FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Is Climate Change really man-made?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 61, 62, 63
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The Bigger Picture
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can any scoffers PLEASE explain the picture in this link?
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/44g.png

No, I didn't think so.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James O'Neill
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 44
Location: Brisbane Australia

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is your point exactly? The map merely shows below average temperatures for most of the continental US and above average for the south east and Alaska for a limited time period. It neither proves nor disproves anything about global climate change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

James O'Neill wrote:
What is your point exactly? The map merely shows below average temperatures for most of the continental US and above average for the south east and Alaska for a limited time period. It neither proves nor disproves anything about global climate change.


OK, point taken; I should have put at least part of the article in, so here it is: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/2016/12/

'...... A Massive Engineered Winter Chemical Cool-Down Assault On The US Population Is Coming

The latest NOAA long term forecast map below should be alarming to any that take the time to examine it closely. The latest theatrically named "winter storm" from power structure owned "The Weather Channel" was "Winter Storm Fortis". This engineered event pushed warmer than average moisture from the Atlantic Ocean over northern parts of New England where many regions saw chemically nucleated snow fall (facilitated by geoengineering jet aircraft dispersions of materials over precipitation zones) at far above freezing temperatures. "Winter Storm Gregory" will be named as part of the engineered winter scenario I am outlining in this article. Alaska, the Arctic, and parts of Florida are forecasted (scheduled) to remain at, or return to, record warmth. The arctic as a whole remains in a meltdown scenario while weather whiplash continues in the US and countless other locations around the globe. Engineering winter has long since been business as usual in many countries.

44g

The projected (scheduled) record cold zone for much of the US comes after the warmest autumn in the US since record keeping began.

When endothermic reacting (toxic) ice nucleating materials are utilized on a massive scale for climate intervention/modification programs, convection is greatly impacted, too many condensation nuclei are present, and precipitation is generally greatly reduced (from what it would have otherwise been) in the core of the engineered chemical cool-down zones. The NOAA precipitation forecast (scheduled weather) map below is for the same window of time as the NOAA map above. It is not hard to recognize that the regions scheduled to get the greatest percentage of above normal precipitation are also generally the regions that are scheduled to experience the greatest above normal temperatures ("A" refers to above normal precipitation on the NOAA maps, "B" is below normal).

44d

In the NOAA map above we should ask this, how does moisture flowing in from the Pacific migrate directly over the Western States with far below normal precipitation? Then, as the moisture continues to flow east (further from the epicenter of the engineered cool-down zone), precipitation transitions to above normal. Why aren't NOAA and NWS personnel speaking out? An illegal federal gag order has been placed on them on all NOAA and NWS employees.

Global temperature deviations in the Average Temperature Anomaly map below tell the bigger picture story. The extremely blotchy composition of hot and cold zones should be alarming to us all. Though the planet is descending into a state of total meltdown, the climate engineers continue to attempt radical (and highly toxic) chemical/biological ice nucleation cool-downs anywhere and everywhere that conditions will permit this process to be carried out. NASA has also long since been a part of the ice nucleation experimentation, some of the elements utilized for this purpose are synthesized urea, and E-coli.

44a

The weather modification chemical cool-downs create a cold, dense (but shallow) layer of air that settles down to the surface and lowers temperatures on the ground. This process is essential for the manipulation of climate perspectives. The engineered winter events are used to create and expand division and confusion in the population in regard to the true state of the global climate.

Massive air mass manipulation is also accomplished with engineered high and low pressure zones. The use of ionosphere heater facilities like HAARP are the a primary factor with this type of manipulation.

44f

Extremely anomalous weather/climate patterns have now become the norm. Global climate engineering operations have completely derailed the Earth's natural climate system.

Meteorologists at The Weather Channel have already admitted to the highly unusual weather pattern that is helping to facilitate the coming abnormal cool-down on a rapidly warming world. High pressure ridges will remain locked anomalously in place on both sides of the North American continent. This configuration will assist with robbing what cold air there is in the Arctic, and will push this air south in an almost perfect outline that will cover the land mass of the lower 48 states.

The ability the climate engineers now have to manipulate Earth's life support systems is far beyond alarming. Geoengineering is nothing short of weather warfare.

Again, how do flows of moisture coming from the west off of record warm global oceans create temperatures that are predicted (scheduled) to be nearly 40 degrees below normal in regions only slightly inland? What is the final product of the the climate engineering chemically ice nucleated cool-down for the US? Radically lowered engineered temperatures at ground level in parts of the US will accompany the start to the new year. The US media will hype and dramatize this completely engineered cool-down. This will obscure the previous climate headlines of the warmest autum on record in the US and also the fact that 2016 will be the warmest year yet recorded on planet Earth since record keeping began. We will soon see if the climate enigneers are actually able to achieve the level and duration of cooldown that they are attempting to carry out. ....'

But I would have thought just seeing such anomalies would be enough to realise 'something stinks in the State of Denmark'....

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 1:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arctic ice melt 'already affecting weather patterns where you live right now':
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/dec/19/arctic-ice-melt-al ready-affecting-weather-patterns-where-you-live-right-now

'Soaring Arctic temperatures strongly linked to recent extreme weather events, say scientists at cutting edge of climate change research.

The dramatic melting of Arctic ice is already driving extreme weather that affects hundreds of millions of people across North America, Europe and Asia, leading climate scientists have told the Guardian.

Severe snowmageddon winters are now strongly linked to soaring polar temperatures, say researchers, with deadly summer heatwaves and torrential floods also probably linked. The scientists now fear the Arctic meltdown has kickstarted abrupt changes in the planets swirling atmosphere, bringing extreme weather in heavily populated areas to the boil.

The northern ice cap has been shrinking since the 1970s, with global warming driving the loss of about three-quarters of its volume so far. But the recent heat in the Arctic has shocked scientists, with temperatures 33C above average in parts of the Russian Arctic and 20C higher in some other places.

In November, ice levels hit a record low, and we are now in uncharted territory, said Prof Jennifer Francis, an Arctic climate expert at Rutgers University in the US, who first became interested in the region when she sailed through it on a round-the-world trip in the 1980s.

These rapid changes in the Arctic are affecting weather patterns where you live right now, she said. In the past you have had natural variations like El Nio, but they have never happened before in combination with this very warm Arctic, so it is a whole new ball game.

It is inconceivable that this ridiculously warm Arctic would not have an impact on weather patterns in the middle latitudes further south, where so many people live.

Its safe to say [the hot Arctic] is going to have a big impact, but its hard to say exactly how big right now. But we are going to have a lot of very interesting weather were not going to get around that one......'


Nothing happening here, folks; get back to the footie and 'Britains Got Talent'. Pass the bottle, Paddy!

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
James O'Neill
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 44
Location: Brisbane Australia

PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you, Outsider. I. Would take some persuading to be convinced that climate manipulation (that I accept happens) is sufficient to explain the scale of the phenomenon being observed. That we are undergoing massive changes is also in my view incontestable. Isn't the big question: what is the appropriate policy response?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

James O'Neill wrote:
Thank you, Outsider. I. Would take some persuading to be convinced that climate manipulation (that I accept happens) is sufficient to explain the scale of the phenomenon being observed. That we are undergoing massive changes is also in my view incontestable. Isn't the big question: what is the appropriate policy response?


