FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Patsies: some of the many anomalies - Sleuthing Around

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:12 am    Post subject: Patsies: some of the many anomalies - Sleuthing Around Reply with quote

A bit dated but still very relevant ...

----------------------------------------------------

http://www.blogigo.co.uk/socialdemocracynow


Social Democracy Now
13.07.2005 at 07:02
'HOMEGROWN' TERRORISTS - PERPETRATORS OR PATSIES?
by: socialdemocracynow

After the murders of Princess Diana and David Kelly, as well as Blair's criminal support for the bombing of Serbia and the war in Iraq, I am extremely sceptical about everything we are reading now about the London bombings. Here I present a list of salient questions with possible answers. I find very little about the official story satisfying.

THE ALLEGED PERPS

1. The one and only eyewitness report of one of the four alleged bombers conspicuously failed to provide a description of the individual. But now - a few days later - an interview with the witness, computer programmer Richard Jones, includes the description: 'about 6-feet tall, olive-skinned and clean-shaven, wearing tight, light brown trousers and a light brown top.' (Jones also used the adjective 'young.') Q: Why was this description initially withheld? Wouldn't releasing a description have helped the public identify the man, if he had escaped the explosion? A: Since there is no way for members of the general public to corroborate Jones's claim that he had been travelling on the doomed bus, or that he is just an ordinary computer programmer (rather than, say, an employee of Visor Consulting, the firm carrying out the terrorist drill that morning), he could well be a planted witness, providing details as needed. Presumably, at the early stage it was felt best to leave out a description until the alleged perpetrators had been identified. Then, once the patsy scenario had been fleshed out, Jones could reappear for another interview, this time helpfully providing a description of the appropriate patsy (officially identified as Hasib Hussain, who is known to have been 'very tall.'). Note also that because all four CCTV cameras aboard the bus weren't working, it is impossible to verify Jones's description of the young man.

PROBLEM: We now know that Hasib Hussain had a beard, but Jones specifically states that the man was clean-shaven. Also, the CCTV frame showing Hussain at Luton station (although, frankly, this picture is so closely-cropped that it could have been taken anywhere) shows that he was not wearing brown clothing. Unless he changed his clothes and shaved on the train from Luton to London, Hussain was obviously not the man Jones saw. Although it is clearly a circumstance in favour of the authenticity of Jones's testimony that he did not see a man identifiable as Hussain, which would have been all too convenient, the CCTV image raises the question of whether Hussain was on the bus at all. Certainly, he wa not the man Jones saw fiddling nervously with his bag. If the man Jones saw was the bomber - which would seem likely - then we are some way towards understanding why the CCTV cameras had been disabled. (We now know that the cameras went through a 20-hour long 'inspection' on the weekend before the bombings.) So it looks to me that the CCTV cameras were turned off to conceal the fact that Hussain would not be on the bus, although someone would have the job of planting his personal documents there. And, on the subject of the no. 30 bus, it is worth noting that it was a Stagecoach bus - Stagecoach being the company run by a truly nasty individual, Brian Souter. It is easy to imagine such a character putting his company at the service of the evil minds behind the bombings.

2. We are told that three of the four bombers were British males of Pakistani origin. Q: Isn't this fast work? A: Allegedly, the men were identified on the basis of ID documents such as credit cards found at the explosion sites.

3. We are told that 'Personal documents have been found at all four bomb scenes.' For example, 'Hussain's driving licence and credit cards were found in the wreckage of the No 30 bus.' Q: Is this likely? A: It is impossible to believe that such documents would have survived such terrific explosions. Jon Rappoport doesn't believe it, I don't believe it and neither should anybody else. In particular, I have a problem believing that, as the Guardian reports, 'The documents of the 30-year-old, whose body was found at Edgware Road station, were discovered both at the scene of that explosion and at the Aldgate bomb scene, where another of the four dead suspects' remains were found.' Why would his documents appear at two separate locations? Q: Even if they did, why would you make it easy for the authorities to identify you? These 'terrorists' seem to have been extremely interested in ensuring that the subsequent investigation made rapid progress, don't you think? A: According to Sky News terror expert Steve Park, the documents may have been deliberately planted to "send police the wrong way". NB: It is apparently not true that documents have been found for all four men. According to a recent report, 'Police believe that the fourth person's remains and documents may still be trapped in the rubble below Russell Square and are hoping they may find those today.'

4. We are told that the four alleged bombers were captured on CCTV at 8.30am. Q: If the men involved have been conclusively identified, why hasn't the CCTV footage been released? It's not as if there's going to be a trial. A: Digital images are easily tampered with and fakery virtually impossible to detect. The footage may be being withheld until the faces of the four young Muslims have been incorporated. If the work doesn't go too well, we can expect to see no more than a couple of still frames, as was done with the 9-11 footage of Atta and Aziz going through security at Portland airport.

5. We are told that 'The four travelled by car from West Yorkshire to Luton and then by train to Kings Cross station shortly before the attacks were launched on Thursday morning, ... Their images were captured by CCTV cameras - one police source said the men were chatting "as though they were going on a hiking holiday". Ditto: 'According to one senior security source who viewed the footage, you would never have known the four were about to blow fellow commuters - and probably themselves - to smithereens. "They were chatting. You would think they were going on a hiking holiday," the source is reported to have said.' Q: Is such behaviour consistent with the theory that they were the perpetrators of the bombings? A: Perhaps they were really going on holiday. There are many possible reasons why they might have come to London that day. The most likely is that they had been hired to play the role of the terrorists in the Visor Consulting counter-terrorism training exercise.

For a scenario showing how the four British Muslims could have been set up this way, see "How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps" by Paul Joseph Watson. Watson points out how a counter-terrorism exercise provides perfect cover for a real terrorist attack. In particular, it provides a plausible explanation should things go wrong: 'If at any stage of the attack your Arabs get caught, tell the police it was part of an exercise.'

6. We are told that the breakthrough came 'at 8pm on Monday when detectives found a CCTV picture of the four bombers at King's Cross station 20 minutes before they blew themselves up.' Q: How did the detectives know that these were the four men involved? A: First, they would have been conspicuous because each was 'carrying an infantry-style rucksack.' (SOURCE) Second, 'the CCTV at King's Cross showed the four young men setting off in different directions.' (SOURCE) These two considerations taken together would seem to make the four men readily distinguishable from other groups of travellers. However, if the CCTV footage showed the four suspects together, I tend to wonder why it wasn't promptly released as a means of identifying the fourth alleged bomber, whose identity was only established a few days after the other three. If the footage had been released, it would have enabled members of the public who recognized him to come forward. The fact that the CCTV footage STILL hasn't been released is incredibly suspicious, since it is the lynchpin of the whole case against the four individuals named as the bombers this week.

7. We are told about one of the four men reportedly involved (Shahzad Tanweer): 'It's impossible. It's not in his nature to do something like this, he's the type of guy who would condemn things like that.' Ditto: "He is sound as a pound," said Azi Mohammed, a close friend. "The idea that he was involved in terrorism or extremism is ridiculous. The idea that he went down to London and exploded a bomb is unbelievable. ... I only played cricket in the park with him around 10 days ago. He is not interested in politics." Q: How come Islamic fundo terrorists never seem to behave like ones? A: This is yet another clue that the Muslims from Leeds are being set up.

8. We are told that 'At least two of the men - Shahzad Tanweer and Hasib Hussain - British-born Muslims with jobs, hobbies and respectable parents were, it seems, living a double life'. Q: In view of the suspicious circumstances, which include intriguing relationships between Peter Power of Visor Consulting, Rudi Giuliani and Richard Scheirer discussed here, isn't it much more likely that they were set up?

9. We are told that the bodies of all four individuals have been found at the crime scenes. Q: Why would they all commit suicide? A: Mike Rivero: 'It is one thing to use oneself as a human guided missile to deliver a bomb, but these bombs are already at the target, and already counting down. There is no purpose to sticking around to be blown up with the bomb, and every reason to leave and plan more bombings.'

