation the Prince of Wales, whose full name is Charles Philip Arthur George, may elect not to be known as "Charles III”.

This is reportedly out of concern to be compared with Charles II of England, who was known for his Catholic sympathies or Charles I of England, who was executed after the English Civil War.

Instead of becoming King Charles he might choose to become King George VII, King Philip, or King Arthur.

Royal revealtion

Royal revealtion: Prince Charles crowned Prince of Wales by Queen Elizabeth II (Image: GETTY)
Who were the other King Charles?
King Charles I of England

Charles I was born on November 19, 1600, and died in 1649).

He was King of England, King of Scotland, and King of Ireland from March 27, 1625, until his execution in 1649.

DON'T MISS
Prince Andrew family tree: Inside the family of the Queen's son [MAP]
Queen family tree: A FULL look back at the Queen’s HUGE family [INSIGHT]
The bizarre ritual Prince Charles carries out whenever he plants trees [VIDEO]

RELATED ARTICLES

How Prince Charles shares Dracula’s blood line

Prince Philip revelation: Duke's shocking connection to Russia
READ MORE

Prince Harry row: How Queen could control Duke's decisions
Charles was born into the House of Stuart as the second son of King James VI of Scotland, but after his father inherited the English throne in 1603 (as James I), he moved to England, where he spent much of the rest of his life.

He became the heir apparent to the three kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland in 1612 on the death of his elder brother Henry Frederick, Prince of Wales.

After his succession in 1625, Charles clashed with the Parliament of England, which sought to curb his royal prerogative.

King Charles I believed in the divine right of kings, and was determined to govern according to his own conscience.

Royal revelation

Royal revelation: Line of succession to the British throne (Image: EXPRESS)
King Charles II

Charles II was King of England, Scotland and Ireland.

He was king of Scotland from 1649 until his deposition in 1651, and king of England, Scotland and Ireland from the 1660 Restoration of the monarchy until his death.

King Charles II was the eldest surviving child of Charles I of England Scotland and Ireland and Henrietta Maria of France.

TRENDING
Royal heartbreak: Meghan Markle drops devastating Christmas update on Instagram
Royal heartbreak: Meghan Markle drops devastating Christmas update on Instagram
Queen Elizabeth II shock: How Her Majesty’s death will spark an unusual chain of events
Queen Elizabeth II shock: How Her Majesty’s death will spark an unusual chain of events
Royal row: How Princess Eugenie could be FORCED to move out of Kensington Palace home
Royal row: How Princess Eugenie could be FORCED to move out of Kensington Palace home
During Charles II reign, however, England entered the period known as the English Interregnum or the English Commonwealth, and the country was a de facto republic led by Oliver Cromwell.

The King fled to mainland Europe and spent the next nine years in exile in France.

But a political crisis that followed the death of Mr Cromwell in 1658 resulted in the restoration of the monarchy, and Charles was invited to return to Britain.

Charles II was one of the most popular and beloved kings of England, known as the Merry Monarch.



PrinceCharlesWilliamExpres.jpg
 Description:
Daily Express headline that made Charles VERY ANGRY
 Filesize:  159.03 KB
 Viewed:  78 Time(s)

PrinceCharlesWilliamExpres.jpg



_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/


Last edited by TonyGosling on Wed Dec 04, 2019 12:01 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prince Charles snub: Prince William should be next king, claims expert - royal bombshell
PRINCE William should be the next king rather than his father Prince Charles as he is “more royal”, an expert has claimed.
By LAURA MOWAT
PUBLISHED: 00:00, Mon, Jun 24, 2019 | UPDATED: 00:37, Mon, Jun 24, 2019
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1144308/Prince-charles-prince-wil liam-future-king-most-royal-queen-royal-news

Royal ancestry expert Matt Baker claimed Princess Diana is from a more “royal bloodline” than Prince Charles, which also makes the Duke of Cambridge “more royal” than his 70-year-old dad. Prince Charles is the first in line to the throne and will succeed his mother Queen Elizabeth II, who is the longest-reigning British monarch, when she abdicates or dies.

ADVERTISING

inRead invented by Teads


RELATED ARTICLES

How Charles told Camilla he wanted to ‘live inside her trousers'

Meghan's split from William and Kate 'symbolic' of something 'deeper'
The historian told the Daily Star: “She has more English royal blood in her veins than does Prince Charles, her 16th cousin once removed.

“All of it flowing from illegitimate unions.