Regarding persuasion, I'm certainly not in the best position to do that. I suggest you read through some of the back articles in Geoengineering Watch. Dane Wiggington may come across as a 'Doom and Gloom' old-style preacher man, but his info is pukka, makes sense to me, anyhow.
Then read the USAF Military Document 'Owning the Weather in 2025.
Watch 'Geoengineering Whistleblower ~ Ex-Military ~ Kristen Meghan, Hauppauge, NY, January 18th, 2014':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHm0XhtDyZA , a short but hard-hitting 21 minute video.

And start to 'Look Up'; start to notice strange anomalies, like multiple equi-distant parallel lines which frequently become apparent at certain times in the day, mainly mornings and evenings. In reality they are there all the time, but only become apparent when the sun is in certain positions and highlights them. They are not, of course, as bright as newly formed Chemtrails, which show whatever the sun's position.
I have counted around thirty at a time, which indicates to me a deliberate spreading by military or military contracted spraying aircraft, working to computer guided routes.
And strange 120* turns (even close to 90* occasionally).
And of course there are a whole mess of patents for all the spray equiptment to deliver the aerosol sprays.

As for the 'Isn't the big question: what is the appropriate policy response?', it obviously has to be exposure of what these Luciferian a**holes are doing to us and the planet.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sat Jan 07, 2017 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, January 7, 2017':
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-watch-global-alert-n ews-january-7-2017/?inf_contact_key=a663fcfdf6fb44118832645b77a47810ac 55ea18267d5ed0a73fcba038f32091


'....Government deception, media deception, climate science mass omission, and an unfortunately large percentage of populations that are generally more interested in fueling their own ideology than finding facts. Record high US stock market numbers are accompanied by massive layoffs, what's wrong with this picture? It has recently again been over 50 degrees colder in the lower 48 states than at the North Pole, how can that be? Global shipping is crashing, ship building contractors are laying off, but the US military can still afford 126 Billion dollar submarines. More recent earthquakes in Japan may have further accelerated the massive Fukushima radiation releases, is this why the US EPA is trying to secretly raise the "safe limits" of radiation in our water supplies to levels that are 10,000 times higher than the already far too high limits? Power structure propaganda stories about Russian hacking remain as dubious as ever and were officially retracted by some sources, but the damage is done and most US citizens have already been deceived. In the meantime, global forests continue to die and the biosphere as a whole continues to crash, what's next? The latest issue of Global Alert News is below.....'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16920
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not everyone agrees on when the Mini Ice Age began
Most say beginning of the 14th Century
1300 for when warm summers stopped being dependable in Northern Europe

Sorry, its wikipedia


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Exxon deliberately misled public on climate science, say researchers':
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/aug/24/exxon-deliberately-mi sled-public-on-climate-science-say-researchers?

'ExxonMobil has knowingly misled the public for decades about the danger climate change poses to a warming world and the oil giants long-term viability, according to a peer-reviewed study.

An analysis of nearly 200 documents spanning decades found that four-fifths of scientific studies and internal memos acknowledged global warming was real and caused by humans.

At the same time a similar proportion of hundreds of paid editorials in major US newspapers over the same period cast deep doubt on these widely accepted facts.

The study also cites ExxonMobil calculations that capping global warming at under 2C the goal enshrined in the landmark Paris climate accord would impose sharp limits on the amount of fossil fuels that could be burned, and thus potentially affect the firms growth.

Both findings are relevant to ongoing investigations by state and federal attorneys general, along with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on whether the company deceived investors on how it accounts for climate change risk.

The new study was published on Wednesday in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

Earlier reporting by InsideClimate News unearthed the internal documents and came to much the same conclusion.

In response, the company the largest oil producer in the United States, with revenue of $218bn last year denied having led a four-decade disinformation campaign........'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
insidejob
Validated Poster
Validated Poster


Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 475
Location: North London

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:27 am    Post subject: New study finds the Medieval Warming Period Reply with quote

https://www.spectator.com.au/2017/08/big-data-finds-the-medieval-warm- period-no-denial-here/
Big data finds the Medieval Warm Period no denial here
Jennifer Marohasy

According to author Leo Tolstoy, born at the very end of the Little Ice Age, in quite a cold country:
Quote:
The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he already knows, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.


So, our new technical paper in GeoResJ (vol. 14, pages 36-46) will likely be ignored. Because after applying the latest big data technique to six 2,000 year-long proxy-temperature series we cannot confirm that recent warming is anything but natural what might have occurred anyway, even if there was no industrial revolution.

Over the last few years, Ive worked with Dr John Abbot using artificial neural networks (ANN) to forecast monthly rainfall. We now have a bunch of papers in international climate science journals showing these forecasts to be more skilful than output from general circulation models.
During the past year, weve extended this work to estimating what global temperatures would have been during the twentieth century in the absence of human-emission of carbon dioxide.

We began by deconstructing the six-proxy series from different geographic regions series already published in the mainstream climate science literature. One of these, the Northern Hemisphere composite series begins in 50 AD, ends in the year 2000, and is derived from studies of pollen, lake sediments, stalagmites and boreholes.

Typical of most such temperature series, it zigzags up and down while showing two rising trends: the first peaks about 1200 AD and corresponds with a period known as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), while the second peaks in 1980 and then shows decline. In between, is the Little Ice Age (LIA), which according to the Northern Hemisphere composite bottomed-out in 1650 AD. (Of course, the MWP corresponded with a period of generally good harvests in England when men dressed in tunics and built grand cathedrals with tall spires. It preceded the LIA when there was famine and the Great Plague of London.)
Ignoring for the moment the MWP and LIA, you might want to simply dismiss this temperature series on the basis it peaks in 1980: it doesnt continue to rise to the very end of the record: to the year 2000?

In fact, this decline is typical of most such proxy reconstructions derived from pollen, stalagmites, boreholes, coral cores and especially tree rings. Within mainstream climate science the decline after 1980 is referred to as the divergence problem, and then hidden.

In denial of this problem, leading climate scientists have been known to even graft temperature measurements from thermometers onto the proxy record after 1980 to literally hide the decline. Phil Jones, the head of the Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia, aptly described the technique as a trick.

Grafting thermometer data onto the end of the proxy record generally fixes the problem after 1980, while remodelling effectively flattens the Medieval Warm Period.

There are, however, multiple lines of evidence indicating it was about a degree warmer across Europe during the MWP corresponding with the 1200 AD rise in our Northern Hemisphere composite. In fact, there are oodles of published technical papers based on proxy records that provide a relatively warm temperature profile for this period. This was before the Little Ice Age when it was too cold to inhabit Greenland.

The modern inhabitation of Upernavik, in north west Greenland, only began in 1826, which corresponds with the beginning of the industrial age. So, the end of the Little Ice Age corresponds with the beginning of industrialisation. But did industrialisation cause the global warming? Tolstoys intelligent man would immediately reply: But yes!
In our new paper in GeoResJ, we make the assumption that an artificial neural network remember our big data/machine learning technique trained on proxy temperatures up until 1830, would be able to forecast the combined effect of natural climate cycles through the twentieth century.
Using the proxy record from the Northern Hemisphere composite, decomposing this through signal analysis and then using the resulting component sine waves as input into an ANN, John Abbot and I generated forecasts for the period from 1830 to 2000.