10. We are told here that the military used military-style explosives to gain access to one suspect's property: 'The military, including a bomb squad, carried out the controlled explosion at the row house at 11:30 a.m. so detectives could enter the home in Burley.' Q: Why not just break down the door? A: Mike Rivero of What Really Happened seems on the ball once again: doing so contaminates 'the entire crime scene with the very same explosives that were apparently used in the bombings.'

11. We are told that because the bombers were allegedly all British, everything has to change: ' The realisation that British nationals are prepared to make suicide attacks has transformed the way the country will have to view security. "What we considered normal has changed forever," said a senior security source. Security measures at all public places will have to be rethought. Tough new security laws are also expected to be introduced to try to combat the threat.' Q: Since Blair and the U.K. government have been trying to get 'tough new security laws' for a long time now, isn't the identification of British nationals as the allegedly bombers too convenient? A: Exactly. Here we have a motive for why the government would carry out an attack on its own citizens and choose particular patsies to serve that purpose.

12. We are told that 'The men are known to have been missing since last week.' Q: Could they have been abducted? A: Without seeing the CCTV footage, it is impossible to say whether the four men allegedly involved are the four men 'known to have been missing since last week.' If the unedited footage is made public, it would be a strong argument in favour of the voluntary nature of their presence in London. If the footage is never made public, or only presented in an edited way, as for example in still frames, then the possibility would exist that coercion of some kind was involved - or that the men were not involved at all. Certainly if the footage is never made public, I would be tempted to draw the conclusion that the men were simply abducted and murdered, while their ID papers were planted at the explosion sites.

13. According to The Times, 'The man who planted the bomb at Edgware Road was named last night as Mohammed Sidique Khan, 30, the married father of an eight-month-old baby, who is believed to have come from the Leeds area.' Q: Do you believe a man with an eight-month old child would kill himself? A: Absolutely not.

THE ABANDONED CAR(S)

14. We are told that 'Police were alerted to the Luton car after a member of the public reported seeing four men getting out of it on Thursday morning.' Q: Why would you report a car to the police simply because you had seen four people getting out of it on Thursday morning? A: You wouldn't. This is possibly a planted story - part of an intrigue for the purpose of framing the occupants.

15. We are told that the attention of the 'member of the public' was attracted by the sight of four men getting out of the car. Q: Since it's now reported that two cars have been found at Luton, wouldn't it make sense that two people got out of one car and the other two got out of the other?

16. We are told that 'explosives have been found in an abandoned car linked to the attacks at Luton railway station.' Q: Why would you leave explosives in the car? A: You wouldn't. This is the pretext for the car's subsequent destruction.

17. We are told that 'Four controlled explosions were carried out on the car after a 100-yard cordon was placed around the station and its car park.' Ditto: 'The car was blown up in four controlled explosions.' Q: Why would you blow up the car? A: To destroy it as a source of forensic evidence.

18. We are now told that two cars were found at Luton, that one or both contained explosives, and one or both were destroyed by controlled demolitions. (HERE and HERE) Q: Isn't that a tad convenient? A: Sure is. Now there is no way of telling whether the cars were really cars belonging to the young Muslim men from Leeds or whether they had really contained explosives or any other incriminating material. Destruction of a car linked to a crime amounts to the destruction of a significant portion of the evidence.

WHAT HAS NOT BEEN REVEALED

19. Peter Power of Visor Consulting has declined to reveal the identity of the client for whom the counter-terrorist exercise was being carried out. Q: Wouldn't Transport for London be a likely client? A: Yes. And, as Mike Rivero points out, the Commissioner for Transport for London is an ex-CIA man who is also a member of the Council for Foreign Relations, Bob Kiley. See his short biography here.

WHAT HAS NOT BEEN FOUND

20. 'There are as yet no indications that any of the four left behind any message about their intentions.' (SOURCE) Q: Why, if you were going to conduct a series of bombings and you were not going to attempt to disguise your identity (you even leave incriminating explosives in your car), would you not also leave a statement of your motives? Why not take the opportunity to denounce Bush, Blair & Co.? After all, for a few days you would have the attention of the whole of Britain and much of the world.

UPDATE: An impressive critique of Richard Jones's problematic eyewitness account is found here. It proves beyond a doubt that his story is complete and utter fiction. Because Jones did not describe a man on the bus who resembled Hussain, I no longer incline to the view that he was a planted witness. We seem to have a plain old-fashioned liar.

11.07.2005 at 04:33
WHITE GUYS BEHIND THE LONDON BOMBINGS?
by: socialdemocracynow

Many people on the left, including George Galloway, Robert Fisk and John Pilger, are taking the line that this week's bombings in London were connected in some way to the occupation of Iraq and that they prove that the Anglo-American policy there is counterproductive. Tariq Ali, for example, although he admits that we don't know who carried out the bombings, nonetheless goes on to write: 'it is safe to assume that the cause of these bombs is the unstinting support given by New Labour and its prime minister to the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.' But this is a huge leap to make, considering that we know nothing at all about the identities and motives of the bombers.

1) There is no evidence whatsoever that the bombings were perpetrated by Islamic terrorists. Blair: 'We know that these people act in the name of Islam.' How do we know that? No copies of the Koran have been found at the crime scenes. Rather, the links to Islam came courtesy of two Israeli security 'experts' - Boaz Ganor, director general of Israel's International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism, and Mordechai Kedar, a counter-terrorism analyst for Israel's public television - who, unless they have psychic powers, are no more qualified to say who was behind the bombings than anybody else. What's more they have a geopolitical predisposition to blame Muslims for terrorism, which make them too biased to be taken seriously as security analysts.

2) In order to keep alive the myth that the bombings were the work of Muslims, the physical description of the bombers is being suppressed. First, notice that Richard Jones, the witness aboard the bus who saw someone acting suspiciously, provides no description of the man. I think we can safely presume that the BBC was instructed to suppress such information, because it simply doesn't make sense for someone to be interviewed about what he saw and not be asked what the suspicious individual actually looked like.

Second, note that although the bus had FOUR CCTV cameras, not one of them happens to have been switched on! Quote: 'the investigation received a serious setback when it was discovered the CCTV cameras on the bus that blew up were not working so detectives will not get vital images of the bomber. One senior Yard source said: "It's a big blow and a disappointment. If the cameras had been running we would have had pin-sharp close-up pictures of the person who carried out this atrocity. "We don't know if the driver forgot to switch them on or if there was a technical problem but there are no images." The bus had four cameras - one covering people getting on, the second at the exit doors and one on each deck scanning the length of the vehicle.'

If this story is true, it proves one thing, which is that when people say that heightened security measures will enable us to catch terrorists in future, we shouldn't believe them! Whatever measure is in place, you can be sure that due to some inexplicable hiccup it won't be functioning the day it's needed. However, as it happens, I don't believe the report at all, and I think the CCTV evidence is being 'disappeared' because it would show precisely who the man on the bus was. I don't think we are meant to find out who he was and I feel sure that we never will.

It's interesting, finally, to note that the theory has emerged that 'a gang of white "mercenary terrorists" was hired by al-Qa'ida to carry out last week's devastating attacks on London.' It's hard to see why such a theory would have emerged, if there wasn't evidence implicating white people in the crime. I think Mike Rivero of the website What Really Happened is on the money when he writes: 'Translation: "The witnesses all saw white guys placing the bombs, so we gotta figure out a story by which we can keep the blame on the Arabs."'

So it looks to me like the bombings were the work of white guys, but that the information is being suppressed until a story can be concocted that will somehow connect them to al-Qaeda.