PROMOTED STORY
Find the best anti-aging cream deals
Find the best anti-aging cream deals
(Yahoo! Search)
“Four of her ancestors were mistresses to English Kings.”

Queen and Prince Charles and Prince William

The Queen has been the country's longest ever reig (Image: GETTY )
Mr Baker claimed the Spencer family tree goes back to Charles II and James II.

Whereas Prince Charles, he argued, is a product of the “illegitimate” bloodline. He is therefore less royal than Princess Diana, making his children more royal than him.

Royal family trees are often very closely related to each other and Prince Charles and Diana are no different, the pair were 7th cousins once removed.

The Palace has constantly insisted that Princes Charles’ wife, Camilla Parker Bowles, will become Princess Consort when he takes the throne signalling she would decline the title of Queen.

Prince William and Prince Charles

The royal expert has claimed William is "more royal" than Charles (Image: GETTY )
Prince William will inherit his father’s title of the Prince of Wales and his estate when he becomes King.

Charles became Prince of Wales at the age on nine in 1958 and he was formally given the title in 1969 by the Queen.

Queen Elizabeth became the monarch in 1952 at the age of 25 when her father, King George VI passed away. At the time, Prince Charles was just three years old.

Prince Charles wants 'different role' as monarch says expert
Play Video

In April 2018, Prince Charles was appointed as the QUeen’s successor as Head of the Commonwealth.

Delivering a speech at Buckingham Palace to the leaders of the Commonwealth, Her Majesty the Queen said: "It is my sincere wish that the Commonwealth will continue to offer stability and continuity to future generations, and will decide that one day the Prince of Wales should carry on the important work started by my father in 1949."

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SO the queen is due to 'retire' in April 2021 when she turns 95 (reluctantly)
Since that was announced:
Prince Andrew - has been Character assassinated
Prince Harry - has been spun out, banished abroad by a honey trap
Now Beatrice and Eugenie have got the boot too
Charles is sealing up his power, cutting out anyone who might challenge his rule.
Why does he feel the need to do this?

Royal SNUB: Prince Andrew furious as Beatrice and Eugenie forced out of Queen role
PRINCE CHARLES blocked Prince Andrew's daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie having roles within the Royal Family where they would represent Queen Elizabeth II according to a royal expert.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1249780/royal-news-Prince-Andrew- Princess-Beatrice-Eugenie-of-york-Queen-Elizabeth-II-royal-family
Ms Nicholl stated Prince Charles told the Princesses that they had to "go and make it on their own" much to the annoyance of Prince Andrew...
"You have got to FTAC which Scotland Yard has.
"FTAC is people who are known to have a grudge against the Royal Family and are kept an eye on I believe.
"So you need all of that.
"If something goes wrong in the private sector we haven’t got several carriers of policemen sitting around the corner coming to our assistance."

Queen ‘to retire in 18 months’ for Charles to become Prince Regent
author imageFaye BrownWednesday 27 Nov 2019 2:39 pm
https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/27/queen-retire-18-months-charles-become-p rince-regent-11228168/

Prince Charles is preparing to take over leadership of the Royals when the Queen turns 95, it has been reported.

The Queen’s oldest son met with his father at Sandringham yesterday to discuss the continuing fallout from his brother’s disastrous TV interview about his links to Jeffry Epstein.

Prince Charles’ key role in ‘retiring’ Prince Andrew from public life has fed speculation he is preparing to become ‘shadow King’, which would see him control day-to-day royal affairs while his mother remains monarch.

Her Majesty will turn 95 in 18 months – the same age at which her husband Prince Philip withdrew from his public duties.

There is talk among courtiers that she may use the milestone to allow her son to become Prince Regent, the Sun reports.

A royal source told the paper: ‘The scandal surrounding Andrew and Epstein gave Charles an opportunity to step in to show that he can run The Firm. No one is bigger than the institution of the Royal Family. Not even Andrew, the Queen’s favourite son.

‘Charles recognised that and acted decisively — like the king he may well soon be. This was the moment when Charles stepped up as Prince Regent, the Shadow King.’

The Queen has been gradually reducing the number of public engagements she attends from 332 in 2016 to a 283 in 2018.

The Prince of Wales has been on an official tour of New Zealand but headed straight for the Queen’s Norfolk estate when he landed yesterday.
Prince Andrew & the Epstein Scandal: The Newsnight Interview
It is believed Charles will also be discussing the fall out from Prince Andrew’s car crash Epstein interview (Picture: BBC NEWS)

Philip, 98, spends most of his time at Wood Farm, a small residence on the estate.

