FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Scottish nuclear submarine faulty reactor kept secret

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> UK 9/11 Truth - Scotland group
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
harry108
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 21 May 2014
Posts: 2
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2014 8:25 pm    Post subject: Scottish nuclear submarine faulty reactor kept secret Reply with quote

I read Tony's report on Press TV, http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/359803.html
So I contacted him and he suggested I post here.

Here is something you might find of interest which I suspect was accepted as possible by some.
(I sent this message below to Mr Salmond.)


Quote:
Respected Alex;

Thank-you for recently exposing the secret nuke submarine problem which has caught worldwide attention.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-26496254
Is there any link with that - to the spat of dead whales that have been washing up on our shores?
I spotted the whale in Melness (see link below) and I informed John Thurso MP.
Then the whale was tied to the pier for several days. (picture on the Melness website)
Then someone came and took it away ... MOD?
Is there a report?
Would they be looking for nuke toxicity in the whales?

http://www.melness.org.uk/newphotopage.html

http://news.stv.tv/scotland/232622-minke-whale-drowned-near-thurso-aft er-getting-caught-in-rope/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-25695370



A similar situation is happening on the USA's Pacific coast.

http://thewatchers.adorraeli.com/2014/05/17/marine-mammals-mysteriousl y-dying-in-record-numbers-along-west-coast/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
harry108
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 21 May 2014
Posts: 2
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:42 pm    Post subject: update Reply with quote

Extra 50m for Dounreay nuclear clean up
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-28034766

This story raises some questions.
"clean up" infers that there is some dirt. Within this context, it must mean potentially lethal nuclear waste. Does this mean that if this "Extra 50m" did not manifest then the situation would be that of a state of nuclear dirt still being available for cleaning? If the answer is no, then what is the "Extra 50m" going to be spent on?
The pub?
or is it simply more msm, bs?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scienceplease 2
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 1702

PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:14 pm    Post subject: Re: update Reply with quote

harry108 wrote:
Extra 50m for Dounreay nuclear clean up
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-28034766

This story raises some questions.
"clean up" infers that there is some dirt. Within this context, it must mean potentially lethal nuclear waste. Does this mean that if this "Extra 50m" did not manifest then the situation would be that of a state of nuclear dirt still being available for cleaning? If the answer is no, then what is the "Extra 50m" going to be spent on?
The pub?
or is it simply more msm, bs?


Hi Harry,

In the context of 1.6billion budget for the facility (for storage of low level radiation) then an extra 50million is not a particularly bad overspend. I think the real figure to concentrate on is not the extra 50 million but the 1.6 billion! The other aspect to consider is the 300 years that the facility will be off limits to anything approaching an organic life form. This is the reason I hate nuclear power, the cr*p being left for future generations.

Consider the low level waste facility over in the states...

The New Mexico Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - built at a cost $19 billion - now rendered completely useless after an accident earlier this year and now, after spreading plutonium into the atmosphere, requires 13 layers of concrete to make it safe.

http://www.dcbureau.org/201406059835/natural-resources-news-service/br eaking-bad-nuclear-waste-disaster.html

You would have thought that a $19 billion disaster would make the news but apparently MSM does not report important news...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> UK 9/11 Truth - Scotland group All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group