UPDATE: So Blair plans to reject a probe into the bombings, 'insisting such a move would distract from the task of catching the perpetrators.' Funny how I saw that one coming! (NB: if we don't catch the perpetrators, that means we get precisely nothing! So my prediction is that sooner or later Tony will have to give in and there'll be a probe of sorts. Paging Lord Hutton! Paging Lord Hutton!)
Back to top
Akbal13
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 94
Location: An Island off Eurasia

PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:25 pm    Post subject: Latest from Wagnews re London Bombs CCTV Anomalies Reply with quote

http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/ops-in-disarray-over-london-bombs. html

Ops in Disarray Over London Bombs Probe


Cointelpro elements in the alternative media have rushed to try blunt the impact of recent analysis of a faked CCTV image appearing to show the alleged 7/7 London bombers.

Our report, published last Saturday [23rd July], demonstrated 13 clear signs of fakery in the CCTV photo of the four alleged bombers at Luton station, released by the London Metropolitan Police. That evidence is already hitting forums and alternative sites across the internet and the world. So also is our accompanying article explaining how the London bombings were actually carried out.

With the cover-story crumbling, the behind-the-scenes boys had to do some quick damage limitation. And so, WhatReallyHappened.com has just published a photo essay warning people away from questioning the CCTV images released by UK police.

Michael Rivero's series of photos tries to show that one of the 13 anomalies --where a railing appears superimposed in front of one of the men-- is not really an anomaly at all. The man's arm is bent at the elbow, says Rivero -and so the railing is behind him. [see pic] Which might be a good point. But there is one problem. And it's a big one.

Rivero is not using the original Luton CCTV image. He's using an altered version.

In the Rivero version of the original, the railing has been digitally altered so that it bends downwards near the man's body. You could prove anything with an altered original! We used a good quality Yahoo Photo image as our original. It shows a straight railing.

We also have copies of the motherlode photo -the one issued by the UK authotiries in the first place. You can view it on the London Metropolitan Police website. And the Met original is the full size CCTV image -with some background detail not in the Yahoo and other media cropped copies. It too has a straight railing. So has every version I have seen -except on Whatreallyhappened.

It hard to figure how someone would use an altered original to deflect people away from the Luton CCTV image anomalies.

There could be a few motivations for this move. First, to fool anyone who doesn't know Rivero is not using the original. Second, to throw up a smokescreen of confusion. Third, to focus attention on the railing anomaly and downplay the other 12 problems with that Luton CCTV image. And most important --to narrow the focus of the entire london bombings investigation down a small section of one image -a few thousand pixels.

Our approach now should be to keep a broad focus to our research. (We should use the best quality image for photo analysis. That's clearly the Met Police version, which has remained unchanged -I've been saving it daily and checking it's the same.)

Internet sleuths are clearly making progress on the London bombings investigation. The Real investigation. The only real one. But, though the photo is key, but it's just one aspect. And it's not going to run away anywhere. We have the photos.

People need to continue fact checking, incidental and background research, and continue to develop analysis of what was the real scenario, in full that day in London.

Plus, we should save, save, save to local disc. News articles with useful detail will be going offline into paid archives and off forum pages. We need that detail for later research. On both the first and second London 'attacks'.

It's heartening. The London Bombing Black Op is still leaking at the seams.

posted by Fintan, BreakForNews.com
at 11:56 AM

4 Comments:

irishdrifter said...

Very well spotted!!

Please examine this :

7:23 PM
Anonymous said...

Good job Fintan! Michael Rivero's "original" is definitely post doctored, doctored, if that makes sense. It almost looks like they tried to contour the fence railing to mold around the guy's back or give the illusion of a downward staircase with a downward railing behind the foreground railing, weird, and a little too obvious, any theories?
7:38 PM
Anonymous said...

Sorry, but I think we don't really go forward to something useful with this kind of discussion: we're talking about a JPG file from a CCTV camera, a very low quality image that has been modified with Photoshop before it was released. If you open the photo from Met-Police site (the original?) with a text-editor you see in the first line, among the garbage of "binary chars", the strings "Ducky" and "Adobe" that show up in all Photoshop-generated jpeg images.

Was it only to change the format of the image file to a format like jpeg used in web sites? Or was the image deeply altered in any other way?

Every time you open and save an image file with a program you "alter" the image in some way because softwares are different: jpeg is a compressed format and every software of compression of an image acts different.

The one thing I find suspect in this image and in all its formats and versions on the web, is the fact that you can't see clearly the face of 3 suspected kamikazes: apart the first (Hussain) none of the faces of the other 3 is clearly visible and, more, if you enlarge the image, it seems to me that their faces have been in part erased, specially for the third and fourth of them (Khan and Anweer?).

But, altered or not, do you recognize without doubt 3 of 4 terrorists in this image? If you watch the photos of those 3 bad guys published on newspapers and then watch at this image, can you say who is Anweer, who is Khan and who is Germain?

If police has better images of the terrorists from CCTV why has not released them?

The images released from police show clearly only Hussain: Hussain died on bus where there were not cameras (they were broken). A coincidence?

_________________
¡Venceremos!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Akbal13
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 94
Location: An Island off Eurasia

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 3:37 am    Post subject: Sleuthing Around Reply with quote

http://100777.com/faketerror/londonbliar?PHPSESSID=193f3e26d68dd16dc30 69200b5a3f42a

"Tony Blair Ordered The London Bombings"



Former MI6 operative: The mainstream media ignores vital evidence of an inside job.
http://www.rense.com/general66/blair.htm



Commentary

By Michael James in Frankfurt, Germany


Rested after a good night's sleep in the Gleneagles Hotel, Tony Blair glanced nervously at his watch and wondered if the bombing of the London transport system would take place on schedule. London's Chief of Police, Sir Ian Blair, and MI5 boss, Eliza Manningham-Buller, had promised to keep him firmly in the loop; and Jack Straw had advised him that the Israelis had been placated.

Blair caught a glimpse of himself in the dresser and checked his profile. Carole, his personal image advisor, had told him to soften the pronounced jaw when seated next to Bush. "You're overdoing the Winston thing," she had said pointedly. "Killing people was yesterday; starving Africans and rainforests is now the thing." She was wrong about the killing, of course. The good Miz Caplin would never understand his rites of passage, at least not in the Brethren's sense of the term. And yet something was still bothering him.

The intelligence services had been caught off balance by Mossad's unwelcome intrusion into matters they considered a strictly British affair. Having the headline "Israel Warned Blair Two Days Before Attack" splashed across the front pages of an otherwise complicit print media was something to be avoided at all costs. Binyamin Netanyahu would go ahead with preparations for his press conference and allow himself to be "advised" by Scotland Yard shortly after the first blast. If MI5 were to dally in their attacks on commuters, he would have no choice but to claim that Scotland Yard had warned him prior to the event, and the Blair government would have to hope that the British people would not notice the obvious irregularity.

Back in London, Netanyahu dropped security protocol and looked cautiously out of his hotel window. Reflecting on his long years of experience in helping to finance and organise terror attacks on Israeli citizens to provoke world outrage against the rightful inhabitants of his stolen country, he knew that errors would be made and officials would let their tongues slip when the heat was on. Press reports would have to be altered at short notice and the volume turned up loud until all the world would hear nothing but "al Qaeda, alQaeda, al Qaeda". It had worked before and it would work again. The Goyim, whether American or British, would once more be led by the nose to believe the official version of events. Binyamin snickered inwardly at Eliza Manningham-Buller's chosen title for the fictitious terror group. The nonsensical "Secret Group of the al Qaeda Organisation in Europe" suggested to him that Manningham-Buller had probably spent her childhood reading nothing other than Enid Blyton's "Famous Five" and "Secret Seven" adventure books. Yes, that was it, the Secret Seven on the seventh of July. How apt. How very Qabalah.