It is believed that Charles will seek his father’s advise over what the family should do next amid continued scrutiny over Prince Andrew’s links to billionaire paedophile Jeffry Epstein.

The Duke of York appeared on Newsnight earlier this month to discuss his controversial friendship, in what was described as a ‘car crash interview’.

Since then, he has been asked to take a step back from public duties while many charities he was a patron of have chosen to distance themselves from him.

It is been reported that Charles wants Andrew to ‘permanently retire’ from his royal role.

It comes after it emerged that Prince William was reported to be involved in the decision to sack the Duke of York.

The second in line to the throne is said to believe that the decision to get Andrew to withdraw from public duties was ‘the right thing to do’.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Queen ‘to retire in 18 months’ for Charles to become Prince Regent
https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/27/queen-retire-18-months-charles-become-p rince-regent-11228168/

Comment Faye BrownWednesday 27 Nov 2019 2:39 pm Share this article via facebookShare this article via twitterShare this article via messenger 18.6k SHARES Queen Elizabeth is reportedly handing over her duties to her son Charles, the Prince of Wales, when she turns 95 (Picture: Reuters) Prince Charles is preparing to take over leadership of the Royals when the Queen turns 95, it has been reported. The Queen’s oldest son met with his father at Sandringham yesterday to discuss the continuing fallout from his brother’s disastrous TV interview about his links to Jeffry Epstein. Prince Charles’ key role in ‘retiring’ Prince Andrew from public life has fed speculation he is preparing to become ‘shadow King’, which would see him control day-to-day royal affairs while his mother remains monarch. Her Majesty will turn 95 in 18 months – the same age at which her husband Prince Philip withdrew from his public duties. TOP ARTICLES 1/5 READ MORE At least 22 dead and ‘number will rise’ in Canada’s deadliest mass shooting There is talk among courtiers that she may use the milestone to allow her son to become Prince Regent, the Sun reports. Prince Charlies is rumoured to be stepping in as ‘Prince Regent’ in 18 months if the Queen retires (Picture: Rex) It is believed he met with his father Prince Philip to discuss the plan yesterday (Picture: Rex) A royal source told the paper: ‘The scandal surrounding Andrew and Epstein gave Charles an opportunity to step in to show that he can run The Firm. No one is bigger than the institution of the Royal Family. Not even Andrew, the Queen’s favourite son. ‘Charles recognised that and acted decisively — like the king he may well soon be. This was the moment when Charles stepped up as Prince Regent, the Shadow King.’ The Queen has been gradually reducing the number of public engagements she attends from 332 in 2016 to a 283 in 2018. The Prince of Wales has been on an official tour of New Zealand but headed straight for the Queen’s Norfolk estate when he landed yesterday. It is believed Charles will also be discussing the fall out from Prince Andrew’s car crash Epstein interview (Picture: BBC NEWS) Prince Andrew has 'no recollection' of meeting sexual abuse claimant Play Video Loaded: 0% 0:00Progress: 0% PlayMute Current Time0:00 / Duration Time0:31 Fullscreen Philip, 98, spends most of his time at Wood Farm, a small residence on the estate. It is believed that Charles will seek his father’s advise over what the family should do next amid continued scrutiny over Prince Andrew’s links to billionaire paedophile Jeffry Epstein. The Duke of York appeared on Newsnight earlier this month to discuss his controversial friendship, in what was described as a ‘car crash interview’. Since then, he has been asked to take a step back from public duties while many charities he was a patron of have chosen to distance themselves from him. It is been reported that Charles wants Andrew to ‘permanently retire’ from his royal role. It comes after it emerged that Prince William was reported to be involved in the decision to sack the Duke of York. The second in line to the throne is said to believe that the decision to get Andrew to withdraw from public duties was ‘the right thing to do’.


Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/27/queen-retire-18-months-charles-become-p rince-regent-11228168/?ito=cbshare

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Queen 'could retire in 18 months' with Charles 'set to take over as Prince Regent'
The Queen turns 95 in 2021 and some insiders believe she may use this milestone to make her son Prince Charles Prince Regent
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queen-could-retire-18-months-209 79082



The Queen still attends events and carries out engagements (Image: Getty Images)

When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. OurPrivacy Noticeexplains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.
The Queen could 'retire' from her royal duties in just 18 months time, passing the role to her son Prince Charles, according to reports.

The Monarch will turn 95 in April 2021, the age her husband Prince Philip was when he stepped back from his royal duties two years ago.