Our results show up to 1C of warming. The average divergence between the proxy temperature record and our ANN projection is just 0.09 degree Celsius. This suggests that even if there had been no industrial revolution and burning of fossil fuels, there would have still been warming through the twentieth century to at least 1980, and of almost 1C.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, relying on General Circulation Models, and giving us the Paris Accord, also estimates warming of approximately 1C, but claims this is all our fault (human caused).
For more information, including charts and a link to the full paper read Jennifer Marohasys latest blog post, http://jennifermarohasy.com/2017/08/recent-warming-natural/
Illustration: Detail from Peasants before an Inn, Jan Steen, The Mauritshuis Royal Picture Gallery, The Hague.
-end-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see; we can pump and spray noxious pollutants into the atmosphere (to give perspective, the atmosphere in scaled-down terms is like a paint layer on a basketball), yet moderates the UVA,B & C and other frequencies (in other words what allows for any kind of life on earth).
We (puny humanity) couldn't POSSIBLY screw that up, could we???
Ask the bees, whales, butterflies, ladybirds, birds, all the rapidly extinct and going extinct species.
Ask the indigenous people, if you can find any; they know the answer to working with nature, and what occurs when you don't.
Think of the Sahara, Egypt, Pacific Islands; denuded of trees for 'grandiose schemes' (Pyramids, statues) and now largely wastelands.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
item8
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 959

PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We're doomed - we're all doomed!!

Give Al gore all your money and he might just save us.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'How NASA is CAUSING the Carnage In Texas':
http://thecontrail.com/video/video/show?id=4744723%3AVideo%3A832070&xg s=1&xg_source=msg_share_video

More info to follow!

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16920
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More on the iffy-looking reports of Professor Lewandowsky - copied over from the Princess Diana thread


Prof Lewandowsky published a paper called NASA faked the Moon Landing therefore (climate Science is a hoax.

This got a lot of media attention, the Guardian’s take on it.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2012/jul/27/climate-scept ics-conspiracy-theorists

Monbiot of course loved it.



Whether or not climate sceptic blog readers are more/less likely to believe in conspiracy theories than the general public, is not my point. It is whether this paper, with this data, actually show it


The title was very provocative, despite only 3 people ‘believing; the title (an anon internet survey) Even if you ignore the all criticism of the paper entirely, and take it at face value 99.7% of people that read those climate blogs did NOT believe in the moon conspiracy.. and had very low numbers for Diana, Aids and other conspiracies. In fact lower % believing conspiracies than the general public.



There were years worth of blog battles about this, including Lewandowsky own blog, but let’s put that to one side.



Some social scientist did have a look at it, and used it as an example (amongst others) of what is wrong with social psychology.



Prof Lee Jussim (Rutgers, social Psychology)..
(peer reviewed paper)

http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~jussim/Jussim%20et%20al,%202016,%20High%20 Moral%20Purposes,%20Sydney.pdf



"The implication that climate skeptics believe in the faking of the moon landing is another phantom fact. Out of over 1,145 respondents, there was a grand total of 10 who believed the moon landing was faked. Among the 134 participants that 'rejected climate science" only THREE people 2% endorsed the moon landing hoax. The link asserted in the title of the paper did not exists in the sample."



"...The notion that skeptics believed something so silly as faking of the moon landing is yet another myth essentially concocted by the researchers" Jussim



Another paper

http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~jussim/Interps%20and%20Methods,%20JESP.pdf

(extracts)

98% of climate skeptics did not believe the Moon Landing was a hoax. Latent variable modeling masked the invalidity of the titular implication that climate skeptics tend to believe in silly conspiracy theories. The invalidity of this conclusion cannot be found in the structural equation model results; it can, however, be found in the simple distribution of responses. In the sample of 1145, only ten participants endorsed the moon-landing hoax. Of the 134 who believed climate science was a hoax, only three endorsed the moon-landing hoax (on a four-point scale of Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree, we are treating both “agree and “strongly agree responses as agreement). Thus, almost no one, including those who rejected climate science, believed the moon landing was a hoax. The abstract reported that “Endorsement of free markets also predicted the rejection of other established scientific findings, such as the facts that HIV causes AIDS and that smoking causes lung cancer. However, only 16 participants in their sample of 1145 rejected the fact that HIV causes AIDS, and only 11 participants rejected the fact that smoking causes lung cancer. There were 176 free market endorsers in their sample. Nine of them rejected the HIVAIDS link, and seven of them rejected the smokinglung cancer link. Thus, 95% and 96% of free market endorsers agreed with those scientific facts. The structural equation modeling performed was a sophisticated set of analyses (Lewandowsky et al., 2013). Interpretations of such analyses as evidence that climate skeptics believe in silly conspiracy theories conflate the sign of the correlational results with participants' actual placement on the items. “



There is no evidence here that people who believe global warming is a hoax were also more likely to believe the moon landing was faked. Also, these data are so skewed, and have so few response options, that it is not clear that the type of structural equation models used in the original report are appropriate.



but too few people actually believed in hoaxes to warrant reaching any conclusions about them. Similar patterns occurred for the other conspiracy beliefs



Prof Lee Jussim

https://www.psychologytoday.com/experts/lee-jussim-phd



Quillete article about this here:

http://quillette.com/2015/12/04/rebellious-scientist-surprising-truth- about-stereotypes/



"...Jussim pointed out that the level of obfuscation the authors went to, in order to disguise their actual data, was intense. Statistical techniques appeared to have been chosen that would hide the study’s true results. And it appeared that no peer reviewers, or journal editors, took the time, or went to the effort of scrutinizing the study in a way that was sufficient to identify the bold misrepresentations.



While the authors’ political motivations for publishing the paper were obvious, it was the lax attitude on behalf of peer reviewers Jussim suggested that was at the heart of of the problems within social psychology." Quillete



Social psychologist Dr Jose Duarte's wrote a less tactful criticism of the Nasa faked the moon landing paper, prior to the above papers (he is a co-author on Lee’s papers above) It is well worth a read to get how shocked how bad he thought the paper was.

http://www.joseduarte.com/blog/more-fraud



Duarte:

“Therefore, the title is false. That's a big problem. (We shouldn't decompose those 10 people, and I do so only out of illustrative necessity the title would be nuts even if the majority of the 10 believed climate science was a hoax.) The title is not only false, it declares the opposite relationship suggested by the authors' trivial data for it. If the authors meant to say something about moon hoaxism based those 10 people, a more accurate title, given their data, would be: "NASA Faked the Moon LandingTherefore (Climate) Science is Reliable."

The title being wildly false is bad enough, but it's made worse by the fact that it slanders millions of people as believing that the moon landing was a hoax. They don't believe any such thing, according to the authors' own data. Slandering one's participants is a serious ethical breach.

That should be enough to retract it was just made up. No scientist should ever get away with that, with just making stuff up under the banner of science. But there's more...



In 2012, the paper had lot's of media coverage, not surprising sceptics made lots of critical comments, which prompted Prof Lewandowsky to amend his ethics approval and research the responses of his critics, for a paper called Recursive Fury, this had lots of complaints, mainly ethical and was retracted. A new paper was then published called Recurrent Fury. (but those two papers stories are even longer)



TonyGosling wrote:
By email
Winchester University Diana death study
- massaging the data to show false results
- suggesting people who believe Diana was murdered
- are incoherent and even crazy?




Hi Tony

Here is the dataset from Dr Michael Wood. I've also attached his paper.