Whatever, the British had insisted on bombing close to the venue at which he had been billed to deliver an important seminar, if only to give the attacks, in the words of an MI6 liason officer, "a real whiff of al Qaeda". The Liverpool Street bombing would even lift the hotel in which former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani was staying. The Prime Minister of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty, was also close to the epicentre. The British government and their Freemason paymasters in the City of London were sure sending a message to the Americans and Canadians: "We're back in control of the terror game now. This time, the British Crown is playing for keeps."

But the clock was ticking, and still no word. "Hashem," Netanyahu growled softly, "deliver us from the ignorant Goyim and their slow-witted ways."

At 8.40 am, "Mad Dog" Spencer stepped into the third carriage of a subway train bound for Aldgate and Liverpool Street Stations. He knew he would have very little time to leave the package behind in a shabby plastic bag and put sufficient distance between himself and the ten pounds of high explosives strapped to a timer. The latex treatment, which had given him the facial appearance of a down-and-out, was beginning to itch. Such inconveniences would have meant nothing to him back in the days when working in Kabul with his old MI6 friend, Clive Newell. It was Newell who had introduced him to the legendary CIA asset, Osama bin Laden, then known by his American codename "Tim Osman". Those were the days: fighting the Soviets back-to-back with artificial Islamic terror groups financed out of London, courtesy of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International.

Spencer remembered Clive fawning over Osama as "our baby", and his raging against the CIA's unwarranted incursions on the British Crown's right to use the fledgling al Qaeda gang as it saw fit. After all, the British had established the occultic Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt during the 1920s for the express purpose of destroying pro-American Arab nationalism as a counterforce to continued British imperial rule and as a means to defame the world's fastest growing religion. America had paid for her obstinacy on September 11, 2001, although the Bush administration had deliberately left the gate wide open to all comers, including Mossad and the mercenary wing of the British SAS. Bush got what he wanted. Now it's our turn.

Had "J-boy" been telepathic, he would doubtless have been sharing Spencer's thoughts. They were old pals and had been through much the same thing. J-boy scanned the faces of his fellow commuters on the southbound Piccadilly Line train. They will all be dead in less than three minutes, he thought. Still, it all works to the good of Queen and country, and Tony will get his shiny new National Identity Cards. A shame it had to be a "wet job", but his many years of experience in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities in Northern Ireland and on the British mainland had shown him that only the proactive approach toward bringing things to a head delivered the political goods.

The 1974 Birmingham pub bombings. Yes, sir, that was us; and six innocent Paddies went to prison. It didn't stop there. The good times for J-boy only started in earnest when working for the maverick Gordon Kerr. As an operative for the DET 14th Intelligence squad, J-boy had killed both Republicans and Loyalists, changing sides as frequently as was required by both MI5 and the SAS. The slaying of pensioner Francisco Notarantonio was J-boy's finest moment because, in contrast to bombings with a high civilian body count, it required a level of deception unmatched in any previous MI5 assassinations in Ireland and Britain. Sir John Stevens finally ended the fun, despite MI5's efforts to kill him too. But still, Her Majesty's Government saved the day by forbidding the press from revealing any further names. Not that the press requires censorship these days - the mainstream boys do it themselves. It's a cakewalk.

J-boy allowed the package to slip neatly between his feet, and he gently sidled it into the corner of the standing room in front of the double doors to the carriage. When the train pulled into the station, J-boy was gone. He would disappear into the crowd and make an expeditious exit before the explosion would claim the lives of twenty-one "useless eaters", and leave at least one hundred survivors without vital body parts for the rest of their lives.

As J-boy vanished into the back seat of an Astra Cabrio before being driven to an MI5 safe house, Tony Blair entered the foyer of the Gleneagles Hotel with a smile on his face. He knew that the first three bombs had been detonated just split seconds apart. Mentally, he quickly ran through the lines he had prepared the night before. He would say something Churchillian with an allusion to the wartime blitz and the unfailing courage of Londoners. It would be a bravely defiant speech. Nobody would suspect that the bombings were his own handiwork. Still, until such time he would have to play dumb and wait for Jonathan Powell or Ian Gleeson to brief him officially. Powell, he knew, had not been informed, but would know soon enough once John Scarlett had apprised him of the matter.

Sir Ian Blair, London's Chief of Police, tried to sound surprised when informed of the bombings. The transport police had, as agreed in prior exercises, already briefed the press about an unexplained power surge. The rationale for such an explanation would be based on the alleged need to minimise panic and, as a helpful corollary, to maximise any potential casualties at sites where bombs had yet to be detonated. MI5 had quite deliberately misbriefed Sir Ian on the number of detonations they had planned, just to keep him sharp. This was the first time that such a hugely complex operation was known to senior figures within the British executive, Scotland Yard and the intelligence services. In fact, considering the potential for accidental disclosure, it was unprecedented in its scope and daring.

Sir Ian was nervous, and rightfully so. He had wanted to suspend all cell phone network services, but had been overruled by both Eliza Manningham-Buller and Tony Blair, the latter saying that "commuters should be given the chance to digitally record the full horror of the attacks". Yet Sir Ian knew that journalists would be curious as to why services were allowed to continue, given the widely known fact that the Madrid bombings had been detonated by mobile devices. It would be a tough call. He wouldn't, of course, be able to say that he knew well in advance that timers had triggered the explosives. He would just have to HOPE THAT JOURNALISTS WOULD IGNORE THIS SMOKING GUN and fall for the mantra their editors would insist on repeating: "al Qaeda, al Qaeda, al Qaeda." Sir Ian took a deep breath and quietly thanked Moloch in his heart for making real investigative journalism a thing of the past.

Eliza Manningham-Buller discovered a spring in her step. This was the first time she had been allowed to participate in the killing of large numbers of innocent people. It was a great day for England. It meant that she and John Scarlett would regain full control over al Qaeda and all the other terror front groups that had deserted to the CIA following Clinton's symbolic and disciplinary cruise missile attacks on the Taliban. Eliza had also been cleaning house. There were no more David Shaylers around to be blowing whistles on payments made to Osama. No more attempts to expose her protection of British-trained and financed terrorists, such as Abu Qatada, a pro-British, anti-American gentleman with impeccable manners and a heart for the Queen.

Department K had already confirmed that both Spencer and J-boy were safe and in debrief. With the Edgware Road detonation also a success, Simpson wouldn't be far behind. That just left 'Green Eagle', Lawton and Pettigrew. Blair would now have been fully informed and she would take the conference call alone. There was still the matter of the fake al Qaeda website. The DNS was still POINTING TO AN INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER IN MARYLAND, AMERICA.[also see this] The Israeli intern had, according to one duty officer who speaks fluent Farsi and classic Arabic, done a poor job of the grammar and had even misquoted the ayahs selected from the Koran. MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes was already saying that al Qaeda would never have posted a statement on a secular website and that the claim of responsibility contained give-away errors. The whole thing is phoney, he scoffed. "This is not something al-Qaeda would do," he said.

Eliza, being a perfectionist and the first to laugh at the CIA's obvious home movie and audio productions of fake al Qaeda PR, was not entirely happy with substandard work. The press, however, would be cowed, online bloggers dismissed as nutty conspiracy theorists and the website pulled as soon as it had served its purpose. She could only hope that the ad hoc team charged with planting "clues" and tampering with forensic "evidence" in the subway stations would make a much better job at framing fictitious Islamic extremists. But, darling, no mini-vans full of Korans or miraculously intact Arab passports to be found within the eye of the blasts. Manningham-Buller sniggered into her coffee cup at the crass ineptitude of the Bush administration. British terrorism had always had a touch of class.

Meanwhile, all hell had broken lose in Tel Aviv. Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom had been barking down the phone to Israeli Ambassador Zvi Heifetz, enraged that the British had not acted on his warnings of an attack on the subway system, but had instead failed to communicate that this was an inside job. How dare they endanger Netanyahu's life? Now they're claiming the finance minister was warned before the attacks and are preparing a damage limitation exercise that points to Mossad in the event that things go awry. Shalom had the soon-to-be redacted Associated Press report in front of him:

(Jerusalem-AP) July 7, 2005 - "British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.

"Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an economic conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him to stay in his hotel room instead, government officials said. ... Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.

"The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the nature of his position."

Shalom was aware of the political fallout this would cause. The British were trying to spin things their way and his opposite number, John Scarlett, was refusing to take his calls. All this despite repeated warnings from the Israeli side since July 4. Yes, we told them it was going to happen, and TONY BLAIR SAT ON THE INFORMATION AND DID NOTHING.

Shalom knew that AP would eventually redact the news report (and they did); so he was pleased to read what Stratfor had put out:

"Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned "minutes before" the first attack, unconfirmed rumours in intelligence circles indicate that the Israeli government actually warned London of the attacks "a couple of days" previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks that turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not want to disrupt the G-8 summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false alarm.

"The British government sat on this information for days and failed to respond. Though the Israeli government is playing along publicly, it may not stay quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his failure to deter this major terrorist attack."

Heifetz ended his conversation with Shalom and eyed his liquor cabinet. If the press runs with this, he thought wistfully, Blair will be exposed as a murderer of his own people. You can kill Israelis and get away with it. You can kill Americans and they'll make you President for a second time. But the Brits are made of wiser stuff. They'll hang Blair from the highest lamppost in London.

Heifetz had also been told that Sir Ian Blair had refused to disable the cell phone networks. That's an open admission that Blair knew well beforehand that explosions were not to be triggered by cell phones. Heifetz whistled at the audacity of it all, and wondered if just one curious journalist would push the matter to its logical conclusion. Not any of the media whores from the Murdoch press, of course. Or even from the Fabian socialist Guardian newspaper. The BBC would naturally report the government-approved version of events and any embarrassing questions would be drowned out in the general cry for revenge and increased police state powers.

As reports of bus explosions hit the airwaves, Tony Blair's face animated the live feed. Flanked by Chirac and Bush, Blair went into Churchill mode and began the spin. Trying to look shocked and concerned, but inwardly full of glee, Blair let loose the repertoire he had prepared the night before. He would be returning to London to meet with police and intelligence chiefs, and he would preside over a press and propaganda control operation known as COBRA.

"A co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos," Sir Ian Blair told Sky News in a telltale direct translation of the Freemasons' Satanic motto "Ordo Ab Chao".

The British people had been fooled again. Another war is on the cards.

---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------

On Saturday July 10, a British freelance journalist with a wealth of experience in sniffing out illegal MI6 activities in Germany took a stroll along the Muenchner Strasse in Frankfurt and recalled the warm summer evening in 1997 when a gun-wielding MI6 operative tried to shoot him dead: an incident witnessed by several passers-by and still on file with Inspector Werner Dietz at Frankfurt's central police headquarters. The attack only strengthened Michael James' determination to return a popular politician from enforced exile to his homeland in Kenya and to continue on African soil his investigation into the MI6 assassination of Robert Ouko, Kenya's anti-British foreign minister.

The same journalist was mulling a call from a former MI6 agent who, back in 1997, had warned him of the clear and present danger to his life. Even though he already knew that Tony Blair had been informed of the impending attacks on London, what he had been told in terms of Blair's direct involvement sounded almost too fantastical. That Tony Blair enjoyed killing Arab children was a proven fact. But British citizens on British soil? "Then tell it as a short story with the outline of events I have provided, my friend," his confidante implored. "The facts will speak for themselves."

And these are the facts: Tony Blair played a direct executive role in the false flag terror attacks on London, killing over sixty innocent civilians and maiming hundreds, possibly thousands, more. He worked in close cooperation with his namesake and fellow occultist, Sir Ian Blair, and with the head of MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller. Jack Straw [Strawinski], the Foreign Secretary, was also kept informed of events leading up to the atrocities.

The first expositor that will surely hang Tony Blair came in the form of reports by the Associated Press and the intelligence specialists Stratfor that the Israelis had been repeatedly warning the British government since July 4, and that Blair chose to ignore both Shalom and Heifetz. The AP reports, which were quickly withdrawn from public view, have been salvaged from the Google cache and are on display at nomorefakenews.com, among many other websites. The second is represented by a major blunder in planning and response, namely Sir Ian Blair's decision not to shut down the cell phone networks. That decision was based entirely on his foreknowledge that the explosives would not be detonated by means of mobile phones, as was the case with the equally suspicious events that struck Madrid on March 3, 2004, and his deferring to Tony Blair's desire for graphic images of the carnage. A third expositor lies in the fact that MI5 made a number of glaring and very telling errors in their presentation of the "al Qaeda" website, even allowing a simple DNS trace to a server in the United States. [also see http://cryptome.org/alneda-wet.htm for possible explanation ]

Another anomaly may emerge in the fact that the perpetrators seem to have somehow escaped being filmed by London's vast network of CCTV cameras - a remarkable feat when one considers that the average Londoner is caught on camera three hundred times a day, and certainly more evidence that these operations were carried out by sophisticated insiders. Without a doubt, a number of Arab men will be rounded up in the days ahead and questioned by police until charges can be made to look credible.

When Tony Blair told the press that the bombings bore all the hallmarks of al Qaeda, he broke with tradition and actually told the truth. The fall-guy al Qaeda network is the b****** child of the British intelligence services and the Freemasonic terror school, the occultic Muslim Brotherhood. MI5, MI6 and al Qaeda are virtually indistinguishable. Yes, Mr Blair, the bombings bore all the hallmarks of MI5 - and you know it, precisely because it was you who authorised the attacks.

It's not the first time that MI5 has been active in perpetrating acts of terror against the British people. Recent exposures have shown that most of the bombings carried out by the Irish Republican Army during its long campaign against the illegal British occupation of Northern Ireland were, in fact, provoked, instigated and executed by undercover MI5 agents posing as Irish patriots.

This pattern of subterfuge and deception in creating terror to manipulate public perceptions has been a specialty of American and British governments for the best part of fifty years. Diligent researchers and real journalists who aren't fooled by government propaganda and the mainstream media, already know that the CIA, MI5 and MI6 financed al Qaeda during its heyday as the main organiser against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. They also know that Osama bin Laden was, and probably still is, on the CIA payroll, operating under the name "Tim Osman". The business relationship between the mercurial and sinister Bush family and the bin Ladens is well known. All of these facts can now be verified on the public record, thanks to the efforts of independent journalists and truth campaigners. Less well known is the integral role played by the British intelligence services (both MI5 and MI6) in creating, steering and financing the terror network, and also in protecting key operatives from public exposure and arrest.

Blair has obtained the results he wanted: the collapse of all resistance to the imminent introduction of National Identity Cards, the inflaming of public rage against Islam in preparation for an attack on Iran and Syria, and a distraction from the continued illegality of the Iraq war and issues that threaten to overwhelm his administration, such as the Downing Street memo, which evidences fraud and treason at the highest levels of state.

Tony Blair has one other ambition that remains unfulfilled. He has stated that he wishes to become the first ever president of a European superstate, a project recently derailed by the stunning French and Dutch rejection of the proposed European constitution. He also wishes, in his capacity as the new Prince of Europe, to remodel the European entity as a UK-US-Israeli forward base for imperial expansion in the Middle East and Central Asia; and he wishes to stamp this initiative with the imprimatur of the British Crown, forcing the United States to play the junior role in a new world order shaped by international bankers in the City of London.

The attacks on London and the forthcoming attacks on France and Germany are therefore also designed to resurrect the failing European project as the answer to the demands for increased security and surveillance and the continued negation of civil liberties - demands that will now be heard and amplified throughout the European Union by frightened and gullible citizens.

