FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Martin Bormann Postwar Nazi 4th Reich Financial Mafia Empire
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Pre-Planned Economic 9/11 - Global Financial Conspiracy
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2599
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who knows?
I do.
Codswallop.
Have you ever heard of disinformation?
Distraction techniques?

Bormann escaped, not Hitler.
Adolf was falling apart with his mad dream.
Physically sick.
The Russians filmed his dead body.
They also accused the British of harbouring Bormann.
The Hitler in Argentina drivel started after Op JB was published.
As a series of spoilers!

So please stop repeating psychological targeted lies Paul.

outsider wrote:
'Hitler in Argentina & The US-Hitler Bargain Including NASA (as well as CIA)':
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=161334
'The recent release of a JFK document pertaining to Hitler escaping to Argentina has given new life to long-standing but ignored evidence that the US made a pact with the Nazis.
Even Hoover didnít know until 1947. The memo from him ORDERING all efforts to explore the rumors (even then) that he and Mrs. Hitler made it out CEASE IMMEDIATELY is a big sign.
Below is a quick overview of the REAL story, with photographs, as I understand it from Harry Cooper at Sharkhunters.com whose book Hitler In Argentina is of enormous importance. In fact, Harry first broke this story over 20 years ago. Here it is in a nutshellÖ
Martin Bormann had HItler and Eva Braun forcibly drugged (AH didnít want to leave the bunker) and had them removed on stretchers. There were witnesses to this.....'

Who knows?

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Buy a slice of history in the Great British sell-off as infrastructure is snapped up by foreign firms
From railways to buses, airports to energy suppliers, water companies to ports, most of what we rely in for our everyday lives is now out of our control
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/buy-slice-history-great-british- 10111100
By Graham Hiscott Head Of Business
22:12, 27 MAR 2017

It's nearly 200 years since engineer George Stephenson created the worldís first passenger railway.

Part of the old Stockton-to-Darlington railway, opened in 1825, still operates to this day.

Only today it is run by German company Deutsche Bahn through its UK offshoot Arriva.

And yesterday it was announced a Hong Kong-based firm will part-run the South West Trains franchise. MTR, together with FirstGroup, snatched the lucrative seven-year licence from Scotlandís Stagecoach, which has operated the route for 20 years.


It marked the latest in a wave of British infrastructure assets snapped-up by overseas firms.

From railways to buses, airports to energy suppliers, water companies to ports, most of what we rely in for our everyday lives is now out of our control.

This free-for-all has proven to be rich pickings for overseas owners, who have often benefitted from regulated price rises to rake in a fortune.


READ MORE
Brexit causes nursing crisis as number joining NHS from Europe plunges 75%
The Middle East state of Qatar yesterday became the latest to pile in, after pledging to pump £5billion into UK infrastructure projects. It has already invested £40billion here and owns the Milford Haven gas terminal, in South Wales, posh store Harrods and London skyscraper The Shard.

Here, we investigate the full scale of the foreign sell-off.

ENERGY

Margaret Thatcher also privatised Britainís gas and electricity industry.

The best known sale, of British Gas in 1986, was soon followed by the 12 regional boards responsible for distributing electricity.


(Image: PA)
Yet a move hoped to boost competition led to control concentrated in the big six.

Four of those are in foreign hands; from Franceís EDF Energy and Spain controlled Scottish Power to German owned npower and E.ON.

And over the past 15 years along, household energy bills have risen 158%. Yet control over our gas and electricity needs extends even further.

EDF, part French owned, has an £18billion contract to run the new Hinkley Point station in Somerset. China is part-funding the project in return for building another nuclear plant in Essex.

AIRPORTS


(Image: AFP)
Heathrow is owned by a consortium that includes a Spanish infrastructure firm, Qatar, a Canadian fund manager and the Chinese state.

It is what left of the old British Airports Authority, after it was ordered to sell most of its
UK airports.

Many were snapped-up by foreign investors, including Edinburgh Airport, bought by a US fund, and Bristol, sold to Canadians.

TRANSPORT


(Image: PA)
From Merseyrail to the Heathrow Express, countless local bus routes to Londonís famous red buses, all are at least partly in foreign hands.

Of the 28 private rail contracts, 21 are partly or wholly owned by overseas states or railways, says the RMT union.

German, French and Dutch transport giants have cashed in on the rush to privatise the UKís train and bus services, joined by mega-rich China and Singapore.

RMT ís Mick Cash said: ďThe announcement the Chinese state will hold a major chunk of South West Trains means three-quarters of UK railways are now wholly or partly controlled by foreign states or foreign companies, with the profits shipped out of Britain. That is nothing short of a scandal.Ē

WATER


(Image: Getty Images)
Even much of the water we drink is foreign owned.

It was former Tory Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who sold off our water suppliers.

Ten regional water authorities floated on the stock market in 1989. The Government kept a ďgolden shareĒ to stop an individual or company taking full control.

But that was dropped in 1994, triggering a shopping spree by foreign buyers.

Of the 10 privatised water companies, just Severn Trent, South West Water and United Utilities are still listed on the London Stock Market.The rest are owned by mega rich individuals or part of offshore set-ups. Northumbrian Water is controlled by Asiaís richest man, Hong Kong based Li Ka Shing, who also owns the container port at Felixstowe.

Australian investment bank Macquarie was accused of loading Thames Water with debt, sucking out profits and paying virtually no tax.

Weak pound and Brexit means more to come warns Mirror Head of Businesss Graham Hiscott

From your Weetabix for breakfast to HP sauce with tea, and a flutter on the National Lottery Ė all have one thing in common: The firms behind them are partly or wholly owned by overseas companies.

Foreign investors own nearly £1trillion worth of UK companies.

Of course, there are good and bad examples. US giant Kraftís 2009 takeover of chocolate-maker Cadbury rightly caused outrage. And Japanís swoop on British technology heavyweight ARM Holdings led to new fears.

But foreign takeovers have also breathed life into tired businesses.

Jaguar Land Rover, for example, has thrived since being bought by Indiaís Tata Group.

Critics argue Britain is too willing to flog the family silver, though UK firms are also major investors abroad.

But, with Brexit looming, this foreign shopping spree Ė fuelled by the weak pound Ė will only make our best businesses more ripe for sell-offs.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UK for sale: Uniquely in the world, Britain has sold more than half its companies to foreigners. And we are all paying the price
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2129507/Britain-sale-Uniquely -world-Britain-sold-half-companies-foreigners-And-paying-price.html

By ALEX BRUMMER FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 22:09, 13 April 2012 | UPDATED: 22:15, 13 April 2012

Just for a moment, imagine being a tourist in search of the full British experience. Where would you start? Well, you might take a sight-seeing trip around London on a red double-decker bus.

Youíd possibly visit a quintessentially British store, such as Boots the chemist, Selfridges or Harrods, before having a proper English tea at the Savoy, Fortnum & Mason or the Dorchester.

Youíd almost certainly go home, via a British airport, thinking youíd seen a slice of the real Britain. But, in one sense at least, youíd be totally wrong.

British icon? Most London buses are run by a Spanish company
British icon? Most London buses are run by a Spanish company

That bus you boarded at Trafalgar Square is run by a German company. Boots fell to the Italians in 2007. Selfridges, Fortnum & Mason and the Savoy are owned by Canadians; Harrods has been bought by a firm based in Qatar; the Dorchester by one based in Brunei. As for our airports, most of them are now run by a Spanish firm.

Maybe a tourist wouldnít care all that much, even if he knew. But should we? After all, does it make any real difference if a British company has a foreign master?

For the past three decades, the UK has had a completely relaxed attitude about selling off its assets to companies based abroad. Indeed, most of the time, the swallowing up of yet another great British institution barely makes a headline.

Sell off: Boots is owned by Italians, and headquartered in Switzerland
Sell off: Boots is owned by Italians, and headquartered in Switzerland

We may be a nation of homeowners, but weíve lost our taste for ownership of our own economy and public services ó from once-great manufacturers such as ICI to most of the companies that deliver our electricity, water and gas.

Even this week, it became clear that the Government is happy to consider letting a Russian firm, the one behind the Chernobyl accident, run some of Britainís next generation of nuclear power stations. In fact, to date, weíve sold off more than half our assets to foreign owners.

And the pace is escalating. In the face of political indifference, foreign companies acquired £30billion worth of British enterprises in 2009. In 2010, that rose to a value of £54.5 billion.

Deregulation: Former Tory Chancellor Geoffrey Howe made it easier for foreigners to snap up British companies
Deregulation: Former Tory Chancellor Geoffrey Howe made it easier for foreigners to snap up British companies

Foreign corporations also currently control 39 per cent of UK patents. This is far more than the percentage of foreign-owned patents in the U.S. (11.Cool, Japan (3.7) or even the European Union as a whole (13.7).

At this rate, itís been said, it wonít be long before weíre all working for foreign companies. So how did we become so attractive to overseas predators? The answer is that it happened in stages, starting with the removal of regulations on overseas investment by former Tory Chancellor Geoffrey Howe in 1979.

This was followed in 1986 by whatís known as the ĎBig Bangí, when a raft of restrictive old practices in the City of London were swept aside. Soon, foreign banks flooded into the City, gobbling up venerable British minnows such as SG Warburg, Robert Fleming and Schroders.

Then came Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, who were so keen to keep in with big business that they refused to block any deals ó even when the Russians eyed up British Gas.

Indeed, anyone ó like me ó who dared question the great British sell-off was instantly labelled a xenophobe, out of touch with the reality of the modern globalised economy.

What tipped the balance towards foreign takeovers in the late Nineties and 2000s were three key factors: the cheap cost of borrowing; liberal takeover rules; and the presence of global investment banks in the City, with ready access to the worldís capital.

Throughout the boom years, these banks were allowed to write their own rules. What this meant, in essence, was that a bank which might once have considered it risky to lend ten times its share capital would now lend up to four times that amount.

The result? Foreign companies took full advantage of all this cheap and easy credit to snap up increasing numbers of great British brands.

Not only that, but our eccentric tax system actually made it more profitable for overseas owners to buy companies with borrowed money. For example, foreign firms who buy British companies using borrowed money are able to deduct the interest they have to pay on those loans from their tax bills.

Stripped: The private equity firms who bought Debenhams left the chain a shadow of its former self
Stripped: The private equity firms who bought Debenhams left the chain a shadow of its former self

And this had a direct effect on jobs in the UK. Weighed down with often massive debts, new owners were far less likely to invest in the future of the firm and were instead more likely to close down factories and plants, throwing thousands of Britons out of work.

Some foreign firms even adopted the practice of making a fast buck by buying a company, stripping its assets and then selling for a quick profit. A classic case was that of the once-great department store, Debenhams, bought in 2003 by two U.S.-based private equity firms. Within three years, theyíd stripped the firm of investment, loaded it with debt and sold it on at a big profit. By then, Debenhams was in such an enfeebled condition that it has taken years to recover.

Worse still was what happened to the care homes provider Southern Cross, which came crashing down last spring. The company had been pieced together by a hard-headed U.S. equity firm called Blackstone, after it started buying up care homes across the country.



More from Alex Brummer for the Daily Mail...