Sources say that while words such as "regime change" are banned, there is an understanding that she will step back at some point, reports the Sun .

According to the newspaper she may use this milestone to "retire" from her official work, but still remain as Monarch.

This means Prince Charles will become Prince Regent, when an heir to the throne acts as the monarch officially in place of the sovereign.


The Queen has already handed over a number of her duties (Image: Getty Images)
RELATED ARTICLES

How Prince Andrew scandal is affecting rest of Royal Family - from Queen to Meghan Markle

Prince Philip won Queen over with 'unusual skill' - and he left her 'pink-faced'
She has already passed a number of her duties down to her son and other members of the Royal Family, however she still has a very busy diary of engagements.

In 2018 she carried out 283 engagements, which while less than 2016's 332, is still very impressive considering her age.

Earlier this month Charles laid a wreath on her behalf at the Remembrance Sunday service and the Duchess of Cambridge has taken on a number of her patronages including the Royal Photographic Society.

Many believe that the sacking of Prince Andrew from his royal roles was an example of Charles stepping up and pulling the strings about the Royal Family's future.


Prince Charles was away on a Royal Tour when the scandal broke, but he was still very involved in the decision (Image: Getty Images)
READ MORE
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry share unseen wedding photo to celebrate special day
A royal source told the newspaper: “Planning for Charles to become king has been going on for some time. A transition is plainly already underway. Her Majesty is in her nineties and can understandably only do so much.

“The scandal surrounding Andrew and Epstein gave Charles an opportunity to step in to show that he can run The Firm. No one is bigger than the institution of the Royal Family. Not even Andrew, the Queen’s favourite son.

“Charles recognised that and acted decisively — like the king he may well soon be. This was the moment when Charles stepped up as Prince Regent, the Shadow King.”

While it was the Queen who actually delivered the news to her favourite son and informed the rest of the Firm, Charles was said to be very involved in the decision.


It has been a difficult few weeks for the Royal Family (Image: AFP via Getty Images)
READ MORE
Inside Queen's sacking of Prince Andrew after he was summoned to Buckingham Palace
The Duke of York was at the centre of a huge scandal after his disastrous interview with BBC Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis about his paedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein.

Andrew, 59, is said to have held crisis talks with Charles, 71, by telephone before he was summoned to Buckingham Palace by the Queen.

During the meeting with his 93-year-old mum, the Duke issued a grovelling apology for heaping shame on the Royal Family.


CLICK TO PLAY
SEE THE MOMENT PRINCE CHARLES AWKWARDLY IGNORES QUESTION ABOUT ANDREW
READ MORE
The Queen

Queen has only worn trousers once


Queen's favourite child 'revealed'


Why Queen refused surgery on her knee

Rolf Harris painting Her Majesty the Queen
Queen's met world's worst villains


Royal who nicknamed the Queen Gary


Queen's sweet gift to Meghan Markle


Connection between Queen's outfits

Queen Elizabeth II
Latest on the Queen
A source told the Telegraph it was the Queen's decision to force Andrew to step back from public life, adding: "The Duke was summoned from his home, Royal Lodge Windsor, to see the Queen personally at Buckingham Palace.


"Effectively he was told to bow out gracefully.

"They agreed he could release a statement saying it was his decision but it was the Queen who told him to do it."

He will no longer receive his £249,000 royal allowance which is taxpayers' money from the Sovereign Grant and he has been ditched by a number of companies and charities.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Royal revelation: Why Prince Charles may never become King Charles III
PRINCE CHARLES will one day take over the British throne from his mother Queen Elizabeth II, but the Prince of Wales may never be known as King Charles III. Here’s why.
By AMALIE HENDEN
PUBLISHED: 07:31, Tue, Dec 3, 2019 | UPDATED: 07:32, Tue, Dec 3, 2019
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1211535/prince-charles-news-regna l-title-king-royal-family-queen-elizabeth-ii-abdicate

Prince Charles, as the current monarch Queen Elizabeth II’s eldest son, will one day take over the British throne. The Prince of Wales has been the heir apparent since the age of three, when his mother was proclaimed Queen in 1952. But the Prince may never become King Charles III.

Queen Elizabeth II shock: Can the Queen STOP Camilla becoming Consort?

Will Queen give Charles THIS title when she step down in 18 MONTHS?
The reason Charles might not become King Charles III is because he is free to choose his own regnal title.

Though most monarchs of the United Kingdom have used their first baptismal name as their regnal name, on three occasions monarchs have chosen a different name.