I was the first, long before Harold Pinter, to publicly call for the lawful arrest and execution of Tony Blair for mass murder and high treason, and I would like to renew that call here and now. With a wry nod in the direction of the British Consulate in Frankfurt, which has already tried to nail me for honest journalism, allow me in my capacity as one who possesses pre-degree qualifications in British Law, Constitution and Government to stress that such measures are not only lawful, but are indeed obligatory under the code governing statutes on Citizens' Arrests.

Tony Blair is a dangerous psychopath who must be stopped before he kills and maims again. According to psychologist Dr Paul Broks, his repeated lies and his lust for the blood of innocent people evidence "a plausible psychopath - charming, intelligent, emotionally manipulative, ruthlessly ambitious and self-serving." How much longer do we permit Blair to remain at large? How many more deaths and fake terror attacks will it take before men and women of courage invoke the law and apprehend this monster?

To paraphrase another serial killer, George W. Bush, if we can't bring Tony Blair to justice, we must bring justice to Tony Blair.

References:

Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks
http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news2/stratfor-london.html

Who's Behind The Bombings In London Town?
http://thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=3325

See No Evil: Spinning Netanyahu's London Terror Tip-off
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/comments.php?id=2205_0_1_0_C

Al Qaeda Net Site Tracks Back To Maryland
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/alqmaryland.html

Network Not Downed
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13382604,00.html

Zionists finally strike London
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=3314

The Muslim Brotherhood: The Globalists' Secret Weapon
http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/MB.htm

British Intelligence: Her Majesty's Terrorist Network
http://www.infowars.com/pdfs/order_ch.PDF

Fomenting the "Clash of Civilizations" for a New World Order
http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/Clash.htm

Al-Qaida suspect hidden by UK agents
http://guardian.co.uk/ukresponse/story/0,11017,751102,00.html

Britain sheltering al-Qaeda leader
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2115371.stm

British army allowed IRA to bomb Ulster Pub
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm

My unit conspired in the murder of civilians in Ireland
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm

Abandoned for killing their own, British Army officers planted as terrorists appeal to MoD
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm

British intelligence sanctioned 1987 killing of pensioner to protect IRA agent
http://www.serve.com/pfc/fru/fru12022k1k.html

Army 'colluded' with loyalist killers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/2955941.stm



-----
Michael James is a British freelance journalist and translator, resident in Germany for almost 13 years. Permission to republish his work in any media is freely grant

_________________
¡Venceremos!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TonyGosling
Editor
Editor


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 15218
Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England

PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tony Blair Ordered the London Bombings

By on July 15, 2005

Rested after a good night’s sleep in the Gleneagles Hotel, Tony Blair glanced nervously at his watch and wondered if the bombing of the London transport system would take place on schedule. London’s Chief of Police, Sir Ian Blair, and MI5 boss, Eliza Manningham-Buller, had promised to keep him firmly in the loop; and Jack Straw had advised him that the Israelis had been placated.

Blair caught a glimpse of himself in the dresser and checked his profile. Carole, his personal image advisor, had told him to soften the pronounced jaw when seated next to Bush. “You’re overdoing the Winston thing,” she had said pointedly. “Killing people was yesterday; starving Africans and rainforests is now the thing.” She was wrong about the killing, of course. The good Miz Caplin would never understand his rites of passage, at least not in the Brethren’s sense of the term. And yet something was still bothering him.

The intelligence services had been caught off balance by Mossad’s unwelcome intrusion into matters they considered a strictly British affair. Having the headline “Israel Warned Blair Two Days Before Attack” splashed across the front pages of an otherwise complicit print media was something to be avoided at all costs. Binyamin Netanyahu would go ahead with preparations for his press conference and allow himself to be “advised” by Scotland Yard shortly after the first blast. If MI5 were to dally in their attacks on commuters, he would have no choice but to claim that Scotland Yard had warned him prior to the event, and the Blair government would have to hope that the British people would not notice the obvious irregularity.

Back in London, Netanyahu dropped security protocol and looked cautiously out of his hotel window. Reflecting on his long years of experience in helping to finance and organise terror attacks on Israeli citizens to provoke world outrage against the rightful inhabitants of his stolen country, he knew that errors would be made and officials would let their tongues slip when the heat was on. Press reports would have to be altered at short notice and the volume turned up loud until all the world would hear nothing but “al Qaeda, alQaeda, al Qaeda”. It had worked before and it would work again. The Goyim, whether American or British, would once more be led by the nose to believe the official version of events. Binyamin snickered inwardly at Eliza Manningham-Buller’s chosen title for the fictitious terror group. The nonsensical “Secret Group of the al Qaeda Organisation in Europe” suggested to him that Manningham-Buller had probably spent her childhood reading nothing other than Enid Blyton’s “Famous Five” and “Secret Seven” adventure books. Yes, that was it, the Secret Seven on the seventh of July. How apt. How very Qabalah.

Whatever, the British had insisted on bombing close to the venue at which he had been billed to deliver an important seminar, if only to give the attacks, in the words of an MI6 liason officer, “a real whiff of al Qaeda”. The Liverpool Street bombing would even lift the hotel in which former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani was staying. The Prime Minister of Ontario, Dalton McGuinty, was also close to the epicentre. The British government and their Freemason paymasters in the City of London were sure sending a message to the Americans and Canadians: “We’re back in control of the terror game now. This time, the British Crown is playing for keeps.”

But the clock was ticking, and still no word. “Hashem,” Netanyahu growled softly, “deliver us from the ignorant Goyim and their slow-witted ways.”

At 8.40 am, “Mad Dog” Spencer stepped into the third carriage of a subway train bound for Aldgate and Liverpool Street Stations. He knew he would have very little time to leave the package behind in a shabby plastic bag and put sufficient distance between himself and the ten pounds of high explosives strapped to a timer. The latex treatment, which had given him the facial appearance of a down-and-out, was beginning to itch. Such inconveniences would have meant nothing to him back in the days when working in Kabul with his old MI6 friend, Clive Newell. It was Newell who had introduced him to the legendary CIA asset, Osama bin Laden, then known by his American codename “Tim Osman”. Those were the days: fighting the Soviets back-to-back with artificial Islamic terror groups financed out of London, courtesy of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International.

Spencer remembered Clive fawning over Osama as “our baby”, and his raging against the CIA’s unwarranted incursions on the British Crown’s right to use the fledgling al Qaeda gang as it saw fit. After all, the British had established the occultic Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt during the 1920s for the express purpose of destroying pro-American Arab nationalism as a counterforce to continued British imperial rule and as a means to defame the world’s fastest growing religion. America had paid for her obstinacy on September 11, 2001, although the Bush administration had deliberately left the gate wide open to all comers, including Mossad and the mercenary wing of the British SAS. Bush got what he wanted. Now it’s our turn.

Had “J-boy” been telepathic, he would doubtless have been sharing Spencer’s thoughts. They were old pals and had been through much the same thing. J-boy scanned the faces of his fellow commuters on the southbound Piccadilly Line train. They will all be dead in less than three minutes, he thought. Still, it all works to the good of Queen and country, and Tony will get his shiny new National Identity Cards. A shame it had to be a “wet job”, but his many years of experience in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities in Northern Ireland and on the British mainland had shown him that only the proactive approach toward bringing things to a head delivered the political goods.

The 1974 Birmingham pub bombings. Yes, sir, that was us; and six innocent Paddies went to prison. It didn’t stop there. The good times for J-boy only started in earnest when working for the maverick Gordon Kerr. As an operative for the DET 14th Intelligence squad, J-boy had killed both Republicans and Loyalists, changing sides as frequently as was required by both MI5 and the SAS. The slaying of pensioner Francisco Notarantonio was J-boy’s finest moment because, in contrast to bombings with a high civilian body count, it required a level of deception unmatched in any previous MI5 assassinations in Ireland and Britain. Sir John Stevens finally ended the fun, despite MI5’s efforts to kill him too. But still, Her Majesty’s Government saved the day by forbidding the press from revealing any further names. Not that the press requires censorship these days – the mainstream boys do it themselves. It’s a cakewalk.