ALEX BRUMMER: Grant Thornton boss's downfall shows the accounting profession needs root-and-branch change15/10/18
ALEX BRUMMER: If the Chancellor is to fulfill the Prime Minister's pledge to end austerity the assault on pensions will likely continue14/10/18
ALEX BRUMMER: A Brexit dividend for Britain if Theresa May can make a deal... City chaos if she can't12/10/18
ALEX BRUMMER: Ten years after the financial crisis and big falls on major stock markets spark fears the bubble is bursting11/10/18
ALEX BRUMMER: Easing pain for taxpayers by making better use of Britain's balance sheet10/10/18
ALEX BRUMMER: Financial armageddon could be just around the corner, but at least most of the risks are there to see09/10/18
ALEX BRUMMER: After a decade of pain Philip Hammond must recognise people don't vote Tory for higher taxes08/10/18
ALEX BRUMMER: Clouds at IMF and World Bank gathering in Bali as Indonesian currency plunges and aftermath of earthquake disaster continues07/10/18
ALEX BRUMMER: Dirty money hits Denmark and it doesn't speak well to post-crash policing of Continental banking04/10/18
VIEW FULL ARCHIVE
Most of its income was guaranteed, as it came from local authorities. But Blackstone wasnít prepared to be a long-term owner. Soon, it had hived off many of the freeholds of the buildings to another company, which then sold them off.

Then Blackstone made a quick profit by floating Southern Cross on the stock market, collecting £600 million for itself and its wealthy investors.

At the time, Blackstone said they believed that the care homes, with their guaranteed source of income, were capable of being self-financing. But the aftermath from the sale of Southern Cross was disastrous.

When new landlords started putting up rents, local authorities were unable to meet the extra cost. A lack of investment and poor management combined to bring Southern Cross to the brink last year, placing its 750 homes at serious risk.

Three thousand jobs had to be cut from the workforce, raising questions about the quality of care in the homes. Eventually, some of the landlords dropped their rents, some took over care homes themselves ó and some have yet to come to an agreement with the company.

Shockingly, as it turned out, this high-stakes financial game had been played at the expense of 31,000 elderly and vulnerable residents. Meanwhile, elsewhere in Britain, one great company after another was being blithely auctioned off ó including Jaguar Rover (to India), Asda (to the U.S.), MG Rover (to China), P&O Ports (to Dubai), the British Airports Authority (to Spain), Corus (formerly British Steel, to India), British Energy (to France), and lottery operator Camelot (to Canada).

It didnít matter whether the buyer was a foreign company or a private-equity fund. If the price was good enough, shareholders and directors took the money and ran.

As firms fell like ninepins around them, canny chief executives demanded new clauses in their contracts that guaranteed the equivalent of lottery wins if their firms were taken over. They did this by insisting that their share options ó usually paid out only after a number of years ó could instantly be converted to cash.

Apathy: No-one seemed to notice - or care - when ICI was snapped up by the Dutch
Apathy: No-one seemed to notice - or care - when ICI was snapped up by the Dutch

Ah, argued defenders of this system, but surely all these deals also brought much-needed injections of cash into the economy?

And yes, of course, they did ó in the short term.

But no one was thinking any further ahead. No one had bothered to work out that if it was hard enough to collect taxes from a UK-based multinational, it might be even harder to do so from one based in Munich, Lucerne or Washington DC.

Paying the price: ICI's subsequent breakup resulted in the loss of thousands of jobs
Paying the price: ICI's subsequent breakup resulted in the loss of thousands of jobs

If that sounds highly theoretical, then consider what happened after Boots the chemist (Alliance Boots) was sold to the Italian pharmacy king Stefano Pessina and private-equity barons KKR in 2007 for £12 billion.

Soon after the takeover, Boots ó which had been based in Nottingham for 161 years ó moved its headquarters to Zug in Switzerland. Why Zug? Well, certainly not for its climate.

Before the takeover, Boots had paid £89 million in British tax in its final year as a quoted company on the London stock market. Now that it pays its tax in Zug, that figure has shrunk to just £9 million.

So the financial rewards from all these foreign takeovers rarely swell government coffers for long. Hence, as more and more British companies vanish overseas, itís the ordinary taxpayer who has to make up the difference ó through higher VAT and other taxes.

As well as tax revenue, what is even more worrying is that weíre rapidly losing the crucial skills we need to compete with the rest of the world.

The real tragedy is that no one seems to care when a company like ICI, the great chemicals giant, disappears into the jaws of a foreign power ó taking with it scientific and industrial expertise built up over many decades.

The truth is that the 2008 Dutch takeover of ICI was, arguably, far more significant than the sell-off of Cadbury, which caused deep public unease. Chocolate, it seems, will always stir more sentiment than paint and chemicals.

ICI was vulnerable to foreign interest for two reasons: the lack of Government interest in its possible future and the shareholdersí greed for cashing in ó to the exclusion of other considerations. So no one gave much thought to what might happen next.

The ICI integration into Hollandís AkzoNobel was far from painless. Within days of the merger, they were jettisoning some of ICIís assets ó such as its adhesives and electronic materials activities, which were sold to a German competitor. Some 29 factories, including several in the UK, were closed, eliminating 3,500 jobs.

Sentimental value: Cadbury's treatment at the hands of Kraft caused public outrage
Sentimental value: Cadbury's treatment at the hands of Kraft caused public outrage

In early 2009, AkzoNobel revealed massive losses of £970 million, largely as a result of buying ICI. More job losses were projected, and a pay freeze was imposed on most of the companyís employees. In 2011, the group was still struggling.

How ICI itself has fared financially, within AkzoNobel, is now impossible to discern. But the most significant and worrying loss has been that of a guaranteed skills base.

For decades, ICIís reputation ó and its profits ó was founded on its ability to develop new products. But once ownership moved abroad, all bets as to the future of such research facilities was off.

'Global economy': David Cameron refuses to erect 'trade barriers'
'Global economy': David Cameron refuses to erect 'trade barriers'

Indeed, if AkzoNobel sells off further parts of the company, the remaining research laboratories in Slough and Newcastle could well move abroad.

After all, no foreign company owes any particular allegiance to Britain. This was vividly illustrated when Kraft Foods took over Cadbury in 2009, after promising to keep open the Somerdale factory near Bristol that made Wispa and other chocolate bars.

Despite this pledge just one month after buying the confectioner, Kraft closed the factory ó leading to the direct loss of 400 jobs, and the indirect loss of others in the supply chain.

In addition, 160 skilled employees at the companyís Uxbridge headquarters were made redundant, and a further 150 posts are due to go at Cadburyís historic Bournville factory in Birmingham this year.

Surprising? Not really. When companies need to cut capacity, they tend to chop operations far from home first.

Yet the Labour government made little effort to block this unpopular takeover. As for the Tories, David Cameron said at the time: ĎWe are an open, global economy. We cannot start creating ownership barriers, trade barriers and protectionist barriers.í

As the economy dipped, Kraft lost no time in squeezing as much income as it could out of its new acquisition in order to pay down debt and please its American shareholders. In March 2010, for instance, Cadbury staff were told that pay would be frozen for three years unless they agreed to opt out of the firmís expensive final-salary pension scheme.

The arrogant American bosses of Kraft felt immune to criticism ó even brushing off politiciansí criticism with disdain.

For example, when asked to appear before a Commons select committee to explain the companyís failure to honour its promises, Kraft chairman and CEO Irene Rosenfeld refused. ĎAppearing before the panel was not the best use of my personal time,í she said.

Red lines: Former French President Jacques Chirac stood up for 'strategic' companies
Red lines: Former French President Jacques Chirac stood up for 'strategic' companies

Is this the price that all nations have to pay for an increasingly globalised world? Not at all ó in fact, Britain is unique in having such a supine attitude to selling off its crown jewels.

Other countries adopt whatís come to be known as Ďeconomic patriotism,í which involves putting tremendous obstacles in the path of foreign bids. Take France, for example, which argues that itís in the national interest to prevent key technologies falling into foreign hands. Key technologies that extend all the way from nuclear power to yoghurt-making.

There was uproar when the U.S. drinks giant PepsiCo was poised to bid for the French food firm Danone in 2005. In the end, the then President Jacques Chirac declared that the French yoghurt-maker was considered a Ďstrategicí company, so couldnít be sold to a foreign firm.

Similarly, Spain has worked hard to hold on to its energy companies ó for example, thwarting a bid in 2006 by German energy group E.ON for Endesa. Yet a year later, because of less patriotic values in Britain, a Spanish company was easily able to buy our own Scottish Power.

In Japan, selling a company over the heads of management is unthinkable. And while India has bought UK enterprises such as Jaguar Rover, it wonít allow British firms to take full control of its own companies.

As for the U.S., the country which portrays itself as a Ďchampioní of free trade wonít permit foreigners to buy U.S. airlines or TV companies. Oil is also jealously guarded: Chinaís state-owned oil company, for instance, was prevented from purchasing struggling U.S. oil firm Unocal in 2005.

No one is proposing that all foreign takeovers should be blocked. But we could easily put our own measures into place to limit further damage. Thereís nothing wrong, for instance, with having a vetting process for foreign deals that would take into account matters of public and national economic interest.

Or with making it illegal for foreign companies to break their promises about keeping jobs and research facilities in the UK. Or with forcing them to declare how much of their bid is based on debt. Directors of British companies could be banned from cashing in on a shares bonanza if a deal went through.

Upper hand: Barclays CEO Bob Diamond has threatened to move the bank's headquarters to New York
Upper hand: Barclays CEO Bob Diamond has threatened to move the bank's headquarters to New York

In other words, a board would be judging a takeover bid on the basis of its merits, not on how rich it would make individual directors.

Why, then, isnít the Government considering any of this? Why do we cheerfully continue to auction off everything from nuclear power generators (to the French ó and now possibly the Russians) to our most popular chocolate brand?

The chief reason lies in our continuing love affair with banking and financial services, which still provide a large slice of our tax revenues. From the late Eighties onwards, governments have viewed these banks ó which arrange and finance all these overseas deals ó as a sort of universal economic panacea.

At all costs, it seems, the banks need to be kept happy. And since much of their money comes from buying and selling companies to the rest of the world, the British sell-off seems destined to continue unabated.

The banks know their power, too. American Bob Diamond, who took over Barclays in 2011, let it be known that heíd consider moving the bankís highly profitable investment banking arm from Britain to New York if it became, as he saw it, over-regulated or over-taxed. And heís by no means the only banker making veiled threats behind the scenes.

As matters stand, trying to protect UK companies is like attempting to guard chickens in a coop to which foxes have been invited.

In the real world, away from the gilded environs of the City, the tragedy is that tens of thousands of jobs have gone. Crucial skills have been lost ó probably for good. And the strategic heart of British manufacturing has been ripped out, which affects our ability to climb out of recession.

Still, the outlook isnít all bleak: bankers and foreign shareholders are doing just fine.

Extracted from Britain For Sale: British Companies In Foreign Hands by Alex Brummer, to be published by Random House Business Books on April 26, £12.99.© 2012 Alex Brummer. To order a copy for £10.99 (incl p&p) call 0843 382 0000

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm afraid all Colonel Ian Bell was following was a Bormann 'lookalike' and a false trail laid specifically by Desmond Morton's little MI6 cell for him. That was why he was told not to apprehend and to keep his distance not knowing where the ship was next going to dock. If his mission was real he would be positively identifying and arresting this chap with a small battle group at his disposal once a probable Bormann had been identified.
I mean, this chap was a Colonel, a colonel and he's just got to sit and watch at Hitler's Treasurer disappears off over the horizon?
Come on please!

