FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

YouTube's New Rules Of Engagement?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Campaigning
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fish5133
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 2545
Location: One breath from Glory

PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

outsider wrote:
Has anyone else noticed RT videos taking ages to load? Perhaps they have been put on the 'slow' internet stream?



May be your PC is being targeted. Ive had nothing but problems the last 4 or 5 years with Virginmedia and now the same with Talk Talk.. Neighbours all seem to enjoy decent speeds and stability . Mine can work ok but its like the gremlins screwing it up all the time --slow speeds (less than 1mb), dropping connection many times each night. BT Engineers say there is nothing wrong with the line. ISP seem to fix it for a day or so then back to usual *rap.

_________________
JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5558
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sure my PC is targeted; anytime I go anywhere near serious Israeli crimes, I get probs.
But with RT, I suspect it is general, which is why I put the question out.

Have you found RT is extremely slow to load?

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 15538
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2017 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 15538
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

List of Demonetized YouTube stars
Michael Tyler
About Michael Tyler
Owner and main contributor to the site.
Written by Michael Tyler September 29, 2017

Google’s latest move is to censor online content moving through it’s various channels; search, video which is ‘controversial’.

You can see it in black and white above.

This site, and other onliners such as WSWS have experienced exclusion from the index, or severe penalties. On the other side of the fence, in the world of YouTube, many publishers whose livelihood is based on the forum through and it’s many subscribers, have found content ‘demonetized’.

Even posters whose content has nothing to do with controversy, light entertainment channels may find they’re getting censored if they don’t present their information in the right way.

In many cases Google is simply targetted the individuals. Removing their content wholesale, whether it’s breaching guidelines or not.

Judgement has been cast
Google refused to monetize my YouTube content many years ago. They said I was running a ‘click-scam’, the truth is, Google Adwords only pays publishers for a PERCENTAGE of the click-thru’s they get on their site. Some clicks don’t get registered at all. When you’re making money from BILLIONS of clicks a day, that’s a lot of money.

I know this, having been a publisher since 2003/2004 when Adwords first came out and I started running the program. I ran it for over 7 years…. Anyway, another story…..

List of demonetized YouTube stars
This list is ongoing, so if you want to slip me an email with your story, I can include you.

ownage pranks
https://www.youtube.com/user/OwnagePranks
Ownage Pranks – 4,300,000 subscribers
Prankster who publishes impersonations he does over the phone as random hoaxes. Very funny.
Partial demonetization.


jaclyn glenn
https://www.youtube.com/user/JaclynGlenn
Jaclyn Glenn – 530,799 subscribers
Discusses topics such as religion, atheism, animal rights, politics.
All videos demonetized.

dave rubin
https://www.youtube.com/user/RubinReport
Dave Rubin – 520,623 subscribers
Creates the Rubin Report. Mostly right wing content with guests and commentary on current affairs.
All videos demonetized.

Wearechange
https://www.youtube.com/user/wearechange
(Luke Rudkowski) – 487,889 subscribers
Non-partisan, independent media organization comprised of individuals and groups working to expose corruption worldwide.
All videos demonetized.

andy warski
https://www.youtube.com/user/Andywarski
Andy Warski – 255,626 subscribers
Video blogger and commentator.
Videos demonetized.

computing forever
https://www.youtube.com/user/LACK78
Computing forever – 254,284 subscribers
Technology & Social Commentaries, discussions about politics, future technology, gaming Top 10s.
Videos demonetized.

some black guy
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7e57qWIEAZTQAaFwHpKdlw
Some Black Guy – 238,262 subscribers
Free speech, logic, critical argument from different alternative viewpoints. By a black person.
All videos demonetized.

John Cedars
https://www.youtube.com/user/johncedars1929/
John Cedars – 14,833 subscribers
Jehovah’s witness dissecting teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses, as well as new developments, keep on top of the latest propaganda released by Watchtower by way of video rebuttals.
Partially demonetized.