J-boy allowed the package to slip neatly between his feet, and he gently sidled it into the corner of the standing room in front of the double doors to the carriage. When the train pulled into the station, J-boy was gone. He would disappear into the crowd and make an expeditious exit before the explosion would claim the lives of twenty-one “useless eaters”, and leave at least one hundred survivors without vital body parts for the rest of their lives.

As J-boy vanished into the back seat of an Astra Cabrio before being driven to an MI5 safe house, Tony Blair entered the foyer of the Gleneagles Hotel with a smile on his face. He knew that the first three bombs had been detonated just split seconds apart. Mentally, he quickly ran through the lines he had prepared the night before. He would say something Churchillian with an allusion to the wartime blitz and the unfailing courage of Londoners. It would be a bravely defiant speech. Nobody would suspect that the bombings were his own handiwork. Still, until such time he would have to play dumb and wait for Jonathan Powell or Ian Gleeson to brief him officially. Powell, he knew, had not been informed, but would know soon enough once John Scarlett had apprised him of the matter.

Sir Ian Blair, London’s Chief of Police, tried to sound surprised when informed of the bombings. The transport police had, as agreed in prior exercises, already briefed the press about an unexplained power surge. The rationale for such an explanation would be based on the alleged need to minimise panic and, as a helpful corollary, to maximise any potential casualties at sites where bombs had yet to be detonated. MI5 had quite deliberately misbriefed Sir Ian on the number of detonations they had planned, just to keep him sharp. This was the first time that such a hugely complex operation was known to senior figures within the British executive, Scotland Yard and the intelligence services. In fact, considering the potential for accidental disclosure, it was unprecedented in its scope and daring.

Sir Ian was nervous, and rightfully so. He had wanted to suspend all cell phone network services, but had been overruled by both Eliza Manningham-Buller and Tony Blair, the latter saying that “commuters should be given the chance to digitally record the full horror of the attacks”. Yet Sir Ian knew that journalists would be curious as to why services were allowed to continue, given the widely known fact that the Madrid bombings had been detonated by mobile devices. It would be a tough call. He wouldn’t, of course, be able to say that he knew well in advance that timers had triggered the explosives. He would just have to HOPE THAT JOURNALISTS WOULD IGNORE THIS SMOKING GUN and fall for the mantra their editors would insist on repeating: “al Qaeda, al Qaeda, al Qaeda.” Sir Ian took a deep breath and quietly thanked Moloch in his heart for making real investigative journalism a thing of the past.

Eliza Manningham-Buller discovered a spring in her step. This was the first time she had been allowed to participate in the killing of large numbers of innocent people. It was a great day for England. It meant that she and John Scarlett would regain full control over al Qaeda and all the other terror front groups that had deserted to the CIA following Clinton’s symbolic and disciplinary cruise missile attacks on the Taliban. Eliza had also been cleaning house. There were no more David Shaylers around to be blowing whistles on payments made to Osama. No more attempts to expose her protection of British-trained and financed terrorists, such as Abu Qatada, a pro-British, anti-American gentleman with impeccable manners and a heart for the Queen.

Department K had already confirmed that both Spencer and J-boy were safe and in debrief. With the Edgware Road detonation also a success, Simpson wouldn’t be far behind. That just left ‘Green Eagle’, Lawton and Pettigrew. Blair would now have been fully informed and she would take the conference call alone. There was still the matter of the fake al Qaeda website. The DNS was still POINTING TO AN INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER IN MARYLAND, AMERICA. The Israeli intern had, according to one duty officer who speaks fluent Farsi and classic Arabic, done a poor job of the grammar and had even misquoted the ayahs selected from the Koran. MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes was already saying that al Qaeda would never have posted a statement on a secular website and that the claim of responsibility contained give-away errors. The whole thing is phoney, he scoffed. “This is not something al-Qaeda would do,” he said.

Eliza, being a perfectionist and the first to laugh at the CIA’s obvious home movie and audio productions of fake al Qaeda PR, was not entirely happy with substandard work. The press, however, would be cowed, online bloggers dismissed as nutty conspiracy theorists and the website pulled as soon as it had served its purpose. She could only hope that the ad hoc team charged with planting “clues” and tampering with forensic “evidence” in the subway stations would make a much better job at framing fictitious Islamic extremists. But, darling, no mini-vans full of Korans or miraculously intact Arab passports to be found within the eye of the blasts. Manningham-Buller sniggered into her coffee cup at the crass ineptitude of the Bush administration. British terrorism had always had a touch of class.

Meanwhile, all hell had broken lose in Tel Aviv. Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom had been barking down the phone to Israeli Ambassador Zvi Heifetz, enraged that the British had not acted on his warnings of an attack on the subway system, but had instead failed to communicate that this was an inside job. How dare they endanger Netanyahu’s life? Now they’re claiming the finance minister was warned before the attacks and are preparing a damage limitation exercise that points to Mossad in the event that things go awry. Shalom had the soon-to-be redacted Associated Press report in front of him:

(Jerusalem-AP) July 7, 2005 – “British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday’s explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.

“Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an economic conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him to stay in his hotel room instead, government officials said. … Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.

“The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the nature of his position.”

Shalom was aware of the political fallout this would cause. The British were trying to spin things their way and his opposite number, John Scarlett, was refusing to take his calls. All this despite repeated warnings from the Israeli side since July 4. Yes, we told them it was going to happen, and TONY BLAIR SAT ON THE INFORMATION AND DID NOTHING.

Shalom knew that AP would eventually redact the news report (and they did: nomorefakenews.com); so he was pleased to read what Stratfor had put out:

“Contrary to original claims that Israel was warned “minutes before” the first attack, unconfirmed rumours in intelligence circles indicate that the Israeli government actually warned London of the attacks “a couple of days” previous. Israel has apparently given other warnings about possible attacks that turned out to be aborted operations. The British government did not want to disrupt the G-8 summit in Gleneagles, Scotland, or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to London, hoping this would be another false alarm.

“The British government sat on this information for days and failed to respond. Though the Israeli government is playing along publicly, it may not stay quiet for long. This is sure to apply pressure on Blair very soon for his failure to deter this major terrorist attack.”

Heifetz ended his conversation with Shalom and eyed his liquor cabinet. If the press runs with this, he thought wistfully, Blair will be exposed as a murderer of his own people. You can kill Israelis and get away with it. You can kill Americans and they’ll make you President for a second time. But the Brits are made of wiser stuff. They’ll hang Blair from the highest lamppost in London.

Heifetz had also been told that Sir Ian Blair had refused to disable the cell phone networks. That’s an open admission that Blair knew well beforehand that explosions were not to be triggered by cell phones. Heifetz whistled at the audacity of it all, and wondered if just one curious journalist would push the matter to its logical conclusion. Not any of the media whores from the Murdoch press, of course. Or even from the Fabian socialist Guardian newspaper. The BBC would naturally report the government-approved version of events and any embarrassing questions would be drowned out in the general cry for revenge and increased police state powers.

As reports of bus explosions hit the airwaves, Tony Blair’s face animated the live feed. Flanked by Chirac and Bush, Blair went into Churchill mode and began the spin. Trying to look shocked and concerned, but inwardly full of glee, Blair let loose the repertoire he had prepared the night before. He would be returning to London to meet with police and intelligence chiefs, and he would preside over a press and propaganda control operation known as COBRA.

“A co-ordinated effort is slowly bringing order out of the chaos,” Sir Ian Blair told Sky News in a telltale direct translation of the Freemasons’ Satanic motto “Ordo Ab Chao”.

The British people had been fooled again. Another war is on the cards.

