FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Toxic MMR - vaccination forced on UK toddlers
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The War On Children, Marriage and the Family
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Robert F. Kennedy Jr Drops Vaccine Truth Bomb Live On TV':
http://yournewswire.com/robert-kennedy-truth-bomb-vaccine/

'...Explaining to Tucker Carlson that this was only the second time he had ever been allowed to talk about vaccine safety on TV, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. launched into a powerful attack on the vaccine industry, comparing it to a lawless mafia state.

“The pharmaceutical industry is so powerful,” he explained. “They give $5.4 billion a year to the media. They’ve gotten rid of the lawyers, so there is no legal interest in those cases. They have really been able to control the debate and silence people like me.“

Asked how things could get this bad, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explained that in 1989 Congress granted Big Pharma “blanket legal immunity” when it comes to vaccines.

Big Pharma became a law unto themselves. They can put toxic ingredients in your vaccines, they can seriously injure your child – but you cannot sue them.

“What you have to understand is that the vaccine regimen changed dramatically around 1989. The reason it changed, Tucker, is that Congress, drowning in pharmaceutical industry money, did something they have never done for any other industry – they gave blanket legal immunity to all the vaccine companies.

“So that no matter how sloppy the line protocols, no matter how absent the quality control, no matter how toxic the ingredients, or egregious the injury to your child, you cannot sue them.

“So there’s no depositions, there’s no discovery, there’s no class action suits. All of a sudden vaccines became enormously profitable.”

The enormous profits in the unregulated industry meant Big Pharma companies raced each other to produce new and unnecessary vaccines to pump into newborn children – often dozens at a time.

“It became a gold rush for the pharmaceutical industry to add new vaccines to the spectrum.”

But at what cost? The vaccine industry, operating under their own rules – or rather, complete absence of rules – is making it impossible for us to find out the facts. President Trump has long called for an independent inquiry into vaccine safety. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is calling for the same.

“I got three vaccines and I was fully compliant. I’m 69 years old. My children got 69 doses of 16 vaccines to be compliant. And a lot of these vaccines aren’t even for communicable diseases. Like Hepatitis B, which comes from unprotected sex, or using or sharing needles – why do we give that to a child on the first day of their life? And it’s loaded with mercury.”

Tucker asked, “We do give that to children?“

“We continue to give it to them. The mercury has been taken out of three vaccines, but it remains in the flu vaccine, and it is still in vaccines all over the world. And it remains the most potent neurotoxin known to man that is not radioactive.”

“How can we inject that into a child?“

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to put the outrageous situation into context.

“If you take that vaccine vial and break it, you have to dispose of that as hazardous waste. You have to evacuate the building. Why would you take that and inject it into a child?”

But he wasn’t finished there. RJK Jr. also took aim at Bill Gates, who recently admitted that he told President Trump “there is no need” for an independent inquiry into the safety of vaccines because he has “looked at it” and they are “completely safe.”

Citing a new independent study, funded by the Danish government, which examined the safety of the Tdap vaccine when given to African children, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. left jaws on the floor when he revealed that the vaccine, pushed on African children by Gates, kills more people than the diseases it is supposed to protect against.

“Virtually every kid in Africa gets it. What they found…they did a vaccinated versus non-vaccinated study, which has never been done…what they concluded was…they said that vaccine is killing more people than Diphtheria, Pertussis, and Tetanus combined (for which the Tdap vaccinated).”

The kids who got the vaccine were “ten times more likely to die from the vaccine” in the two months following the vaccination, than those children who did not receive the vaccine.

“So we need to do these cost/benefit analyses on every vaccine.”


Tucker then asked the question that gave RFK Jr. the opportunity to explain how Big Pharma has marginalized anybody who dares raise questions about anything that could impact their massive profits:

“So why has the point that you are making, that doesn’t seem crazy, been so discredited?“

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replied: “I’m called anti-vax all the time because the pharmaceutical industry is so powerful. They give $5.4 billion a year to the media. They’ve gotten rid of the lawyers, so there is no legal interest in those cases. They have really been able to control the debate and silence people like me. So I’m really grateful to you, for having the courage to allow me on the show to talk about this. This is the second show in 10 years that has allowed me to talk about this.

“We ought to be having a responsible debate. A debate that is real, that is based on science.”

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 16007
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We brought together 60 of the world’s top health experts to bring you…
“The Truth About Vaccines”
https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/

The Truth About Vaccines 7-Day Docu Series Begins August 17th

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rGjnnxrRWg

Episode 1

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHWeJ0f_o3A

Episode 2

Link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49hAV9Y1RcQ

The History of Vaccines
Vaccination programs are given credit for eradicating some of the most devastating illnesses of the past, but they’re no longer immune to controversy of their own.

Vaccine Risks and Safety Concerns
Concerns about vaccine injuries, mercury toxicity, and autism have increased substantially in recent years, and public debate is once again heating up.

Full List of Options and Alternatives
You don’t have to pro- or anti-vaccine anymore. New options are available to guard against serious illness, based on your unique situation and risk factors.

“I Just Want Them To Be Safe”
We can all agree there’s nothing more important than the health and safety of our children…
Parents should be informed about both the benefits and the risks associated with vaccines — without pressure, propaganda, or agenda.

So we brought together more than 60 of the world’s foremost health experts to investigate both sides of this contentious debate to give you the science, the history, and the untold story… the REAL information you need to make an informed decision on how to best protect your child.