First, Queen Victoria had been christened Alexandrina Victoria, but took the throne under the name Victoria.

King Edward VII, Victoria’s eldest son, chose Edward as his regnal title, although he had been known by his first name of Albert.

READ MORE: Prince Charles title: Will Charles change his name when he is King?

Revealed: How Prince Philip ‘never wanted royal title’
In 1936, after the abdication crisis, Prince Albert, Duke of York, assumed the throne as King George VI rather than "King Albert".

His full name was Albert Frederick Arthur George; like Edward VII and Victoria he used another of his names.

There has been speculation the Prince of Wales, whose full name is Charles Philip Arthur George, may elect not to be known as "Charles III”.

This is reportedly out of concern to be compared with Charles II of England, who was known for his Catholic sympathies or Charles I of England, who was executed after the English Civil War.

Instead of becoming King Charles he might choose to become King George VII, King Philip, or King Arthur.

Royal revealtion

Royal revealtion: Prince Charles crowned Prince of Wales by Queen Elizabeth II (Image: GETTY)
Who were the other King Charles?
King Charles I of England

Charles I was born on November 19, 1600, and died in 1649).

He was King of England, King of Scotland, and King of Ireland from March 27, 1625, until his execution in 1649.

DON'T MISS
Prince Andrew family tree: Inside the family of the Queen's son [MAP]
Queen family tree: A FULL look back at the Queen’s HUGE family [INSIGHT]
The bizarre ritual Prince Charles carries out whenever he plants trees [VIDEO]

RELATED ARTICLES

How Prince Charles shares Dracula’s blood line

Prince Philip revelation: Duke's shocking connection to Russia
READ MORE

Prince Harry row: How Queen could control Duke's decisions
Charles was born into the House of Stuart as the second son of King James VI of Scotland, but after his father inherited the English throne in 1603 (as James I), he moved to England, where he spent much of the rest of his life.

He became the heir apparent to the three kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland in 1612 on the death of his elder brother Henry Frederick, Prince of Wales.

After his succession in 1625, Charles clashed with the Parliament of England, which sought to curb his royal prerogative.

King Charles I believed in the divine right of kings, and was determined to govern according to his own conscience.

Royal revelation

Royal revelation: Line of succession to the British throne (Image: EXPRESS)
King Charles II

Charles II was King of England, Scotland and Ireland.

He was king of Scotland from 1649 until his deposition in 1651, and king of England, Scotland and Ireland from the 1660 Restoration of the monarchy until his death.

King Charles II was the eldest surviving child of Charles I of England Scotland and Ireland and Henrietta Maria of France.

TRENDING
Queen heartbreak: Monarch devastated after giving up royal role that 'means a lot to her'
Queen heartbreak: Monarch devastated after giving up royal role that 'means a lot to her'
Royal warning: The one 'worrying' sign to look out for when Queen is out - 'Really bad'
Royal warning: The one 'worrying' sign to look out for when Queen is out - 'Really bad'
Serena Williams insists she has ‘never heard’ of Meghan Markle after ex-royal's LA move
Serena Williams insists she has ‘never heard’ of Meghan Markle after ex-royal's LA move
During Charles II reign, however, England entered the period known as the English Interregnum or the English Commonwealth, and the country was a de facto republic led by Oliver Cromwell.

The King fled to mainland Europe and spent the next nine years in exile in France.

But a political crisis that followed the death of Mr Cromwell in 1658 resulted in the restoration of the monarchy, and Charles was invited to return to Britain.

Charles II was one of the most popular and beloved kings of England, known as the Merry Monarch.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2020 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Speculation is growing that the date has been set for the Queen’s retirement. Prince Charles, 71, made a beeline for Sandringham as soon as he touched down in the UK on Wednesday after his New Zealand trip, with reports of discussions entering on the fallout of Prince Andrew’s BBC interview and Charles’s role going forward.

Prince Charles title: Will Queen give Charles THIS title? Queen to step down in 18 months
THE QUEEN will turn 94 next year, and already holds the record for the oldest and longest-reigning monarch of all time. So is she preparing to hand the reigns over to her son in 18 months?
By KATE WHITFIELD
PUBLISHED: 07:05, Mon, Dec 2, 2019 | UPDATED: 08:03, Mon, Dec 2, 2019
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1210550/prince-charles-title-quee n-step-down-18-months-retire-prince-regent-royal-family-latest

Prince Charles will see change in attitude when King says expert

Speculation is growing that the date has been set for the Queen’s retirement. Prince Charles, 71, made a beeline for Sandringham as soon as he touched down in the UK on Wednesday after his New Zealand trip, with reports of discussions entering on the fallout of Prince Andrew’s BBC interview and Charles’s role going forward.