Check the study 1 raw data for yourself.
No individual 2nd yr psychology undergraduate (av. age 20.3 yrs, 4/5ths female) student of the 137 students surveyed believed in mutually contradictory

Princess Di Dead AND alive conclusion of the paper.

S Mcintyre's analysis appears to be completely correct.

https://climateaudit.org/2013/11/07/more-false-claims-from-lewandowsky  /

As far as I'm aware, this is the only paper that has this conclusion.

Best Regards

Barry Woods

Looking at the other results, I'd be a bit concerned about all the conspiracies these students do believe in!


From: Michael.Wood
Sent: 18 January 2016 13:13
To: Barry Woods
Subject: RE: Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories.

Ah, apologies, didn't see the request for the data in your first email here it is.

Best regards,

Dr. Michael Wood
Department of Psychology
University of Winchester
office: HJB 211



From: Barry Woods
Sent: 18 January 2016 12:03
To: Michael Wood
Subject: Re: Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories.

Many Thanks

Can I download the responses to both studies from an archive somewhere?
If not could you send me an official copy of both studies responses?

I recently looked up a Yougov survey on the Diana conspiracy, and was actually rather surprised to find a very high percentage of UK public (across demographics, ages, genders) ‘believed’ in a Diana conspiracy.
https://yougov.co.uk/news/2013/09/17/38-brits-princess-dianas-death-wa s-not-accident/

And, I also wondered how psychology undergraduates compared with general public.

And with reference to one of your other papers there might be a hypothesis to why sometimes a 'conspiracy theorist' label are damaging and some not. Because of relative belief amongst the general public. If say 40-50% of public think Diana conspiracy at least plausible even if not believe it likely themselves, then not against the public opinion, and not damaging to be called a conspiracy theorist.

Whereas someone saying the moon landing (or 911, chemtrails, fluoride, etc) was a conspiracy the label ‘conspiracy theorists’ sticks as damaging, because those people in the public view are obviously nuts (ie a very low % of public believe that conspiracy, or that it is remotely plausible)

There is a danger of course, random members of public when presented with question like these may be casually responding in a manner of that it is plausible, but not an actual belief.

So your paper, which has a 7 point scale might suggest a 7 would be a very strong believer in a conspiracy, vs someone answering with a 5 as a ‘plausible’. Exit interviews would help of course, sometime people tick the wrong box, or think they can’t put all 4s, etc,etc

Thanks again

Barry Woods


From: Michael.Wood
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 11:33 AM
To: Barry Woods
Subject: RE: Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories.

Dear Mr Woods,

Please find attached the study materials, as requested (Study 1 on pages 1-3, Study 2 on pages 4-5). There was also a consent form attached but I don’t have a copy handy at the moment. The wording was fairly generic, in any case, and didn’t have any specific instructions for answering the questions.

Best regards,

Dr. Michael Wood
Department of Psychology
University of Winchester
office: HJB 211
t: +44 (0)1962 826390





From: Barry Woods
Sent: 14 January 2016 16:35
To: Michael.Wood
Subject: Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories.

Dear Dr Wood

I am in the process of obtaining data to submit a comment to the journal Psychological Science, at the invitation of Prof Stephen Lindsay the current editor.

The paper in Psychological Science that I’m responding cites your paper - Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories.

Would it be possible for you to supply me with the material provided to the students in Study 1 and Study 2, ie the actual questionnaire as shown to the students in Study 1, any advice given to both sets of students and the Bin Laden articles mentioned in the paper. As these materials may, or may not support a possibility I am considering to include in my response.

The actual responses to Study 1 and Study 2 would also be very useful.

Best Regards and thanks in advance

Barry Woods



University of Winchester, a private charitable company limited by guarantee in England and Wales number 5969256.
Registered Office: Sparkford Road, Winchester, Hampshire SO22 4NR
175th Signature

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Weather derivative': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_derivative

Could be a nice little earner if you are on the inside and know what the Chemtrailers and HAARP have on the menu for us.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Geoengineered Winter Weather, The Chemical Ice Nucleation Factor':
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineered-winter-weather-the-ch emical-ice-nucleation-factor/

Do any 'skeptics' have an explanation for the spherical ice balls?

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'CLEARING UP CLIMATE CONFUSION':
http://www.momscleanairforce.org/climate-confusion-factsheet/?autologi n=true&utm_source=moms-clean-air-force

Simple explanations from ordinary folk.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
item8
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 959

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Usual "explanations" for simple minded folk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Give me 'simple minded' folk any day over the 'Experts'.
These people are mostly mothers; they know the dangers their kids are in, and are doing something about it, not sitting back and 'having an opinion' about it.

Ever wondered how difficult it is to get a device to accurately measure UVC?
Well, it could be that according to the 'Experts', PTB and their stooges the MSM etc., no UVC should get through the upper atmosphere.
But it has been shown to do so in California, and I'm sure it does in many more places, especially Australia and similar latitudes.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2018 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Humans Didnt Exist the Last Time there was this Much CO2 in the Air':
https://countercurrents.org/2018/05/09/humans-didnt-exist-the-last-tim e-there-was-this-much-co2-in-the-air/

'...In little more than a century of frenzied fossil-fuel burning, we humans have altered our planets atmosphere at a rate dozens of times faster than natural climate change. Carbon dioxide is now more than 100 ppm higher than any direct measurements from Antarctic ice cores over the past 800,000 years, and probably significantly higher than anything the planet has experienced for at least 15 million years. That includes eras when Earth was largely ice-free.

Not only are carbon dioxide levels rising each year, they are accelerating. Carbon dioxide is climbing at twice the pace it was 50 years ago. Even the increases are increasing.

Thats happening for several reasons, most important of which is that were still burning a larger amount of fossil fuels each year. Last year, humanity emitted the highest level of greenhouse gas emissions in history even after factoring in the expansion of renewable energy. At the same time, the worlds most important carbon sinks our forests are dying, and therefore losing their ability to pull carbon dioxide out of the air and store it safely in the soil. The combination of these effects means we are losing ground, and fast....'

But Trump has a plan - stop monitoring Co2 levels; almost as good as Obama stopping radiation monitoring after the Fukushima meltdown, or 'W' Bush threatening to fine Americans $100 if they didn't leave their fridge and freezer doors open to counter global warming (OK, so I made the last one up):
'As CO2 Levels Soar Past Troubling 410 ppm Threshold, Trump Kills NASA Carbon Monitoring Program':
https://countercurrents.org/2018/05/12/as-co2-levels-soar-past-troubli ng-410-ppm-threshold-trump-kills-nasa-carbon-monitoring-program/

'...As climate scientists continue to warn about the global consequences of rising levels of CO2 and other greenhouse gasessuch as more intense and frequent extreme weather eventsthe Trump administration has pursued a multi-pronged anti-science agenda that includes rolling back regulations that aim to limit emissions and blocking future research....'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2018 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Did Israel steal Irans clouds? Tehran looks for source of suspicious climate change': https://www.rt.com/news/431583-israel-iran-no-clouds/

I would say, highly likely it was the US with Chemtrails and HAARP.
Syria also had a bad drought before the 2011 mercenary-backed armed insurrection began.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16920
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We are entering a Grand Solar Minimum (GSM). The sun's radiance will be lessened as it was during
the Maunder and Dalton Minimums. But how do we explain weird weather like record heat and droughts?