The Truth About Vaccines is a 7-episode documentary series COMING SOON. Register above and you’ll be first in line to see the whole thing for FREE – NOW Playing!

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not MMR, but Polio:

'ROTARY International argues that vaccine-derived polio, caused by polio vaccines, is somehow caused by NOT ENOUGH children being vaccinated':
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-23-rotary-international-argues-tha t-vaccine-derived-polio-caused-by-polio-vaccines-is-somehow-caused-by- not-enough-children-being-vaccinated.html

' In a superior example of the circular “logic” of mainstream medicine, Rotary International has announced that a recent polio outbreak in Syria, caused by the polio vaccine itself, could have been averted if more kids had been vaccinated. That’s right: The polio vaccine is giving kids polio, so we should be sure to vaccinate more kids as quickly as possible. Wait, what?

There are two types of polioviruses: Vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) and wild polioviruses (WPVs). While WPVs have been all but eradicated worldwide, VDPVs keep popping up all over the place.

Caused by the weakened form of the live poliovirus contained in the polio vaccine, VDPVs develop after the vaccine is ingested, replicates in the vaccinated child’s gut, and is then excreted. In poor areas like Syria, where war has resulted in compromised sanitation measures, the virus can then spread to other vulnerable children. As it circulates, the virus begins to mutate, and can eventually develop into a strain strong enough to cause paralysis. (Related: Stay in the loop with the latest developments in healthcare at Medicine.news.)

Rotary insists that if more children are vaccinated, then when the vaccine is excreted and starts spreading, it won’t be able to infect other children. While this appears logical on the surface, surely the more intelligent solution is to just not vaccinate any kids at all? Since two of the three known strains of WPVs have already been exterminated, and naturally occurring cases of WPV are few and far between, it seems illogical to insist on vaccinating hundreds of thousands of children – 355,000 little kids in Syria alone – in an attempt to prevent a disease that is now primarily only caused by the vaccine itself!..'

'Polio Paralyzes 17 Children in Syria, W.H.O. Says':
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/20/world/middleeast/syria-polio-childr en-paralyzed.html

'At least 17 children in eastern Syria have been paralyzed from a recently confirmed outbreak of polio, the World Health Organization said Tuesday, punctuating the health risks to a population ravaged by more than six years of war.

It is the second outbreak of the crippling disease to hit Syria since the war began, and largely reflected the inability of health workers to immunize all children caught in conflict zones where access is difficult and sanitation is poor.

The polio virus, once thought to verge on eradication, is one of the most contagious diseases in inadequately protected areas. One confirmed case of paralysis is considered an outbreak, as doctors assume it means up to 200 other people may have been exposed to the virus.

Tarik Jasarevic, a spokesman for the World Health Organization in Geneva, said there was an urgent need to vaccinate more than 400,000 children under the age of 5 in the Deir al-Zour area, where the outbreak was first confirmed in an announcement made by the organization on June 8. He described the outbreak as “very serious.”

Sixteen of the paralyzed children were from Mayadin, south of Deir al-Zour, and one was from farther north in Raqqa, the Syrian redoubt of the Islamic State extremist group. The entire region has been upended by fighting.'

Yes, and we can trust ISIS and the WHO to supply 'safe vaccines', can't we?

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And flu shots:
'Flu shots scientifically proven to weaken immune response in subsequent years… researchers stunned':
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-17-bombshell-flu-shots-scientifica lly-proven-to-weaken-immune-response-in-subsequent-years-researchers-s tunned.html

' A medical study conducted at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center found that women who received flu vaccines had a weakened immune system response in subsequent years.

Lisa Christian, PhD, the lead researcher on the study, concluded, “Growing evidence shows that those who received a flu shot in the prior year have lower antibody responses in the current year.”

The study proves yet again that the official narrative of the flu shot industry — and its complicit corporate-run media — is false and deliberately deceptive. Far from offering bulletproof protection, flu shots actually make people more vulnerable to influenza infections, which of course contributes to more people catching the flu and then falsely thinking they need more flu shots for “more protection.”

Yet it is the flu shots themselves that are leading to an increase in influenza infections. The flu vaccine, in other words, perpetuates the myth that flu vaccines are needed by ensuring influenza spreads more rapidly than would otherwise occur. In effect, flu vaccines spread the very infections that generate more demand for flu vaccines. The structure is a “perfect” self-perpetuating medical hoax rooted in fake science and relentless media propaganda.

In my news video below, you’ll also learn:

People who had a 2008 flu shot experienced a 250% increase in influenza infections in subsequent years.
A study published in Human & Environmental Toxicology found that mercury-laced flu vaccines caused a 4,250 percent increase in fetal deaths during the 2009 flu season.
The flu shot narrative pushed by the vaccine industry is a medical hoax that’s easily disproved by fact-based evidence.
People who get flu shots will be the first to die in an actual global pandemic because they have been made vulnerable to infections.
Watch my full video, below, for more details:.........'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'As White House appoints pro-vaccine officials, plan for safety commission appears stalled':
https://www.statnews.com/2017/08/21/trump-vaccine-commission-robert-ke nnedy/

Wonder who twisted Trump's arm?

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

'How To Suppress Vaccine Safety Concerns And Protect Financial Interests — Part One':
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2017/12/suppress-vaccine-safety-concerns- financial-interests.html?