Martin Bormann's Escape

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDGdsS5D67w

Granada TV World In Action documentary filmed Mossad over in Paraguay and Argentina on the tail of and kidnapping members of the death cult. Bormann was creeping about with Adolf Eichmann and Klaus Barbie. Auschwitz 'Angel Of Death' Josef Mengele was his personal doctor. Watch it. They don't make 'em like that now the Bormann 4th Reich financial network runs the West. Former CBS Paul Manning spent two years writing all about it in Martin Bormann Nazi In Exile which you can get as a free pdf.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2019 12:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red Cross and Vatican helped thousands of Nazis to escape
Research shows how travel documents ended up in hands of the likes of Adolf Eichmann, Josef Mengele and Klaus Barbie in the postwar chaos
Dalya Alberge
Wed 25 May 2011 15.31 BST First published on Wed 25 May 2011 15.31 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/25/nazis-escaped-on-red-cro ss-documents

SS officers at Auschwitz in 1944. From left: Richard Baer, who became the commandant of Auschwitz in May 1944, Josef Mengele, commandant of Birkenau Josef Kramer, hidden, and the former commandant of Auschwitz Rudolf HŲss, foreground; the man on the right is unidentified. Photograph: AP
The Red Cross and the Vatican both helped thousands of Nazi war criminals and collaborators to escape after the second world war, according to a book that pulls together evidence from unpublished documents.

The Red Cross has previously acknowledged that its efforts to help refugees were used by Nazis because administrators were overwhelmed, but the research suggests the numbers were much higher than thought.

Gerald Steinacher, a research fellow at Harvard University, was given access to thousands of internal documents in the archives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The documents include Red Cross travel documents issued mistakenly to Nazis in the postwar chaos.

They throw light on how and why mass murderers such as Adolf Eichmann, Josef Mengele and Klaus Barbie and thousands of others evaded capture by the allies.


Sign up for Bookmarks: discover new books in our weekly email
Read more
By comparing lists of wanted war criminals to travel documents, Steinacher says Britain and Canada alone inadvertently took in around 8,000 former Waffen-SS members in 1947, many on the basis of valid documents issued mistakenly.

The documents Ė which are discussed in Steinacher's book Nazis on the Run: How Hitler's henchmen fled justice Ė offer a significant insight into Vatican thinking, particularly, because its own archives beyond 1939 are still closed. The Vatican has consistently refused to comment.

Steinacher believes the Vatican's help was based on a hoped-for revival of European Christianity and dread of the Soviet Union. But through the Vatican Refugee Commission, war criminals were knowingly provided with false identities.

The Red Cross, overwhelmed by millions of refugees, relied substantially on Vatican references and the often cursory Allied military checks in issuing travel papers, known as 10.100s.

It believed it was primarily helping innocent refugees although correspondence between Red Cross delegations in Genoa, Rome and Geneva shows it was aware Nazis were getting through.

"Although the ICRC has publicly apologised, its action went well beyond helping a few people," said Steinacher.

Steinacher says the documents indicate that the Red Cross, mostly in Rome or Genoa, issued at least 120,000 of the 10.100s, and that 90% of ex-Nazis fled via Italy, mostly to Spain, and North and South America Ė notably Argentina.

Former SS members often mixed with genuine refugees and presented themselves as stateless ethnic Germans to gain transit papers. Jews trying to get to Palestine via Italy were sometimes smuggled over the border with escaping Nazis.

Steinacher says that individual Red Cross delegations issued war criminals with 10.100s "out of sympathy for individuals Ö political attitude, or simply because they were overburdened". Stolen documents were also used to whisk Nazis to safety. He said: "They were really in a dilemma. It was difficult. It wanted to get rid of the job. Nobody wanted to do it."

The Red Cross refused to comment directly on Steinacher's findings but the organisation says on its website: "The ICRC has previously deplored the fact that Eichmann and other Nazi criminals misused its travel documents to cover their tracks."

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2599
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin Bormann and the Future of Germany
New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/1973/03/03/archives/martin-bormann-and-the-fut ure-of-germany.html
Paul Manning - 3rd March 1973
https://www.nytimes.com/1973/03/03/archives/martin-bormann-and-the-fut ure-of-germany.html

Martin Bormann and the Future of Germany
By PAUL MANNING MARCH 3, 1973

The article as it originally appeared.


March 3, 1973, Page 31Buy Reprints
The New York Times Archives
When the true story of Martin Bormann is written it will reveal him to be the man largely responsible for West Germany's postwar recovery.

The blueprint for this economic resurgence was outlined at a secret meeting of German induatrialists in Strasbourg, France, on Aug. 10, 1944. A directive addressed to the meeting from Martin Bormannóthe most powerful man in Germany next to Hitlerósaid the war was practically lost and that a postwar commercial campaign must take its place.

The secret, verbatim minutes of this conference where a new Germany was born promised that ďthe Govermnent would allocate large sums to industrialists so that each could establish a secure postwar foundations in foreign countries.Ē The minutes also noted that ďafter the defeat of Germany, the Nazi party recognizes that certain of its best known leaders will be condemned as war criminals. However, in cooperation with the industrialists it is arranging to place its less conspicuous but most important members in positions with various German factories as technical experts or members of its research and designing offices.Ē

But the main thrust of the Strasbourg gathering was deployment of Germany's economic reserves into neutral countries where they would be beyond reach of the wartime Allies.

When Martin Bormann informed these industrialists through his personal representative at the meeting that all Government controls over the export of wealth (money, patents, scientists and administrators) were to be relaxed immediately, the transfer of these national assets became an official policy of the Nazi state.

Continue reading the main story
A report by the U.S. Treasury Department in 1946 stated that 750 companies were set up all over the world by the German industrialists following the Aug. 10, 1944 meeting in Strasbourg. Their listing noted 112 in Spain, 58 in Portugal, 35 in Turkey, 98 in Argentina, 214 in Switzerland, 233 in various other countries.

In Berlin, Adolf Hitler had advised Bormann to ďBury everything, you will need it to return to power.Ē Bormann, the man designated as Reichsieiter (the leader) by Hitler with authority to carry on policies of the Fuehrer, interpreted the advice in the sophisticated fashion of a man who knew finance and how to distribute it most effectively to the neutral nations. It was, in fact, the policy he had been pursuing for two years before the fall of Berlin, sensing that defeat was possible and knowing that Germany would need all the economic strength it could muster for a commercial comeback in the postwar years.

While Hitler concerned himself with the mounting problems of the battlefields, Martin. Bormann was carefully planning the economic survival and future of Germany.

During 1942 and 1943, Bormann began transferring party and S.S. funds under his control from the Third Reich to South America. The transfers included currency, gold, diamonds and share‐holding certificates controlling numerous blue‐chip German and foreign corporations.

The master plan which Bormann put into motion for German industry had two aspects: removal of funds from the Third Reich and stepping up of German investments in neutral countries.

West Germany owes a debt for its revival to the American Marshall Plan, to the Swiss bankers who were first to channel investment money back into German industry after 1945, and to the dedication and hard work of the German people.

I. G. Farbenindustrie, A. G., the largest and most powerful chemical combine in the world during the twelve years of the Third Reich, controlleclóboth admitted and concealed óover 500 firms in 92 countries. It was the largest single earner of foreign exchange for Germany, and its cartel agreements numbered over 2,000 and included such major industrial concerns as Standard Oil (New Jersey), the Aluminum Company of America, E. I. du Pont de Nemours, Ethyl Export Corporation, Imperial Chemical Industries (Great Britain), the Dow Chemical Company, Rohm & Haas, Etablissements Kuhlmann (France), and the Mitsui interests of Japan, When Martin Bormann switched on the green light for massive transfers of wealth, I. G. Farben moved into high gear.

Hermann Schmitz, I. G.'s, president of that era, reported to Martin Bormann: ďOur measures of camouflage have proved to be very good during the war, and have even surpassed our expectations.Ē The measures he referred to was camouflage of the true ownership of Farben assets as a war and postwar device. The company cloaked its direct and indirect ownership and control of hundreds of its foreign subsidiaries by utilizing every conceivable device known to the legal mind. It was a razzle‐dazzle operation, with Bormann nodding approval and giving assistance every step of the way. Other major German firms pursued the same complicated and devious course.

A primary technique used generally for shifting control of Gerrnan property to avoid Allied seizure in the last year of the war was to use a cloaking device of ownership. The German owner would transfer his holdings to neutral national who acted as the nominal owner; made easy by the general European practice of using bear er shares as a token of ownership (bearer shares are negotiable by delivery, and it is exceedingly difficult to trace the chain of title of a particular share). Fees varied for this service, but the usual figure was 5 per cent of the deal.

But the man who conceived and made possible the transfer of German assets on a vast scale which made possible the establishment of bastions of economic strength outside Germany lives today in South America.

Martin Bormann, at 72, is the Reichsleiter in exile, a legally appointed head of state who does not consider himself to be a war criminal, according to spokesmen for him. Much has been written about Bormann in recent times; all of it incorrect except for the single fact he is alive and in South America.

If he is ever to come out into the open and live the life of a free man once again, he must refute the charges of. Nuremberg, where he was tried in absentia in 1945‐46 and found not guilty on the charge of crimes against peace, but guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The indictment which the prosecution attorney hammered home in the emotion‐charged atmosphere of that period was that Bormann had been ďextremely active in the persecution of the Jews not only in Germany but also in the absorbed or conquered countries.Ē As the crime of racial extermination was ó realistically ó what the first Nuremberg trial was all about, Bormann must produce incontrovertible evidence of his personal innocence on this critical point. In its decision, the International Military Tribunal left a loophole for Martin Borrnann if he ever wishes to reopen the case.

ďIf Bormann is not dead,Ē the tribunal stated, ďand is later apprehended, the Control Council for Germany may, under Article 29 of the Charter, consider any facts in mitigation, and alter or reduce his sentence, if deemed proper.Ē

Will Martin Bormann, an unquestioned genius of finance and administration, take the gamble, or continue to be the most hunted man in history?
This is a digitized version of an article from The Timesís print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.

Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems. Please send reports of such problems to archive_feedback@nytimes.com.

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Dulles brothers were nephews of Wilson's Secretary of State Lansing.

But they only were invited to work at Versailles on the Peace Treaty by
their friend Bernard Baruch. Allan Dulles said he was on the committee that drew Czechoslovakia's borders. He said it would up looking like a
banana.

Also Ferdinand Lundberg told us in America's 60 Families that one reason America entered WW I so it could make the war last longer and bankrupt England and France so New York could become the world financial capitol.

You might Google this: "July 1,1916 worst day in British military history."

They had 58,000 casualties on that one day. If Wilson had never promised to
enter the war, it would likely have ended in 1915.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2599
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2019 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

He dreamt up Bond, but did Fleming also create the CIA?
Ben Macintyre
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/he-dreamt-up-bond-but-did-fleming-a lso-create-the-cia-l3nkg9blnmn

August 15 2008, 9:40pm, The Times

Ian Fleming, the creator of James Bond, liked to claim Ė only half in jest Ė that he had helped to create the CIA.

During the Second World War Fleming worked as personal assistant to John Godfrey, the hard-driving head of Naval Intelligence, who was Flemingís model for M in the Bond series.