The magnetosphere of the sun and the earth is reduced. This allows the Jet Stream to wander about giving
us all strange weather patterns, such as, pushing warm air from the Caribbean in your direction. However,
there is another more serious problem. The reduced magnetosphere allows more cosmic rays to strike the
earth. This has been correlated with increased volcanic activity and earthquakes. In 1816 we had a "Year
without a summer" because a volcano in Indonesia sent so much ash into the air that it blocked sunlight

in the northern hemisphere in 1816. If that happened today, we would lose two billion or more people due
to decreased food production. I would recommend buying seeds to sprout indoors in apartments. If you
have land, I would recommend greenhouses. Also for droughts you need to read up on Mycorrhizal fungi.
They take water and nutrients from some distance away to your plant's roots in exchange for sugars the
plant produces in photosynthesis. Dr Elaine Ingham once said that a leaf in a 100 foot tall tree (30.5 meters)
can send a signal down to the tree's roots for calcium. An exchange is made, sugar for calcium. And the

calcium is sent up to the leaf. The 200 foot round trip takes 90 seconds. The point is that using a plough to
farm disturbs the soil and kills the fungi. You cannot afford to kill fungi in a drought. No Till farming is growing

in popularity around the world.



I wrote previously about the US entering WW I with the stated goal of prolonging the war in order to bankrupt
Britain, France and Russia. This was according to Lamont Thompson, a business partner of J P Morgan.
He made the statement at a public meeting of businessmen in Philadelphia in 1915 according to the
book America's 60 Families written by Ferdinand Lundberg.


I would like to share my views on the Mideast. I wrote this article:


Iran Waits With Mach 14 Missiles While The US Collapses


https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2018/07/30/iran-waits-with-mach-14-miss iles-while-the-us-collapses/


Some in Britain have mistakenly assumed I am a racist because I oppose Israel. My opposition to
Israel is based on my opposition to war not on racial animosity.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5910
Location: East London

PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'How Feedback Loops Are Driving Runaway Climate Change':
https://truthout.org/articles/how-feedback-loops-are-driving-runaway-c limate-change/

'...Dr. Peter Wadhams is a world-renowned expert who has been studying Arctic sea ice for decades.

His prognosis for the Arctic sea ice is grim: He says it is in its death spiral.

Multi-year ice is now much less than 10 percent of the area of the ice cover; it was 60 percent or more before 2000, Dr. Wadhams told Truthout. [Sea ice] extent in summer is down to 50 percent of its value in the 1980s.

Dr. Wadhams, who is also the President of the International Association for the Physical Sciences of the Ocean (IAPSO), noted that this primary feedback loop is much further along than most of us realize.

I see the summer sea ice disappearing by the early 2020s, Wadhams said. He noted that the change of albedo (a measure of reflection of solar radiation) due to the loss of sea ice and snowline retreat across the Arctic is sufficient to add 50 percent to the warming effect of CO2 emissions alone.

Alarmingly, on August 21, Arctic scientists told The Guardian that the oldest and strongest sea ice in the Arctic had broken up for the first time in recorded history. One of them described the event as scary, in part because it occurred off the north coast of Greenland, which is normally frozen year-round. The region has long been believed to be the last ice area: It was thought, at least until now, to be the final place that would hold out against the melting impacts from an increasingly warmer planet....'

'..Dr. Leifer warned that as these processes continue and the Arctic continues to heat up faster than the tropics, the pole-equator temperature difference that controls our weather and causes three major weather circulation cells tropical, mid-latitude, and arctic will merge into a single weather cell. A similar merging of weather cells occurred during the time of the dinosaurs....'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2606
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is Climate Change Really Man Made? Bristol University Dr Jo House versus sceptic Piers Corbyn

Link

Is Climate Change Really Man Made? Bristol University Dr Jo House versus sceptic Piers Corbyn https://youtu.be/vgX4YY3cXhA

Is Climate Change Really Man Made? Bristol Uni Climate Science Dr takes on sceptic Piers Corbyn
Series: Bristol Broadband Co-operative
Subtitle: Two strong advocates on different sides of the Man-Made Climate Change debate
Program Type: Weekly Program
Featured Speakers/Commentators:
Contributor: Bristol Broadband Co-operative [Contact Contributor]
Broadcast Restrictions: No excerpting/modifying without permission.
License: Attribution No Derivatives (by-nd)
Broadcast Advisory: No Advisories - program content screened and verified.
Summary:
Credits: Piers and Jo have a rigorous discussion about the strength of evidence for man made-climate change. They range around almost all related subjects such as polar ice cap cooling, the effect of sunspots, pre-industrial changes of weather, lobbying by the fossil fuel industry, historic changes in levels of CO2, as well as the knock-on effects of US president Donald Trump pulling out of the November 2016 Paris Climate accords.
Rarely do two so strong advocates on the different sides of the Man-Made Climate Change debate cover so much ground in so much detail, helping the listener, we hope, to make up their own mind based on a broad spread of opinions on one of the most vital policy issues affecting our world today.

Piers Corbyn's Weather Action predictions: http://www.weatheraction.com
The Global Warming Debate http://www.weatheraction.com/pages/pv.asp?p=wact48

Dr Jo House - Reader in Environmental Science and Policy, Bristol University
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/geography/people/jo-i-house/about.html
Impacts and mitigation of climate change in the UK - the Committee on Climate Change: https://www.theccc.org.uk
Images telling the human story of climate change: https://www.climatevisuals.org
Campaigns/what people can do: https://www.theclimatecoalition.org/
A variety of climate change information including briefings - Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit: https://www.eciu.net
The science and arguments of global warming skepticism: https://www.skepticalscience.com
Straightforward and reliable take on science and policy: https://www.carbonbrief.org/
Communicating climate change: https://www.climateoutreach.org
US National Climate Assessment : https://nca2014.globalchange.gov

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2606
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

item7 wrote:


Link

Good old David Bellamy. "I have been banned from television. They sacked Julian Pettifer and Robin Page and they are just conservationists.


David Bellamy tells of moment he was "frozen out" of BBC
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/9817181/David-Bellamy-t ells-of-moment-he-was-frozen-out-of-BBC.html
David Bellamy has described how the BBC froze him out when he dismissed global warming as poppycock.
David Bellamy has claimed his fellow conservationist David Attenborough used to be sceptical about global warming before he had a change of heart
David Bellamy insists global warming is "poppycock" Photo: REX FEATURES
By Victoria Ward - 22 Jan 2013
The 80-year old environmentalist and former broadcaster, admitted that his scepticism signalled the end of his career as he had known it.
From that moment, I really wasnt welcome at the BBC, he said.
They froze me out, because I dont believe in global warming. My career dried up. I was thrown out of my own conservation groups and I got spat at in London.
Mr Bellamy said things first began to change in 1996 when he spoke out against wind farms during one of his regular appearances on Blue Peter.
That was the beginning really, he told the Daily Mail. From that moment, I was not welcome at the BBC.