'How to Suppress Vaccine Safety Concerns and Protect Financial Interests — Part Two':
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/suppress-vaccine-safety-concerns- protect-financial-interests-part-two/

The Big Pharma and their agents and bought scientists and lobbyists try to stop independent testing of the safety of vaccines, just as they do with microwave safety, and for the same reasons.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Aluminum in Vaccines: History and Toxicity':
https://healthfreedomidaho.org/aluminum-in-vaccines-history-and-toxici ty97
'...What scientific research or evidence do we have for an applicable “safe” limit?
In the FDA Code of Federal Regulations on TPN therapy (Total Parenteral Nutrition – the feeding of a person intravenously), it states:
“premature [newborns], who receive parenteral levels of aluminum at greater than 4 to 5 [micro]g/kg/day accumulate aluminum at levels associated with central nervous system and bone toxicity.”
And that,
“Tissue loading may occur at even lower rates of administration.”
Based on the above, it can be gathered that an exposure level of even 5 micrograms of aluminum (per kilogram body weight, per day) is a dose that would cause observable adverse effects in infants. This dose is much higher than what an experimentally determined safe limit would be. However, this is the closest thing that we have to a potential injectable reference dose for how much is approaching “unquestionably too much”....'
BUT:
'...Some calculations:
The average newborn weighs approximately 7.5lbs or 3.5kg.
“Safe limit” = 5 micrograms/kg/day
Multiply by weight of newborn: (5mcg/kg/day)(3.5kg) = 17.5 micrograms/day.
Amount of aluminum in the hepatitis B vaccine, given on the first day of life = 250 micrograms.
Demonstrably, the amount of aluminum in just one hepatitis B vaccine is over 14x the “safe limit” for how much a newborn would receive in one day.....'

And you should see the number of vaccinations babies get by the age of one year, all cumulative.
This all ties up together, its a Luciferian agenda our 'Esteemed Leaders' leading us into wars by means of 'False Flag' attacks, hoaxes and lies, and their wanton destruction of the environment, poisoning of our food with pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, GMO's, factory farming, toxic injections of livestock and so on. Their reward? Power and wealth - a crock of potage in eternity, but they figure it's worth it.

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Once Upon A Time There Were Aluminum-free Adjuvant Vaccines: What Happened?':
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/02/upon-time-aluminum-free-adjuvant- vaccines-happened.html?

'Do you realize that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines do not require clinical approval? It’s the vaccine that gets approval—that’s the technicality as delineated by various independent vaccine researchers!

That being said, aluminum is a nerve toxin with neurotoxic adverse effects and probable “cause and effect” associations for various diseases, most notably Multiple Sclerosis, where the myelin sheath is destroyed.

Another life-altering disease, as clinically established by French researchers and doctors at Henri Mondor Hospital in Paris, France, is MMF (Macrophagic Myofasciitis, a rare muscle disease) which Henri Mondor has become a focal research center for due to researchers there confirming the findings that aluminum in vaccines is the apparent “cause and effect,” especially high-aluminum-adjuvant vaccines like a HPV (Human papilloma virus) vaccine, which have caused severe life-altering, adverse health reactions in young girls, and boys too!......'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very detailed book about mercury in vaccines:
'Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak: The Evidence Supporting the Immediate Removal of Mercury--a Known Neurotoxin--from Vaccines21 Aug 2014
by Jr. Robert F. Kennedy and Martha R Herbert PhD MD'
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Thimerosal-Supporting-Immediate-Mercury-Neuro toxin/dp/1632206013/ref=sr_1_12?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1517854922&sr=1-12 &keywords=Robert+F+Kennedy+Jr

'Over a decade ago, following a sharp rise in developmental disorders such as autism and ADHD, the mercury-containing preservative Thimerosal was widely believed to have been eliminated from vaccine supplies in the United States and abroad. However, dangerous quantities of Thimerosal continue to be used, posing a significant threat to public health and leading to a crisis of faith in vaccine safety.

In this groundbreaking book, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., examines the research literature on Thimerosal and makes a very clear statement about its potentially dangerous effects. In the past, the CDC, FDA, NIH, and AAP, as well as the US Congress, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the US Department of Agriculture, the European Medicines Agency, and the California Environmental Protection Agency have expressed concerns over the use of Thimerosal in vaccines. But despite the many voices calling for action, the media and policy makers have repeatedly failed to adequately address the issue.

Now, with Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak, the science supporting the elimination of this toxic chemical from the world’s vaccine supplies, and its replacement with already available safer alternatives, is all in one place. Making this change should increase vaccination rates by restoring the trust of concerned parents in the vaccine program—a program that is so vitally important to public health.'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Is Tamiflu Dangerous?':
https://www.mommypotamus.com/tamiflu-side-effects/

'....Tamiflu Banned In Japan After Suicides
Tamiflu – which is marketed as a drug that can reduce the symptoms and life cycle of the flu by about one day – was banned in Japan after twelve children died while taking it.

In 2005, a 14-year old girl either fell or jumped to her death from a high-rise apartment building after taking the medication, while “a 17-year-old boy who had taken Tamiflu before going to bed . . . walked out of the house and stood in front of an oncoming truck. The truck driver told police the boy was smiling at the moment of impact.” (source 1, source 2)

According to Reuters, a total of 12 children died and 32 experienced abnormal behavior after taking it during that flu season. (source) Three adults in Japan also committed suicide while on the medication. (source)

Around that time, FDA spokeswoman Susan Bro told the Associated Press that the FDA had received the information on the deaths from Roche and the Japanese Ministry of Health, “Our scientists have said, even with the additional information, we are not seeing any reason to make a causal association between the use of the drug and the deaths,” she said. “The data don’t lead to that conclusion.” Japan, which closely monitors all new drugs brought to market, acted by banning Tamiflu for use in 10-19 year olds in 2007.