Part of Flemingís job was to liaise with General William ďWild BillĒ Donovan, head of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), Americaís newly minted wartime answer to MI6. The two men got on extremely well, and when Donovan was preparing plans for a new American intelligence service in 1941, he asked Fleming to write him a blueprint.

Flemingís 72-page memo on how a US service might look contains a description of theÖ

****



Does Macintyre have the full 72 or 78-page memo?

Ben Macintyre
columnist, the times
@BenMacintyre1

Ben Macintyre is an associate editor, columnist and writer at large for The Times. He was the newspaperís bureau chief in New York, Paris and Washington, before returning to the UK in 2001. He has written a weekly column since 1996. He is also the author of 12 books of non-fiction, including Agent Zigzag and The Spy and the Traitor.

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin Bormann - A New Body of Evidence?
Published on May 11, 2016
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/martin-bormann-new-body-evidence-lauren ce-de-mello/

By Laurence de Mello

When anyone mentions the name Martin Bormann, most baby-boomers will know who he was, they will also be quick to tell you that even though there was a wild goose chase across the globe to find him, he certainly died in 1945, proved they say, by the finding of his bones in Berlin in 1972.

On the publication of the 1998 Bormann DNA report, and statements given to the media by the West German prosecutor, Londonís ĎDaily Expressí newspaper called the Bormann report a Ďíwhitewashíí, perpetrated by the Brandt government.

If we now know, that leading war criminals such as Klaus Barbie (the butcher of Lyon) and Reinhard Gehlen were recruited and employed by the C.I.A post WWII, with total disregard to the heavy sentences served on the two at the Nuremberg Trials, why is it so hard to accept the possibility that Nazi Germany's pen-pushing 'Banker' escaped, possibly with the help of British intelligence?

After all, numerous Nazi officers who were participant in the brutal slavery of concentration camp prisoners were snapped up by the USA after the war, many of whom were made post WWII heroís in the American scientific community. So why is it so repugnant to believe that the allies could rescue the man with the money?

Between 1945 and 1965 there were numerous sightings of Bormann. Bormannís former personal chauffeur, Jakob Glas, said that he had seen Bormann months after May 1945 as did many others.

Paul Manning, author, former war correspondent and counter intelligence expert, claims along with others, that Bormann certainly escaped. But when Manning tried to publish his extensively researched 1981 book ĎMartin Bormann Nazi in Exileí he received dire threats. After finally getting a renegade publisher to agree to publish his work, within two weeks, the publisher had his legs broken and Manningís son was mysteriously murdered shortly after. The culprits were never found.

In fact, Manningís story is very much in line with the former British Intel officer and author of OPJB. Christopher Creighton states that Bormann escaped, as does Former WWII British army captain and war crimes investigator, Ian Bell. Bell can be seen on YouTube telling us that he saw Bormann being taken to a ship in Bari and when he radioed back to his command, he was told to follow but Ďído not apprehendíí.

Contrary to the survival story being told by those considered Ďícrazyíí conspiracy theorists, there are many very qualified and well versed investigators and former intelligence agents that tell us; the story we teach our children at school is just that, a story.

Hugh Thomas, former surgeon and forensic expert of international repute and author of the 1995 book Doppelgšngers , writes extensively about the forensics investigation that suggests Bormann died later than 1945. According to Jonathan Glancey of The Guardian, Thomasís ííscalpel-sharp eye for detailíí and second investigative work which produced the book Hess: A Tale of Two Murders , Ďíprecipitated a six-month Scotland Yard inquiry that saw its report immediately suppressed."

Thomas confirms that the original Bormann medical reports in 1972 released only some and not all the information found under the microscope. While it is true the dentistry of the skull found was identified as Bormann, they failed to reveal to the public that there was dentistry performed in the skull, which could only have been done in the 1950ís, due to the technology used. A man that died in 1945 is not going to go to the dentist in 1950.

Also, the skull Ďífoundíí in Berlin, was encased in a red clay type earth, exotic to Germany but local to a place in Paraguay, the very place that many investigators, including myself, have traced Bormann to in his last years. Those last yearís being possibly as late as 1969.

Reinhard Gehlen, former Nazi, Cold war spymaster and later a CIA recruit and head of the West German intelligence network, also claimed that Bormann escaped to South America and died in Paraguay.

But probably the most disturbing work comes from Ladislas Farago. In 1974, Farago, a brilliant military historian, WWII war correspondent and former civilian naval intelligence officer, published Aftermath: Martin Bormann and the Fourth Reich. Farago, after a long and painstaking investigation on the ground in South America, much of which was spent accessing classified Argentine intelligence documents, presented his evidence including copies of said documents in his book. Not only did Farago examine and get the classified documents he accessed authenticated, he called a team to join him in Buenos Aires, to witness and document the authentication of such.

The formidable 1972 Buenos Aires team included four highly distinguished international attorneys; Former intelligence operative and practicing new York attorney Joel Weinberg, Dr. Silvio Frondizi, the brother and former legal aid to Argentine President Arturo Frondizi, Dr. Guillermo Macia Ray and Dr. Horacio A. Perillo . They were also joined by Stewart Steven, who at the time was the highly respected Foreign Editor of London's Daily Express. Steven was not just there as a witness, but also a participant in the document analysis.

Farago and his team's unanimous conclusion, was that Martin Bormann certainly escaped Europe in 1945 with the help of the allies and went on to South America where he survived for many years, many of which in Argentina.

Even though Farago and his team were more than qualified to make an intelligent and thorough analysis and investigation on the authenticity of the documents made available to them, Faragoís publication was ignored and serious attempts were made to discredit him and the other members of the team.

A precedence had been set, when it came to stating or even suggesting Martin Bormann had survived post 1945, even experts like Farago, who was also the worldís leading expert on propaganda and clandestine psychological forms of espionage and warfare, was not safe from ridicule and criticism.

Respected British newspaper man Stewart Steven, who published the 1998 'Whitewash' article was part of Farago's team and was later sacked as Foreign Editor from London's 'Daily Express' for publishing the article suggesting the official 1998 investigation, which had been instigated by the West German prosecutor, was nothing more than a cover-up.

It can not be ignored that there were those, that were determined to keep the 1945 Bormann death myth in force. But not everyone ignored Faragoís book. The content and evidence produced by Farago was so compelling, that it attracted the attention of German born American Dr. Robert M. W. Kempner, a former Nuremburg trial attorney , who decided to reopen the Bormann investigation, based on Ladislas Faragoís documentary evidence of Martin Bormann's survival.

But the trail though cold, may not yet be completely dead in the water;

Recent research reveals that a classified Federal Police archive in Argentina has evidence that the FBI were sending agents to Argentina to follow the Bormann case and the money trails well into the 1980ís and courageous new witnesses have come forward since 2010, with evidence which cannot be ignored. This new evidence may very well lead to an undisputable revelation, that not only did Bormann escape, but he lived for many years in South America with the protection of the allies.

One important new witness is a former military ADC to Argentine General Juan Peron. Commissioner Generale Jorge Silvio Colotto.

This high ranking, internationally decorated, military and federal police commissioner, had been the ADC to 7 Argentine presidents, a close personal friend of Chilean President Pinochet and Eva peron and was the chief of the tough Argentine Federal secret police. He was also prominently involved in the dismantling of the Argentine narcotics trafficking in the 1990ís.

His taped testimony given to Goldeneye Films in 2010, (highly edited clips on YouTube) was on the premise that it could only be revealed after his death to protect his family and that he met Martin Bormann frequently in Buenos Aires in late 1952 and till the end of 1953. He also testifies that on the instructions of Peron, he organised the personal security for Bormann and escorted him to various meetings in Argentina.

Commissioner Colotto also stated that Martin Bormann had been installed in a famous luxury hotel in Buenos Aires throughout 1953, which was owned by Germans. The ADC testifies that he was sent on a weekly basis to collect the Bormann bill from the concierge, to take directly to Peron, who paid the bill from his personal accounts.

This man asked for nothing in exchange for his testimony, all he requested was that the truth be finally known. Commissioner Jorge Colotto died in 2012 and part of his testimony was shown on the A&E channel in the 'Hunting Hitler' tv series.

Another recent witness, with ties to the FBI and C.I.A, is a former Naval Captain who was in charge of the security for the port of Buenos Aires. He told us that not only was it common knowledge, but it is documented in the classified Federal police archives, that Bormann was in Argentina in the 50ís and that the CIA were in Argentina keeping tabs on Bormann as late as 1967.

The author of the 1996 book OPJB, Christopher Creighton, writes that he was instructed by Lord Louis Mountbatten and Winston Churchill to reveal the truth of all the ops in which he was participant, 25 years after the death of both. Documents have been seen which were written to Creighton aka John Ainsworth-Davis, from Lord Louis Mountbatten, which prove Creighton was certainly working for British Naval intelligence at the highest level, which puts in grave doubt spy writer Nigel Westís claims that Creighton is a Ďícharlataníí.

There are also letters from James Bond author Ian Fleming to Creighton which testify to OPJB, the covert operation that removed Bormann from Berlin in may 1945, as being fact and that he based his James Bond Character on Creightonís operations. How did Fleming know? Because according to verified letters from Fleming to Creighton, Fleming was part of the operation while he was a Royal Naval commander under the command of spymaster Desmond Morton, for the British secret service.

Potential New Leads
In 2007 a lady whose name cannot be revealed at this time, contacted us with a story that she had been born in a German clinic in Brazil. This five foot two, blonde, green eyed lady, was found to be a well balanced, well educated, a discreet and trustworthy member of her community - a far cry from a publicity-seeking, delusional, self-promoter.

Her deceased adoptive father had been a senior naval officer for the Dominican Republic dictator Rafael Trujillo. She claims her adoptive father was entrusted with her in 1952 the year of her birth, after he was in Brazil negotiating arms deals between the Dominican Republic government and the German arms factories in the Brazilian jungle.

In 1984 she contacted the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, after her adoptive father revealed on his death-bed that she was the daughter of Ďíone of Germanyís three greatest meníí. Extremely distressed at this death-bed revelation, she with her Jewish American attorney, approached the Simon Wiesenthal Centre for help. Within weeks her attorney was anonymously threatened with his life. He immediately dropped her representation after the SWC told him, more than just abruptly, that they were not able to help and would not investigate due to Ďílack of fundsíí. An unusual response from a wealthy organisation whose main objective has been to investigate the trails of and track down Nazi war criminals.

Even Simon Wiesenthal himself believed that Bormann escaped and was frequently outspoken against the official version. In 1966 he said "he is alive and living on the Chile Argentine border using the name Ricardo Bauer". It was only after the 1972 finding of the remains in Berlin, that Wiesenthal gave up the search. It is shocking and detrimental to Wiesenthalís memory, that those that now head the very organisation founded in his name, ridicule others who believe what Wiesenthal believed, Bormann escaped.

If Bormann did escape, then the adopted woman may very well be the daughter of Martin Bormann, not only because of the mysterious dynamics surrounding her birth, but photos of her, the timing of her birth and the fact investigators believe Bormann was in Brazil with Dr Joseph Mengele in 1951 and 1952.

(It is well documented that Mengele spent many years in Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay, where he focused on genetics, supported by his formal qualifications as a gynaecologist and obstetrician.)

Recent photos of her son given to us show an uncanny similarity of her son with Martin Bormannís eldest son Adolf. Access to the true DNA of Bormann children is now vital to make a comparison.