Global warming at a standstill, new Met Office figures show 08 Jan 2013
However, it was not until 2004 when he caused controversy by questioning whether the world was warming that his profile really began to slide.
I worked with the Wildlife Trusts for 52 years, he said And when they dropped me, they didnt even tell me. They didnt have the guts.
I read about it in the newspapers. Can you believe it?
Now they dont want to be anywhere near me. But what are they doing? The WWF might have saved a few pandas, but what about the forests?
What have Greenpeace done?
Mr Bellamys wife Rosemary admitted that they had both been devastated by the developments.
It did upset us terribly, she said. But we pretended not to be upset, didnt we David? The best thing to do was not to talk about it. So we didnt.
Its been very difficult, because he does feel strongly about things.
Mr Bellamy insisted that he had no regrets about being so outspoken and had not changed his opinions about global warming.
I still say its poppycock, he said. "For the last 16 years, temperatures have been going down and the carbon dioxide has been going up and the crops have got greener and grow quicker.
"Weve done plenty to smash up the planet, but theres been no global warming caused by man.
If you believe it, fine. But I dont and theres thousands like me."
He added: "Who cares if theyve put me on the back burner? I can still talk to my flowers, which are all fine and growing amazingly and say, Thank you very much, David!
The Met Office this month downgraded its forecast for global warming to suggest that by 2017 temperatures will have remained about the same for two decades.

Attenborough 'sceptical about global warming' 13 Jan 2013
Sir David Attenborough dispels any doubts 11 Nov 2011

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2606
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2019 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Finnish study finds practically no evidence for man-made climate change
https://www.rt.com/news/464051-finnish-study-no-evidence-warming/

Published time: 12 Jul, 2019 20:44
Finnish study finds practically no evidence for man-made climate change
Reuters / Charles Platiau

A new study conducted by a Finnish research team has found little evidence to support the idea of man-made climate change. The results of the study were soon corroborated by researchers in Japan.

In a paper published late last month, entitled No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic climate change, a team of scientists at Turku University in Finland determined that current climate models fail to take into account the effects of cloud coverage on global temperatures, causing them to overestimate the impact of human-generated greenhouse gasses.

Models used by official bodies such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature, the study said, adding that a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in the models.

Adjusting for the cloud coverage factor and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions, the researchers found that mankind is simply not having much of an effect on the Earths temperature.

If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice.

The studys authors make a hard distinction between the type of model favored by climate scientists at the IPCC and genuine evidence, stating We do not consider computational results as experimental evidence, noting that the models often yield contradictory conclusions.

Given the evidence presented in the study, the Finnish team rounded out the paper by concluding we have practically no anthropogenic climate change, adding that the low clouds control mainly the global temperature.

The results sharply cut against claims put forward by many environmentalists, including US lawmakers such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who argue not only that climate change is an immediate threat to the planet, but that it is largely a man-made phenomenon. Ocasio-Cortez, better known as AOC, has proposed a Green New Deal to address the supposedly dire threat.

Japanese researchers at the University of Kobe arrived at similar results as the Turku team, finding in a paper published in early July that cloud coverage may create an umbrella effect that could alter temperatures in ways not captured by current modeling.

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16920
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Aug 08, 2019 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is Climate Change a Prince Charles production

Prince Charles 'lobbied for climate policy change without disclosing offshore financial interest'
Prince's actions amount to serious conflict of interest, says former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-charles-paradis e-papers-latest-conflict-interest-offshore-finances-money-investment-a 8042736.html
Harry Cockburn
Tuesday 7 November 2017 18:15
94 comments

Click to follow
The Independent
Board members of a company the Prince of Wales invested in were reportedly sworn to secrecy over his involvement
Board members of a company the Prince of Wales invested in were reportedly sworn to secrecy over his involvement ( AP )
Prince Charles campaigned to alter climate change agreements without disclosing his estates financial interest in such a rule change, leaks from the Paradise Papers indicate.

In 2007, the Prince of Wales reportedly bought shares worth $113,500 (83,600), in a Bermuda-based company run by one of his best friends, Hugh van Cutsem. That friend was also a director of Sustainable Forestry Management, the board of which invested invested in land to protect it from deforestation.

The purchase of the shares was regarded as highly sensitive, The Guardian reports, and members of Sustainable Forestry Managements board were reportedly sworn to secrecy about the Princes involvement.

Read more

Lewis Hamilton's tax dodging revealed in Paradise Papers

Apple used Jersey for new tax haven, Paradise Papers reveal

Corbyn suggests Queen should apologise over offshore investments
The Prince of Wales has long been a vocal speaker on the issue of climate change. According to the BBC, he mounted a high profile campaign for changes to two major environmental agreements just weeks after Sustainable Forestry Management sent his office lobbying documents.

Four weeks after purchasing the shares, Prince Charles called for the Kyoto Protocol and the EUs emissions trading system to recognise carbon credits from rainforests, saying it was wrong.

In October 2007, he launched the Princes Rainforest Project, which aimed to highlight the impact of tropical deforestation. And in January 2008 he released a video in which he called for new ways of supporting rainforests.

The BBCs Panorama programme said it was unable to find any evidence of speeches made by the Prince about changing Kyoto, or EU ETS policy about rainforests, prior to purchasing the shares.

Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said the Princes actions amounted to a serious conflict of interest.

Read more

Dont let the focus on the Queen distract you from the bigger story
According to the BBC, he said: There's a conflict of interest between his own investments of the Duchy of Cornwall, and what hes trying to achieve publicly.

And I think its unfortunate that somebody of his importance, of his influence, becomes involved in such a serious conflict.

Labour MP Margaret Hodge said the revelations made clear the need for proper transparency.

She told The Guardian: It seems clear to me that Prince Charles could not have known or understood the nature of the investment in his friends company, she said.

What is clear is that there should be proper transparency of all investments made by the Duchy of Cornwall, that the Prince of Wales should not be involved in investment decisions and that the Treasury should monitor the investments to ensure that the reputation and integrity of our royal family is protected.




Prince Charles SHOCK: Carbon emissions DOUBLE in year - so much for Charles' green lecture
THE ROYAL FAMILY has released their financial reports for the year 2018 to 2019 and the carbon emissions from royal travel has doubled in a year, despite Prince Charles campaigning on climate change.
By GEORGINA LAUD
PUBLISHED: 09:03, Tue, Jun 25, 2019 | UPDATED: 09:15, Tue, Jun 25, 2019

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1144938/prince-charles-shock-carb on-emissions-royal-family-climate-change-royal-finances-news


C02 emissions for the Royal Family have increased from 1,687 in 2018 to 3,344 in 2019 - despite a 24 percent decrease in energy usage at the palace. This is an increase of a staggering 98.22 percent. The emissions in question are from business travel and were calculated using the relevant carbon conversion factors from DEFRA.

RELATED ARTICLES

The real reason taxpayer paid 2.4m to fund Meghan and Harry's home

The devastating letter Queen Elizabeth wrote after Diana's death
Officials said it was a matter of regret but stressed increased foreign travel on behalf of the Government was responsible for the rise.

One official told the Daily Mail: This is clearly linked to five major overseas visits rather than one the previous year.

On the official document detailing the royal finances, a statement on environmental sustainability from Sir Michael Stevens, Keeper of the Privy Purse reads: The Household will continue to work on improving energy efficiency, waste management, water use and other environmental impacts across the Estate.

The Household will investigate opportunities with both existing and new suppliers to further improve our combined environmental performance; including for example reducing single-use food containers at catering outlets, to achieve improvements in both material use and waste generation.