So what data gave the FDA such confidence, you may ask? According to the prestigious British Medical Journal, agencies such as the CDC, WHO and others recommended Tamiflu without vetting the data.....'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 4:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

'How the Mainstream Media Are Deceiving You about the Flu Vaccine':
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2018/02/09/how-the-mainstream-med ia-are-deceiving-you-about-the-flu-vaccine%C2%AD/?

'...To support his assertions about the proven safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, he cites two meta-analyses from the prestigious Cochrane Collaboration. In this type of study, researchers search the medical literature for relevant studies and review the body of evidence available by combining the results of studies that meet the inclusion criteria.

The first study was a 2010 Cochrane review, which Carroll characterizes as having found that the influenza vaccine confers “a big payoff in public health.” The second was from a 2012 review, which he claims showed that “The negatives of a flu shot are almost nonexistent, and significant side effects are very rare.”

In fact, the 2010 review found evidence of the effectiveness of the vaccine lacking. Far from concluding that the CDC’s policy conferred “a big payoff in public health”, the Cochrane researchers concluded that their findings “seem to discourage the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”

And, in fact, the 2012 review expressed concern that, given known harms from specific influenza vaccines including narcolepsy and febrile convulsions, their search turned up “only one study of inactivated vaccine in children under two years”. Their conclusion was that, given the fact the CDC recommends vaccination of children under two, even infants as young as six months, “large-scale studies assessing important outcomes, and directly comparing vaccine types are urgently required.”

A 2014 Cochrane review expressed the additional concern that the number of randomized controlled trials of influenza vaccine for pregnant women was zero. The researchers concluded that “The results of this review provide no evidence for the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”

In fact, the 2010 review Carroll cites to support the CDC’s policy went so far in its criticism of that policy as to accuse the CDC of deliberately misrepresenting the science in order to support its recommendation.....'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5773
Location: East London

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'U.S. government statistics reveal that the flu vaccine is the most dangerous vaccine in America':
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-06-22-u-s-government-statistics-revea l-that-the-flu-vaccine-is-the-most-dangerous-vaccine-in-america.html

'... a report released in 2013 by the Department of Justice, shows that more than half of all claims settled by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, also known as the Vaccine Court, were for injuries caused by the influenza vaccine.

As reported by Health Impact News, during the period covering 16 August to 15 November 2013, 139 claims were settled by the Vaccine Court, 70 of which received compensation. Of these settled claims, 42 – or 60 percent – were for injuries caused by the flu vaccine. The remaining 40 percent were for injuries caused by 11 other vaccines.

The greatest number of injuries by far that were reported as a result of the flu vaccine were for Guillain-Barré Syndrome, or GBS, a condition which the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke describes as follows:

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a disorder in which the body’s immune system attacks part of the peripheral nervous system. The first symptoms of this disorder include varying degrees of weakness or tingling sensations in the legs. In many instances the symmetrical weakness and abnormal sensations spread to the arms and upper body. These symptoms can increase in intensity until certain muscles cannot be used at all and, when severe, the person is almost totally paralyzed. In these cases the disorder is life threatening – potentially interfering with breathing and, at times, with blood pressure or heart rate – and is considered a medical emergency. Such an individual is often put on a ventilator to assist with breathing and is watched closely for problems such as an abnormal heart beat, infections, blood clots, and high or low blood pressure. Most individuals, however, have good recovery from even the most severe cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, although some continue to have a certain degree of weakness.

The flu vaccine: a toxic recipe for disaster
The injuries caused by the flu vaccine, as listed in the Department of Justice report, are not limited to Guillain-Barré Syndrome, however. They also include: neurological injury, peripheral neuropathy, painful myalgias, psychological sequella, opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome, cerebellar ataxia, corneal transplant failure, transverse myelitis, encephalitis, shoulder injury, bilateral optic neuritis resulting in permanent legal blindness, leukoencephalopathy, chemically-induced multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, fibromyalgia, and death, among others.

To the uninformed it might seem shocking that a medical procedure considered safe by the mainstream medical community could cause such serious health problems. When one considers the flu vaccine’s ingredients and adjuvants, however, it becomes totally understandable.

For one thing, the flu vaccine contains 25,000 times more mercury than is legally allowed in water. For another, statistics confirm that vaccinated people are actually more susceptible to the flu and often get more ill than those who focus on building up their own body’s immune system.....'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Whitehall_Bin_Men
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 2242
Location: Westminster, LONDON, SW1A 2HB.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2018 4:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Happy New Year: The Lancet Acknowledges Dr. Andrew Wakefield Is Exonerated
https://www.autisminvestigated.com/the-lancet-dr-andrew-wakefield/

Lancet editor apologises for Gaza article by scientists who circulated anti-Semitic video

While The Lancet ombudsman Dr. Malcolm Molyneux refused to reverse the retraction of exonerated gastroenterologist Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s landmark paper on post-vaccination autism, Dr. Molyneux did acknowledge that the UK General Medical Council’s findings of misconduct against Dr. Wakefield had been overturned.