In 2010, I contacted the SWC to request access to the files held by them on Martin Bormann. We were stalled for many weeks until finally the SWC refused to help by giving access to any of the files. Rather like the famous Anna Anderson and Russian Grand Duchess Anastasia case, but not covered by the media in the same way, all efforts to access information to see if this adopted woman has Bormann DNA have so far failed.

Even if one did access the DNA in the Files held by the various agencies, who is to know whether the DNA profiles held in the public files are indeed that of Martin Bormann? If Bormann did indeed escape, those that covered it up, are certainly going to go to enormous lengths to hide any incriminating data. Genuine DNA profiles of Bormann would be the last thing they would leave hanging around.

I spoke to Dr. Katja Anslinger one of the doctors that was participant in the 1998 DNA investigation into the Bormann skeleton, which was carried out at the Dept of forensic Med, at the University of Munich. After inquiring as to the DNA profiles which were prepared from the bones she replied;

'' The mtDNA profile of Martin Bormann was published by us in 2001 ................ Further investigations weren't done.''

One would have thought that an institution with an opportunity to examine the Martin Bormann remains, would have taken every possible sample that could be used for scientific and historical purposes. But no, only a mitochondrial DNA profile was made. A mitochondrial DNA profile is useless to match a child to a father, as mtDNA is only passed down through the mother. This was a very strange route to take for the lab, as this meant the matching of the skeleton to confirm identity would have had to be through a maternal relation of Martin Bormann's, where the mtDNA could be met.

It seems an unusual step to not have carried out a full DNA profiling on the remains using Bormann's eldest son Adolf! was this a deliberate move by the intelligence services to prevent any DNA profiling on data bases which could potentially match up children of Bormann in the future? children that had been conceived post May 1945?

It is also interesting to note, that like the supposed corpse of Osama Bin Laden, after positively identifying Bormann in 1998, his remains were swiftly cremated and disposed of ''into the sea''.

The search is now on for genuine Martin Bormann maternal relatives, and children and/or grandchildren, to not only cross match DNA with the woman, but also to cross match the mtDNA, supposedly used to identify Bormann in 1998. If this woman does have Bormann DNA and being born in a German clinic in Brazil in 1953, it will once and for all put to bed the mystery and will vindicate all those that have sacrificed much to reveal what they believed to be the truth. Could that truth be that Martin Bormann escaped and went on to manage the vast funds accumulated by Nazi Germany with the help of Britain?
Conclusion:
Since 1972, historians and academics have spun their tales and told the world that Bormann certainly died near the Lehrter station Berlin, during the early hours of May 2 1945. This aural history is based on no more than unreliable witnesses, two of which were Naziís and a mtDNA match to a skeleton found in 1972.

DNA may prove that the remains are those of Bormann, but it does not prove he died in 1945, as there is more evidence to prove he was alive for at least 25 years after 1945. 25 years, in which he could have managed the vast Nazi wealth, including cash, gold, stocks, bonds, shares and priceless works of art. After all, it is rather surprising that with all the modern banking forensics available to date, not one single intelligence or government agency has declared that the vast booty has been found! Or has it? Yet it has been officially written, printed, signed sealed and delivered, even into our children's history lessons that Martin Bormann died in 1945 de-facto, the loot disappeared and anyone that tells you different is a Ďconspiracy theoristí.

Proving once and for all with new testimony, documentation and forensic science that Hitlerís handler, Martin Bormann survived, will redeem damaged reputations and will certainly bury the myth and cause many a red face in the high end academic Ďíhistoryíí community. But more importantly, it will open a very nasty can of worms and raise many more complicated and embarrassing questions to those agencies and governments that have knowingly perpetrated the Bormann death myth for the past 70 years.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2599
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin Bormann and the Nazi gold timeline
https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/martin-bormann-and-the-nazi-gol d/

Since 2012 Tony Gosling has been investigating evidence that from August 1944 Hitlerís treasurer Martin Bormann was secretly bargaining for the Allies to protect him after WWII, with the $1bn+ loot he controlled.

Soldiers and journalists such as Ladisas Farago, Harry Beckhough, Paul Manning, Dave Barnby, John Ainsworth-Davis,†Laurence de Mello, Carter Hydrick, Dave†Emory, Mike Sparks and Joseph Farrell have done much research and writing on what may be the ultimate WWII betrayal, masterminded by Winston Churchillís private secretary Major Desmond Morton.

Tony has produced the following theoretical timeline of Bormannís rise to power and subsequent rescue and protection by international organised crime, operating at the apex of the British state.

Did the Nazi party treasurer live in Reigate, Surrey from 1945 to 1956?

1920, 24 Feb†Ė Formation of the Nazi party, NSDAP, in Munich, Germany by group including Adolf Hitler, Rudolf Hess, Ernst Rohm, Dietrich Eckart, Anton Drexler, Gottfried Feder, Hans Frank and the Nazi partyís Ďspiritual fatherí Alfred Rosenberg.

18 September 1931†Ė Hitlerís niece, Geli Raubal Ďshoots herselfí after breaking off a sexual relationship with uncle Adolf. Nazi Martin Bormann said to have subsequently bribed detective Heinrich Muller who was investigating her death. As confidants of Herr Hitler both are to go on to achieve Ďgreat thingsí in the Nazi party.

23 March 1933†Ė Adolf Hitler made dictator of Germany via democracy & violence

1938†Ė Using forced labour, Martin Bormann completes building of Hitlerís ĎEagleís Nestí retreat complex at Berchtesgarten, Obersalzberg in the Bavarian/Austrian alps.

10 May 1941†Ė† Shortly before Germanyís 22 June ĎOperation Barbarossaí invasion of the Soviet Union Rudolf Hess is persuaded to fly from Berlin to Britain on a bogus Ďpeace missioní. On 12 May NSDAP membership number 60508, Martin Bormann, takes over Hessí job running the Nazi party, controlling promotion/access to Fuhrer.

Thursday 10 August 1944†Ė Red House meeting in Strasbourg. Nazi industrialistsí flight capital programme initiated by party chief, Reichsleiter Bormann, who begins to countermand Hitlerís orders eg. scorched earth ĎNeroí policy is quietly overturned.

1-11 May 1945†Ė Martin Bormann is smuggled out of Berlin by commandos via canals, and the Spree and Havel rivers, to Werben in the Allied sector, where Major Desmond Morton, CO of ĎMí section, MI6, is waiting, thence to Britain. Training took place on the Chichester canal and at Birdham commando base, near HMS Northney in Hampshire. Described by Christopher Creighton in his 1996 book, Op JB.

May 1945†Ė after debriefing, possibly at Marjory Hall, Martin Bormann is given the identity William Robert Hornegold, D.O.B. 1906. Bormann is sole signatory to Nazi bank accounts, mostly in Switzerland, Spain and Argentina, which contain over a billion dollars worth of looted wealth from Nazi occupations in Europe and elsewhere.

4 August 1945†Ė Commodore Coastal Convoys & Commander, Special Boat Unit, training commandos at Birdham near Chichester and HMS Northney, Hampshire, Harold Goulding DSO dies mysteriously of subdural haematoma following meningitis under the care of Dr Norman Dodd in Bangour Hospital, Edinburgh, aged 41.

1 October 1946†Ė Nuremberg trials convict Martin Bormann of war crimes Ďin absentiaí, he is sentenced to death by hanging.

1952†Ė Bormann allegedly changes name again to Peter Michael Broderick-Hartley

29 April 1956†Ė Soviet premiere Khrushchev is preparing to visit Britain with an unprecedented security entourage. Prime minister Anthony Eden orders a hidden Martin Bormann, however financially useful he is, out of the UK.

15 February 1958†Ė According to Paraguayan police papers released in 1998, Martin Bormann is said to have died of stomach cancer and been buried in an unmarked grave in Ita, near Asuncion, Paraguay.

8 September 1981†Ė Former CBS wartime radio journalist Paul Manning publishes ĎMartin Bormann, Nazi In Exileí where he details Bormannís activities in South America creating 750 ĎFourth Reich business mafiaí companies into which laundered Nazi loot is injected. Former SS officers and international Nazi sympathisers are given seats on these boards. Unscrupulous members of the Zionist mafia are sought out for senior roles in these companies to camouflage their Nazi origins.

1989†Ė Major Desmond Mortonís replacement as commander of ĎMí section MI6, Susan Kemp, tells John Ainsworth-Davis this is the year Bormann (or the doppelganger) died and is buried in Reigate cemetery.

December 1995†Ė Reports in News of the World and Mail on Sunday that Martin Bormannís son may be living in Wray Common Road, Reigate. A diligent journalist has stood the story up with documentary evidence. Shortly after publication ĎMartin Bormannís soní is arrested on drugs charges. Whilst on remand he is reported to have committed suicide by hanging in his cell. Whether this ĎBormannís soní really died and was buried, or there was a mock funeral and he got a new identity, is unknown.

1 September 1996†Ė Publication of ĎOp JB, The Last Great Secret Of The Second World Warí by John Ainsworth-Davis under the pen name Christopher Creighton because he is worried about being prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act. It details a top secret operation masterminded by Ian Fleming and Churchillís private secretary Major Desmond Morton for commandos to rescue Bormann from Berlin, via canals, at the end of World War Two. The story is endorsed by letters from WWII Royal Navy intelligence commander turned author, Ian Fleming and Winston Churchill. Another endorsement later emerges by Lord Mountbatten of Burma.

Monday 4 May 1998†Ė German and Swiss scientists say DNA tests on a skull dug up in central Berlin is conclusive proof that Bormann died there in the final days of WWII. However the skull has eight dental fillings more than his WWII German records indicate and red clay on the skull is found in Ita, Paraguay but not Berlin.

2010†Ė Churchill research fellow, former deputy head of Reigate Priory primary school, Grace Filby, gives her ĎChurchillís Secret Reigateí presentations. They include the Bormann story and examine a secret WWII bunker under Reigate Hill. S.E. Regional Command was General Montgomeryís 21st Army Group headquarters for the defence of Britain in the event of a Nazi invasion. Grace also explains Winston Churchill was billeted at ĎBroadleazeí, and Montgomery at ĎUnderbeechesí, Underhill Park Road, large old detached houses with access to the bunker complex. Grace believed the ĎReigate Bormanní was a Ďdoppelgangerí, to be produced if anyone accused the British government of hiding the real Bormann in the town.

18 March 2015†Ė Grace Filby attends Buckingham Palace and meets the queen. Grace dies in the winter of 2015/16, just three weeks after being diagnosed with cancer.

Comments, criticism or anything to add?

If you have anything to add do please call me,†Tony Gosling, 07786 952037,†11:00 Ė 19:00 Mon to Thu or send me an SMS text, whenever suits. I also have further extracts/articles detailing this story which I will post to you for a £10.00, cheque/PO.

Email me at†tony@cultureshop.org.uk†or post at†Tony Gosling, PRSC Arts Centre, 17-25 Jamaica Street, BRISTOL, BS2 8JP.I acknowledge receipt on request.

ĎFrom South America, where payment must be made with subtlety, the Bormann organization has made a substantial contribution. It has drawn many of the brightest Jewish businessmen into a participatory role in the development of many of its corporations, and many of these Jews share their prosperity most generously with Israel. If their proposals are sound, they are even provided with a specially dispensed venture capital fund. I spoke with one Jewish businessmen in Hartford, Connecticut. He had arrived there quite unknown several years before our conversation, but with Bormann money as his leverage. Today he is more than a millionaire, a quiet leader in the community with a certain share of his profits earmarked as always for his venture capital benefactors. This has taken place in many other instances across America and demonstrates how Bormann's people operate in the contemporary commercial world, in contrast to the fanciful nonsense with which Nazis are described in so much 'literature.'