Perhaps the most disturbing of these is comedy channel, Ownage Pranks; the others may be seen to be inciting controversy through ‘taking a view’. He described his experience below.
‘Cracking down’
Ownage Pranks owner sheds a little light on the information given from his ‘Google insider’ that suggests that many of the decisions are ‘algorithm’, or A1 driven.



Jim Stone, the investigative conspiracy supremo, claims that Google uses a tool such as this perspectiveapi.com.

A1 Censorship vs Human Censorship
perspectiveapi.com is a software that users can get a free test account, it’s basically a A1 program that automatically vets user generated content for ‘toxicity‘, giving it a score in percentage terms.

You can move this score up and down, and ban or allow comments on this basis.

Where YouTuber’s videos are being demonetized on a ‘case by case’ basis, such as Ownage Pranks, it’s clear from his video that the video’s are censored using automated technology. Individual uploads being affected by something as arbitrary as the thumbnail image, or the name of the subtitle file.

Demonetizing whole YouTube channels
As well as this, Google’s closing whole channels for business. Like Dave Rubin and Jaclyn Glenn.

Although many people are saying the A1 is responsible for this, I’d think it unlikely.

Google censors are sitting down with a list of information given by the A1, looking at words, phrases , content and images in that channel’s video collection. That information in hand, watching a handful of most viewed content from the channel, then deciding based on some set of arbitrary discrimination rules, whether that channel is ‘controversial’ or ‘non-controversial’.

Government directives
It’s very likely these rules take into account directives from central government. The Conservative Party manifesto reveals a darker, divisive, authoritarian form of information censorship which supports the governments views and viewpoints, where supporters are rewarded and detractors punished.

The text of the manifesto talks of ‘cracking down’ on Google where the UK Government’s demands are not being met.

Again, it’s all very chilling stuff.

Search and YouTube
It’s no different, they’re two sides of the same coin, GOOGLE.

If Google’s cracking down on controversial video‘s, it’s cracking down on controversial websites. The two go hand in hand.

When we want to look at the drivers of that crackdown, we need to be looking at Governments. Governments and big business, as Theresa May points out in her manifesto, government needs to be looking out for the ‘advertising revenues’ of those organisations loyal to the establishment

‘Hitler Update’
In April Google had an update which was supposedly on or close to the birth date of Hitler, which is also in April, (April 20th).

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5558
Location: East London

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Re youtube censorship:
'YouTube DELETED My Las Vegas “Shooting” VIDEO!! NOW RESTORED! CENSORSHIP EXPOSED—REUPLOAD!':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNtFnLRjaaM

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outsider
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 5558
Location: East London

PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'YouTube is trying to stop people seeing Las Vegas conspiracy theories':
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/youtube-las-vegas-sho oting-second-shooter-false-flag-conspiracy-theories-search-results-cha nge-a7987236.html

'YouTube has changed its secretive search algorithms in response to the spread of conspiracy theory videos about the mass shooting in Las Vegas.

The home-video behemoth came under fire in the wake of the shooting, when several unsubstantiated claims made their way into the top new results about the massacre. Videos such as "Proof Las Vegas Shooting Was a FALSE FLAG attack—Shooter on 4th Floor" made it into the “Top News” section on Tuesday, just two days after the shooting occured, according to the Wall St Journal.

But YouTube has since changed its search algorithms to promote more reputable news, a source close to the company told The Independent. The changes had been planned for months, the source added, but were moved up in the wake of the shooting.

By Friday, the top ten results for “Las Vegas shooting” all came from news outlets, or contained direct uploads of footage from the event.

But the company is still working on its “Up Next” feature, which suggests related content to watch at the end of a video, according to the Journal. On Friday, watching a video titled “Las Vegas Shooting: 6 QUESTIONS - False Flag? Multiple Shooters? Paddock patsy?” lead to suggested videos like “A False Flag Patsy Event Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes” and “CNN Crisis Actor Caught Red Handed”.

YouTube uses secret algorithms to determine which videos appear in its “Top News” and “Up Next” section. The company has said publicly that it factors in a video’s popularity and a user’s history when choosing which videos to display, but has declined to reveal more.