When told that the 2012 High Court decision in favor of Dr. Wakefield’s colleague Prof. John Walker-Smith “would kill the GMC findings on which your journal’s retraction was based”, the ombudsman Dr. Malcolm Molyneux replied:

Dear Mr Crosby,

Thank you for your letter of June 13, 2015, in which you request that the Lancet Editor reinstate the retracted paper Ileal-lymphoid-nodular-hyperplasia, non-specific colitis and pervasive developmental disorder in children.

In the retraction statement, the editors of The Lancet stated that “several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al are incorrect. In particular….’” The retraction then mentions the enrolment [sic] procedure and ethical clearance, but implies that there remain other elements on which the decision was based.

Having considered all of the relevant material, I can see no sufficient reason for reinstatement of the Wakefield paper. I do not believe that COPE’s guidelines have been violated by retraction of the paper in question, or by failure to reinstate it.

I do not believe there is justification for any further debate about this extensively discussed article.

Yours sincerely,

Prof Malcolm Molyneux, Lancet Ombudsman

Despite Molyneux alluding to “other elements” which he did not name, at least both The Lancet and Dr. Andrew Wakefield agree that he was exonerated of the disciplinary findings against him now that they have been completely overturned. The British Medical Journal had better have a strong enough relationship with the drug company Merck to offset the expulsion from the National Library of Medicine that journal may now face as a result of defaming Dr. Wakefield. Now that The Lancet ombudsman has acknowledged that elements of its own retraction of Dr. Wakefield’s paper have proven to be false, The Lancet had better hope the same for its own relationship with Merck as well.

There is another choice The Lancet can make, however, which is to do the right thing by restoring Dr. Wakefield’s paper to its rightful place in the medical literature. And then maybe – just maybe – The Lancet editor can get that five minutes with Donald Trump he’s been begging for…








Here’s to a Happy New Year!

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on RedditPin on PinterestFlattr the authorDigg thisBuffer this pageShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon
Previous Post
Merry Christmas: BMJ Editor Rattled By Photo Of Andrew Wakefield With Trump
Next Post
BREAKING: RFK JR. ASKED TO HEAD VACCINE SAFETY COMMITTEE
58 responses


Shawn Siegel
December 31, 2016
I missed the part where Molyneux actually said Andy’s exonerated.

Reply


Jake Crosby
December 31, 2016
He acknowledged that the findings against him were overturned.

Reply


Colin
January 3, 2017
No, he didn’t. He pointed out that even if one were to set those findings aside there would not be any reason to un-retract the publication. In other words, he said something like “even if you were right,” not “you are right.”

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 4, 2017
Yes he did, and try using the actual quote next time rather than reinventing a new one.

Reply


Colin
January 4, 2017
“In the retraction statement, the editors of The Lancet stated that “several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al are incorrect. In particular….’” The retraction then mentions the enrolment procedure and ethical clearance, but implies that there remain other elements on which the decision was based.”

Nothing in that statement acknowledges that charges against Mr. Wakefield were overturned. It is a polite response noting that there is no point in engaging on the subject, because there were other elements on which the decision was based. So even if your interpretation of the judgment were correct, it would not support a change in that decision.

The reason people keep asking you where the email acknowledges that the charges against Mr. Wakefield were overturned, and the reason that you cannot find any such statement, is that there isn’t one. Saying that there were multiple reasons for the decision is not the same as saying that Wakefield was exonerated.

The thinness, desperation, and logical bankruptcy of this latest act of hero worship says rather a lot about the character of the anti-vax movement.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 4, 2017
“It is a polite response noting that there is no point in engaging on the subject, because there were other elements on which the decision was based.”

Thank you for proving my point.

Reply


Colin
January 4, 2017
I’m not sure if you’re being stubborn or actually missing the point; there was no point in engaging with you because *even if you were right,* there were other grounds for retracting the Wakefield paper. At no point did their response to you ever say that Wakefield has been exonerated, nor is that a fair or honest rephrasing of what they said.

Wakefield can be judged by his work (retracted, untrustworthy); his later career (unscientific, predatory); and the defenders he inspires (this article–grasping, desperate, dishonest). The record you are creating here is a great testimony to the character and caliber of his work.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 4, 2017
“because *even if you were right*” – Not what they said.

Reply


michael
January 29, 2018
The other element of the case, had they given Wakefield’s license back and exonerated him off wrong doing, would show the world just how corrupt the LANCELOT is.
The compensation would be in the multi millions of pounds, we can’t let that happen, can we, the old British saying goes.
The world, through their own experiments, show the correlation between the MMR vaccination and gut issues, resulting in Autism.
It shows just how far evil people will go to protect their investment.
So, this article is actually saying, if you read between the lines that Andrew is correct in his assumptions that the MMR vaccination causes Autism, but because of the financial compensation that will cost the Lancelot and Merck
a whole lot of money, we still deny that he is crrect.

Reply


Janet Newham
October 1, 2017
When trials of Clofibrate showed it did more harm than good W.German Govt withdrew it. Manufacturer threatened legal action against the Govt. So drug was put back on the market (Scrip 408, 1.8.79)
When Br Biotech clinicical research director Andre Miller cast doubt on the validity of his company’s boastful claims about 2 new wonder drugs he was suspended (Times Higher Education Supplement, 8.9.2000)
When Dr Nancy OlivierI (Toronto) discovered a drug treatment for childen had potential risks the company that owned the patent ordered her not to make her findings public…. Olivieri was fired, threatened with legal action, gagged from telling anyone and became victim of hate mail. Manufacturers moved to Europe and drug was licenced in 24 countries and they discredited Dr Olivieri’s findings. Dr Olivieri recalls countless other drs that were persecuted and harassed for questioning safety of drugs. (Dying for Drugs, BBC documentary, 28.4.03)
In 1998 when Dr Andrew Wakefield discovered…….. !!!!!!