The Queen will turn 95 in 18 months - the same age at which her husband Philip withdrew from his public duties.

According to royal sources, courtiers behind palace walls are murmuring that she may use the milestone to hand over the day-to-day control of the monarch to Charles, Prince of Wales.

If this manifests, she would likely grant him the title of Prince Regent, while she retains the title of Queen and doesn’t officially abdicate.

The Regent title is used when a monarch is unable to fulfil their duties for whatever reason - in this case, it would be old age.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2921
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Galalae versus Windsor!

PRINCE WILLIAM IS WORRIED THERE ARE JUST TOO MANY PEOPLE IN THE WORLD
https://www.newsweek.com/prince-charles-prince-william-elephants-popul ation-climate-change-700696
BY JOSH LOWE ON 11/3/17 AT 8:06 AM EDT
11_03_Prince William
Britain’s Prince William speaks at a gala night for the conservation charity Tusk at The Roundhouse in London on November 2.
PETER NICHOLLS/REUTERS

Prince William, second in line to the British throne, has warned that exploding populations around the world will put "enormous pressure" on wildlife unless it is properly managed.

"In my lifetime, we have seen global wildlife populations decline by over half," the prince, who is known as the Duke of Cambridge, said at a gala dinner for the Tusk Trust charity in London, the Telegraph reported.

"We are going to have to work much harder," the duke continued, "and think much deeper, if we are to ensure that human beings and the other species of animal with which we share this planet can continue to coexist.


"Africa's rapidly growing human population is predicted to more than double by 2050—a staggering increase of three and a half million people per month.

"There is no question that this increase puts wildlife and habitat under enormous pressure.

"Urbanisation, infrastructure development, cultivation—all good things in themselves, but they will have a terrible impact unless we begin to plan and to take measures now."


RELATED STORIES
Prince William Reveals Lesson He'll Teach Prince George
When Is the Royal Baby Due?
Prince William Should Lose Public Funding: Lawmaker
The duke said new ideas were needed on how to manage water resources and the grazing of animals, in case overcrowding ends up having a "catastrophic effect" on wildlife.

A report from WWF and the Zoological Society of London published in 2016 found that the world was on course to lose two-thirds of its wild animals by 2030, with the destruction of wilderness for agriculture, logging and poaching all major contributing factors, The Guardian reported at the time.


In 2010 William's father, Prince Charles, who is first in line to the British throne, warned that the earth could not "sustain us all," and that "in the next 50 years, we face monumental problems as the figures rocket," according to a separate Telegraph report.


Charles said at the time that "it would certainly help if the acceleration slowed down, but it would also help if the world reduced its desire to consume."

And he praised the success of family planning services: "Interestingly, where the loans are managed by the women of the community, the birth rate has gone down. The impact of these sorts of schemes, of education and the provision of family planning services, has been widespread.

"I fear there is little chance these sorts of schemes can help the plight of many millions of people unless we all face up to the fact more honestly than we do that one of the biggest causes of high birth rates remains cultural," Charles added.

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 17560
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prince Charles’s ‘annoyed’ Queen and Prince Philip with ‘un-royal’ trait, expert claims
PRINCE CHARLES sparked doubts over his future as King after provoking the "annoyance" of both the Queen and Prince Philip with one of his most characteristic traits, royal biographer Angela Levin claimed.
By AURORA BOSOTTI
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1277540/Prince-Charles-news-Queen -Elizabeth-II-Prince-Philip-royal-news-latest

Prince Charles had the Queen and Prince Philip believe they "could not trust him" because of his tendency to be outspoken, the royal biographer claimed. The Prince of Wales has been known to depart from the Royal Family's tendency to remain silent on public issues, becoming an outspoken supporter of the environment and conservationism. But Charles' vocal traits allegedly provoked the "annoyance" of Her Majesty and the Duke of Edinburgh early in their eldest son's career as heir to the throne.

Camilla snub: Duchess blasted for getting 'more airtime' in lockdown
Speaking to the documentary 'The Queen and Prince Charles: Mother and Son,' Ms Levin said: "He annoyed his parents, actually.

"They felt he was weak, they felt they couldn’t trust him to be king, that he had all these funny ideas about spiritualism and plastic in the sea."