The company says it regularly deletes videos flagged for violating its community guidelines. These guidelines cover everything from nudity to child endangerment, but do not discuss conspiracy theories or unverifiable claims. YouTube declined to provide details to The Independent on its standards regarding conspiracy theories.

The company told the Guardian, however, that a video called “Las Vegas ‘Shooting’ … Did It Actually Happen?” did not violate its standards. The video – which questions whether the shooting was “faked” by paid actors – had amassed almost 350,000 views by Friday morning.

The company did pull the aforementioned video calling the shooting a “false flag attack," however. YouTube also gave the creator's account a penalty strike. Accounts that receive more than three strikes are terminated.

The video’s creator, Jake Morphonios, claimed the clip garnered 2.5m views before it was deleted. He pushed back against the video's deletion, saying he was simply offering an opinion.

“I’m not presenting myself as mainstream media,” Mr Morphonios told the Journal. “I’m just a guy with a computer offering an opinion. And to be punished for that is, well, it’s draconian'.

Re that latest sentence, the WSJ MADE IT UP, and had to apologise - see the guy's 'Comment':

'The Wall Street Journal reporter did not print what I actually said. I did not suggest that I'm a "nobody" with a computer. I explained that I am a professional investigator with decades of investigative experience. THAT was conveniently left out of the WSJ article because it didn't fit the reporter's agenda.

Also, if you look up the WSJ article, you will find at the bottom of the page that the WSJ had to retract a quote that the reporter fabricated and attributed to me.

The WSJ article demonstrates why people do not trust the MSM anymore. These reporters have political agendas and do not report facts. After 30 minutes of trying to get me to agree that I'm not an authoritative source, the WSJ outright lied and made up a quote of me saying that I "know" I'm not authoritative like the mainstream media. After I threatened to sue for libel, the Wall St. Journal admitted publicly that it faked a quote.'

_________________
'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 15538
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is James Foley's death fake?
81% Say Yes - 19% Say No
http://www.debate.org/opinions/is-james-foleys-death-fake

James Foley beheading video: ISIS A Big Lie? Hoax Faked Psychological Warfare? - Martin Summers from TonyGosling on Vimeo.



Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 04:25:14 -0700
X-No-Auto-Attachment: 1
Subject: Your video has been removed from YouTube
From: YouTube <accounts-noreply@youtube.com>

Hi,

As you may know, our Community Guidelines describe which content we allow and what we don’t allow on on YouTube. Your video "James Foley - ISIS - A Big Lie? - Hoax Faked Psychological Warfare Martin Summers" was flagged for review. Upon review, we’ve determined that it violates our guidelines. s. We’ve removed it from YouTube and assigned a Community Guidelines strike, or temporary penalty, to your account.


Video content restrictions

YouTubers share their opinions on a wide range of different topics. However, there's a fine line between passionate debate and personal attacks. As our Community Guidelines outline, YouTube is not a platform for things like predatory behavior, stalking, threats, harassment, bullying, or intimidation. We take this issue seriously and there are no excuses for such behavior. We remove comments, videos, or posts where the main aim is to maliciously harass or attack another user. If you're not sure whether or not your content crosses the line, we ask that you not post it. Learn more here .


The impact of strikes



This is the first strike applied to your account. We understand that users seldom intend to violate our policies. That’s why strikes es don’t last forever – this strike will will expire in three months. Howeveer, it’s important nt to remember that additional strikes could prevent you from posting content to YouTube or even lead to your account being terminated.


How you can respond



If you believe this was a mistake, we’d like to hear from you. u. Please follow both of these steps as simply deleting the video won’t resolve the strike on your account. t.
The next time you sign in you will be asked to acknowledge this strike on your account.
If you would like to appeal this strike, please submit this form. Our team will thoroughly review your appeal and will contact you again very soon.

We value your opinions and feedback. Please take a few minutes to fill out our survey.

Yours sincerely,

- The YouTube Team

2017 YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066, USA

_________________
www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Campaigning All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group