…Research made tentative connection between measles jab and sharp rise in chrohns disease and colitis in children (Lancet, 1994; 343:105) NOTE!!!
THIS WAS 4 YRS BEFORE DR WAKEFIELD MADE THE CONNECTION

Reply


Catherine Nichols Pogorzelski
January 11, 2018
Have you seen the recent findings on http://www.gadoliniumtoxicity.com many patients who have vaccine injury may go on to having many medical tests in their young lives, building up these toxicities in brain and entire body, @Fibrosis whcih is internal scarring, until almost as high a s NY skyscraper! Three types of gadolinium based contrast agents are pulled from the market, but NOWHERE ELSE! WHY?! MONEY TALK$$$$$$ http://WWW.GADOLINIUMTOXICITY.COM <this is NTO MY site but a site wehre tehre is a great repositry of info on GADOLINIUM TOXICITY and here: https://gadoliniumtoxicity.com/2017/07/25/european-medical-authority-t akes-action-on-linear-contrast-agents/ Just today there was more here and here are some words on Andy Wakefield! http://www.autisminvestigated.com/the-lancet-dr-andrew-wakefield/

The Lancet Acknowledges Dr. Andrew Wakefield Is Cleared
AUTISMINVESTIGATED.COM

Reply


Jen
December 31, 2016
I missed the part where you showed us or even cited the source of this “reaction” from Molyneux. “When told of the… decision. .. Molyneux replied” leaves out a lot of information. To whom was he conversing? Where is the primary source? Your blog adds nothing to the discussion if it doesn’t show us that these aren’t just words that some blogger has pulled out of thin air. Maybe you haven’t heard that there is a lot of BS floating around out there; we want to see your sources.

Reply


Jake Crosby
December 31, 2016
“To whom was he conversing?”

Does “Dear Mr Crosby” not answer your question?

Reply


Maurine Meleck
December 31, 2016
You rock Jake. Thanks for this and a Happiest of New Years to you!!

Reply


Maurine Meleck
December 31, 2016
Great! Happy New Year.

Reply


Wendy Stephen
January 1, 2017
If we take the definition of “overturned” to be, abolish, or invalidate /reverse a previous system or decision, could you please direct me to a source for your statement that the disciplinary findings against Andrew Wakefield have been “completely overturned”. By way of a response please do not provide the findings of Justice Mitting in the appeal by Professor John Walker Smith, who did not have the same charges proven against him by the GMC. The GMC Findings of Fact, list charges brought and proven against Andrew Wakefield which were neither brought nor proven against Professor Walker Smith.

Thanks

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 2, 2017
“Professor John Walker Smith, who did not have the same charges proven against him by the GMC.” – lie.

Reply


Colin
January 3, 2017
The statement is provably true. As the commenter noted, “The GMC Findings of Fact, list charges brought and proven against Andrew Wakefield which were neither brought nor proven against Professor Walker Smith.”

If you think that this is not true (and I suspect that you know that it is, but want desperately to find some way to confuse the facts) you could always post a comparison of the charges brought and proven against both men and show they are identical.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 4, 2017
The case against Wakefield being true hinged on the case against Walker-Smith being true. It was not, but feel free to be pedantic.

Reply


Colin
January 4, 2017
Honesty is not pedantry. Charges were alleged and proven against Wakefield that were not alleged or proven against Walker-Smith. Exonerating Walker-Smith cannot logically exonerate Wakefield, especially given that one of Walker-Smith’s defenses was that he relied on Wakefield to correct misleading information in the Lancet piece.

You are not helping Mr. Wakefield or yourself by calling commenters liars when you know they are telling the truth. The facts are not what you want them to be, but they are the facts.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 4, 2017
You’re just digging yourself a deeper and deeper hole:

“it was not misconduct for him, Dr. Murch or Dr. Thomson to invite a research colleague, Dr. Wakefield, to correct a misleading statement in the draft and leave it to him to do so. Because the panel made no finding on that issue, its reasoning is inadequate.”

Reply


Colin
January 4, 2017
The segment you quoted is referring to the reasoning as to Walker-Smith, not as to Wakefield. The appellate decision did not find that the “misleading statement” was not misleading. It found that the panel did not adequately establish that Walker-Smith was responsible for that statement, especially given that he invited Wakefield to correct it.

Relying on Andrew Wakefield to correct misleading information was a terrible mistake. I know, having interviewed him personally and having found him to be extremely deceptive and dishonest.

It is no credit to you to worship such a man, as should be obvious from the amount of work you have to do in juggling and whitewashing the record of his malfeasance.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 4, 2017
What the appellate decision found was that “the panel made no finding on that issue”. IOW, there is no remaining issue since the panel didn’t rule on it.

Also, if you’re going to allude to having personally interviewed Wakefield, it would be nice for you to provide the contents of that interview for readers to draw their own conclusions from. Otherwise, it’s just your word against his. And your word really has no value here.