Royal historian Dr Kate Williams agreed Charles' outspokenness sparked criticism from the public as members of the Royal Family before him had traditionally tended to stick to a neutral position on most matters.

Dr Williams said: "Increasingly, people started talking about Prince Charles as a bit eccentric.

PROMOTED STORY
Dubai Photos That Will Make You Wonder About Visiting
(The Primary Market)
JUST IN: Meghan Markle ‘working on new project' in US - and long-term fans will be THRILLED

prince charles news queen elizabeth prince philip
Prince Charles allegedly "annoyed" the Queen and Philip with his outspoken behaviour, Levin claimed (Image: GETTY)
prince charles news royal family latest

Prince Charles has long spoken out about his support for the environmentpr (Image: GETTY)
"There are cartoons of him talking to his plants, and thinking too much about his plants."

Prince Charles has spoken on several occasions about his concerns for the environment and earlier this year met with environmental activist Greta Thunberg during the World Economic Forum to discuss her campaign.

Through the years, the Prince of Wales has launched several initiatives aimed at making the world become more sustainable.

But his positions have at times sparked backlash because of his direct involvement with the political sphere.

READ MORE: Meghan Markle STILL using Sussex Royal despite Queen banning it

Queen thinks ‘very highly’ of Camilla claims expert
Play Video

prince charles queen elizabeth ii prince philip royal family latest

The Queen and Prince Philip were concerned about Charles' behaviour, according to Levin (Image: GETTY)
prince charles news prince william prince harry latest news

Prince Charles passed on his passion to his sons, William and Harry (Image: GETTY)
The Prince of Wales attempted for several years to prevent the publication of the so-called "black spider memos" he sent to several members of Cabinet and MPs over the years.

The memos revealed Prince Charles had raised several issues, including affordable rural housing and public health, with members of Government during the years.

The release opened the Prince up to criticism suggesting he was meddling in politics – damaging the royal household’s neutrality.

However, Clarence House defended Charles’ intervention, noting the correspondence showed "the range of the Prince of Wales' concerns and interests for this country and the wider world".

DON’T MISS

Real reason behind William’s struggles with Beatrice and Eugenie [INSIGHT]
Charles backlash: Plan for new honour slapped down - ‘Not the time’ [ANALYSIS]
The sad reason Queen would rather be away from Philip right now [ROYAL]

RELATED ARTICLES

The subtle way Princess Charlotte photos pay tribute to Queen

Queen forced to keep composure during life changing event
prince charles news royal family tree uk

Prince Charles is first in line to the British throne (Image: EXPRESS.CO,UK)
TRENDING
Real reason behind William’s struggles with Beatrice and Eugenie: ‘Diana was link!’
Real reason behind William’s struggles with Beatrice and Eugenie: ‘Diana was link!’
How Princess Margaret’s husband took ‘drastic action to escape her’ exposed
How Princess Margaret’s husband took ‘drastic action to escape her’ exposed
Prince Charles’s ‘annoyed’ Queen and Prince Philip with ‘un-royal’ trait, expert claims
Prince Charles’s ‘annoyed’ Queen and Prince Philip with ‘un-royal’ trait, expert claims
In a statement released following the publication of the memos said: “The letters published by the Government show the Prince of Wales expressing concern about issues that he has raised in public like affordable rural housing, the quality of hospital food, the preservation and regeneration of historic buildings, an integrated approach to healthcare, climate change, and others.

"In all these cases, the Prince of Wales is raising issues of public concern, and trying to find practical ways to address the issues."

And Prince Charles' outspokenness has since appeared to have been passed on to both his sons, Prince William and Prince Harry.

Both princes have not shied away from discussing the impact the tragic death of their mother Diana in their teenage years had on their mental health.

Willian and Harry repeatedly joined forces in a bid to improve the debate surrounding mental health issues, and they have repeatedly praised the Prince of Wales for his commitment to the environment.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2921
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2020 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Princess Charlotte’s incredible influence on Queen’s abdication debate exposed
QUEEN ELIZABETH II is likely to reign until her death, and according to unearthed reports, this is partly due to the popularity younger royals such as Princess Charlotte bring.
By KATE NICHOLSON
15:08, Wed, May 6, 2020 | UPDATED: 16:23, Wed, May 6, 2020
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1278622/princess-charlotte-news-q ueen-elizabeth-ii-abdication-prince-william-spt


Queen will make VE Day broadcast ‘very personal’ claims expert
Play Video

Sign up for FREE now and never miss the top Royal stories again!
SUBSCRIBE
We will use your email address only for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for details of your data protection rights.