Read More: The Meghan Markle effect: Royal Family receives huge cash boost

Prince Charles SHOCK
Prince Charles SHOCK: The Prince of Wales is passionate about the environment and sustainability (Image: GETTY)
A spokesman for the Prince of Wales pointed out his emissions had risen by only two percent overall, despite his increased travel.

Prince Charles made 17 journeys costing 15,000 or more according to the royal finance report, travelling either by charter, royal train or helicopter.

Just this month Prince Charles warned it may be too late to save the planet from an impending environmental crisis.

The Prince of Wales added the increasing loss of biological diversity terrifies him and any changes are happening too slowly.

RELATED ARTICLES

Meghan Markle forces taxpayers to fork out 2.4m for home

Meghan Markle questioned over ring redesign by fans
Prince Charles SHOCK

Prince Charles SHOCK: Despite the increase, Charles' own usage has only gone up by 2 percent (Image: GETTY)
Speaking to The Daily Telegraph, the 70-year-old said: We seem to have forgotten that everything in nature is interconnected, including ourselves.

Unfortunately, the destruction is continuing at a rapid pace chemicals of every description, artificial fertilisers and antibiotics are still being used in all kinds of ways, all of them entering the rivers and going out to sea where theyre causing untold damage to the marine environment, often without people knowing it.

Whilst Charles acknowledged some of this can be resolved, he said it is really difficult to persuade people to adopt alternative ways of living to reduce their impact on the planet.

This came just days after the Prince met with US President Donald Trump, and according to the president Charles spoke at length on the topic.

Prince Charles SHOCK

Prince Charles SHOCK: Charles spoke with Mr Trump at length on climate change (Image: GETTY)
Speaking to Piers Morgan on Good Morning Britain, Mr Trump said he totally listened to Charles and that He wants to make sure future generations have climate that is good climate as opposed to a disaster, and I agree.

He said of the meeting at Clarence House: We had a 15-minute chat and it lasted an hour and a half and he did most of the talking.

But when asked if he believed in climate change himself, Mr Trump replied dismissively: I believe that there is a change in weather and I think it changes both ways.

Dont forget it used to be called global warming, that wasnt working, then its climate change, now its extreme weather.

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16920
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZERO CARBON, 5G DENIAL AND GREEN-FASCISM
October 22, 2019
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/10/22/zero-carbon-5g-denial-and-green -fascism

Zero Carbon, 5G Denial and Green-Fascism

Julian Rose, Contributor - Waking Times

Why is it that the two words ‘Zero Carbon’ send a cool shiver down my spine? Is it the ‘zero’ or is it the ‘carbon’? Or is it particularly the combination of the two?

I wasn’t sure, until I looked-up ‘zero carbon’ within a scientific context addressing greenhouse gasses, and the answer that came back was this “If there were no greenhouse gasses the average temperature on Earth would be about -18 degrees celsius”. Now I know why the cool shiver passed down my spine.

The high-profile use of this zero carbon goal, particularly via Green New Deal proponents upping the pressure on governments to follow-through their commitments to the Paris climate change treaty, carries with it the overtones of a global crusade. And the missionary zeal behind global crusades is often drummed-up by people and institutions guided by dogma rather than by conscious and humanitarian instincts for a better world.




An exploration of the roots of the ambition to achieve ‘zero carbon’ reveals a direct link to ‘climate action’/’climate emergency’ measures promoted via Extinction Rebellion, advocates of a Green New Deal and the ‘sustainable development’ edicts of the United Nation’s Agenda 21 – now renamed Agenda 2030.

All of these ‘stop global warming’ institutions/movements are heavily backed by money derived from sources that have no record of following a transparently ‘green’ commitment within their own ethos or business practices.

Now this immediately raises the question: if the backers are not ethically in line with the supposed aims of those they are funding – could those that they are funding be influenced to adapt to the values of their backers? Might they be drawn into something quite contrary to the original ideal they set out to achieve?

Well, quite obviously the answer is yes, they could. And a quick review of the fate of such organisations as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth shows that this is exactly what happened.

High ambitions of the sort embraced by Greenpeace, for example, led to it becoming embroiled in ‘the art of compromise’ for the sake of rapid growth and influence.

Very soon genuine green credentials become tainted by the influence of the corporate and/or political backers, whose funds come with the proviso to adhere to certain criteria and conditions in order for further funding to be guaranteed. It’s a trap a large number of ambitious NGO’s have fallen into and never recovered from.

The truth is that leading parties in green NGO organisations focused on a prize which conformed to the standard definition of neo-liberal globalisation ‘success’, rather than holding true to the founding principles of the organisations they were steering.

The green movement that jumped onto the band-wagon called ‘stop global warming’ has, however, got an even bigger problem to deal with, one which is far more devious than the familiar ‘art of compromise’ that has undone so many once well-intentioned movements.

This is the fact that ‘the problem’ it is addressing is an invention – not a reality. An invention pushed into prominence by the United Nation’s body called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A body with direct links to the most powerful grouping of corporate institutions on the planet with the addition of a coterie of multi millionaires determined to set the planet’s top-down ‘green’ agenda for the indefinite future.

An agenda that has little or nothing to do with the environment – and everything to do with the survival of the neo-liberal ‘big’ global economy, as admitted by Dr. Otmar Edenhofer, head of Working Group 3 of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The actual causes of climactic change – and yes, it is happening – are to be found in a composite of man-made and natural events, ranging from HAARP’s gross interference via heating-up the ionosphere, atmospheric aerosol geoengineering (chemtrails), the residues of perpetual war, natural solar activity, the Pole shift, a weakening magnetosphere, intense electro smog and ozone depletion.

CO2 making only a tiny contribution.




Zero Carbon and the Extinction Event
The Centre for Alternative Technology (CAT) is an NGO based in West Wales. It started-out in the early 1970’s as a truly innovative ‘make something out of nothing’ alternative energy and ecological life style community. A small group of entrepreneurs settled an old slate quarry at Machynlleth on the edge of Snowdonia, and built around themselves a community devoted to self-sufficiency, especially in renewable energy, where home-made wind turbines and water wheels, mostly constructed from scrap metal, powered their makeshift homes and artisan enterprises. CAT was an inspiration for many early ecological enthusiasts, many of whom (including myself) had read EF Schumacher’s iconic book ‘Small Is Beautiful’ and wanted to put into practice the human scale wisdom expressed in its pages.

The CAT community increased throughout the 1980’s and 1990’s and more eco-friendly innovations were put in place that enabled the public to get their hands onto green solutions to everyday needs. Soon people came from all over the world to learn about renewable energy and the art of human scale ecologically sustainable living.

It wasn’t until around 2000 that most of the original pioneers retired from active involvement in CAT’s development and a new breed of entrepreneur took their place. With a focus ever more geared to education, large sums of money were raised to build a state of the art rammed earth eco-friendly education centre in which officially recognised state supported training courses were put in place that enabled budding practitioners to learn the skills necessary for a general ‘greening ‘ of the wider environment.

As the global warming/climate change concept rose up the political agenda, so CAT became more and more absorbed by the edicts of the CO2 obsessed IPCC. Seeing itself as a beacon of pragmatic light in a sea of theoretical dogma, CAT’s new leadership sought to take the helm, declaring that the various suggested time frames for reduction in warming to be achieved by ‘decarbonising’ the atmosphere, were all too long and too unambitious. There was an emergency, they declared, and (initially within the context of the UK) only a ‘zero carbon by 2030’ end game could save the day.