Reply


Lawrence
January 5, 2017
Too funny coming from you, Jake.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 6, 2017
Still suffering from post-election butthurt, Larry? And yes, I’m still laughing at you over this.

Reply


Lawrence
January 6, 2017
Actually Jake, I’m doing just fine.

I do feel sorry for all of those people who voted for Trump who will loss their health insurance over the next year….

Reply


michael
January 29, 2018
The only person that I can see here being “extremely deceptive and dishonest is you, Colin.
You seem to have an agenda, of sorts, that is to discredit someone who was doing his “Hippocratic oath”, that is, being honest and protective of lies perpetuated by those, “People of The Lie” by Scott Peck, a good read, about narcissism.
Is someone paying you Scot to vilify Andrew, because that is what it sounds like in your writings.

Reply


Robin
January 1, 2017
Hi Jake – you have said in a comment above “He acknowledged that the findings against him were overturned.” – but this is not in the article. Could you let us know where he said that? Thanks.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 2, 2017
In the retraction statement, the editors of The Lancet stated that “several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al are incorrect. In particular….’” The retraction then mentions the enrolment [sic] procedure and ethical clearance, but implies that there remain other elements on which the decision was based.

His decision to keep the paper retracted is based on reasons other than the GMC findings, which means he knows the findings were overturned.

Reply


Lawrence
January 5, 2017
And you complain about other people “putting words in mouths?”

Seriously?

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 6, 2017
No Larry, just in people not having basic command of the English language.

Reply


James Lyons-Weiler
January 22, 2017
Jake is 100% correct here. The “other elements” reference is specious, and smacks of the same dribble fed re: the retraction of Hooker’s re-analysis of the data that had been sanitized from Destefano et al. 2004. Vague references to unproven allegations of conflict of interest on Hooker’s part have been denied by Dr. Hooker (as quoted in “Cures vs. Profits”. Here, the Lancet specifically acknowledges that it would seem reasonable to reverse the retraction based on allegations of misconduct (which for Dr. Walker-Smith have been “quashed”). We should not go about retracting studies on “implications”. Dr. Wakefield and the other authors deserve clear exposition on the grounds that remain for sustaining the retraction, especially in light of new studies that show GI lesions found in autism, enteric microglia-like cells being activated. In citing “implies”, the Lancet is mumbling. The should be clear, precise and detailed in their replies to calls to reverse the retraction. And they should certainly consider those “implied” considerations in light of the tone of the entire proceedings, which hinged on guesswork and conjecture as to Dr. Walker-Smith’s intentions vs. Dr. Wakefields. Of course both knew they were caring for patients, and of course both knew of the investigational nature of some of the assays. Compared to the outright omission of results by Destefano et al. (2004) because, as Destefano told Sharyl Attkisson, they didn’t believe the result (not a sufficient reason to ditch results after manipulating study group definitions to make associations go away, after all why test for associations if they are going to be rejected if detected???). Numerous aspects of Dr. Wakefield’s concerns appear to have been corroborated (see https://molecularautism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13229-016- 0110-z), with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) observed after vaccination, not only after infection, and other science similar to Dr. Wakefield’s hypothesis of persistent viral infections being involved with autism (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00401-016-1629-y).

Even as some worked overtime to dispense with results showing association, science on neurological development disorders has progressed. Over 1,000 studies cited in “Causes” available here: envgencauses.com We must continue to work to understand which patients are at risk and find ways, including familial risk factors (as Jake has pointed out previously ), other known and suspected indicators (there are numerous to be tested out), and protein and genetic biomarkers to identify susceptible subgroups to keep them out of harm’s way.

As for my professional opinion, the retraction, in fact, does not stand in my mind. Every day that goes by with the Lancet failing to act upon the calls to reverse the retract they demonstrate their illegitimacy as a source of reliable medical research information. And journals that retract after someone tweets to scientists that they should boycott the journal because the Tweeter, or a commenter does not like the results of given study, but ignores all signs of fraud and malfeasance in the various “science” studies showing no association of vaccines and autism, well, such actions speak for the integrity of their peer review process. Such weakness of editors and editorial boards in the face of post-publication community pressure perverts the objectivity of the peer-review process and subjects science to mob rule.

Reply


jill
August 3, 2017
I love it!!!! James Lyons-Weiler

Reply


jill
August 3, 2017
Exactly Jake!

Reply


Dawn Loughborough
January 2, 2017
Nice angle to try…

Reply


Wendy Stephen
January 2, 2017
Jake, as an example, are you saying that item 4 (a) of the GMC Findings of Fact has been overturned and if so, where /what is your proof to back that up. Has the GMC issued something I’ve missed?

4(a) i “you failed to cause the Legal Aid Board to be informed that investigations represented by the clinicians as being clinically indicated would be covered by NHS funding” (Found Proved)

Are you saying that item 4 (a) i, of the GMC Findings of Fact has been overturned and if so, where/what is your source to back that up?.

4a ii ” you caused or permitted the money supplied by the Legal Aid Board to be used for purposes other than those for which you said it was needed and for which it had been granted”
(Found Proved in relation to the second instalment of £25,000)

Are you saying that item 4 a ii, of the GMC Findings of Fact has been overturned also and if so, where/what is your source to back that up?

Please provide proof that these charges were (a) brought in respect of Professor Walker Smith and (b) found proven against him.