The Queen is the longest reigning British monarch, having sat on the throne for 68 years. She promised upon her 21st birthday that she would dedicate her whole life to the throne, claiming she would “be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family”. However, after Prince Philip retired in 2017, royal fans began to speculate that the Queen could follow suit now that she is 94.

RELATED ARTICLES

How Charles’ love for Camilla left partner furious — it wasn't Diana

Shock claim 'paranoia gene' impacted Duke's relationship with Beatrice
To do this, she would have to pass the crown to her heir, the 71-year-old Prince Charles, in an unprecedented move not seen since the abdication of Edward VIII in 1936.


Yet, royal documentary-maker Nick Bullen told the Daily Mail back in 2018 that “abdication will never happen”.

He explained: “I think the Queen sees what those boys and their wives bring, I also wonder whether she even throws forward to the great grandchildren.

PROMOTED STORY
Limited Time Offer: Get A Discount On Your First Four HelloFresh Boxes!
Limited Time Offer: Get A Discount On Your First Four HelloFresh Boxes!
(HelloFresh)
“Princess Charlotte, already at the age of 3, knows how to work a crowd.

Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Charlotte
Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Charlotte (Image: Getty)
William, Kate, George, Charlotte and Louis clapping for carers in their Norfolk residence
William, Kate, George, Charlotte and Louis clapping for carers in their Norfolk residence (Image: Getty)
“Maybe now through her grandchildren she can see a way of just staying on the crest of that wave.”


Mr Bullen added: “Her mother lived to 101.

“The Queen is there for the long run…. She could live for at least another 10 years.

“She’s seen it all, she’s done it all, she is the ultimate working mother and working woman and I don’t think she’s going anywhere, anytime soon.”

READ MORE: Why Princess Diana ‘lacked discipline Royal Family expected'


Princess Charlotte and the Queen: The Queen is said to be very pleased with the popularity of the younger generation
Princess Charlotte and the Queen: The Queen is said to be very pleased with the popularity of the younger generation (Image: Getty)
RELATED ARTICLES

Royal heartbreak: How Prince Charles confessed his ‘obsession’

Real reason Diana wanted to marry Charles before romance even began
Royal insiders have indicated in the past that if the Queen reaches 95, she may consider bringing the Regency Act into force, which would allow Charles effectively to reign while she lives.

The monarch has indeed been steadily handing over more duties to the other senior royals, and in 2017 Charles became the Queen’s successor as Head of the Commonwealth.

Additionally, Marie Claire pointed out last year how one particular photograph may have suggested the Queen was clearing the way for Charles to take over.

DON'T MISS
Kate Middleton's prophetic comment about Prince William exposed [INSIGHT]
Kate Middleton: How Palace ‘worried about a repeat of Diana’ [EXPLAINED]
Lord Mountbatten’s true intention for heir to throne exposed [REVEALED]

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge with their children and the Duchess of Cornwall
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge with their children and the Duchess of Cornwall (Image: Getty)
The Queen leans down to George at Charlotte's christening in July 2015
The Queen leans down to George at Charlotte's christening in July 2015 (Image: Getty)
The article read: “The monarch wasn’t featured in Prince Charles’ official 70th birthday photographs, supposedly [meaning the Queen was] stepping back for him to lead the family.”

For the Prince of Wales’ landmark birthday, he was pictured surrounded by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, the Duchess of Cornwall and his three grandchildren.

His fourth and youngest grandchild, Archie, had not yet been born – he turned one today – and the Queen was also absent from the picture.

Yet Marie Claire also suggested that Charlotte could have influenced the Queen’s decision not to abdicate in another way, aside from her popularity.

The Queen and Princess Charlotte: Line of succession to the British throne
The Queen and Princess Charlotte: Line of succession to the British throne (Image: Express.co.uk)
TRENDING
Prince Charles ‘annoyed’ Queen and Prince Philip with ‘un-royal’ trait, expert claims
Prince Charles ‘annoyed’ Queen and Prince Philip with ‘un-royal’ trait, expert claims
Queen forced to put foot down after Charles' public skirmish amid royal break up
Queen forced to put foot down after Charles' public skirmish amid royal break up
As Charles’ second eldest grandchild, she is fourth in the line of succession, and the next female.

Her 2015 birth was particularly important because she was the first female royal to be put above her younger male siblings in order of precedence after the 2013 Succession to the Crown Act.

In the past, male heirs were always set to inherit first before the females, whereas now it is arranged strictly by age.

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group