On Saturday July 10, a British freelance journalist with a wealth of experience in sniffing out illegal MI6 activities in Germany took a stroll along the Muenchner Strasse in Frankfurt and recalled the warm summer evening in 1997 when a gun-wielding MI6 operative tried to shoot him dead: an incident witnessed by several passers-by and still on file with Inspector Werner Dietz at Frankfurt’s central police headquarters. The attack only strengthened Michael James’ determination to return a popular politician from enforced exile to his homeland in Kenya and to continue on African soil his investigation into the MI6 assassination of Robert Ouko, Kenya’s anti-British foreign minister.

The same journalist was mulling a call from a former MI6 agent who, back in 1997, had warned him of the clear and present danger to his life. Even though he already knew that Tony Blair had been informed of the impending attacks on London, what he had been told in terms of Blair’s direct involvement sounded almost too fantastical. That Tony Blair enjoyed killing Arab children was a proven fact. But British citizens on British soil? “Then tell it as a short story with the outline of events I have provided, my friend,” his confidante implored. “The facts will speak for themselves.”

And these are the facts: Tony Blair played a direct executive role in the false flag terror attacks on London, killing over sixty innocent civilians and maiming hundreds, possibly thousands, more. He worked in close cooperation with his namesake and fellow occultist, Sir Ian Blair, and with the head of MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller. Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, was also kept informed of events leading up to the atrocities.

The first expositor that will surely hang Tony Blair came in the form of reports by the Associated Press and the intelligence specialists Stratfor that the Israelis had been repeatedly warning the British government since July 4, and that Blair chose to ignore both Shalom and Heifetz. The AP reports, which were quickly withdrawn from public view, have been salvaged from the Google cache and are on display at nomorefakenews.com, among many other websites. The second is represented by a major blunder in planning and response, namely Sir Ian Blair’s decision not to shut down the cell phone networks. That decision was based entirely on his foreknowledge that the explosives would not be detonated by means of mobile phones, as was the case with the equally suspicious events that struck Madrid on March 3, 2004, and his deferring to Tony Blair’s desire for graphic images of the carnage. A third expositor lies in the fact that MI5 made a number of glaring and very telling errors in their presentation of the “al Qaeda” website, even allowing a simple DNS trace to a server in the United States.

Another anomaly may emerge in the fact that the perpetrators seem to have somehow escaped being filmed by London’s vast network of CCTV cameras – a remarkable feat when one considers that the average Londoner is caught on camera three hundred times a day, and certainly more evidence that these operations were carried out by sophisticated insiders. Without a doubt, a number of Arab men will be rounded up in the days ahead and questioned by police until charges can be made to look credible.

When Tony Blair told the press that the bombings bore all the hallmarks of al Qaeda, he broke with tradition and actually told the truth. The fall-guy al Qaeda network is the b****** child of the British intelligence services and the Freemasonic terror school, the occultic Muslim Brotherhood. MI5, MI6 and al Qaeda are virtually indistinguishable. Yes, Mr Blair, the bombings bore all the hallmarks of MI5 – and you know it, precisely because it was you who authorised the attacks.

It’s not the first time that MI5 has been active in perpetrating acts of terror against the British people. Recent exposures have shown that most of the bombings carried out by the Irish Republican Army during its long campaign against the illegal British occupation of Northern Ireland were, in fact, provoked, instigated and executed by undercover MI5 agents posing as Irish patriots.

This pattern of subterfuge and deception in creating terror to manipulate public perceptions has been a specialty of American and British governments for the best part of fifty years. Diligent researchers and real journalists who aren’t fooled by government propaganda and the mainstream media, already know that the CIA, MI5 and MI6 financed al Qaeda during its heyday as the main organiser against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. They also know that Osama bin Laden was, and probably still is, on the CIA payroll, operating under the name “Tim Osman”. The business relationship between the mercurial and sinister Bush family and the bin Ladens is well known. All of these facts can now be verified on the public record, thanks to the efforts of independent journalists and truth campaigners. Less well known is the integral role played by the British intelligence services (both MI5 and MI6) in creating, steering and financing the terror network, and also in protecting key operatives from public exposure and arrest.

Blair has obtained the results he wanted: the collapse of all resistance to the imminent introduction of National Identity Cards, the inflaming of public rage against Islam in preparation for an attack on Iran and Syria, and a distraction from the continued illegality of the Iraq war and issues that threaten to overwhelm his administration, such as the Downing Street memo, which evidences fraud and treason at the highest levels of state.

Tony Blair has one other ambition that remains unfulfilled. He has stated that he wishes to become the first ever president of a European superstate, a project recently derailed by the stunning French and Dutch rejection of the proposed European constitution. He also wishes, in his capacity as the new Prince of Europe, to remodel the European entity as a UK-US-Israeli forward base for imperial expansion in the Middle East and Central Asia; and he wishes to stamp this initiative with the imprimatur of the British Crown, forcing the United States to play the junior role in a new world order shaped by international bankers in the City of London.

The attacks on London and the forthcoming attacks on France and Germany are therefore also designed to resurrect the failing European project as the answer to the demands for increased security and surveillance and the continued negation of civil liberties – demands that will now be heard and amplified throughout the European Union by frightened and gullible citizens.

I was the first, long before Harold Pinter, to publicly call for the lawful arrest and execution of Tony Blair for mass murder and high treason, and I would like to renew that call here and now. With a wry nod in the direction of the British Consulate in Frankfurt, which has already tried to nail me for honest journalism, allow me in my capacity as one who possesses pre-degree qualifications in British Law, Constitution and Government to stress that such measures are not only lawful, but are indeed obligatory under the code governing statutes on Citizens’ Arrests.

Tony Blair is a dangerous psychopath who must be stopped before he kills and maims again. According to psychologist Dr Paul Broks, his repeated lies and his lust for the blood of innocent people evidence “a plausible psychopath – charming, intelligent, emotionally manipulative, ruthlessly ambitious and self-serving.” How much longer do we permit Blair to remain at large? How many more deaths and fake terror attacks will it take before men and women of courage invoke the law and apprehend this monster?

To paraphrase another serial killer, George W. Bush, if we can’t bring Tony Blair to justice, we must bring justice to Tony Blair.

References:

Israel Warned United Kingdom About Possible Attacks
http://fairuse.1accesshost.com/news2/stratfor-london.html

Who’s Behind The Bombings In London Town?
http://thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=3325

See No Evil: Spinning Netanyahu’s London Terror Tip-off
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/comments.php?id=2205_0_1_0_C

Al Qaeda Net Site Tracks Back To Maryland
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/alqmaryland.html

Network Not Downed
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13382604,00.html

Zionists finally strike London
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=3314

The Muslim Brotherhood: The Globalists’ Secret Weapon
http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/MB.htm

British Intelligence: Her Majesty’s Terrorist Network
http://www.infowars.com/pdfs/order_ch.PDF

Fomenting the “Clash of Civilizations” for a New World Order
http://www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/Clash.htm

Al-Qaida suspect hidden by UK agents
http://guardian.co.uk/ukresponse/story/0,11017,751102,00.html

Britain sheltering al-Qaeda leader
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2115371.stm

British army allowed IRA to bomb Ulster Pub
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm

My unit conspired in the murder of civilians in Ireland
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm

Abandoned for killing their own, British Army officers planted as terrorists appeal to MoD
http://cryptome.org/fru-herald.htm

British intelligence sanctioned 1987 killing of pensioner to protect IRA agent
http://www.serve.com/pfc/fru/fru12022k1k.html

Army ‘colluded’ with loyalist killers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/2955941.stm

Michael James is a British freelance journalist and translator, resident in Germany for almost 13 years. Permission to republish his work in any media is freely granted.

Also see:
London Transport Network Controlled by Known CIA Agent
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=3350

How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2005/130705teneasysteps.htm

_________________
www.rethink911.org
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group