You need to understand Jake that these particular charges were highly significant and of great interest to the legally aided litigants in the UK class action. It would be pretty shabby of anyone to distribute incorrect information stating that they had been overturned if that was not the case.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 2, 2017
Yes, because they did not have to be brought against Walker-Smith. They both rested on the finding that the investigations described in the Lancet paper were part of litigation-funded project; that was disproved.

Reply


Jake Crosby
January 2, 2017
Btw, I’m not approving your latest comment because it says the same thing as your previous. I’ve already answered your question, but I won’t get into a tit-for-tat with you over extraneous details that do not make your point any less wrong.

Reply


Hans Litten
January 5, 2017
*****************SEEMS BIG NEWS TO ME *************************

http://www.healthnutnews.com/reuters-frieden-resign-cdc-director/

The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Thomas Frieden, plans to submit his resignation on January 20th, the day of President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration.

It will go down in history that he was running the CDC during the explosive #CDCWhistleblower scandal where a senior scientist blew the whistle on the agency for fraud, corruption, and blatant lies on the 2004 MMR Autism study (and probably many more- we are sure that’s just the tip of the iceberg).

Frieden disclosed his plans to resign in a year-end interview with Reuters. His future plans are not currently known.

Reply


Lawrence
January 5, 2017
And why is this big news? Literally hundreds of appointees are leaving, as happens with every other single Presidential transition….in fact, every single member of the West Wing is being replaced, as happens, again, during every single new administration.

As most former directors of the CDC (with one notable exception), I’m sure he will take a teaching or research position in academia.

Reply


Anonymous
January 5, 2017
Frieden and the other creeps can run but they can’t hide. Not surprising at all that they will “retire” as a no-nonsense person is the new sheriff. Rats and sinking ships…

Reply


Lawrence
January 6, 2017
Again, this happens with the changeover of every administration…..very few, if any, political appointees are asked to stay.

If you check out the potential replacements being discussed, all of them are either directly from the industry or believe in less, not more regulation.

Reply


Hans Litten
January 5, 2017
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/scientists-prove-link-between-aluminu m-and-early-onset-alzheimer-s-disease

Scientists Prove Link Between Aluminum and Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease
In today’s world, aluminum is omnipresent, building up within our system from everyday products. Now, we are learning that aluminum toxicity can manifest itself in alarming ways.
As many of us are aware, the human body is being bombarded with aluminum in everyday products. Many of our foods, vaccinations, medications, baby products, cosmetics, cleaning products and even soft furnishings contain aluminum and it appears that we are powerless to prevent the ever-increasing onslaught.
This is extremely worrying because, according to Professor Exley, a scientist from Keele University in Staffordshire, aluminum can accumulate in the body and has the potential to do harm wherever it ends up.

Reply


Hans Litten
January 5, 2017
For all these trolls you have attracted Jake : (why don’t you guys ever go to AoA – because you already run that site perhaps ?)

http://www.naturalblaze.com/2017/01/3-polio-facts-cdc-wishes-you-didnt -know.html

http://healthimpactnews.com/2017/free-vaccine-docuseries-reveals-bigge st-public-health-experiment-ever/

Reply


tgglenn
January 31, 2017
http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/01/keeping-anderson-cooper-honest-is-b rian-deer-the-fraud.html

Reply


sey
April 24, 2017
“Few men are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of their society. Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. It is the one essential, vital quality for those who seek to change a world which yields most painfully to change.” Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

This quote I dedicate to Dr. Andrew Wakefield, a man of heroic proportions and true moral courage, who acted with integrity to publish his findings regarding the MMR and who has been vilified as a result. I also, dedicate this quote to Dr. William Thompson, Senior Scientist at the CDC, who came forward after ten years of silence regarding his fraudulent study published in Pediatrics in 2004 asserting that there is no connection between the MMR and autism. He would later admit to having manipulated the data under duress from his supervisors at the CDC. He would later admit that there was a dramatic relationship between autism and the MMR vaccine.

Dr. William Thompson apologized to Dr. Wakefield. He said: “I apologize, again, for the price you paid for my dishonesty.” Dr. Wakefield, being the humble and forgiving man he is, responded: “I forgive you completely and without bitterness” (Vaccine Whistleblower 143).

The field of science is no longer a viable one because of the incredible dishonesty of so many who call themselves scientists. Science is only as reliable as the integrity of the scientist. The editors of two of the most prestigious medical journals have admitted as much.

• “The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.” Dr. Arnold Seymour Relman, Harvard Professor of Medicine and former editor-in-chief of the New England Medical Journal
• “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” Dr. Richard Horton, current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world

CDC Scientists are increasingly coming forward to complain of the corruption of their industry: See Huffington Post: “Spider Bites the CDC” – “A group calling itself CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research, or CDC SPIDER, put a list of complaints in writing in a letter to the CDC Chief of Staff and provided a copy of the letter to the public watchdog organization U.S. Right to Know (USRTK). The members of the group have elected to file the complaint anonymously for fear of retribution.”

I’d like to thank another scientist, James Lyons Weiler, who commented above, for his moral courage in investigating the science without prejudice and coming forward to publish and present his findings that the science is clearly indicating that autism is resulting from vaccination.

_________________
--
'Suppression of truth, human spirit and the holy chord of justice never works long-term. Something the suppressors never get.' David Southwell
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com
Martin Van Creveld: Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother."
Martin Van Creveld: I'll quote Henry Kissinger: "In campaigns like this the antiterror forces lose, because they don't win, and the rebels win by not losing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> The War On Children, Marriage and the Family All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group