So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish participation in Bormann companies that when Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires. Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities in no uncertain terms that this must never happen again because a repetition would permanently rupture relations with the Germans of Latin America, as well as with the Bormann organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish money to Israel. It never happened again, and the pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most efficient German infrastructure in history as well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.í
http://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Fri Oct 25, 2019 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin Bormann ‚Äď A New Body of Evidence
https://techfeatured.com/3575/martin-bormann-a-new-body-of-evidence

When anyone mentions the name Martin Bormann most baby-boomers will know who he was, they will also be quick to tell you that even though there was a wild goose chase across the globe to find him, he certainly died in 1945, proved they say, by the finding of his bones in Berlin in 1972. Martin Bormann Hitler’s right hand man and chancellor, the man that controlled all of the vast Nazi loot was tried in absentia in October 1946 at the Nuremberg trials. Found guilty of war crimes and sentenced to death by hanging, Bormann evaded the noose due to his mysterious disappearance.



Two Nazi witnesses at the Nuremberg trials testified to the fact that they had seen Bormann and fellow Nazi, Dr Ludwig Stumpfegger dead, only hours after fleeing the bunker where Hitler had supposedly put a bullet through his brain. One going as far as to say that he had even seen Bormann‚Äôs dead ‚ÄĚmoonlit face‚ÄĚ.

From 1945 the hunt for Martin Bormann was on. During the confusion of those early post war years, the West German government kept the heat up, but UKUSA‚Äôs ‚Äėhunt‚Äô was only, If anything, luke-warm. A concentrated search effort had been made in 1945 around the site of the supposed ‚Äėmoonlit‚Äô scenario of Bormann and Stumpfegger, with who he was last seen alive. With the advantage of hordes of allied troops on the ground to co-ordinate a thorough search, no stone was left unturned. The same was done independently by a Russian recon group, after Lieutenant General Konstantin Telegin, of the Soviet 5th Shock Army was delivered of a diary said to be of Bormann‚Äôs, found near the same site.

In those early post war years, it was not yet a ‚Äėcold case‚Äô, with memories still fresh and the ground still soft. Any such corpses although decomposed, would have certainly been on, or near the surface and easily identifiable with the minimum of forensics; but not as much as a scrap of flesh was found of either man. At least they had some disputable charred remains of Hitler, but the bodies of Bormann and Stumpfegger had literally vanished into thin air, along with the Nazi loot.

But after construction workers came across human remains near the Lehrter station in Berlin in 1972, the world’s press gathered to hear if this was indeed Bormann. Bormann’s Nazi dentist Dr Hugo Blaschke was called and he recalled from memory his former patient’s dental physiology and gave testimony that they were one and the same, the case was closed. It was not until 1998 that due to modern science the remains were subjected to a DNA forensic study by the West German prosecutor. The reason for this new 1998 investigation was that in 1996 Christopher Creighton, aka John Ainsworth-Davis a former British Naval Intelligence agent and member of the covert British group C.O.P.P (Combined Operations Pilotage Parties) had published a book, OPJB(Operation James Bond). In the book, Creighton using a pseudonym claims that along with Ian Fleming, he was instructed by Winston Churchill and Desmond Morton the head of Secret British intelligence section V to rescue Martin Bormann from a burning Berlin in May 1945. The book, passed off as a novel to protect Creighton from serious breach consequences of the Official Secrets Act unsettled the German government so much that a thorough forensics and DNA investigation was carried out on the remains. The forensic results came back after the legal medical team matched blood from a Bormann relative, the match was positive.

A confirmation of the remains being those of Bormann was released to the world’s press, along with the statement that Martin Bormann had certainly died in 1945 at the site his remains were found.

Due to the 1998 DNA confirmation of the Skeleton, Modern historians teach their students that stories of Bormann escaping to South America are false, nothing more than the rantings of conspiracy theorists and madmen. Investigative journalists and even former intelligence agents have been continually slandered after they have released information to the contrary, that there has been a cover up by the western allies, that not only did Bormann escape, but his escape was orchestrated by the British intelligence services with the support of the United States government.

Anyone that dares to raise any questions as to the true dynamics of Bormann’s disappearance and death, are discredited based only on the DNA match which confirm the remains as being Bormann. But why are there such conflicting stories between the official version and the version by those that have seriously investigated this strange case for decades? Bormann’s remains were found in 1972, but did he really die in 1945? And what exactly is at stake if the facts were proved that he died much later than we are led to believe? Even though his remains were found in 1972 in Berlin, it does not mean that his body had lain there since 1945 and there is no evidence to suggest such. In fact, there is more evidence to suggest foul play by the British and American intelligence services, that Bormann did escape and after his death in the late 1960’s his remains were carefully reburied in the place history likes to believe he fell.

On the publication of the 1998 Bormann DNA report, London‚Äôs Daily Expresscalled it a ‚Äėwhitewash‚Äô. Later the author of the article, Stewart Steven a very experienced foreign editor of the Daily Express, who was hands on involved with a thorough Bormann investigation was sacked 6 days later after he was accused of publishing a ‚Äėhoax‚Äô.

If we now suspect, contrary to the official version that Kennedy was certainly not shot by a lone gunman, why is it so hard to swallow that Bormann escaped with the help of British intelligence. After all, numerous Nazi officers who were participant in the brutal slavery of concentration camp prisoners were snapped up by the USA after the war, many of whom were made post WWII heroes in the American scientific community. Notorious Nazi Klaus Barbie known as the ‚ÄėButcher of Lyon‚Äô was tried at Nuremberg and sentenced to death in absentia. Yet it is documented that Barbie was protected and formally employed in 1947 by the U.S Army Counterintelligence Corps (CIC) and later by the CIA to set up the Western Intelligence Network to keep tabs on communist threat. This was a major and shocking betrayal by the USA as to the allied Nuremberg trial sentencing of Barbie. When the French government discovered that the USA were protecting Barbie, they requested he be immediately handed over for execution under international law. The USA flatly refused and consequently gave Barbie a new identity and shipped him off to Bolivia. If the USA could blatantly fly in the face of the International Nuremberg trials death sentence which they were actively participant in by protecting a psychopathic killer such as Barbie, why is it so unacceptable to believe that the allies would rescue Martin Bormann, the man with access to the hidden Nazi funds?

Between 1945 and 1965 there were numerous sightings of Bormann. Bormann’s former personal chauffeur, Jakob Glas, said that he had seen Bormann in Munich months after May 1945 as did many others.

Paul Manning, author, intelligence expert and former war correspondent claimed along with others that Bormann escaped. When Manning tried to publish his extensively researched 1981 book ‚ÄėMartin Bormann Nazi in exile‚Äô, he was menacingly threatened. After finally getting a renegade publisher to agree to publish his work, within two weeks the publisher had his legs broken in a vicious and anonymous attack and shortly after Manning‚Äôs son was mysteriously murdered. In fact Manning‚Äôs story is very much in line with the former British Intel officer and author of OPJB. Christopher Creighton states that Bormann escaped, as does Former WWII British army General and war crimes investigator, Ian Bell. Bell can be seen on YouTube telling us that he saw Bormann being taken to a ship in Genoa and when he radioed back to his HQ command, he was told to follow but ‚ÄĚdo not apprehend‚ÄĚ.

Contrary to the survival story being told by those considered ‚ÄĚcrazy conspiracy theorists‚ÄĚ, there are many highly qualified and well versed investigators and former intelligence agents that tell us the story we teach our children at school is just that, a story.

Hugh Thomas, surgeon, international forensic expert and author of the 1995 book Doppelg√§ngers wrote extensively about the Bormann forensics investigation that suggest Bormann died later than 1945. According to Jonathan Glancey of The Guardian, Thomas‚Äôs ‚ÄĚscalpel-sharp eye for detail‚ÄĚ and second investigative work Hess: A Tale of Two Murders, ‚ÄĚprecipitated a six-month Scotland Yard inquiry that saw its report immediately suppressed.‚ÄĚ Thomas confirms that the original Bormann medical reports in 1972 released only some and not all the information found under the microscope. While it is true the dentistry of the skull found was identified as Bormann, the official report failed to reveal to the public that there was dentistry performed in the skull, which could only have been done in the 1950‚Äôs due to the technology used. A man that died in 1945 is certainly not going to go to the dentist in 1950. Also, the skull ‚ÄĚfound‚ÄĚ in Berlin was encased in a ‚Äėred clay‚Äô type earth, exotic to Germany but local to a place in Paraguay, the very place that many investigators have traced Bormann to in his last years. Those last year‚Äôs being as late as 1969. Reinhardt Gehlen former senior Nazi, Cold war spymaster and head of the West German intelligence network, also claimed that Bormann escaped to South America and died in Paraguay.

But probably some of the most disturbing work comes from Ladislas Farago. In 1974, Farago a brilliant military historian, WWII war correspondent and former civilian naval intelligence officer, published ‚ÄėAftermath: Martin Bormann and the Fourth Reich.‚Äô Farago, after a long and painstaking investigation on the ground in South America, much of which was spent accessing classified Argentine intelligence documents, presented his evidence including copies of said documents in his book. Not only did Farago examine and get the classified documents he accessed authenticated, he called in a team to join him on the ground in Buenos Aires to witness and document the authentication of such. The formidable 1972 Buenos Aires team with Farago included former intelligence operative and practicing new York attorney Joel Weinberg, Stewart Steven the Foreign Editor of the London Daily Express and four top Argentine attorneys; Dr. Guillermo Macia Ray, Dr. Jaime Joaquin Rodriguez, Dr. Silvio Frondizi the brother of the former President of Argentina and Horacio A. Perillo, the former legal aid to the Argentine President Frondizi. Farago and his teams conclusion were that Martin Bormann certainly escaped Europe in 1945 with the help of the allies and went on to South America where he survived for many years, many of which in Argentina. Even though Farago and his team were highly qualified to make an intelligent and thorough analysis and investigation on the documents made available to them, Farago‚Äôs publication was ignored and serious attempts were made to discredit him and the other members of the team. Precedence had been set, when it came to stating or even suggesting Bormann had survived, even experts like Farago, who was also the world‚Äôs leading expert on propaganda and clandestine psychological forms of espionage at the time, was not safe from character assassination, ridicule and criticism. It is blatant there were those that were determined to keep the 1945 Bormann death myth in force and such suppression of evidence continues to this day.

But not everyone ignored Farago’s book. The content and evidence produced by Farrago was so compelling that it attracted the attention of Dr. Robert M.W. Kempner, a former Nuremberg trial attorney who decided to reopen the Bormann investigation, based on Farago’s documentary evidence of survival.

Farago, Manning, Thomas and Kempner, are sadly long gone, but the Bormann investigation is far from a cold case, as a new generation of investigative journalists have reopened the dusty Bormann files and have enthusiastically picked up from where their predecessors departed. Recent research reveals that the Federal police archives in Argentina show that the FBI were sending agents to Argentina to follow the Bormann case and his financial trails well into the 1980’s. New elderly witnesses, who till recently refused to talk have also come forward in the past 3 years and startling new evidence has come to light that cannot be ignored and may very well lead to the undisputable discovery that Bormann did escape and lived for many years in South America with the protection of the allies.