This message was presented to the public, to government officials and to industry, with scientific documentation to back it up. Suddenly CAT was the centre of a hugely controversial arena, pitching its Zero Carbon message in amongst the list of demands forming the basis of various international climate treaties of which the Paris accord is the most recent.

But how many stopped to ask the question: what exactly is ‘Zero Carbon’?

Do CAT and the other institutions holding high this flag want us to take it literally? Is it simply a strategic way of getting the climate change agenda speeded up? What actually is going on here?

Upon closer examination the entire package is riddled with holes. A kind of madness is built into the entire process, right from the original thesis that one variable – ‘CO2’ – a clear and odorless gas that constitutes just 0.0391% of the composition of the atmosphere, could, on its own, be responsible for dangerously warming the entire planet. This, even when this proportion may be rising due to the burning of fossil fuels.

Then the notion that we should all buckle down to bring this single element ‘carbon dioxide’ down to an even smaller percentage of global atmospheric gasses, by using carbon taxes and ‘cap and trade’ regulations to force less industrialised countries of the world to slow their fossil fuel dependent economies and hobble their infrastructural development. Isn’t this simply the old colonial rule dressed in new clothes? And these two issues are, of course, just the tip of the iceberg. The real story behind the push to promote ‘stop global warming’/’climate change’ involves the fostering of a scam whose scale and deviousness has surely set a new precedent in the art of deception.

Those, like me, who deeply believe in a progressive transformation of polluting fossil fuels into decentralised human scale renewable energy solutions, are being dramatically conned; even if CAT and other environmental NGO publications suggest otherwise.

Zero Carbon is the official call we are all being told to get behind, and it is the one taken up, directly or indirectly, by Extinction Rebellion, the Greta Thunberg school of youth indoctrination, the proponents of Green New Deal and the telecoms pushing forward a blanket 5G network.

Smelling big money, politicians are happy to go along with it too. Especially since Mark Carney, director of the Bank of England, announced that any businesses that do not conform to the zero carbon ‘green’ criteria will be blocked from access to new loans, while those that do can expect high financial rewards. Yes, all the big multinational/transnational corporations are being invited to the table and are running to get the best seats. It’s a heist.

A heist, led by ‘the green movement’ itself. What an irony! The supposedly anti neo-liberal globalist movement that was supposed to point the way to a decentralised, localised and human scale form of people power, taking sound ecological practices as the foundation for a world that would finally shift ‘the god of money’ off its throne to be replaced by the cultivation of respect for the laws of nature and a human scale economy operating ‘as if people mattered’.

When one takes a serious look at the scale of our current deviation from the path of truth, it swims before one’s eyes like a virtual reality dream (nightmare). The zero carbon world we are being exalted to adapt to, when viewed through this virtual google 3D head set, reveals scenes of a fenced-off brave new world of ‘rewilded’ landscapes on the one hand – and sterile 5G driven ‘smart cities’ on the other. All of it overseen by Amazon/Google ‘Cloud’ powered smart grids monitoring and controlling an ever more dystopian robotic world, increasingly resembling a totalitarian prison camp.

Ray Kurzwell would surely feel quite at home with the ushering-in of such artificial intelligence led systems finally achieving their place as the ‘new brain’; having successfully usurped the human one.

Zero Carbon suggests to me that the cyborg 5G smart city is the Agenda 2030 ‘sustainable development’ carbon free omega point towards which we are all being ushered at brake-neck speed. With Caroline Lucas, Greta Thunberg, Gail Bradbrook, Yanis Verufakis and others leading ‘the rebellion’ while holding high the flag of a Green-Fascist New World Order.

Eco-fascism has arrived on our doorstep and its appeal has become almost irresistible to those who combine a hyped-up fear of ‘the end of the world’ with belief in the rhetoric of bought-out climatologists, ambitious fake green con men (and women) and the political figurehead puppets of the deep state.


Zero carbon has taken the lead as ‘the solution’ to an anthropogenic global warming invention whose alarmist climate rhetoric was cunningly dreamed-up by the Club of Rome some thirty-five years ago, as the perfect means of controlling the people as well as the essential political agenda of planetary life, both economic and social. By cleverly giving carbon the lead role in an extinction narrative – in which it is caste as the chief villain – the perpetrators of the myth (United Nations plc) have grabbed the headlines – insisting that this harmless, essential component of nature (CO2) is the all-time baddie that must now be reduced to zero in order to save the planet. The Putin of the biosphere.

The sheer audacity of this lie is breathtaking. Think about it.. reduce nature’s natural capital, carbon dioxide, to zero and what do you have? An extinction event. The very ‘event’ that Extinction Rebellion is, on behalf of the United Nation’s Agenda 2030, blocking the streets of London, New York, Berlin et al. to demand action against. Thereby supporting a bunch of crooks, well versed in the art of deception, to enforce their master plan for absolute control combined with a significant reduction in the world population. “Carbon must be eliminated – therefore get rid of non carbon neutral humans.”

The unknowing would never associate fascism with environmentalism, would they. They would never guess that a fake green agenda could be the Trojan horse for the final take-over. Yet the fascist take-over that failed under Hitler and Mussolini, has crept steadily and stealthily forward under the dictatorship of the giant banking fiefdoms of the past half century – and it is precisely these institutions that are now falling in line to back a Green New Deal.

Green is the colour chosen for the final great deception and that which trees and plants convert into oxygen has been cast as the ‘demiurge’ which heroic styled NGO’s are riding out to do battle with. A battle to the death, no less.

We will not all be fooled all the time, even if a majority maintain an eyes wide shut disposition to the roll-out of such a toxic agenda. The wake-up is gathering momentum at an ever accelerating rate. An instinctual resistance to the 5G microwave crowd control weapon, coupled with a plethora of reports on its egregious health affects, is acting as a powerful vector to unite people across the globe, causing all of us to recognise that this is not just about one exceptionally cruel form of eco-genocide, but the pinnacling of an underlying fear – by humanity’s oppressors – of that which stands behind love, beauty, compassion and joy. Fear that takes the form of an aggressive suppression of these primary life instincts.

As the eminent social psychiatrist Dr Erich Fromm stated, it is The Fear of Freedom that we are witnessing in the diabolic attempts to shut-down the energetic evolution of the universal life force itself.

The tables are turning. The greater the downward pressure to conform to a dead-end, slavish and robotic existence, the greater the innate inner power of opposition rises up in resistance – in those who let it. A resistance sparked by outrage – and a defiant determination to act in defence of Life.

Onward, onward, dear friends, in the midst of the darkness more and more light is shining through!


About the Author
Julian Rose is an international activist, writer, organic farming pioneer and actor. In 1987 and 1998, he led a campaign that saved unpasteurised milk from being banned in the UK; and, with Jadwiga Lopata, a ‘Say No to GMO’ campaign in Poland which led to a national ban of GM seeds and plants in that country in 2006. Julian is currently campaigning to ‘Stop 5G’ WiFi. He is the author of two acclaimed titles: Changing Course for Life and In Defence of Life. His latest book Overcoming the Robotic Mind is now available from Amazon and Dixi Books. Julian is a long time exponent of yoga/meditation. See his web site for more information www.julianrose.info

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The Bigger Picture All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 61, 62, 63
Page 63 of 63

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group