One important witness is a former military ADC to Argentine General Juan Peron. This high ranking internationally decorated military officer had been the ADC to 7 Argentine presidents, a close personal friend of Chilean President Pinochet and was the sub chief of the tough Argentine Federal secret police and prominently involved in the dismantling of the Argentine narcotics traffic in the 1990’s. His taped testimony given in 2010 on the premise that it could only be revealed after his death to protect his family is that he met Martin Bormann frequently in Buenos Aires in late 1952 and till the end of 1953. He also testifies that on the instructions of Peron, he organised the personal security for Bormann and escorted him to various meetings in Argentina. This highly credible witness also tells us that Bormann had been installed in a famous luxury hotel in Buenos Aires throughout 1953 which was owned by Germans. The ADC also testifies that he was sent on a weekly basis to collect the Bormann bill from the hotel concierge which he was instructed to take directly to Peron, who paid the bill from his personal bank accounts. This man asked for nothing in exchange for his testimony, all he requested was that the truth be finally known after his death. The official died in 2012 and his testimony is now ready for publication.

Another recent elderly witness with ties to the FBI and CIA, is a former Naval Captain who was in charge of the security for the port of Buenos Aires. He tells us that not only was it common knowledge, but it is documented in the classified Federal police archives that Bormann was certainly living in Argentina in the 50’s and that the CIA were in Argentina keeping close tabs on Bormann’s South American movements as late as 1967.

The most controversy surrounds the author of the 1996 book OPJB. Christopher Creighton writes that he was instructed by Lord Louis Mountbatten and Winston Churchill to reveal the truth of all the ops in which he was participant, 25 years after the death of both. According to Creighton, OPJB is not only the title of the book, but the operational code name given to the plan to rescue Bormann from Berlin. Documents have been seen and recently photographed which were written to Creighton from Lord Louis Mountbatten in 1976 which prove Creighton was not only certainly working for British Naval intelligence at the very highest level, but that Creighton was Desmond Morton‚Äôs Godson. This new evidence puts in grave doubt spy writer Nigel West‚Äôs claims that Christopher Creighton is a ‚ÄĚcharlatan‚ÄĚ. There are also letters from James Bond author Ian Fleming to Creighton which testify to OPJB, the highly covert operation as being fact and that he based his James Bond Character on Creighton‚Äôs covert naval operations. How did Fleming know? Because according to verified letters from Fleming to Creighton, Fleming was not only part of the operation while he was a Royal Naval commander under the command of Desmond Morton for the British secret service, but he was the commander in charge of the rescue. A British factual film company, Christopher Robin Media Ltd, have in their possession an as yet unpublished 2013 interview of Creighton recorded only weeks before his death. The startling interview gives never before revealed details of various highly covert British Naval intelligence operations, including the assassination of French Admiral Francois Darlan and the operation to remove Martin Bormann from Berlin.

In 2007 a lady whose name cannot be revealed at this time, came forward to investigators with a story that she had been born in a German clinic in Brazil. This five foot two, blonde, green eyed lady was found to be a well balanced, well educated and discreet and trustworthy member of her community, a far cry from a publicity seeking delusional self promoter. Her adoptive father was a senior naval officer for the Santa Dominican republican dictator Trujillo. She claims her adoptive father was entrusted with her in 1953 the year of her birth, after he was in Brazil negotiating arms deals between the Santa Dominican Republic government and the German arms factories in the Brazilian jungle. In 1984 she contacted the Simon Wiesenthal centre after her adoptive father revealed on his death bed that she was the daughter of ‚ÄĚone of Germany‚Äôs three greatest men‚ÄĚ. Extremely distressed at this death bed revelation and wondering who it could possibly be, she with her attorney approached the Simon Wiesenthal Centre for help. Within weeks her attorney was anonymously threatened with his life and he immediately dropped her representation after the SWC aggressively told him that they were not able to help and would not investigate due to ‚ÄĚlack of funds‚ÄĚ. An unusual response from a wealthy organisation that‚Äôs main objective has been to track down Nazi war criminals. Even Simon Wiesenthal himself believed till his death in 2005, a full 7 years after the 1998 DNA analysis that Bormann escaped and was frequently outspoken against the official version. It is shocking and detrimental to Wiesenthal‚Äôs memory, that those that now head the very organisation founded in his name have obstructed investigations and ridicule others that believe what Wiesenthal believed, Bormann escaped.

Those currently investigating the story feel that if Bormann did escape, then the adopted woman may very well be the daughter of Martin Bormann, not only because of the mysterious dynamics surrounding her birth, but photos of her, the officials involved, the timing of her birth and the fact investigators believe Bormann was in Brazil with Dr Joseph Mengele in the 1952. Recent photos of her son show an uncanny similarity of her son with Martin Bormann’s eldest son Adolf. Access to the true DNA of Bormann is now vital to make a comparison.

The British investigator of this case contacted the SWC in 2010 to request access to the file held by them on Martin Bormann. The investigator was stalled and the SWC refused to help by giving her access to the files. Rather like the famous Anna Anderson and Russian Grand Duchess Anastasia case, all efforts to access information on official files to see if this adopted woman has Bormann DNA have failed. Even if one did access the DNA in the Files held by the various agencies, who is to know whether the DNA profiles held in the official files are indeed those of Martin Bormann? If Bormann did indeed escape, those that covered it up are going to go to enormous lengths to hide any incriminating evidence. Bonafide DNA profiles of Bormann would be the last thing they would leave hanging around. The investigator leading this case is are now seeking genuine close Martin Bormann blood relatives to come forward, to not only cross match with the woman, but also to cross match with the DNA profiles supposedly used to identify Bormann in 1998 and those held in official and public files. Of course if this woman does have Bormann DNA and being born in a German clinic in Brazil in 1953, it will once and for all put to bed the mystery and will vindicate all those that have sacrificed much to reveal what they believed to be the truth. Could that truth be that Martin Bormann escaped and went on to manage the vast funds accumulated by Nazi Germany with the help of Britain and the USA? And according to recent research, those vast funds were probably laundered through and invested into over 750 international companies with or without Bormann.

Since 1972, ‚Äėofficial‚Äô historians and academics have spun their tales and told the world that Bormann certainly died near the Lehrter station in the early hours of May 2 1945. This oral history is based on no more than unreliable witnesses, two of which were Nazi‚Äôs and a DNA match to a skeleton found in 1972. DNA may prove that the remains are those of Bormann, but there is more evidence to prove that he was alive for at least 25 years after 1945. 25 years, in which he could have managed the vast Nazi wealth, including cash, gold, stocks, bonds, shares and priceless works of art. After all, with all the modern banking forensics available to date, not one single intelligence agency or government claims that the vast, fat, booty has been found! Or has it? Yet it has been officially written, printed, signed sealed and delivered, even into our children‚Äôs history lessons. Martin Bormann died in 1945 de-facto, the loot disappeared and anyone that tells you different is a deluded ‚Äėconspiracy theorist‚Äô.

Proving once and for all with new testimony, documentation and forensic science that Hitler‚Äôs handler, Martin Bormann survived, will redeem many damaged reputations and will certainly bury the myth and cause many a red face in the high end academic ‚ÄĚhistory‚ÄĚ community. But more importantly, it will open a very nasty can of worms and raise many more complicated and embarrassing questions to those agencies and governments that will have knowingly perpetrated the Bormann death myth for the past 70 years.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BORMANN

STEWART STEVEN

1941
Born in Hamburg to Jewish parents, Steven fled to England with his parents in 1941 as a refugee.

1958/60
Western Daily Press

1964
moved to Daily Express

1972
Working closely with Hungarian journalist Ladislas Farago tracking Eichmann, Mengele etc

Saturday 25 Nov 1972
Daily Express Exclusive
Martin Bormann Alive
You Are Bormann!
The Vatican and President Juan Peron are said to have been complicit in his escape

Monday 27 Nov 1972
interview

Friday 1 December 1972 - declared a HOAX! ???

1974 - Farago book - Aftermath - Martin Bormann and the Fourth Reich

1982-1992
Mail on Sunday Editor

1982
In 1982, he became editor of the Mail on Sunday, serving until 1992, when he became editor of the Evening Standard. In 1995, he printed a story critical of Tony Blair under the name of Bryan Gould, a former member of the Labour Party's shadow cabinet; in fact, Conservative Party Home Secretary Michael Howard's teenage son Nick had written the article

1998
On the publication of the 1998 Bormann DNA report, London‚Äôs Daily Express called it a ‚Äėwhitewash‚Äô. Later the author of the article, Stewart Steven a very experienced foreign editor of the Daily Express, who was hands on involved with a thorough Bormann investigation was sacked 6 days later after he was accused of publishing a ‚Äėhoax‚Äô.

January 2004
died

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martin Bormann Ran Hitler for the Illuminati
September 14, 2019
https://www.henrymakow.com/002026.html
(Bormann, with Hitler)

Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann was at the heart of the Nazi apparatus.

He signed Hitler's paycheck.

Louis Kilzer examined the wire traffic between the spy known

as "Werther" and Moscow and determined that only Bormann

had access to this information.

"The Soviets were able to ask very detailed questions about Nazi defenses and intentions.

The result was the decisive Nazis defeats at Stalingrad and Kursk.

Louis Kilzer writes, "Bormann had been as useful to Russia as fifty Red Army divisions."



(From June 2007)

By Henry Makow Ph.D.


The second most powerful man in Nazi Germany, Martin Bormann, was a "Soviet" (i.e. Illuminati) agent who ensured the destruction of both Germany and European Jewry.

Thus, he advanced two of the Illuminati's main goals: integrate Germany into a world government by annihilating its national, cultural and racial pretensions, and establish Israel as the Masonic banker's world capital by threatening European Jews with extermination.

The Illuminati are a loose alliance of Jewish finance and the British/America/European aristocracy joined by marriage, money, and belief in the occult (Freemasonry). Winston Churchill, a Freemason whose mother was Jewish, fits this description perfectly.

They own vast interlocking cartels (banking, oil, pharmaceuticals, war, chemicals, minerals, media, etc.) and control society and government through corporate and professional groups, the media, education, secret societies, think tanks, foundations and intelligence agencies. Their goal is "to absorb the world's wealth" (in Cecil Rhodes' words) and control its citizens using war, propaganda, "education" and social engineering.

Nations (Britain, US, Israel) movements (Zionism, Socialism, Nazism, Communism) and people (Americans, Germans, Jews) are their pawns to be sacrificed to their demented megalomaniac scheme for global dictatorship. Bormann's career illustrates how they plant sleeper agents and orchestrate wars to advance this long-term objective.



BORMANN



Martin Bormann (1900-?) was the organizer, treasurer and paymaster of the Nazi Party and controlled its powerful machine. He was the contact with Illuminati bankers and industrialists who financed the Nazi Party and donated millions to Hitler. As Deputy Fuhrer and Hitler's Secretary, Bormann signed Hitler's paycheck and managed his accounts. He determined whom and what Hitler saw, and acted in his name.

Goering said, "Bormann stayed with Hitler day and night and gradually brought him so much under his will that he ruled Hitler's whole existence." ("Martin Bormann" by James McGovern, p.160)

Hitler made Bormann the executor of his will. Bormann, not Hitler, owned the Berghof. "The entire complex on the Obersalzberg, consisting of 87 buildings and worth over one and a half million marks, was legally registered in Bormann's name." (McGovern, p.128)

smiling-hitler.jpg(Goebbels & Hitler, the joke's on you)

In 1972 Gen. Reinhard Gehlen (head of West German intelligence, the BND) revealed that Bormann had been a Soviet spy, a view shared by many top Nazi generals and officials including Gottlob Berger, a SS Lieutenant General who knew Bormann well. "Bormann did the greatest harm of anyone," Berger testified at Nuremberg. (McGovern, 181)

The implications are staggering. Remember what Winston Churchill said. "This war is not against Hitler or National Socialism but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest." (Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill, His Career in War and Peace p. 145)

The Nazi Party was created, and the Second World War staged in order to lead the German people into a diabolical trap, after fatally compromising them morally.



In "The Bormann Brotherhood" (1972) William Stevenson says Bormann "gave the lowest priority to the fate of Germany...He was concerned instead with a future based on Nazi philosophy, financed by Nazi loot, supported by a personally loyal Brotherhood..." (62) Is this the Illuminati?


It is possible that the next world war also will be staged, this time to undermine the United States.

BORMANN

It is unlikely that Bormann perished in war-torn Berlin, as the Illuminati would like us to believe. A man who carefully prepared for the survival of the Reich by setting up 750 corporations in neutral countries would have provided for his own escape. There have been reports that the Russians rescued Bormann and set him up in Moscow. Other reports placed him in South America. Adolph Eichmann's eldest son, Horst claimed he had many conversations with him in Argentina. (McGovern, p.194)

Obviously, Bormann was working for both the Soviets and the Nazis, i.e. he was working for the Illuminati.

Two-time Pulitzer Prize winner Louis Kilzer makes the case that Bormann was a "Soviet" spy in his book "Hitler's Traitor" (2000). He examined the wire traffic between the spy known as "Werther" and Moscow and determined that only Bormann had access to this information. Bormann told Hitler he wanted a record for posterity and had stenographers transcribe Hitler's war conferences.

The Soviets were able to ask very detailed questions about Nazi defenses and intentions. The result was the decisive Nazis defeats at Stalingrad and Kursk. "Bormann had been as useful to Russia as fifty Red Army divisions," Kilzer writes. (61)

"His value to Stalin began early. In 1941, when Germany could have used millions of Ukrainian nationalists to defeat Soviet rule, Bormann decided that they deserved only, "enslavement and depopulation. ...Faced with ... genocide by the Germans or political domination by the Soviets, the Ukrainians chose to live and by so doing ruined German hopes for an easy conquest." (261)

Borman used the Nazi defeat at Stalingrad as an excuse to begin the extermination of Jews, the second Illuminati goal.

In the words of the Nuremberg prosecutor, Bormann was a "prime mover in the program of starvation, degradation, spoliation and extermination." He shielded Hitler from the grisly details, forbidding Himmler from discussing the subject with Hitler and filing Himmler's reports. (261)

"Bormann's role with the Ukrainians and the Jews was only part of his devastating effect on the Third Reich," Kilzer writes. He blocked Albert Speer's attempt to move the economy to a "total war" footing until it was too late. "Bormann's influence," Speer concluded, "was a national disaster." (263)

Kilzer goes into great detail about Bormann's contacts with the Soviet espionage system, profiling many of his handlers. Even one of Bormann's mistresses, Marie Rubach Spangenberg, was active in the German Communist underground. (264)

Bormann encouraged Hitler to ignore the threat of encirclement at Stalingrad. Hitler's decisions "ceased to have anything in common with the principles of strategy and operations," General Halder noted in his diary. (McGovern, 82)

Bormann won Hitler's total allegiance by pretending to be his ruthlessly efficient instrument. When Bormann was criticized, Hitler replied, "Everybody has failed me but Bormann...whoever is against Bormann is also against the State! I'll shoot the lot of them..."(McGovern, 101.) And, "Bormann's proposals are so exactly worked out that I need only say yes or no..." (9Cool

Bormann subtly influenced Hitler to fire competent generals and did nothing to interfere with the gradual poisoning of the Fuhrer by his personal physician, Morrell.

In general, Bormann ensured that Germany did not make common cause with the Ukrainians and Russians suffering under the Bolshevik yolk. More than 3 million Russian POWS died in Nazi detention. They wanted to fight for the Nazis.

The question remains, "Was Hitler himself a traitor?" Did he also serve the Illuminati? Kilzer remarks that Hitler was surprisingly lenient to dissent within the ranks and cultivated a "culture of treason." (Kilzer, 6) Was Hitler aware of Bormann's role and played along? Hitler protected Bormann from suspicion. Hitler was an Illuminati agent. Nazism was a trap.


CONCLUSION

William Stevenson provides a suitable conclusion: "Bormann represented secret power; and in our disheveled human condition, we suspect that the trappings of democracy are more of a dangerous camouflage...that real power begins where secrecy begins. Martin Bormann ... possessed that secret power...to such a degree that he was able to escape the gallows." (9).

Bormann's example suggests that the Illuminati modus operandi is to empower someone who is predisposed or even brainwashed to do what they want. While he still has personal volition, they subtly manipulate him.

The lesson of this story is that the "news" upholds the "camouflage of democracy." Don't pay too much attention or invest your best energies. History is a play. The Illuminati control all the politicians who stand a chance.They control the mass media.

We live in a world where the dominant elite has organized into a sinister secret society to plot against humanity. It is creating a "New World Order" symbolized by the unfinished capstone on the pyramid on the US Great Seal.

Its symbols are everywhere but we are not allowed to protest them. Success depends on our willingness to betray our fellow citizens, nation and civilization and to allow this malignant power to grow in our midst.

-----

Related- "Bormann was a Rothschild Agent - Damning Evidence"

--------- Bormann and Hitler Were Traitors

---------Youtube-- "How Hitler Lost the War"

Bormann Rescued by the British?

Benjamin Freedman's Warning to Americans (1961)`



First Comment from James Perloff



I read Kilzer's book nearly two decades ago. He demonstrated by process of elimination that only Bormann could have been the spy code-named "Werther," who betrayed Germany's military secrets to Stalin through the radio transmitters of the "Red Orchestra" espionage network in neutral Switzerland. Data included: exact strength and movements of German units; who commanded them; how many soldiers were held in reserve; where flanks were unprotected, etc. The reports even stated the exact times Hitler entered and left his war room.

Bormann had devised an ingenious method of collecting this information. In 1942, he convinced Hitler that stenographers should record each military staff meeting. Thus Bormann had, at his disposal, every word said at these talks.

More than any other factor, this is why the Germany military's fate in the Soviet Union changed from complete success to bitter failure. Beginning in 1942, Stalin and his generals were playing with a marked deck every day.

All this was confirmed independently of Kilzer by intelligence specialist Pierre de Villemarest (one of France's best writers on the New World Order) in his out-of-print book UNTOUCHABLE: WHO PROTECTED BORMANN AND GESTAPO MULLER AFTER 1945? De Villemarest actually saw Bormann after the war and fleetingly spoke to him. Subsequently, he reported that Bormann was alive and in Argentina to the CIA, Mossad, and even the KGB. They all gave him the same answer: they knew about Bormann, but he was classified as "untouchable." Hence the title of de Villemarest's book.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16893
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For years, a worn-looking sign reading "Pathway to Bormann's House," has lead the way to the ruins at the center of the archaelogists research. Despite evidence proving the death of Martin Bormann in Berlin in 1945, local legend says Hitler's right-hand man settled in a house in the Teyu Cuare provincial park following the fall of the Third Reich.


'Nazi refuge' unearthed by archaeologists in Argentina
In the depths of Argentina's rainforest, archaeologists have discovered what they believe to be a Nazi hideout, built during the Second World War. But lack of evidence has historians questioning the authenticity.
https://www.dw.com/en/nazi-refuge-unearthed-by-archaeologists-in-argen tina/a-18333891

Misiones Province Argentina
For years, a worn-looking sign reading "Pathway to Bormann's House," has lead the way to the ruins at the center of the archaelogists research. Despite evidence proving the death of Martin Bormann in Berlin in 1945, local legend says Hitler's right-hand man settled in a house in the Teyu Cuare provincial park following the fall of the Third Reich.

Following months of research by a team of archaeologists from the University of Buenos Aires (UBA) in the northeastern province of Misiones, the small complex of buildings has been thrown into the limelight once again, surrounded by as much conviction as ever before.

The team investigating the ruins believes the stone structures, which allegedly date back to the 1940s, were built as a hideout for leading Nazis in preparation for defeat in the Second World War.

Coins and porcelain

Almost exactly 70 years since the end of the six-year war, the ruined buildings now stand hidden beneath wild vines and thick undergrowth.

Among the remains, researchers from the UBA's Center for Urban Archaeology (CAU) found objects which alluded to links with Nazi Germany, including German coins minted between 1938 and 1944, and fragments of porcelain marked with "Made in Germany" which also dated from the same time period.

German coins
Crudely chiseled into one of the walls is a huge swastika - the sign most closely associated to the Nazi dictatorship which resulted in the deaths of some 11 million people across Europe, including 6 million Jews.

Preparation for defeat

"We can find no other explanation as to why anyone would build these structures, at such great effort and expense, at a site which at that time was totally inaccessible, away from the local community, with material which is not typical of the regional architecture," archeological team leader Daniel Schavelzon told Argentinean newspaper Clarin.

"Apparently, halfway through the Second World War, the Nazis had a secret project of building shelters for top leaders in the event of defeat Ė inaccessible sites, in the middle of deserts, in the mountains, on a cliff or in the middle of the jungle like this," Schavelzon said.

Dubious evidence

The lack of evidence and documentation regarding the ruins, however, has forced historians to question the truth behind the overgrown house.

"There were many Germans in Argentina during the Second World War," University of Jena historian Daniel Stahl told DW.

"There was economic trade. Therefore its by no means strange that German coins and goods from this period have emerged in Argentina.

"These theories are not scientifically proven," Stahl added.

'Nazi refuge' in Argentina
Similarly, Buenos Aires-based author and historian Uki Goni, told DW categorically that the ruins were not those of a Nazi hideout.

"This is just another part in the myth," Goni said.

"For about 10 years there has been a sign saying that Martin Bormann lived here, and of course that's not true either as Bormann also died in Berlin.

"We have no proof that those coins weren't dropped there by somebody who was keen to get some more tourist up there so they can make a little bit more money," Goni added.

'Nazi refuge'

Schavelzon, however, said the ruins, which he described as a "refuge for the Nazi hierarchy," would have been in an ideal location - just 10 minutes away from bordering Paraguay where they could easily escape to if necessary.

Despite the Nazis defeat in May 1945, leaders of the German, Croatian Ustasha and Italian regimes were able to live openly in Argentina under the blessing of then-President Juan Peron.

"When the war was over some useful Germans helped us build our factories and make the best use of what we had and in time they were able to help themselves too," Peron said at the time.

Abraham Zylberman, a historian at the Holocaust Museum Buenos Aires, also said, that the assumptions of Schavelzon and his team must first be proved. He acknowledged, however, that for experts, such a discovery would be extremely valuable and unique.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Pre-Planned Economic 9/11 - Global Financial Conspiracy All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group